Motivation and Ability: Unpacking Underperforming Firms’ Risk Taking

References

• Ai C, Norton EC (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. 80(1):123–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldrich H (1999) Organizations Evolving (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Baum JA, Rowley TJ, Shipilov AV, Chuang YT (2005) Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(4):536–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry H (2013) When do firms divest foreign operations? Organ. Sci. 24(1):246–261.Link, Google Scholar
• Berry H, Guillén MF, Zhou N (2010) An institutional approach to cross-national distance. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 41(9):1460–1480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bromiley P (1991) Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Acad. Management J. 34(1):37–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen MJ (1996) Competitor analysis and inter-firm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Acad. Management Rev. 21:100–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen G, Crossland C, Luo S (2015) Making the same mistake all over again: CEO overconfidence and corporate resistance to corrective feedback. Strategic Management J. 36(10):1513–1535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Delios A, Beamish PW (1999) Geographic scope, product diversification, and the corporate performance of Japanese firms. Strategic Management J. 20:711–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Kaul A (2018) Motivation and ability? A behavioral perspective on the pursuit of radical invention in multi-technology incumbents. Acad. Management J. 61(1):67–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39(2):175–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC, Cannella AA (2009) Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Gaba V, Greve HR (2019) Safe or profitable? The pursuit of conflicting goals. Organ. Sci. 30(4):647–667.Link, Google Scholar
• Gamache DL, McNamara G, Graffin SD, Kiley J, Haleblian J, Devers CE (2019) Impression offsetting as an early warning signal of low CEO confidence in acquisitions. Acad. Management J. 62(5):1307–1332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal D, Ocasio W (2007) Perspective: Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie School’s past, present, and reconstructing for the future. Organ. Sci. 18(3):523–536.Link, Google Scholar
• George G (2005) Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms. Acad. Management J. 48(4):661–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gosling P, Denizeau M, Oberle D (2006) Denial of responsibility: A new mode of dissonance resolution. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90:722–733.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (1998) Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):58–86.‏Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2003) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grinblatt M, Keloharju M (2009) Sensation seeking, overconfidence, and trading activity. J. Finance 64:549–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grullon G, Larkin Y, Michaely R (2019) Are US industries becoming more concentrated? Rev. Finance 23(4):697–743.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haleblian J, Rajagopalan N (2005) Top managerial cognitions, past performance, and strategic change: A theoretical framework. Strategy Process (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 63–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayward ML, Hambrick DC (1997) Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):103–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt MA, Tihanyi L, Miller T, Connelly B (2006) International diversification: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J. Management 32:831–867.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoetker G (2007) The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management J. 28:331–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu S, Blettner D, Bettis RA (2011) Adaptive aspiration: Performance consequences of risk preferences at extremes and alternative reference groups. Strategic Management J. 32:1426–1436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu S, Gu Q, Xia J (2022) Problemistic search of the embedded firm: The joint effects of performance feedback and network positions on venture capital firms’ risk taking. Organ. Sci. 33(5):1889–1908.Link, Google Scholar
• Iyer DN, Miller KD (2008) Performance feedback, slack, and the timing of acquisitions. Acad. Management J. 51(4):808–822.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyer DN, Baù M, Chirico F, Patel PC, Brush TH (2019) The triggers of local and distant search: Relative magnitude and persistence in explaining acquisition relatedness. Long Range Planning 52(5):101825.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karaca-Mandic P, Norton EC, Dowd B (2012) Interaction terms in nonlinear models. Health Serv. Res. 47:255–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kotiloglu S, Chen Y, Lechler T (2019) Organizational responses to performance feedback: A meta-analytic review. Strategic Organ. 19(2):285–311.Google Scholar
• Kuusela P, Keil T, Maula M (2017) Driven by aspirations, but in what direction? Performance shortfalls, slack resources and resource-consuming vs. resource-freeing organizational change. Strategic Management J. 38(5):1101–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lehman DW, Hahn JP (2013) Momentum and organizational risk taking: Evidence from the national football league. Management Sci. 59(4):852–868.Link, Google Scholar
• Lehman DW, Hahn J, Ramanujam R, Alge BJ (2011) The dynamics of the performance–risk relationship within a performance period: The moderating role of deadline proximity. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1613–1630.Link, Google Scholar
• Lin WT (2014) How do managers decide on internationalization processes? The role of organizational slack and performance feedback. J. World Bus. 49:396–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Shapira Z (1987) Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Sci. 33:1404–1418.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG, Shapira Z (1992) Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psych. Rev. 99:172–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller KD, Chen WR (2004) Variable organizational risk preferences: Tests of the March–Shapira model. Acad. Management J. 47(1):105–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mishina Y, Pollock TG, Porac JF (2004) Are more resources always better for growth? Resource stickiness in market and product expansion. Strategic Management J. 25:1179–1197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore DA, Healy PJ (2008) The trouble with overconfidence. Psych. Rev. 115(2):502–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nosek BA, Hardwicke TE, Moshontz H, Allard A, Corker KS, Dreber A, Vazire S (2022) Replicability, robustness, and reproducibility in psychological science. Annu. Rev. Psych. 73(1):719–748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio WC (1995) The enactment of economic adversity: A reconciliation of theories of failure-induced change and threat-rigidity. Res. Organ. Behav. 17:287–331.Google Scholar
• Posen H, Keil T, Kim S, Meissner F (2018) Renewing research on problemistic search: A review and research agenda. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):208–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ref O, Gnizy I (2021) Resource indivisibility, lumpy costs and the multinationality–performance relationship. Internat. Marketing Rev. 38(3):539–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ref O, Shapira Z (2017) Entering new markets: The effect of performance feedback near aspiration and well below and above it. Strategic Management J. 38(7):1416–1434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ref O, Feldman NE, Iyer DN, Shapira Z (2021) Entry into new foreign markets: Performance feedback and opportunity costs. J. World Bus. 56(6):101258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross L (1977) The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 10:173–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilke O, Levine SS, Kacperczyk O, Zucker LG (2019) Call for papers: Special issue on experiments in organizational theory. Organ. Sci. 30(1):C2–C3.Link, Google Scholar
• Schumacher C, Keck S, Tang W (2020) Biased interpretation of performance feedback: The role of CEO overconfidence. Strategic Management J. 41(6):1139–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapira Z (1995) Risk Taking: A Managerial Perspective (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
• Shimizu K (2007) Prospect theory, behavioral theory, and the threat-rigidity thesis: Combinative effects on organizational decisions to divest formerly acquired units. Acad. Management J. 50(6):1495–1514.‏Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shinkle GA (2012) Organizational aspirations, reference points, and goals: Building on the past and aiming for the future. J. Management 38(1):415–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sobrepere i Profitós X, Keil T, Kuusela P (2022) The two blades of the scissors: Performance feedback and intrinsic attributes in organizational risk taking. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(4):1012–1048.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staw BM, Sandelands LE, Dutton JE (1981) Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 1:501–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Titus V Jr, O’Brien JP, Dixit J (2022) Does performance breed slack? Ownership as a contingency to the performance feedback and slack relationship. J. Management 48(5):1270–1298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and psychology of choice. Science 211:453–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vidal E, Mitchell W (2015) Adding by subtracting: The relationship between performance feedback and resource reconfiguration through divestitures. Organ. Sci. 26:1101–1118.Link, Google Scholar
• Walker J, Risen J, Golovich T, Thaler R (2018) Sudden death aversion: Avoiding superior options because they feel riskier. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 115(3):363–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Washburn M, Bromiley P (2012) Comparing aspiration models: The role of selective attention. J. Management Stud. 49(5):896–917.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiseman RM, Bromiley P (1996) Toward a model of risk in declining organizations: An empirical examination of risk, performance and decline. Organ. Sci. 7(5):524–543.Link, Google Scholar
• Xu D, Zhou K, Du F (2019) Deviant vs. aspirational risk taking: The effects of performance feedback on bribery expenditure and R&D intensity. Acad. Management J. 62(4):1226–1251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaheer S (1995) Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Acad. Management J. 38(2):341–363.Crossref, Google Scholar