How Local Industry R&D Shapes Academic Research: Evidence from the Agricultural Biotechnology Revolution

References

• Abadie A , Athey S , Imbens GW , Wooldridge J (2017) When should you adjust standard errors for clustering? NBER Working Paper 24003, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar
• Agrawal A (2006) Engaging the inventor: Exploring licensing strategies for university inventions and the role of latent knowledge. Strategic Management J. 27(1):63–79.Google Scholar
• Agrawal A , Cockburn I (2003) The anchor tenant hypothesis: Exploring the role of large, local, R&D-intensive firms in regional innovation systems. Internat. J. Industrial Organ. 21(9):1227–1253.Google Scholar
• Agarwal R , Ohyama A (2013) Industry or academia, basic or applied? Career choices and earnings trajectories of scientists. Management Sci. 59(4):950–970.Google Scholar
• Alcácer J , Chung W (2007) Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Management Sci. 53(5):760–776.Google Scholar
• Almeida P , Kogut B (1999) Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. 45(7):905–917.Google Scholar
• Andrews M (2020) How do institutions of higher education affect local invention? Evidence from the establishment of U.S. Colleges. Preprint, submitted March 30, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3072565.Google Scholar
• Anselin L , Varga A , Acs Z (1997) Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. J. Urban Econom. 42(3):422–448.Google Scholar
• AP News (1989) Dow, Eli Lilly to form agricultural products company. AP News (April 18), https://apnews.com/d8aee2e7d987a1687db79f366e879c2d.Google Scholar
• Arora A , Belenzon S , Patacconi A (2018) The decline of science in corporate R&D. Strategic Management J. 39(1):3–32.Google Scholar
• Audretsch DB , Feldman MP (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):630–640.Google Scholar
• Azoulay P , Ding W , Stuart T (2009) The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality and direction of (public) research output. J. Indust. Econom. 57(4):637–676.Google Scholar
• Azoulay P , Graff Zivin J , Wang J (2010) Superstar extinction. Quart. J. Econom. 25:549–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balconi M , Brusoni S , Orsenigo L (2010) In defence of the linear model: An essay. Res. Policy 39(1):1–13.Google Scholar
• Bania N , Eberts RW , Fogarty MS (1993) Universities and the startup of new companies: Can we generalize from route 128 and Silicon Valley? Rev. Econom. Statist. 75(4):761–766.Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1964) Human Capital Theory (Columbia University, New York).Google Scholar
• Belenzon S , Schankerman M (2013) Spreading the word: Geography, policy, and knowledge spillovers. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95 (3):884–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-David J (1968) Fundamental research and the universities: Some comments on international differences. British J. Ed. Stud. 16(3):350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bercovitz J , Feldman M (2006) Entpreprenerial universities and technology transfer: A conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. J. Tech. Transfer 31(1):175–188.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M , Duflo E , Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Google Scholar
• Bikard M (2014) The Division of Innovative Labor between Academia and Industry and Pasteur’s Quadrant (Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY).Google Scholar
• Bikard M , Vakili K , Teodoridis F (2019) When collaboration bridges institutions: The impact of university–industry collaboration on academic productivity. Organ. Sci. 30(2):426–445.Google Scholar
• Blumenthal D , Gluck M , Louis KS , Stoto MA , Wise D (1986) University-industry research relationships in biotechnology: Implications for the university. Science 232 (4756):1361–1366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonny S (2017) Corporate concentration and technological change in the global seed industry. Sustainability 9(9):1632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buenstorf G , Klepper S (2009) Heritage and agglomeration: The Akron tyre cluster revisited. Econom. J. 119(537):705–733.Google Scholar
• Bush V (1945) Science: The endless frontier. Report, Office of Scientific Research and Development, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Carayol N , Matt M (2004) Does research organization influence academic production?: Laboratory level evidence from a large European university. Res. Policy 33(8):1081–1102.Google Scholar
• Catalini C (2018) Microgeography and the direction of inventive activity. Management Sci. 64(9):4348–4364.Google Scholar
• Charles D (2001) Lords of the Harvest: Biotech, Big Money, and the Future of Food (Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Cohen WM , Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connolly LS (1997) Does external funding of academic research crowd out institutional support? J. Public Econom. 64(3):389–406.Google Scholar
• Dickson D (1981) US industry moves into biotechnology. Nature 292(5822):397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison G , Glaeser EL , Kerr WR (2010) What causes industry agglomeration? Evidence from coagglomeration patterns. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(3):1195–1213.Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz H , Webster A , Healey P (1998) Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia (SUNY Press, New York). Google Scholar
• Evans J (2010) Industry induces academic science to know less about more. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(2):389–452.Google Scholar
• Fabrizio KR , Di Minin A (2008) Commercializing the laboratory: Faculty patenting and the open science environment. Res. Policy 37(5):914–931.Google Scholar
• Feldman M (2003) The locational dynamics of the US biotech industry: Knowledge externalities and the anchor hypothesis. Industry Innovation 10(3):311–329.Google Scholar
• Feldman MP , Florida R (1994) The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geographers 84(2):210–229.Google Scholar
• Fudickar R , Hottenrott H , Lawson C (2018) What’s the price of academic consulting? Effects of public and private sector consulting on academic research. Indust. Corporate Change 27 (4):699–722.Google Scholar
• Furman JL , MacGarvie MJ (2007) Academic science and the birth of industrial research laboratories in the US pharmaceutical industry. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 63(4):756–776.Google Scholar
• Furman JL , MacGarvie M (2009) Academic collaboration and organizational innovation: the development of research capabilities in the US pharmaceutical industry, 1927–1946. Indust. Corporate Change 18 (5):929–961.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godin B (2006) The linear model of innovation the historical construction of an analytical framework. Sci. Techn. Human Values 31 (6):639–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb B (2008) The effect of government contracting on academic research: Does the source of funding affect scientific output? Res. Policy 37(1):41–58.Google Scholar
• Greenstone M , Hornbeck R , Moretti E (2010) Identifying agglomeration spillovers: Evidence from winners and losers of large plant openings. J. Political Econom. 118(3):536–598.Google Scholar
• Gulbrandsen M , Smeby JC (2005) Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Res. Policy 34(6):932–950.Google Scholar
• Hausman N (2012) University innovation, local economic growth, and entrepreneurship. Working Paper 12-10, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Hegde D , Tumlinson J (2014) Does social proximity enhance business partnerships? Theory and evidence from ethnicity’s role in U.S. venture capital. Management Sci. 60(9):2355–2380.Google Scholar
• Hottenrott H , Lawson C (2014) Research grants, sources of ideas and the effects on academic research. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 23(2):109–133.Google Scholar
• Huffman D , Quigley JM (2002) The role of the university in attracting high tech entrepreneurship: A Silicon Valley tale. Ann. Regional Sci. 36(3):403–419.Google Scholar
• Iacus SM , King G , Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB (1989) Real effects of academic research. Amer. Econom. Rev. 79(5):957–970.Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB , Trajtenberg M , Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):577–598.Google Scholar
• Jensen R , Thursby J , Thursby MC (2010) University-industry spillovers, government funding, and industrial consulting. NBER Working Paper 15732, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Jones CI (1995) R&D-based models of economic growth. J. Political Econom. 103(4):759–784.Google Scholar
• Kantor S , Whalley A (2014) Knowledge spillovers from research universities: Evidence from endowment value shocks. Rev. Econom. Statist. 96(1):171–188.Google Scholar
• Kantor S , Whalley A (2019) Research proximity and productivity: Long-term evidence from agriculture. J. Political Econom. 127(2):819–854.Google Scholar
• Katz E , Ziderman A (1990) Investment in general training: The role of information and labour mobility. Econom. J. 100(403):1147–1158.Google Scholar
• Katz JS , Martin BR (1997) What is research collaboration? Res. Policy 26(1):1–18.Google Scholar
• Kleinman DL (1998) Politics on the endless frontier: Postwar research policy in the United States. Capital Class 22 (2):174–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kline SJ , Rosenberg N (1986) An overview of innovation. Landau R, Rosenberg N, eds. The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth (National Academy Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Leins C (2019) University of Maryland starts nation’s first medical marijuana master’s degree program. US News & World Report (September 5), https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/articles/2019-09-05/university-of-maryland-starts-nations-first-medical-marijuana-masters-degree-program.Google Scholar
• Levine DO (1988) The American College and the Culture of Aspiration, 1915-1940 (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY). Google Scholar
• Liebeskind JP , Oliver AL , Zucker L , Brewer M (1996) Social networks, learning, and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Organ. Sci. 7(4):428–443.Google Scholar
• Liu S (2015) Spillovers from universities: Evidence from the land-grant program. J. Urban Econom. 87:25–41.Google Scholar
• Lundberg J , Tomson G , Lundkvist I , Skr J, Brommels M (2006) Collaboration uncovered: Exploring the adequacy of measuring university-industry collaboration through co-authorship and funding. Scientometrics 69(3):575–589.Google Scholar
• Mansfield E (1995) Academic research underlying industrial innovations: Sources, characteristics, and financing. Rev. Econom. Statist. 77(1):55–65.Google Scholar
• Mansfield E , Lee JY (1996) The modern university: Contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support. Res. Policy 25(7):1047–1058.Google Scholar
• Marshall A (1920) Principles of Economics (Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
• Marx M , Strumsky D , Fleming L (2009) Mobility, skills, and the Michigan non-compete experiment. Management Sci. 55(6):875–889.Google Scholar
• Melin G , Persson O (1996) Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics 36(3):363–377.Google Scholar
• Moeen M , Agarwal R (2017) Incubation of an industry: Heterogeneous knowledge bases and modes of value capture. Strategic Management J. 38(3):566–587.Google Scholar
• Mowery DC , Nelson RR , Sampat BN , Ziedonis AA (2015) Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University-Industry Technology Transfer Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act (Stanford University Press, CA). Google Scholar
• Mowery DC , Ziedonis AA (2015) Markets vs. spillovers in outflows of university research. Res. Policy 44(1):50–66.Google Scholar
• Murmann JP (2013) The co-development of industrial sectors and academic disciplines. Sci. Public Policy 40(2):229–246.Google Scholar
• Murray F , Stern S (2007) Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 63(4):648–687.Google Scholar
• National Research Council (1984) Genetic Engineering of Plants: Agricultural Research Opportunities and Policy Concerns (National Academies Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Nátr L (1994) Plant physiology, biotechnology and crop improvement. Biotech. Equipment 8(3):85–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oettl A (2012) Reconceptualizing stars: Scientist helpfulness and peer performance. Management Sci. 58(6):1122–1140.Google Scholar
• Office of Technology Assessment (1984) Commercial Biotechnology: An International Analysis (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Overman HG , Puga D (2010) Labor Pooling as a Source of Agglomeration: An Empirical Investigation. Agglomeration Economics (University of Chicago Press).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J , Powell WW (2004) Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ. Sci. 15(1):5–21.Google Scholar
• Payne AA (2001) Measuring the effect of federal research funding on private donations at research universities: Is federal research funding more than a substitute for private donations? Internat. Tax Public Finance 8(5):731–751.Google Scholar
• Perkmann M , Walsh K (2009) The two faces of collaboration: Impacts of university-industry relations on public research. Indust. Corporate Change 18(6):1033–1065.Google Scholar
• Perkmann M , Tartari V , McKelvey M , Autio E , Broström A , D’Este P , Fini R , et al. . (2013) Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Res. Policy 42(2):423–442.Google Scholar
• Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J. Political Econom. 98(5):S71–S102.Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1982) Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (Cambridge University Press, UK).Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N , Nelson RR (1994) American universities and technical advance in industry. Res. Policy 23(3):323–348.Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT , Agung SD , Jiang L (2007) University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature. Indust. Corporate Change 16(4):691–791.Google Scholar
• Sauermann H , Roach M (2014) Not all scientists pay to be scientists: PhDs’ preferences for publishing in industrial employment. Res. Policy 43(1):32–47.Google Scholar
• Saxenian A (1996) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Shu P (2016) Innovating in Science and Engineering or ‘Cashing In’ on Wall Street? Evidence on Elite STEM Talent (Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY).Google Scholar
• Singh J (2005) Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Sci. 51(5):756–770.Google Scholar
• Stephan PE (1996) The economics of science. J. Econom. Literature 34(3):1199–1235.Google Scholar
• Stephan PE (2012) How Economics Shapes Science, vol. 1 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Stern S (2004) Do scientists pay to be scientists? Management Sci. 50(6):835–853.Google Scholar
• Stokes DE (1997) Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Williams HL (2013) Intellectual property rights and innovation: Evidence from the human genome. J. Political Econom. 121(1):1–27.Google Scholar
• Wong PK , Singh A (2013) Do co-publications with industry lead to higher levels of university technology commercialization activity? Scientometrics 97(2):245–265.Google Scholar
• Woodward D , Figueiredo O , Guimarães P (2006) Beyond the Silicon Valley: University R&D and high-technology location. J. Urban Econom. 60(1):15–32.Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (1997) Quasi-likelihood methods for count data. Pesaran MH, Schmidt P, eds. Handbook of Applied Econometrics, vol. 2 (Blackwell Publishing, Hoboken, NJ), 352–406.Google Scholar
• Zucker LG , Darby MR , Armstrong J (1998a) Geographically localized knowledge: Spillovers or markets? Econom. Inquiry 36(1):65–86.Google Scholar
• Zucker LG , Darby MR , Brewer MB (1998b) Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(1):290–306.Google Scholar