Relational Embeddedness, Breadth of Added Value Opportunities, and Business Growth

References

• Adner R , Zemsky P (2006) A demand‐based perspective on sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. 27(3):215–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson E , Jap S (2005) The dark side of close relationships. Sloan Management Rev. 46(3):74–82.Google Scholar
• Angelini P , Generale A (2008) On the evolution of firm size distributions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(1):426–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS , Liebeskind JP (1999) Contractual commitments, bargaining power, and governance inseparability: Incorporating history into transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. 24(1):49–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker WE (1990) Market networks and corporate behavior. Am. J. Sociol. 96(3):589–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bird M , Zellweger T (2018) Relational embeddedness and firm growth: Comparing spousal and sibling entrepreneurs. Organ. Sci. 29(2):264–283.Link, Google Scholar
• Brahm F , Parmigiani A , Tarijan J (2021) Can firms be both broad and deep? Exploring the interdependencies of horizontal and vertical firm scope. J. Management . Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Brandenburger A , Stuart H (2007) Biform games. Management Sci. 53(4):537–549.Link, Google Scholar
• Broschak JP (2004) Managers’ mobility and market interface: The effect of managers’ career mobility on the dissolution of market ties. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(4):608–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broschak JP (2015) Client relationships in professional service firms. Empson L , Muzio D , Broschak J , eds. The Oxford Handbook of Professional Service Firms (Oxford University Press, UK), 304–326. Google Scholar
• Broschak JP , Block ES (2014) With or without you: When does managerial exit matter for the dissolution of dyadic market ties? Acad. Management J. 57(3):743–765.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byun H , Frake J , Agarwal R (2018) Leveraging who you know by what you know: Specialization and returns to relational capital. Strategic Management J. 39(7):1803–1833.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnahan S , Somaya D (2013) Alumni effects and relational advantage: The impact on outsourcing when your buyer hires employees from your competitors. Acad. Management J. 56(6):1578–1600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler AD (1990) Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise , vol. 120 (MIT Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Chatain O (2011) Value creation, competition, and performance in buyer-supplier relationships. Strategic Management J. 32(1):76–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatain O , Zemsky P (2007) The horizontal scope of the firm: Organizational tradeoffs vs. buyer-supplier relationships. Management Sci. 53(4):550–565.Link, Google Scholar
• Chatain O , Zemsky P (2011) Value creation and value capture with frictions. Strategic Management J. 32(11):1206–1231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen PL , Williams C , Agarwal R (2012) Growing pains: Pre-entry experience and the challenge of transition to incumbency. Strategic Management J. 33(3):252–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coates JC , DeStefano MM , Nanda A , Wilkins DB (2011) Hiring teams, firms, and lawyers: Evidence of the evolving relationships in the corporate legal market. Law Soc. Inquiry 36(4):999–1031.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM , Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cottrell T , Nault BR (2004) Product variety and firm survival in the microcomputer software industry. Strategic Management J. 25(10):1005–1025.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danneels E (2007) The process of technological competence leveraging. Strategic Management J. 28(5):511–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH (1996) Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: Evidence from the auto industry. Strategic Management J. 17(4):271–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH (1997) Effective interim collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximise transaction value. Strategic Management J. 18(7):535–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH , Singh H (1998) The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):660–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elfenbein DW , Zenger TR (2014) What is a relationship worth? Repeated exchange and the development and deployment of relational capital. Organ. Sci. 25(1):222–244.Link, Google Scholar
• Elfenbein DW , Zenger T (2017) Creating and capturing value in repeated exchange relationships: The second paradox of embeddedness. Organ. Sci. 28(5):894–914.Link, Google Scholar
• Empson L , Muzio D , Broschak J , Hinings B (2015) Researching professional service firms: An introduction and overview. Empson L , Muzio D , Broschak J , Hinings B , eds. Oxford Handbook of Professional Service Firms (Oxford Univ. Press, UK), 1–22.Google Scholar
• Evans DS (1987) Tests of alternative theories of firm growth. J. Political Econom. 95(4):657–674.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss NJ , Klein PG , Kor YY , Mahoney JT (2008) Entrepreneurship, subjectivism, and the resource‐based view: Toward a new synthesis. Strategic Entrepreneurial J. 2(1):73–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank KA (2000) Impact of a confounding variable on a regression coefficient. Sociol. Methods Res. 29(2):147–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman D (2013) Secrets of the masters: The business development guide for lawyers. Accessed October 19, 2017, http://www.altmanweil.com//dir_docs/resource/2e046637-e467-48aa-ba77-a73c02a831c6_document.pdf.Google Scholar
• Gans JS , Ryall MD (2017) Value capture theory: A strategic management review. Strategic Management J. 38(1):17–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geroski PA (2005) Understanding the implications of empirical work on corporate growth rates. Management Decision Econom. 26(2):129–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granger CW (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37(3):424–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2008) A behavioral theory of firm growth: Sequential attention to size and performance goals. Acad. Management J. 51(3):476–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R (1995) Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Acad. Management J. 38(1):85–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH , Jaffe AB , Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Hausman JA (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46:1251–1271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He D , Nickerson JA (2006) Why do firms make and buy? Efficiency, appropriability and competition in the trucking industry. Strategic Organ. 4(1):43–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heide JB (2003) Plural governance in industrial purchasing. J. Marketing 67(4):18–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE , Eisenhardt KM (2004) Inter‐temporal economies of scope, organizational modularity, and the dynamics of diversification. Strategic Management J. 25(13):1217–1232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill AD , Recendes T , Ridge JW (2019) Second‐order effects of CEO characteristics: How rivals’ perceptions of CEOs as submissive and provocative precipitate competitive attacks. Strategic Management J. 40(5):809–835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoetker G , Swaminathan A , Mitchell W (2007) Modularity and the impact of buyer–supplier relationships on the survival of suppliers. Management Sci. 53(2):178–191.Link, Google Scholar
• Jia N (2013) Competition, governance, and relationship‐specific investments: Theory and implications for strategy. Strategic Management J. 34(13):1551–1567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kale P , Singh H , Perlmutter H (2000) Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management J. 21(3):217–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kang MP , Mahoney JT , Tan D (2009) Why firms make unilateral investments specific to other firms: The case of OEM suppliers. Strategic Management J. 30(2):117–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klemperer P , Padilla AJ (1997) Do firms’ product lines include too many varieties? RAND J. Econom. 28(3):472–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kor YY , Mahoney JT (2000) Penrose’s resource‐based approach: The process and product of research creativity. J. Management Stud. 37(1):109–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kor YY , Mahoney JT (2004) Edith Penrose’s (1959) contributions to the resource‐based view of strategic management. J. Management Stud. 41(1):183–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lane PJ , Lubatkin M (1998) Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management J. 19(5):461–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA , Fichman M (1988) Dynamics of interorganizational attachments: Auditor-client relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 23(3):345–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lippman SA , Rumelt RP (2003) A bargaining perspective on resource advantage. Strategic Management J. 24(11):1069–1086.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacDonald G , Ryall MD (2004) How do value creation and competition determine whether a firm appropriates value? Management Sci. 50(10):1319–1333.Link, Google Scholar
• Macneil IR (1980) The New Social Contract: An Inquiry into Modern Contractual Relations (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Maister DH (1993) Managing the Professional Service Firm (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Mawdsley JK , Somaya D (2018) Demand-side strategy, relational advantage and partner-driven corporate scope: The case for client-led diversification. Strategic Management J. 39(7):1834–1859.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer KJ , Somaya D , Williamson IO (2012) Firm-specific, industry-specific, and occupational human capital and the sourcing of knowledge work. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1311–1329.Link, Google Scholar
• Mishina Y , Pollock TG , Porac JF (2004) Are more resources always better for growth? Resource stickiness in market and product expansion. Strategic Management J. 25(12):1179–1197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moeen M , Somaya D , Mahoney JT (2013) Supply portfolio concentration in outsourced knowledge-based services. Organ. Sci. 24(1):262–279.Link, Google Scholar
• Monteverde K , Teece DJ (1982) Supplier switching costs and vertical integration in the automobile industry. Bell J. Econom. 13(1):206–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moran P (2005) Structural vs. relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance. Strategic Management J. 26(12):1129–1151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nason RS , Wiklund J (2018) An assessment of resource-based theorizing on firm growth and suggestions for the future. J. Management 44(1):32–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nayyar PR (1990) Information asymmetries: A source of competitive advantage for diversified service firms. Strategic Management J. 11(7):513–519.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oster E (2017) Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 40:1–18.Google Scholar
• Parmigiani A (2007) Why do firms both make and buy? An investigation of concurrent sourcing. Strategic Management J. 28(3):285–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parmigiani A , Mitchell W (2009) Complementarity, capabilities, and the boundaries of the firm: the impact of within‐firm and interfirm expertise on concurrent sourcing of complementary components. Strategic Management J. 30(10):1065–1091.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penrose ET (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (Oxford Univ. Press, UK).Google Scholar
• Penrose ET (1960) The growth of the firm—A case study: The Hercules Powder Company. Bus. History Rev. 34(1):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penrose ET (2009) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm , 4th ed. (Oxford Univ. Press, UK).Google Scholar
• Pitelis C , ed. (2002) The Growth of the Firm: The Legacy of Edith Penrose (Oxford Univ. Press, UK).Google Scholar
• Pitelis CN (2007) A behavioral resource-based view of the firm: The synergy of Cyert and March (1963) and Penrose (1959) . Organ. Sci. 18(3):478–490.Link, Google Scholar
• Poppo L , Zhou KZ , Zenger TR (2008) Examining the conditional limits of relational governance: specialized assets, performance ambiguity, and long‐standing ties. J. Management Stud. 45(7):1195–1216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Priem RL (2007) A consumer perspective on value creation. Acad. Management Rev. 32(1):219–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Priem RL , Swink M (2012) A demand‐side perspective on supply chain management. J. Supply Chain Management 48(2):7–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Priem RL , Li S , Carr JC (2012) Insights and new directions from demand-side approaches to technology innovation, entrepreneurship, and strategic management research. J. Management 38(1):346–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P , Gulati R , Bhattacharya S (2013) How much to make and how much to buy? An analysis of optimal plural sourcing strategies. Strategic Management J. 34(10):1145–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raffiee J (2017) Employee mobility and interfirm relationship transfer: Evidence from the mobility and client attachments of United States federal lobbyists, 1998–2014. Strategic Management J. 38(10):2019–2040.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rietveld J (2017) Creating and capturing value from freemium business models: A demand‐side perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurial J. 12(2):171–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rietveld J , Eggers JP (2018) Demand heterogeneity in platform markets: Implications for complementors. Organ. Sci. 29(2):304–322.Link, Google Scholar
• Sakhartov AV , Folta TB (2014) Resource relatedness, redeployability, and firm value. Strategic Management J. 35(12):1781–1797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sako M , Chondrakis G , Vaaler PM (2016) How do plural-sourcing firms make and buy? The impact of supplier portfolio design. Organ. Sci. 27(5):1161–1182.Link, Google Scholar
• Schmidt J , Makadok R , Keil T (2016) Customer‐specific synergies and market convergence. Strategic Management J. 37(5):870–895.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seabright MA , Levinthal DA , Fichman M (1992) Role of individual attachments in the dissolution of interorganizational relationships. Acad. Management J. 35(1):122–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharma A (1997) Professional as agent: Knowledge asymmetry in agency exchange. Acad. Management Rev. 22(3):758–798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N (2003) Why focus? A study of intra‐industry focus effects. J. Industry Econom. 51(2):121–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Somaya D (2000) Obtaining and protecting patents in the United States, Europe, and Japan. Kagan L , Axelrod L , eds. Regulatory Encounters: Multinational Corporations and American Adversarial Legalism (Univ. of California Press, Berkeley), 275–310.Google Scholar
• Somaya D , Williamson IO , Lorinkova N (2008) Gone but not lost: The different performance impacts of employee mobility between cooperators vs. competitors. Acad. Management J. 51(5):936–953.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O , Waguespack DM (2006) Social structure and exchange: Self-confirming dynamics in Hollywood. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(4):560–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Squicciarini M , Dernis H , Criscuolo C (2013) Measuring Patent Quality: Indicators of Technological and Economic Value (No. 2013/3) (OECD Publishing, Paris). Google Scholar
• Starr E (2019) Consider this: Training, wages, and the enforceability of covenants not to compete. Industry Labor Related Rev. 72(4):783–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starr E , Frake J , Agarwal R (2019) Mobility constraint externalities. Organ. Sci. 30(5):961–980.Link, Google Scholar
• Subramani MR , Venkatraman N (2003) Safeguarding investments in asymmetric interorganizational relationships: Theory and evidence. Acad. Management J. 46(1):46–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzunca B (2018) A competence-based view of industry evolution: The impact of submarket convergence on incumbent−entrant dynamics. Acad. Management J. 61(2):738–768.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):35–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B , Lancaster R (2003) Relational embeddedness and learning: The case of bank loan managers and their clients. Management Sci. 49(4):383–399.Link, Google Scholar
• Vandaie R , Zaheer A (2014) Surviving bear hugs: Firm capability, large partner alliances, and growth. Strategic Management J. 35(4):566–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Von Nordenflycht A (2010) What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge-intensive firms. Acad. Management Rev. 35(1):155–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vuori OT , Huy NQ (2015) Distributed attention and shared emotions in the innovation process: how Nokia lost the smartphone battle. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(1):9–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang H , Chen WR (2010) Firm-specificity in technological innovation and rent appropriation: The roles of environmental dynamism and technological diversity. Res. Policy 39(1):141–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang H , He J , Mahoney JT (2009) Firm‐specific knowledge resources and competitive advantage: The roles of economic‐and relationship‐based employee governance mechanisms. Strategic Management J. 30(12):1265–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Welsch RE (1982) Influence Functions and Regression Diagnostics (Academic Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1971) The vertical integration of production: Market failure considerations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 61:112–123.Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1975) Markets and Hierarchies (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Ye G , Priem RL , Alshwer AA (2012) Achieving demand-side synergy from strategic diversification: How combining mundane assets can leverage consumer utilities. Organ. Sci. 23(1):207–224.Link, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A , Venkatraman N (1995) Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange. Strategic Management J. 16(5):373–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajac EJ , Olsen CP (1993) From transaction cost to transactional value analysis: Implications for the study of interorganizational strategies. J. Management Stud. 30(1):131–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zander I , Zander U (2005) The inside track: On the important (but neglected) role of customers in the resource‐based view of strategy and firm growth. J. Management Stud. 42(8):1519–1548.Crossref, Google Scholar