Group Size and Its Impact on Diversity-Related Perceptions and Hiring Decisions in Homogeneous Groups

References

• Abascal M, Xu J, Baldassarri D (2021) People use both heterogeneity and minority representation to evaluate diversity. Sci. Adv. 7(11):eabf2507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almeida T, Lordan G (2020) Moving from cheap talk to action: The case of diversity and inclusion. LSE Business Review (June 30), https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/2020/06/30/moving-from-cheap-talk-to-action-the-case-of-diversity-and-inclusion/.Google Scholar
• Apfelbaum EP, Phillips KW, Richeson JA (2014) Rethinking the baseline in diversity research: Should we be explaining the effects of homogeneity? Perspect. Psych. Sci. 9(3):235–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avery DR, McKay PF (2006) Target practice: An organizational impression management approach to attracting minority and female job applicants. Personnel Psych. 59(1):157–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avery DR, McKay PF, Tonidandel S, Volpone SD, Morris MA (2012) Is there method to the madness? Examining how racioethnic matching influences retail store productivity. Personnel Psych. 65(1):167–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bauman CW, Trawalter S, Unzueta MM (2014) Diverse according to whom? Racial group membership and concerns about discrimination shape diversity judgments. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 40(10):1354–1372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beaurain G, Masclet D (2016) Does affirmative action reduce gender discrimination and enhance efficiency? New experimental evidence. Eur. Econom. Rev. 90:350–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker TE (2005) Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organ. Res. Methods 8(3):274–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E (2017) Field experiments on discrimination. Banerjee AV, Duflo E, eds. Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 309–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besag J, Clifford P (1991) Sequential Monte Carlo p-values. Biometrika 78(2):301–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blader SL (2007) What determines people’s fairness judgments? Identification and outcomes influence procedural justice evaluations under uncertainty. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 43(6):986–994.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohnet I, van Geen A, Bazerman M (2016) When performance trumps gender bias: Joint vs. separate evaluation. Management Sci. 62(5):1225–1234.Link, Google Scholar
• Bouvy JC, Mujoomdar M (2019) All-male panels and gender diversity of issue panels and plenary sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconom. Open 3(3):419–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowen F, Blackmon K (2003) Spirals of silence: The dynamic effects of diversity on organizational voice. J. Management Stud. 40(6):1393–1417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JA, Anderson A, Salas JM, Ward AJ (2017) Do investors care about director tenure? Insights from executive cognition and social capital theories. Organ. Sci. 28(3):471–494.Link, Google Scholar
• Bunn C (2023) Hamstrung by ‘golden handcuffs’: Diversity roles disappear 3 years after George Floyd’s murder inspired them. NBC (February 27), https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/diversity-roles-disappear-three-years-george-floyd-protests-inspired-rcna72026.Google Scholar
• Carron AV, Spink KS (1995) The group size-cohesion relationship in minimal groups. Small Group Res. 26(1):86–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang EH, Milkman KL, Chugh D, Akinola M (2019) Diversity thresholds: How social norms, visibility, and scrutiny relate to group composition. Acad. Management J. 62(1):144–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Levin D (2005) When optimal choices feel wrong: A laboratory study of Bayesian updating, complexity, and affect. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(4):1300–1309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA, O’Reilly CA (2004) Asymmetric reactions to work group sex diversity among men and women. Acad. Management J. 47(2):193–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chng DHM, Rodgers MS, Shih E, Song XB (2015) Leaders’ impression management during organizational decline: The roles of publicity, image concerns, and incentive compensation. Leadership Quart. 26(2):270–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clogg CC, Petkova E, Haritou A (1995) Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. Amer. J. Sociol. 100(5):1261–1293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colvin C (2022) Once neglected, DEI initiatives now present at all Fortune 100 companies. HR Dive (July 20), https://www.hrdive.com/news/2022-fortune-companies-dei/627651/.Google Scholar
• Corno L, La Ferrara E, Burns J (2022) Interaction, stereotypes, and performance: Evidence from South Africa. Amer. Econom. Rev. 112(12):3848–3875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawes RM (1989) Statistical criteria for establishing a truly false consensus effect. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 25(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dezső CL, Ross DG, Uribe J (2016) Is there an implicit quota on women in top management? A large-sample statistical analysis. Strategic Management J. 37(1):98–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunning D, Meyerowitz JA, Holzberg AD (1989) Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 57(6):1082–1090.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Dukerich JM, Harquail CV (1994) Organizational images and member identification. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(2):239–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD, Sutton RI (1992) Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Acad. Management J. 35(4):699–738.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD, Sutton RI, Principe KE (1998) Averting expected challenges through anticipatory impression management: A study of hospital billing. Organ. Sci. 9(1):68–86.Link, Google Scholar
• Else H (2019) How to banish manels and manferences from scientific meetings. Nature 573(7773):184–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ely RJ, Thomas DA (2001) Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(2):229–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engel Y, Lewis T, Cardon MS, Hentschel T (2023) Signaling diversity debt: Startup gender composition and the gender gap in joiners’ interest. Acad. Management J. 66(5):1469–1500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Fischbacher U (2004) Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution Human Behav. 25(2):63–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I, Fernandez RM (2016) Bending the pipeline? Executive search and gender inequality in hiring for top management jobs. Management Sci. 62(12):3636–3655.Link, Google Scholar
• Field E, Krivkovich A, Kügele S, Robinson N, Yee L (2023) Women in the workplace 2023. McKinsey (October 5), https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/women-in-the-workplace.Google Scholar
• Finnegan E, Oakhill J, Garnham A (2015) Counter-stereotypical pictures as a strategy for overcoming spontaneous gender stereotypes. Frontiers Psych. 6:1291.Google Scholar
• Folger R, Bies RJ (1989) Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice. Employee Responsibilities Rights J. 2:79–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick SW, Mochon D (2012) A scale distortion theory of anchoring. J. Experiment. Psych. Gen. 141(1):124–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallese V, Goldman A (1998) Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends Cognitive Sci. 2(12):493–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gasman M (2023) What’s with the objection to DEI work? Forbes (June 20), https://www.forbes.com/sites/marybethgasman/2023/06/20/whats-with-the-objection-to-dei-work/?sh=393d92e36d35.Google Scholar
• Georgeac OAM, Rattan A (2022) Stop making the business case for diversity. Harvard Business Review (June 15), https://hbr.org/2022/06/stop-making-the-business-case-for-diversity.Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G, Hoffrage U (1995) How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psych. Rev. 102(4):684–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilliland SW (1993) The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 18(4):694–734.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gomila R (2021) Logistic or linear? Estimating causal effects of experimental treatments on binary outcomes using regression analysis. J. Experiment. Psych. General 150(4):700.Google Scholar
• Graffin SD, Carpenter MA, Boivie S (2011) What’s all that (strategic) noise? Anticipatory impression management in CEO succession. Strategic Management J. 32(7):748–770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green J (2020) Goldman to refuse IPOs if all directors are White, straight men. Bloomberg (January 23), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-01-24/goldman-rule-adds-to-death-knell-of-the-all-white-male-board.Google Scholar
• Green E, Daniels D (2021) Bayesian instinct. Preprint, submitted July 29, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2916929.Google Scholar
• Grieco D, Hogarth RM (2009) Overconfidence in absolute and relative performance: The regression hypothesis and Bayesian updating. J. Econom. Psych. 30(5):756–771.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffiths TL, Tenenbaum JB (2006) Optimal predictions in everyday cognition. Psych. Sci. 17(9):767–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harmeling S (2023) Virtue signaling on race relations only hurts the cause. Forbes (January 16), https://www.forbes.com/sites/susanharmeling/2023/01/16/virtue-signaling-on-race-relations-only-hurts-the-cause/?sh=3d329aa452f7.Google Scholar
• Harris AJ, Speekenbrink M (2016) Semantic cross-scale numerical anchoring. Judgment Decision Making 11(6):572–581.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris MM, Lievens F, Van Hoye G (2004) “I think they discriminated against me”: Using prototype theory and organizational justice theory for understanding perceived discrimination in selection and promotion situations. Internat. J. Selection Assessment 12(1–2):54–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Klein KJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1199–1228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hegtvedt KA, Johnson C, Ganem NM, Waldron KW, Brody LM (2009) When will the unaffected seek justice for others? Perceptions of and responses to another’s injustice. Australian J. Psych. 61(1):22–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME (1983) Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Res. Organ. Behav. 5:269–298.Google Scholar
• Hentschel T, Shemla M, Wegge J, Kearney E (2013) Perceived diversity and team functioning: The role of diversity beliefs and affect. Small Group Res. 44(1):33–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herring C (2009) Does diversity pay?: Race, gender, and the business case for diversity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(2):208–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Highhouse S, Brooks ME, Gregarus G (2009) An organizational impression management perspective on the formation of corporate reputations. J. Management 35(6):1481–1493.Google Scholar
• Holt CA, Smith AM (2009) An update on Bayesian updating. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 69(2):125–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homan AC, Buengeler C, Eckhoff RA, van Ginkel WP, Voelpel SC (2015) The interplay of diversity training and diversity beliefs on team creativity in nationality diverse teams. J. Appl. Psych. 100(5):1456–1467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Institutional Shareholder Services (2019) ISS director data. Accessed July 21, 2019, wrds.wharton.upenn.edu.Google Scholar
• Jehn KA, Chadwick C, Thatcher SM (1997) To agree or not to agree: The effects of value congruence, individual demographic dissimilarity, and conflict on workgroup outcomes. Internat. J. Conflict Management 8:287–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanter RM (1977) Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. Amer. J. Sociol. 82(5):965–990.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr NL (1989) Illusions of efficacy: The effects of group size on perceived efficacy in social dilemmas. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 25(4):287–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kersten D, Mamassian P, Yuille A (2004) Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annu. Rev. Psych. 55:271–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirkland R, Bohnet I (2017) Focusing on what works for workplace diversity. McKinsey (April 7), https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/gender-equality/focusing-on-what-works-for-workplace-diversity.Google Scholar
• Koch AJ, D’Mello SD, Sackett PR (2015) A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making. J. Appl. Psych. 100(1):128–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kroeper KM, Williams HE, Murphy MC (2022) Counterfeit diversity: How strategically misrepresenting gender diversity dampens organizations’ perceived sincerity and elevates women’s identity threat concerns. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 122(3):399–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar S (2018) New study: Almost 70% of professional event speakers are male. Bizzabo (November 1), https://www.bizzabo.com/blog/event-gender-diversity-study.Google Scholar
• Kunda Z (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psych. Bull. 108(3):480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lai CK, Hoffman KM, Nosek BA (2013) Reducing implicit prejudice. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 7(5):315–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larcker DF, Tayan B (2020) Diversity in the C-suite: The dismal state of diversity among Fortune 100 senior executives. Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Closer Look Series: Topics, Issues and Controversies in Corporate Governance No. CGRP-82, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Latané B, Williams K, Harkins S (1979) Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 37(6):822–832.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawson MA, Martin AE, Huda I, Matz SC (2022) Hiring women into senior leadership positions is associated with a reduction in gender stereotypes in organizational language. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119(9):e2026443119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leslie LM, Manchester CF, Dahm PC (2017) Why and when does the gender gap reverse? Diversity goals and the pay premium for high potential women. Acad. Management J. 60(2):402–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leslie LM, Flynn E, Foster-Gimbel OA, Manchester CF (2023) Happy talk: Is common diversity rhetoric effective diversity rhetoric? Acad. Management J. (ja), amj-2021.Google Scholar
• Leventhal GS, Karuza J, Fry WR (1980) Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. Mikula G, ed. Justice and Social Interaction (Springer-Verlag, New York), 167–218.Google Scholar
• Lotz S, Okimoto TG, Schlösser T, Fetchenhauer D (2011) Punitive vs. compensatory reactions to injustice: Emotional antecedents to third-party interventions. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 47(2):477–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lount RB Jr, Sheldon OJ, Rink F, Phillips KW (2015) Biased perceptions of racially diverse teams and their consequences for resource support. Organ. Sci. 26(5):1351–1364.Link, Google Scholar
• Lyness KS, Heilman ME (2006) When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. J. Appl. Psych. 91(4):777–785.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma DS, Correll J, Wittenbrink B (2015) The Chicago Face Database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behav. Res. Methods 47(4):1122–1135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacCorquodale P, Jensen G (1993) Women in the law: Partners or tokens? Gender Soc. 7(4):582–593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mack A (2003) Inattentional blindness: Looking without seeing. Curr. Directions Psych. Sci. 12(5):180–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mankiw NG (2020) Principles of Economics (Cengage Learning, Boston).Google Scholar
• Mannix E, Neale MA (2005) What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psych. Sci. Public Interest 6(2):31–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maxwell SE, Kelley K, Rausch JR (2008) Sample size planning for statistical power and accuracy in parameter estimation. Annu. Rev. Psych. 59:537–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGreevy P (2018) Gov. Jerry Brown signs bill requiring California corporate boards to include women. Los Angeles Times (September 20), https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-ca-governor-women-corporate-boards-20180930-story.html.Google Scholar
• McKay PF, Avery DR, Morris MA (2009) A tale of two climates: Diversity climate from subordinates’ and managers’ perspectives and their role in store unit sales performance. Personnel Psych. 62(4):767–791.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKay PF, Avery DR, Tonidandel S, Morris MA, Hernandez M, Hebl MR (2007) Racial differences in employee retention: Are diversity climate perceptions the key? Personnel Psych. 60(1):35–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McLeod PL, Lobel SA, Cox TH Jr (1996) Ethnic diversity and creativity in small groups. Small Group Res. 27(2):248–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra A, Kilduff M, Brass DJ (1998) At the margins: A distinctiveness approach to the social identity and social networks of underrepresented groups. Acad. Management J. 41(4):441–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer B (2017) Team diversity. Salas E, Rico R, Passmore J, eds. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Team Working and Collaborative Processes (Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ), 151–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore DA, Healy PJ (2008) The trouble with overconfidence. Psych. Rev. 115(2):502–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore DA, Small DA (2008) When it is rational for the majority to believe that they are better than average. Krueger JI, ed. Rationality and Social Responsibility: Essays in Honor of Robyn Mason Dawes (Psychology Press, Hove, UK), 141–174.Google Scholar
• Mor Barak ME, Cherin DA, Berkman S (1998) Organizational and personal dimensions in diversity climate: Ethnic and gender differences in employee perceptions. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 34(1):82–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newburry W, Gardberg NA, Belkin LY (2006) Organizational attractiveness is in the eye of the beholder: The interaction of demographic characteristics with foreignness. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 37(5):666–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. Gen. Psych. 2(2):175–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ng ES, Wiesner WH (2007) Are men always picked over women? The effects of employment equity directives on selection decisions. J. Bus. Ethics 76(2):177–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozcelik H, Barsade SG (2018) No employee an island: Workplace loneliness and job performance. Acad. Management J. 61(6):2343–2366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paluck EL, Green SA, Green DP (2019) The contact hypothesis re-evaluated. Behav. Public Policy 3(2):129–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paternoster R, Brame R, Mazerolle P, Piquero A (1998) Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology 36(4):859–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patrice J (2018) Paul Weiss press release captures everything broken about biglaw in one image. Above the Law (December 11), https://abovethelaw.com/2018/12/paul-weiss-press-release-captures-everything-broken-about-biglaw-in-one-image/?rf=1.Google Scholar
• Patterson F, Zibarras LD (2011) Exploring the construct of perceived job discrimination in selection. Internat. J. Selection Assessment 19(3):251–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petsko CD, Rosette AS (2023) Are leaders still presumed white by default? Racial bias in leader categorization revisited. J. Appl. Psych. 108(2):330–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips KW (2003) The effects of categorically based expectations on minority influence: The importance of congruence. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 29(1):3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Loyd DL (2006) When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 99(2):143–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Mannix EA, Neale MA, Gruenfeld DH (2004) Diverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 40(4):497–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40(3):879–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pryor Cashman (2017) Pryor Cashman elects four new partners and elevates three to counsel. Accessed February 15, 2020, https://www.pryorcashman.com/news-and-insights/pryor-cashman-elects-four-new-partners-and-elevates-three-to.html.Google Scholar
• Richard OC, Murthi BS, Ismail K (2007) The impact of racial diversity on intermediate and long‐term performance: The moderating role of environmental context. Strategic Management J. 28(12):1213–1233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riordan CM, Shore LM (1997) Demographic diversity and employee attitudes: An empirical examination of relational demography within work units. J. Appl. Psych. 82(3):342–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robertson DA, Weiss D (2017) In the eye of the beholder: Can counter-stereotypes change perceptions of older adults’ social status? Psych. Aging 32(6):531–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schaffer BS, Riordan CM (2013) Relational demography in supervisor-subordinate dyads: An examination of discrimination and exclusionary treatment. Canadian J. Admin. Sci. 30(1):3–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scheiber N, Eligon J (2019) Elite law firm’s all-White partner class stirs debate on diversity. New York Times (January 27), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/27/us/paul-weiss-partner-diversity-law-firm.html.Google Scholar
• Schlueter E, Scheepers P (2010) The relationship between outgroup size and anti-outgroup attitudes: A theoretical synthesis and empirical test of group threat- and intergroup contact theory. Soc. Sci. Res. 39(2):285–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shanton K, Goldman A (2010) Simulation theory. Wiley Interdisciplinary Rev. Cognitive Sci. 1(4):527–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shemla M, Meyer B, Greer L, Jehn KA (2016) A review of perceived diversity in teams: Does how members perceive their team’s composition affect team processes and outcomes? J. Organ. Behav. 37:S89–S106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shuman E, Knowles E, Goldenberg A (2023) To overcome resistance to DEI, understand what’s driving it. Harvard Business Review (March 1), https://hbr.org/2023/03/to-overcome-resistance-to-dei-understand-whats-driving-it.Google Scholar
• Simmons C (2018) Paul Weiss vows to ‘do better’ after partner promotions stir diversity debate. Law.com (December 18), https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2018/12/18/paul-weiss-vows-to-do-better-after-partner-promotions-stir-diversity-debate/.Google Scholar
• Sinaceur M, Thomas-Hunt MC, Neale MA, O’Neill OA, Haag C (2010) Accuracy and perceived expert status in group decisions: When minority members make majority members more accurate privately. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 36(3):423–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Lichtenstein S (1971) Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 6(6):649–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spreitzer GM (1995) Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. 38(5):1442–1465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stevens P (2020) Companies are making bold promises about greater diversity, but there’s a long way to go. CNBC (June 11), https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/11/companies-are-making-bold-promises-about-greater-diversity-theres-a-long-way-to-go.html.Google Scholar
• Sweeney PD, McFarlin DB (1997) Process and outcome: Gender differences in the assessment of justice. J. Organ. Behav. 18(1):83–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• S&P Dow Jones Indices (2019) S&P Composite 1500, July 2019. Accessed March 29, 2020, https://us.spindices.com/indices/equity/sp-composite-1500.Google Scholar
• Thatcher SM, Jehn KA, Zanutto E (2003) Cracks in diversity research: The effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance. Group Decision Negotiation 12(3):217–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas KM, Wise PG (1999) Organizational attractiveness and individual differences: Are diverse applicants attracted by different factors? J. Bus. Psych. 13(3):375–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tinsley CH, Wade JB, Main BG, O’Reilly CA (2017) Gender diversity on US corporate boards: Are we running in place? ILR Rev. 70(1):160–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Triana MDC, Miller TL, Trzebiatowski TM (2014) The double-edged nature of board gender diversity: Diversity, firm performance, and the power of women directors as predictors of strategic change. Organ. Sci. 25(2):609–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Unzueta MM, Binning KR (2012) Diversity is in the eye of the beholder: How concern for the in-group affects perceptions of racial diversity. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 38(1):26–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Unzueta MM, Knowles ED, Ho GC (2012) Diversity is what you want it to be: How social-dominance motives affect construals of diversity. Psych. Sci. 23(3):303–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D, Schippers MC (2007) Work group diversity. Annu. Rev. Psych. 58:515–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D, Haslam SA, Platow MJ (2007) Unity through diversity: Value-in-diversity beliefs, work group diversity, and group identification. Group Dynam. 11(3):207–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watkins MB, Simmons A, Umphress E (2019) It’s not black and white: Toward a contingency perspective on the consequences of being a token. Acad. Management Perspect. 33(3):334–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winston A (2023) Why business leaders must resist the anti-ESG movement. Harvard Business Review (April 5), https://hbr.org/2023/04/why-business-leaders-must-resist-the-anti-esg-movement.Google Scholar