Finding Creativity in Predictability: Seizing Kairos in Chronos Through Temporal Work in Complex Innovation Processes

References

• Aagaard A, Gertsen F (2011) Supporting radical front-end innovation: Perceived key factors of pharmaceutical innovation. Creativity Innovation Res. 20(4):330–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Catalini C, Goldfarb A, Luo H (2018) Slack time and innovation. Organ. Sci. 29(6):1056–1073.Link, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in Context (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
• Ancona D, Chong CL (1996) Entrainment: Pace, cycle, and rhythm in organizational behavior. Res. Organ. Behav. 18:251–284.Google Scholar
• Ancona DG, Waller MJ (2007) The dance of entrainment: Temporally navigating across multiple pacers. Rubin BA, ed. Workplace Temporalities. Research in the Sociology of Work, vol. 17 (Emerald Group Publishing, Leeds, UK), 115–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ancona DG, Goodman PS, Lawrence BS, Tushman ML (2001) Time: A new research lens. Acad. Management Rev. 26(4):645–663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andriani P, Ali A, Mastrogiorgio M (2017) Measuring exaptation and its impact on innovation, search, and problem solving. Organ. Sci. 28(2):320–338.Link, Google Scholar
• Austin RD, Devin L, Sullivan EE (2012) Accidental innovation: Supporting valuable unpredictability in the creative process. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1505–1522.Link, Google Scholar
• Banerjee T, Siebert R (2017) Dynamic impact of uncertainty on R&D cooperation formation and research performance: Evidence from the bio-pharmaceutical industry. Res. Policy 46(7):1255–1271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansal P, Reinecke J, Suddaby R, Langley A (2022) Temporal work: The strategic organization of time. Strategic Organ. 20(1):6–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beck TE, Solansky ST, Davis DJ, Ford-Eickhoff K (2024) Temporal adaptive capacity: A competency for leading organizations in temporary interorganizational collaborations. Group & Organ. Management 49(1):114–140.Google Scholar
• Bévort F, Suddaby R (2016) Scripting professional identities: How individuals make sense of contradictory institutional logics. J. Professions Organ. 3(1):17–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biscaro C, Comacchio A (2018) Knowledge creation across worldviews: How metaphors impact and orient group creativity. Organ. Sci. 29(1):58–79.Google Scholar
• Blagoev B, Schreyögg G (2019) Why do extreme work hours persist? Temporal uncoupling as a new way of seeing. Acad. Management J. 62(6):1818–1847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bluedorn AC (2002) The Human Organization of Time: Temporal Realities and Experience (Stanford University Press, Redwood City, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1997) The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bryde DJ, Joby R (2007) Product-based planning: The importance of project and project management deliverables in the management of clinical trials. R&D Management 37(4):363–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bucher S, Langley A (2016) The interplay of reflective and experimental spaces in interrupting and reorienting routine dynamics. Organ. Sci. 27(3):594–613.Link, Google Scholar
• Busch C (2022) Toward a theory of serendipity: A systematic review and conceptualization. J. Management Stud., ePub ahead of print November 13, https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butzin A (2013) Knowledge dynamics in innovation biographies: A methodological and spatial perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Philips Universität, Marburg, Germany.Google Scholar
• Chai S (2017) Near misses in the breakthrough discovery process. Organ. Sci. 28(3):411–428.Link, Google Scholar
• Cooper RG (2008) Perspective: The Stage‐Gate® idea‐to‐launch process—Update, what’s new, and nexgen systems. J. Product Innovation Management 25(3):213–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Courpasson D, Younes D (2018) Double or quits: Understanding the links between secrecy and creativity in a project development process. Organ. Stud. 39(2–3):271–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cuganesan S (2022) Investigating how the clock–event time dialectic shapes the doing of time in organizational change. Organ. Stud. 43(5):749–771.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davies A, Hobday M (2005) The Business of Projects: Managing Innovation in Complex Products and Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Rond M (2014) The structure of serendipity. Culture Organ. 20(5):342–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dibrell C, Fairclough S, Davis PS (2015) The impact of external and internal entrainment on firm innovativeness: A test of moderation. J. Bus. Res. 68(1):19–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dille T, Hernes T, Vaagaasar AL (2023) Stuck in temporal translation? Challenges of discrepant temporal structures in interorganizational project collaboration. Organ. Stud. 44(6):867–888.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D (2015) Taking advantage of emergence. Garud R, Simpson B, Langley A, Tsoukas H, eds. The Emergence of Novelty in Organizations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 157–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D (2017) Organizing for innovation in complex innovation systems. Innovation 19(1):11–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D, Dunne DD (2011) Organizing ecologies of complex innovation. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1214–1223.Link, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D, Dunne DD (2012) Digital science and knowledge boundaries in complex innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1467–1484.Link, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D, Bertels H, Chung K, Dunne DD, Kraemer J (2013) Whose time is it? Understanding clock-time pacing and event-time pacing in complex innovations. Management Organ. Rev. 9(2):233–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunne DD, Dougherty D (2016) Abductive reasoning: How innovators navigate in the labyrinth of complex product innovation. Organ. Stud. 37(2):131–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espeland W, Stevens M (2008) A sociology of quantification. Eur. J. Sociol. 49(3):401–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farjoun M (2010) Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Acad. Management Rev. 35(2):202–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fayard AL (2023) Making time for social innovation: How to interweave clock time and event time in open social innovation to nurture idea generation and social impact. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of September 28, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.0832.Link, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Gehman J, Giuliani AP (2018) Serendipity arrangements for exapting science-based innovations. Acad. Management Perspect. 32(1):125–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Gehman J, Kumaraswamy A (2011) Complexity arrangements for sustained innovation: Lessons from 3M Corporation. Organ. Stud. 32(6):737–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Tuertscher P, Van de Ven AH (2013) Perspectives on innovation processes. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):775–819.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gassmann O, Reepmeyer G (2005) Organizing pharmaceutical innovation: From science‐based knowledge creators to drug‐oriented knowledge brokers. Creativity Innovation Management 14(3):233–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geiger D, Danner-Schröder A, Kremser W (2021) Getting ahead of time—Performing temporal boundaries to coordinate routines under temporal uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(1):220–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick CJ (1994) Pacing strategic change: The case of a new venture. Acad. Management J. 37(1):9–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson CB, Birkinshaw J (2004) The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. 47(2):209–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giddens A (1984) The Constitution of Society (Polity, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organ. Res. Methods 16(1):15–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Transaction, Piscataway, NJ).Google Scholar
• Golden-Biddle K (2020) Discovery as an abductive mechanism for reorienting habits within organizational change. Acad. Management J. 63(6):1951–1975.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granqvist N, Gustafsson R (2016) Temporal institutional work. Acad. Management J. 59(3):1009–1035.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison SH, Rouse ED (2014) Let’s dance! Elastic coordination in creative group work: A qualitative study of modern dancers. Acad. Management J. 57(5):1256–1283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawhee D (2002) Kairotic encounters. Atvill JM, Lauer JM, eds. Perspectives on Rhetorical Invention. Tennessee Studies in Literature, vol. 39 (University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, TN), 16–35.Google Scholar
• Hawk A, Pacheco‐de‐Almeida G (2018) Time compression (dis)economies: An empirical analysis. Strategic Management J. 39(9):2489–2516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hernes T, Schultz M (2020) Translating the distant into the present: How actors address distant past and future events through situated activity. Organ. Theory 1(1):1–20.Google Scholar
• Hilbolling S, Deken F, Berends H, Tuertscher P (2022) Process-based temporal coordination in multiparty collaboration for social challenges. Strategic Organ. 20(1):135–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hjorth D, Strati A, Drakopoulou Dodd S, Weik E (2018) Organizational creativity, play and entrepreneurship: Introduction and framing. Organ. Stud. 39(2–3):155–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holt R, Johnsen R (2019) Time and organization studies. Organ. Stud. 40(10):1557–1572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacques E (1982) The Form of Time (Heinemann, London).Google Scholar
• Joas H (1996) The Creativity of Action (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2009) Polychronicity in work teams: A theoretical examination of antecedents and consequences. Roe RA, Waller MJ, Clegg SR, eds. Time in Organizational Research (Routledge, London), 103–126.Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Orlikowski W (2013) Temporal work in strategy making. Organ. Sci. 24(4):965–995.Link, Google Scholar
• Khavul S, Pérez-Nordtvedt L, Wood E (2010) Organizational entrainment and international new ventures from emerging markets. J. Bus. Venturing 25(1):105–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klingbeil C, Semrau T, Ebers M, Wilhelm H (2019) Logics, leaders, laboratory coats: A multi‐level study on how institutional logics are linked to entrepreneurial intentions in academia. J. Management Stud. 56(5):929–965.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kostopoulou O, Wildman M (2004) Sources of variability in uncertain medical decisions in the ICU: A process tracing study. Quality Safety Health Care 13(4):272–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kunisch S, Bartunek JM, Mueller J, Huy QN (2017) Time in strategic change research. Acad. Management Ann. 11(2):1005–1064.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lampel J, Honig B, Drori I (2014) Organizational ingenuity: Concept, processes and strategies. Organ. Stud. 35(4):465–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley ANN, Smallman C, Tsoukas H, Van de Ven AH (2013) Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Acad. Management Rev. 56(1):1–13.Google Scholar
• Lantz PMV, Just SN (2021) Getting the time right: Kairos as the rhetorical framing of time. Scand. J. Management 37(3):101167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis MW, Smith WK (2022) Reflections on the 2021 AMR Decade Award: Navigating paradox is paradoxical. Acad. Management Rev. 47(4):528–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lifshitz-Assaf H, Lebovitz S, Zalmanson L (2021) Minimal and adaptive coordination: How hackathons’ projects accelerate innovation without killing it. Acad. Management J. 64(3):684–715.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke K, Golden-Biddle K, Feldman MS (2008) Making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organ. Sci. 19(6):907–918.Link, Google Scholar
• Mainemelis C (2001) When the muse takes it all: A model for the experience of timelessness in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 20(4):549–565.Google Scholar
• Mainemelis C (2002) Time and timelessness: Creativity in (and out of) the temporal dimension. Creativity Res. J. 14(2):227–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mainemelis C (2010) Stealing fire: Creative deviance in the evolution of new ideas. Acad. Management Rev. 35(4):558–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mainemelis C, Sakellariou E (2023) Creativity and the arts of disguise: Switching between formal and informal channels in the evolution of creative projects. Organ. Sci. 34(1):380–403.Link, Google Scholar
• Mantere S, Ketokivi M (2013) Reasoning in organization science. Acad. Management Rev. 38(1):70–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• McGivern G, Dopson S, Ferlie E, Fischer M, Fitzgerald L, Ledger J, Bennett C (2018) The silent politics of temporal work: A case study of a management consultancy project to redesign public healthcare. Organ. Stud. 39(8):1007–1030.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath J, Kelly J, Machatka D (1984) The social psychology of time: Entrainment of behavior in social and organizational settings. Appl. Soc. Psych. Annual 5:21–44.Google Scholar
• Merton RK, Barber E (2004) The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity: A Study in Sociological Semantics and the Sociology of Science (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Miller CR (1992) Kairos in the rhetoric of science. Witte SP, Nakadate N, Cherry RD, eds. A Rhetoric of Doing (Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL), 310–327.Google Scholar
• Okhuysen GA, Bechky BA (2009) Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):463–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2002) It’s about time: Temporal structuring in organizations. Organ. Sci. 13(6):684–700.Link, Google Scholar
• Ortmann G, Sydow J (2018) Dancing in chains: Creative practices in/of organizations. Organ. Stud. 39(7):899–921.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Otto B, Schüßler E, Zangerle K (2020) Greenhouses are made of glass: Tensions in experimental spaces for creative collaboration in front-end pharmaceutical research. Collaborative Spaces at Work (Routledge, England, UK), 238–251.Google Scholar
• Peirce CS (1934) The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Hartshorne C, Weiss P, eds. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Pérez-Nordtvedt L, Tyge Payne G, Short JC, Keida BL (2008) An entrainment-based model of temporal organizational fit, misfit, and performance. Organ. Sci. 19(5):785–801.Link, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith JE, Mannucci PV (2017) From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Acad. Management Rev. 42(1):53–79.Google Scholar
• Pritchard JF, Romet MJ, Reimer MLJ, Mortimer E, Rolfe B, Cayen MN (2003) Making better drugs: Decision gates in non-clinical drug development. Nature Rev. Drug Discovery 2(7):542–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Putnam LL, Fairhurst GT, Banghart S (2016) Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):65–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rafols I, Hopkins MM, Hoekman J, Siepel J, O’Hare A, Perianes-Rodriquez A, Nightingale P (2014) Big pharma, little science? A bibliometric perspective on big pharma’s R&D decline. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change 81(January):22–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raisch S, Birkinshaw J (2008) Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J. Management 34(3):375–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raisch S, Hargrave TJ, Van De Ven AH (2018) The learning spiral: A process perspective on paradox. J. Management Stud. 55(8):1507–1526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinecke J, Ansari S (2015) When times collide: Temporal brokerage at the intersection of markets and developments. Acad. Management J. 58(2):618–648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sætre AS, Van de Ven AH (2021) Generating theory by abduction. Acad. Management Rev. 46(4):684–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scannell J, Blanckley A, Boldon H, Warrington B (2012) Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiency. Nature Rev. Drug Discovery 11:191–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schultz M, Hernes T (2013) A temporal perspective on organizational identity. Organ. Sci. 24(1):1–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Sewell WH Jr (1992) A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(1):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi W, Prescott JE (2012) Rhythm and entrainment of acquisition and alliance initiatives and firm performance: A temporal perspective. Organ. Stud. 33(10):1281–1310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shipp AJ, Jansen KJ (2021) The “other” time: A review of the subjective experience of time in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 15(1):299–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shipp AJ, Richardson HA (2021) The impact of temporal schemata: Understanding when individuals entrain vs. resist or create temporal structure. Acad. Management Rev. 46(2):299–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simpson B, Tracey R, Weston A (2020) The timefulness of creativity in an accelerating world. Reinecke J, Suddaby R, Langley A, eds. Time, Temporality, and History in Process Organization Studies (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 69–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slawinski N, Bansal P (2015) Short on time: Intertemporal tensions in business sustainability. Organ. Sci. 26(2):531–549.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith JE (1969) Time, times, and the “right time”: Chronos and kairos. Monist 53(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Lewis MW (2011) Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):381–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sonenshein S (2016) Routines and creativity: From dualism to duality. Organ. Sci. 27(3):739–758.Link, Google Scholar
• Standifer R, Bluedorn A (2006) Alliance management teams and entrainment: Sharing temporal mental models. Human Relations 59(7):903–927.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Styhre A (2008) The element of play in innovation work: The case of new drug development. Creativity Innovation Management 17(2):136–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Styhre A, Sundgren M (2011) Management regimes in science-based innovation: Control and uncertainty during early phases of new drug development. Tech. Anal. Strategic Management 23(5):567–581.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sydow J, Schreyögg G, Koch J (2020) On the theory of organizational path dependence: Clarifications, replies to objections, and extensions. Acad. Management Rev. 45(4):717–734.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Timmermans S, Tavory I (2012) Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociol. Theory 30(3):167–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson M (2011) Ontological shift or ontological drift? Reality claims, epistemological frameworks, and theory generation in organization studies. Acad. Management Rev. 36(4):754–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H, Chia R (2002) On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organ. Sci. 13(5):567–582.Link, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH, Polley DE, Garud R, Venkataraman S (1999) The Innovation Journey (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Vogelgsang L (2022) When creativity gets you fired—Why professionals tasked with innovation employ subversion when facing competing institutional demands in hybrid organizations. J. Professions Organ. 9(2):170–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang SL, Luo Y, Maksimov V, Sun J, Celly N (2019) Achieving temporal ambidexterity in new ventures. J. Management Stud. 56(4):788–822.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yaqub O (2018) Serendipity: Toward a taxonomy and a theory. Res. Policy 47(1):169–179.Crossref, Google Scholar