Strategic Authenticity: Signaling Authenticity Without Undermining Professional Image in Workplace Interactions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.14807

References

  • Abrams D, Marques JM, Bown N, Henson M (2000) Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 78(5):906–912.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Altman I, Taylor DA (1973) Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York).Google Scholar
  • Aronson E, Mettee DR (1968) Dishonest behavior as a function of differential levels of induced self-esteem. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 9(21):121–127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bai F, Ho GCC, Liu W (2020) Do status incentives undermine morality-based status attainment? Investigating the mediating role of perceived authenticity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 158:126–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bailey E, Levy A (2022) Are you for real? Perceptions of authenticity are systematically biased and not accurate. Psych. Sci. 33(5):798–815.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bakan D (1966) The Duality of Human Existence: An Essay on Psychology and Religion (Rand McNally, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Barley SR, Bechky BA, Nelsen BJ (2016) What do technicians mean when they talk about professionalism? An ethnography of speaking. Cohen LE, Burton MD, Lounsbury M, eds. The Structuring of Work in Organizations, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 47 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 125–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barsade SG, O’Neill OA (2014) What’s love got to do with it? A longitudinal study of the culture of companionate love and employee and client outcomes in a long-term care setting. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(4):551–598.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumeister RF (1982) A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psych. Bull. 91(1):3–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bellezza S, Gino F, Keinan A (2014) The red sneakers effect: Inferring status and competence from signals of nonconformity. J. Consumer Res. 41(1):35–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bem SL (1974) The measurement of psychological androgyny. J. Consulting Clinical Psych. 42(2):155–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bem SL (1981) Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psych. Rev. 88(4):354–364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J, Barasch A (2018) A candid advantage? The social benefits of candid photos. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 9(8):1010–1016.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolino M, Long D, Turnley W (2016) Impression management in organizations: Critical questions, answers, and areas for future research. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 3:377–406.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bond R, Smith PB (1996) Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psych. Bull. 119(1):111–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brooks AW, Gino F, Schweitzer ME (2015) Smart people ask for (my) advice: Seeking advice boosts perceptions of competence. Management Sci. 61(6):1421–1435.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown B (2015) Daring Greatly: How the Courage to Be Vulnerable Transforms the Way We Live, Love, Parent, and Lead (Penguin, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bruk A, Scholl SG, Bless H (2018) Beautiful mess effect: Self–other differences in evaluation of showing vulnerability. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 115(2):192–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cable DM, Gino F, Staats BR (2013) Breaking them in or eliciting their best? Reframing socialization around newcomers’ authentic self-expression. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(1):1–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll GR, Kovács B (2021) Authenticity: Meanings, targets, audiences and third parties. Res. Organ. Behav. 41:100149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll GR, Wheaton DR (2009) The organizational construction of authenticity: An examination of contemporary food and dining in the US. Res. Organ. Behav. 29:255–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Casciaro T, Gino F, Kouchaki M (2014) The contaminating effects of building instrumental ties: How networking can make us feel dirty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(4):705–735.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caza BB, Moss S, Vough H (2018) From synchronizing to harmonizing: The process of authenticating multiple work identities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):703–745.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cha SE, Hewlin PF, Roberts LM, Buckman BR, Leroy H, Steckler EL, Cooper D (2019) Being your true self at work: Integrating the fragmented research on authenticity in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 13(2):633–671.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ (2004) Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Rev. Psych. 55:591–621.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clark MS, Mills J (1993) The difference between communal and exchange relationships: What it is and is not. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 19(6):684–691.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clinton HR (2017) What Happened (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
  • Collins NL, Miller LC (1994) Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psych. Bull. 116(3):457–475.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conway M, Pizzamiglio MT, Mount L (1996) Status, communality, and agency: Implications for stereotypes of gender and other groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 71(1):25–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corrigan PW, Kuwabara SA, O’Shaughnessy J (2009) The public stigma of mental illness and drug addiction: Findings from a stratified random sample. J. Social Work 9(2):139–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • David EM, Kim TY, Farh JL, Lin X, Zhou F (2021) Is ‘be yourself’ always the best advice? The moderating effect of team ethical climate and the mediating effects of vigor and demand–ability fit. Human Relations 74(3):437–462.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Derlega VJ, Chaikin AL (1976) Norms affecting self-disclosure in men and women. J. Consulting Clinical Psych. 44(3):376–380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dumas TL, Sanchez-Burks J (2015) The professional, the personal, and the ideal worker: Pressures and objectives shaping the boundary between life domains. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):803–843.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dumas TL, Phillips KW, Rothbard NP (2013) Getting closer at the company party: Integration experiences, racial dissimilarity, and workplace relationships. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1377–1401.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton JE, Heaphy E (2003) The power of high-quality connections. Cameron KS, Dutton JE, Quinn RE, eds. Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline (Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco), 263–278.Google Scholar
  • Dutton JE, Ragins BR, eds. (2007) Exploring Positive Relationships at Work: Building a Theoretical and Research Foundation (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York).Google Scholar
  • Eagly AH (2013) Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation (Psychology Press, Hoboken, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eastman KK (1994) In the eyes of the beholder: An attributional approach to ingratiation and organizational citizenship behavior. Acad. Management J. 37:1379–1391.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elsbach KD, Bechky BA (2018) How observers assess women who cry in professional work contexts. Acad. Management Discoveries 4(2):127–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ensari N, Miller N (2002) The out-group must not be so bad after all: The effects of disclosure, typicality, and salience on intergroup bias. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83(2):313–329.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2):117–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fincham FD, Jackson H, Beach SR (2005) Transgression severity and forgiveness: Different moderators for objective and subjective severity. J. Soc. Clinical Psych. 24(6):860–875.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske AP, Tetlock PE (1997) Taboo tradeoffs: Reactions to transactions that transgress the spheres of justice. Political Psych. 18(2):255–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gardner WL, Cogliser CC, Davis KM, Dickens MP (2011) Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. Leadership Quart. 22(6):1120–1145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gershon R, Smith RK (2020) Twice-told tales: Self-repetition decreases observer assessments of performer authenticity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 118(2):307–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibson KR (2018) Can I tell you something? How disruptive self-disclosure changes who “we” are. Acad. Management Rev. 43(4):570–589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gill C, Caza A (2018) An investigation of authentic leadership’s individual and group influences on follower responses. J. Management 44(2):530–554.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goffman E (1978) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Harmondsworth, London).Google Scholar
  • Grandey AA, Gabriel AS (2015) Emotional labor at crossroads: Where do we go from here? Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 2(2):323–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grandey AA, Rupp D, Brice WN (2015) Emotional labor threatens decent work: A proposal to eradicate emotional display rules. J. Organ. Behav. 36(6):770–785.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene K, Derlega VJ, Mathews A (2006) Self-disclosure in personal relationships. Vangelisti AL, Perlman D, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 409–427.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hahl O, Kim M, Zuckerman EW (2018) The authentic appeal of the lying demagogue: Proclaiming the deeper truth about political illegitimacy. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 83(1):1–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hahl O, Zuckerman EW, Kim M (2017) Why elites love authentic lowbrow culture: Overcoming high-status denigration with outsider art. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(4):828–856.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall EV, Hall AV, Galinsky AD, Phillips KW (2019) MOSAIC: A model of stereotyping through associated and intersectional categories. Acad. Management Rev. 44(3):643–672.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heider F (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (Wiley, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heilman ME (2001) Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):657–674.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heilman ME, Okimoto TG (2007) Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: The implied communality deficit. J. Appl. Psych. 92(1):81–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hennekam S, Ladge JJ (2023) Free to be me? Evolving gender expression and the dynamic interplay between authenticity and the desire to be accepted at work. Acad. Management J. 66:1529–1553.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hewlin PF (2003) And the award for best actor goes to …: Facades of conformity in organizational settings. Acad. Management Rev. 28(4):633–642.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hewlin PF (2009) Wearing the cloak: Antecedents and consequences of creating facades of conformity. J. Appl. Psych. 94(3):727–741.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hewlin PF, Dumas TL, Burnett MF (2017) To thine own self be true? Facades of conformity, values incongruence, and the moderating impact of leader integrity. Acad. Management J. 60(1):178–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hewlin PF, Karelaia N, Kouchaki M, Sedikides C (2020) Authenticity at work: Its shapes, triggers, and consequences. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 158:80–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Higgins ET (1987) Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psych. Rev. 94(3):319–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinojosa AS, Gardner WL, Walker HJ, Cogliser C, Gullifor D (2017) A review of cognitive dissonance theory in management research: Opportunities for further development. J. Management 43(1):170–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hopwood CJ, Good EW, Levendosky AA, Zimmermann J, Dumat D, Finkel EJ, Eastwick PE, Bleidorn W (2021) Realness is a core feature of authenticity. J. Res. Personality 92:104086.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ibarra H (2015) The authenticity paradox. Harvard Bus. Rev. 93(1/2):53–59.Google Scholar
  • Ingram P, Zou X (2008) Business friendships. Res. Organ. Behav. 28:167–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • James W, Burkhardt F, Bowers F, Skrupskelis IK (1890) The Principles of Psychology (Macmillan, London).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Janes D (2021) Scruffy Boris Johnson’s “man of the people” look is part of a long British tradition. The Conversation (October 5), https://theconversation.com/scruffy-boris-johnsons-man-of-the-people-look-is-part-of-a-long-british-tradition-168773.Google Scholar
  • Jiang L, John LK, Boghrati R, Kouchaki M (2022) Fostering perceptions of authenticity via sensitive self-disclosure. J. Experiment. Psych. Appl. 28(4):898–915.Google Scholar
  • John LK, Barasz K, Norton MI (2016) Hiding personal information reveals the worst. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113(4):954–959.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jongman-Sereno KP, Leary MR (2019) The enigma of being yourself: A critical examination of the concept of authenticity. Rev. General Psych. 23(1):133–142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kifer Y, Heller D, Perunovic WQE, Galinsky AD (2013) The good life of the powerful: The experience of power and authenticity enhances subjective well-being. Psych. Sci. 24(3):280–288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kniffin KM, Narayanan J, Anseel F, Antonakis J, Ashford SJ, Bakker AB, Bamberger P, et al. (2021) COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. Amer. Psych. 76(1):63–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kossek EE, Dumas TL, Piszczek MM, Allen TD (2021) Pushing the boundaries: A qualitative study of how stem women adapted to disrupted work–nonwork boundaries during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Appl. Psych. 106(11):1615–1629.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kundro TG, Rothbard NP (2023) Does power protect female moral objectors? How and when moral objectors’ gender, power, and use of organizational frames influence perceived self-control and experienced retaliation. Acad. Management J. 66:306–334.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leary MR, Kowalski RM (1990) Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psych. Bull. 107(1):34–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lehman DW, O’Connor K, Kovács B, Newman GE (2019) Authenticity. Acad. Management Ann. 13(1):1–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM, Vaast E (2017) Social media and their affordances for organizing: A review and agenda for research. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):150–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Little LM, Major VS, Hinojosa AS, Nelson DL (2015) Professional image maintenance: How women navigate pregnancy in the workplace. Acad. Management J. 58(1):8–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacCannell D (1973) Staged authenticity: Arrangements of social space in tourist settings. Amer. J. Sociol. 79(3):589–603.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin AE, Slepian ML (2021) The primacy of gender: Gendered cognition underlies the big two dimensions of social cognition. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 16(6):1143–1158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martinko MJ, Harvey P, Dasborough MT (2011) Attribution theory in the organizational sciences: A case of unrealized potential. J. Organ. Behav. 32(1):144–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCluney CL, Durkee MI, Smith RE II, Robotham KJ, Lee SSL (2021) To be, or not to be … Black: The effects of racial codeswitching on perceived professionalism in the workplace. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 97:104–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McFarland LA, Ployhart RE (2015) Social media: A contextual framework to guide research and practice. J. Appl. Psych. 100(6):1653–1677.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGraw AP, Warren C (2010) Benign violations: Making immoral behavior funny. Psych. Sci. 21(8):1141–1149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Methot JR, LePine JA, Podsakoff NP, Christian JS (2015) Are workplace friendships a mixed blessing? Exploring tradeoffs of multiplex relationships and their associations with job performance. Personnel Psych. 69:311–355.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore C, Lee SY, Kim K, Cable DM (2017) The advantage of being oneself: The role of applicant self-verification in organizational hiring decisions. J. Appl. Psych. 102(11):1493–1513.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morris MW, Hong YY, Chiu CY, Liu Z (2015) Normology: Integrating insights about social norms to understand cultural dynamics. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 129:1–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newman A, Donohue R, Eva N (2017) Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Rev. 27(3):521–535.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nyhan B (2015) Hillary Clinton’s authenticity problem, and ours. New York Times (October 2), https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/02/upshot/hillary-clintons-authenticity-problem-and-ours.html.Google Scholar
  • Opie TR, Freeman RE (2017) Our biases undermine our colleagues’ attempts to be authentic. Harvard Bus. Rev. (July 5), https://hbr.org/2017/07/our-biases-undermine-our-colleagues-attempts-to-be-authentic.Google Scholar
  • Opie TR, Phillips KW (2015) Hair penalties: The negative influence of Afrocentric hair on ratings of Black women’s dominance and professionalism. Frontiers Psych. 6:1311.Google Scholar
  • Oyserman D, Coon HM, Kemmelmeier M (2002) Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psych. Bull. 128(1):3–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paul P (2022) Do not bring your whole self to work. New York Times (September 25), https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/25/opinion/business-economics/work-office-whole-self.html.Google Scholar
  • Peterson RA (2005) In search of authenticity. J. Management Stud. 42(5):1083–1098.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips KW, Dumas TL, Rothbard NP (2018) Diversity and authenticity. Harvard Bus. Rev. 96(2):132–136.Google Scholar
  • Phillips KW, Rothbard NP, Dumas TL (2009) To disclose or not to disclose? Status distance and self-disclosure in diverse environments. Acad. Management Rev. 34(4):710–732.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pillemer J, Rothbard NP (2018) Friends without benefits: Understanding the dark sides of workplace friendship. Acad. Management Rev. 43(4):710–734.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Radoynovska N, Ruttan R (2021) A matter of transition: Authenticity judgments and attracting employees to hybridized organizations. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2373–2391.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ragins BR, Cotton JL (1999) Mentor functions and outcomes: A comparison of men and women in formal and informal mentoring relationships. J. Appl. Psych. 84(4):529–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reid E (2015) Embracing, passing, revealing, and the ideal worker image: How people navigate expected and experienced professional identities. Organ. Sci. 26(4):997–1017.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Robert C, Wasti SA (2002) Organizational individualism and collectivism: Theoretical development and an empirical test of a measure. J. Management 28(4):544–566.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts LM (2005) Changing faces: Professional image construction in diverse organizational settings. Acad. Management Rev. 30(4):685–711.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts LM, McCluney C (2020) Working from home while Black. Harvard Bus. Rev. (June 17), https://hbr.org/2020/06/working-from-home-while-black.Google Scholar
  • Roberts LM, Cha SE, Hewlin PF, Settles IH (2009) Bringing the inside out: Enhancing authenticity and positive identity in organizations. Roberts LM, Dutton JE, eds. Exploring Positive Identities in Organizations (Psychology Press, New York), 149–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenblum M, Schroeder J, Gino F (2020) Tell it like it is: When politically incorrect language promotes authenticity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 119(1):75–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rossignac-Milon M, Pillemer J, Bailey ER, Horton CB Jr, Iyengar SS (2024) Just be real with me: Perceived partner authenticity promotes relationship initiation via shared reality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 180:104306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothbard NP, Ramarajan L, Ollier-Malaterre A, Lee SS (2022) OMG! My boss just friended me: How evaluations of colleagues’ disclosure, gender, and rank shape personal/professional boundary blurring online. Acad. Management J. 65(1):35–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rucker DD, Galinsky AD, Magee JC (2018) The agentic–communal model of advantage and disadvantage: How inequality produces similarities in the psychology of power, social class, gender, and race. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 58:71–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sanchez-Burks J (2002) Protestant relational ideology and (in)attention to relational cues in work settings. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83(4):919–929.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sedikides C, Slabu L, Lenton A, Thomaes S (2017) State authenticity. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 26(6):521–525.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seppälä E (2014) What bosses gain by being vulnerable. Harvard Bus. Rev. (December 11), https://hbr.org/2014/12/what-bosses-gain-by-being-vulnerable.Google Scholar
  • Silver I, Newman G, Small DA (2021) Inauthenticity aversion: Moral reactance toward tainted actors, actions, and objects. Consumer Psych. Rev. 4(1):70–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stephens JP, Heaphy E, Dutton JE (2012) High-quality connections. Cameron KS, Spreitzer GM, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship (Oxford University Press, Cambridge, UK), 385–399.Google Scholar
  • Tetlock PE (2002) Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice: Intuitive politicians, theologians, and prosecutors. Psych. Rev. 109(3):451–471.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Triandis HC (1989) The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psych. Rev. 96(3):506–520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trilling L (2009) Sincerity and Authenticity (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uhlmann EL, Heaphy E, Ashford SJ, Zhu L, Sanchez‐Burks J (2013) Acting professional: An exploration of culturally bounded norms against nonwork role referencing. J. Organ. Behav. 34(6):866–886.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uysal A, Lin HL, Knee CR, Bush AL (2012) The association between self-concealment from one’s partner and relationship well-being. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 38(1):39–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Kleef GA, Wanders F, Stamkou E, Homan AC (2015) The social dynamics of breaking the rules: Antecedents and consequences of norm-violating behavior. Current Opinion Psych. 6:25–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vogelgesang GR, Leroy H, Avolio BJ (2013) The mediating effects of leader integrity with transparency in communication and work engagement/performance. Leadership Quart. 24(3):405–413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vohs KD, Baumeister RF, Ciarocco NJ (2005) Self-regulation and self-presentation: Regulatory resource depletion impairs impression management and effortful self-presentation depletes regulatory resources. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 88(4):632–657.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Voronov M, Foster WM, Patriotta G, Weber K (2023) Distilling authenticity: Materiality and narratives in Canadian distilleries’ authenticity work. Acad. Management J. 66:1438–1468.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walumbwa FO, Avolio BJ, Gardner WL, Wernsing TS, Peterson SJ (2008) Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. J. Management 34(1):89–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • West AL, Muise A, Sasaki JY (2021) The cost of being “true to yourself” for mixed selves: Frame switching leads to perceived inauthenticity and downstream social consequences for Biculturals. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 12(5):829–838.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.