Architectural Search and Innovation
References
- (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Dealing with complexity: Integrated vs. chunky search processes. Organ. Sci. 24(1):116–132.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Search on rugged landscapes: An experimental study. Organ. Sci. 25(1):93–108.Link, Google Scholar
- (2001) Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):597–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Strategies for survival in fast-changing industries. Management Sci. 44(12 part 2):S207–S220.Google Scholar
- (2002) Disruption, disintegration and the dissipation of differentiability. Indust. Corporate Change 11(5):955–993.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution. Res. Policy 14(5):235–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) How much to copy? Determinants of effective imitation breadth. Organ. Sci. 21(3):661–676.Link, Google Scholar
- (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Blackwell, Oxford, United Kingdom).Google Scholar
- (1994) A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development. Res. Engrg. Design 6(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004a) Bounded rationality and the search for organizational architecture: An evolutionary perspective on the design of organizations and their evolvability. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(3):404–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004b) Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Sci. 50(2):159–173.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) The power of integrality: Linkages between product architecture, innovation, and industry structure. Res. Policy 37(8):1296–1316.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Res. Policy 30(7):1019–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1229–1249.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) NK model as a representation of innovative search. Res. Policy 46(10):1783–1800.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex (Freeman, New York).Google Scholar
- (1990) Architectural innovation—the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1975) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI).Google Scholar
- (1988) Discerning threats and opportunities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 33(3):370–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Persistence of integration in the face of specialization: How firms navigated the winds of disintegration and shaped the architecture of the semiconductor industry. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1195–1213.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) What firms make vs. what they know: How firms’ production and knowledge boundaries affect competitive advantage in the face of technological change. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1227–1248.Link, Google Scholar
- (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1183–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Managing discontinuous change: A simulation study of organizational learning and entrepreneurship. Strategic Management J. 11(summer):147–179.Google Scholar
- (2010) Does interdependency affect firm and industry profitability? An empirical test. Strategic Management J. 31(2):121–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
- (1981) A model of adaptive organizational search. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 2(4):307–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Landscape design: Designing for local action in complex worlds. Organ. Sci. 10(3):342–357.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) Exploring the structure of complex software designs: An empirical study of open source and proprietary code. Management Sci. 52(7):1015–1030.Link, Google Scholar
- (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
- (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
- (1995) Complementarities and fit—strategy, structure, and organizational-change in manufacturing. J. Accounting Econom. 19(2–3):179–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2018) Architectural innovation and the emergence of a dominant design: The effects of strategic sourcing on performance. Res. Policy 47(1):326–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. 46(6):824–844.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) Patterned interactions in complex systems: Implications for exploration. Management Sci. 53(7):1068–1085.Link, Google Scholar
- (1996) Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management J. 17(winter):63–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organ. Sci. 16(2):101–122.Link, Google Scholar
- (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
- (1981) The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management EM-28(3):71–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Intel shows off its next big chip plans for ‘architecture era.’ VentureBeat. Retrieved July 29, 2020, https://venturebeat.com/2018/12/12/intel-shows-off-its-next-big-chip-plans-for-architecture-era/.Google Scholar
- (1985) Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Res. Organ. Behav. 7(1985):171–222.Google Scholar
- (1995) The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy 24(3):419–440.Crossref, Google Scholar

