Local Adaptation Without Work Intensification: Experimentalist Governance of Digital Technology for Mutually Beneficial Role Reconfiguration in Organizations

References

• Adler PS (1992) The Learning Bureaucracy (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT).Google Scholar
• Adler PS (2006) Beyond hacker idiocy: A new community in software development. The Firm as a Collaborative Community: Reconstructing Trust in the Knowledge Economy (Oxford University Press, New York), 198–259.Google Scholar
• Adler PS, Goldoftas B, Levine DI (1997) Ergonomics, employee involvement, and the Toyota Production System: A case study of NUMMI’s 1993 model introduction. ILR Rev. 50(3):416–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adler PS, Goldoftas B, Levine DI (1999) Flexibility vs. efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ. Sci. 10(1):43–68.Link, Google Scholar
• Adler PS, Kwon SW, Heckscher C (2008) Perspective—professional work: The emergence of collaborative community. Organ. Sci. 19(2):359–376.Link, Google Scholar
• Adler PS, Riley P, Kwon SW, Signer J, Lee B, Satrasala R (2003) Performance improvement capability: Keys to accelerating performance improvement in hospitals. California Management Rev. 45(2):12–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anteby M, Chan CK (2018) A self-fulfilling cycle of coercive surveillance: Workers’ invisibility practices and managerial justification. Organ. Sci. 29(2):247–263.Link, Google Scholar
• Armour J, Parnham R, Sako M (2020) Augmented lawyering. European Corporate Governance Institute - Law Working Paper 558/2020. European Corporate Governance Institute, Brussels.Google Scholar
• Bailey DE, Barley SR (2020) Beyond design and use: How scholars should study intelligent technologies. Inform. Organ. 30(2):1–12.Google Scholar
• Bailey DE, Leonardi PM, Barley SR (2012) The lure of the virtual. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1485–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT Scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1):78–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker G, Gibbons R, Murphy K (2002) Relational contracts and the theory of the firm. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):39–84.Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1990) The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):61–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (2015) Why the Internet makes buying a car less loathsome: How technologies change role relations. Acad. Management Discoveries 1(1):5–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (2020) Work and Technological Change. (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrett M, Walsham G (1999) Electronic trading and work transformation in the London insurance market. Inform. Systems Res. 10(1):1–22.Link, Google Scholar
• Barrett M, Oborn E, Orlikowski W (2016) Creating value in online communities: The sociomaterial configuring of strategy, platform, and stakeholder engagement. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):704–723.Link, Google Scholar
• Barrett M, Oborn E, Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2012) Reconfiguring boundary relations: Robotic innovations in pharmacy work. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1448–1466.Link, Google Scholar
• Batt R (1999) Work organization, technology, and performance in customer service and sales. ILR Rev. 52(4):539–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Batt R (2015) Electronic monitoring and control at work: What is it good for? LERA 14:1–2.Google Scholar
• Batt R, Colvin AJ (2011) An employment systems approach to turnover: Human resources practices, quits, dismissals, and performance. Acad. Management J. 54(4):695–717.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beane M (2019) Shadow learning: Building robotic surgical skill when approved means fail. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(1):87–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beane M, Orlikowski WJ (2015) What difference does a robot make? The material enactment of distributed coordination. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1553–1573.Link, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2021) Blood, Powder, and Residue: How Crime Labs Translate Evidence into Proof (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Berente N, Yoo Y (2012) Institutional contradictions and loose coupling: Post-implementation of NASA’s enterprise information system. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):376–396.Link, Google Scholar
• Berente N, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y, King JL (2016) Routines as shock absorbers during organizational transformation: Integration, control, and NASA’s enterprise information system. Organ. Sci. 27(3):551–572.Link, Google Scholar
• Berente N, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y, Maurer C (2019) Institutional logics and pluralistic responses to enterprise system implementation: A qualitative meta-analysis. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 43(3):873–902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein ES (2017) Making transparency transparent: The evolution of observation in management theory. Acad. Management Ann. 11:217–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boland RJ Jr, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y (2007) Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organ. Sci. 18(4):631–647.Link, Google Scholar
• Canales R, Greenberg J (2015) A matter of (relational) style: Loan officer consistency and exchange continuity in microfinance. Management Sci. 62(4):1202–1224.Link, Google Scholar
• Chreim S, Langley A, Reay T, Comeau-Vallée M, Huq JL (2020) Constructing and sustaining counter-institutional identities. Acad. Management J. 63(3):935–964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christin A (2017) Algorithms in practice: Comparing web journalism and criminal justice. Big Data Society 4(2):1–14.Google Scholar
• Christin A (2018) Counting clicks: Quantification and variation in web journalism in the United States and France. Amer. J. Sociol. 123:1382–1415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christin A, Lewis R (2021) The drama of metrics: Status, spectacle, and resistance among YouTube drama creators. Social Media Soc. 1:1–14.Google Scholar
• Currie G, Spyridonidis D (2019) Sharing leadership for diffusion of innovation in professionalized settings. Human Relations 72(7):1209–1233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis GF (2016) Can an economy survive without corporations? Technology and robust organizational alternatives. Acad. Management Perspective 30(2):129–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiBenigno J (2020) Rapid relationality: How peripheral experts build a foundation for influence with line managers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(1):20–60.Google Scholar
• DiBenigno J, Kellogg KC (2014) Beyond occupational differences: The importance of crosscutting demographics and dyadic toolkits for collaboration in a US hospital. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(3):375–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D, Dunne DD (2012) Digital science and knowledge boundaries in complex innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1467–1484.Link, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and digital technology introduction and integration in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):685–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Empson L, Langley A (2015) Leadership and professionals. Empson L, Muzio D, Broschak J, Hinings C, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Professional Service Firms (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 163–188.Google Scholar
• Faik I, Barrett M, Oborn E (2020) How information technology matters in societal change: An affordance-based institutional logics perspective. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 44(3):1359–1590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Azad B (2012) The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. Leonardi P, Nardi B, Kallinikos J, eds. Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 237–258.Google Scholar
• Fayard AL, Gkeredakis E, Levina L (2016) Framing innovation opportunities while staying committed to an organizational epistemic stance. Inform. Systems Res. 27:302–323.Link, Google Scholar
• Galperin RV (2017) Mass-production of professional services and pseudo-professional identity in tax preparation work. Acad. Management Discoveries 3(2):208–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galperin RV (2020) Organizational powers: Contested innovation and loss of professional jurisdiction in the case of retail medicine. Organ. Sci. 31(2):508–534.Link, Google Scholar
• Gawer A, Phillips N (2013) Institutional work as logics shift: The case of Intel’s transformation to platform leader. Organ. Stud. 34(8):1035–1071.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbons R, Henderson R (2012) Relational contracts and organizational capabilities. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1350–1364.Link, Google Scholar
• Gibbons R, Grieder M, Herz H, Zehnder C (2020) Building an equilibrium: Rules versus principles in relational contracts. Presentation, Organization Science Special Issue Conference on Experiments and Organizational Theory, May 8.Google Scholar
• Gittell JH (2016) Transforming Relationships for High Performance: The Power of Relational Coordination (Stanford University Press, Redwood City, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gittell JH, von Nordenflycht A, Kochan TA (2004) Mutual gains or zero sum? Labor relations and firm performance in the airline industry. ILR Rev. 57(2):163–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray ML, Suri S (2019) Ghost Work: How to Stop Silicon Valley from Building a New Global Underclass (HMH Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Heckscher CC, Adler PS (2006) The Firm as a Collaborative Community: Reconstructing Trust in the Knowledge Economy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Bailey DE (2003) Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ. Sci. 14(6):615–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Mortensen M (2005) Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ. Sci. 16(3):290–307.Link, Google Scholar
• Hinings B, Gegenhuber T, Greenwood R (2018) Digital technology introduction and integration and transformation: An institutional perspective. Inform. Organ. 28(1):52–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huising R, Silbey SS (2018) From nudge to culture and back again: Coalface governance in the regulated organization. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 14:91–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kallinikos J, Aaltonen A, Marton A (2013) The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(2):357–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karunakaran A (2019) Front-line professionals in the wake of digital scrutiny: The paradox of public accountability. Academy of Management Proc. (Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY), 13114.Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC (2019) Subordinate activation tactics: Semi-professionals and micro-level institutional change in professional organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(4):928–975.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC (2021) Covert operations: Managing vendor intentional secrecy during ML tool development in a high technology organization. Presentation, MIT Economic Sociology Working Group Seminar, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC, Valentine MA, Christin A (2020a) Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):366–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC, Myers JE, Gainer L, Singer SJ (2020b) Moving violations: Pairing an illegitimate learning hierarchy with trainee status mobility for acquiring new skills when traditional expertise erodes. Organ. Sci. 32(1):181–209.Google Scholar
• Kelly EL, Moen P (2020) Overload: How Good Jobs Went Bad and What We Can Do About It (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Kochan TA, Rubinstein SA (2000) Toward a stakeholder theory of the firm: The Saturn partnership. Organ. Sci. 11(4):367–386.Link, Google Scholar
• Kochan TA, Eaton AE, McKersie RB, Adler PS (2013) Healing Together: The Labor-Management Partnership at Kaiser Permanente (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
• Kochan TA, Yang D, Kimball WT, Kelly EL (2019) Worker participation in America: Is there a gap between what actors expect and what they experience? ILR Rev. 72(1):3–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kronblad C (2020) How digitalization changes our understanding of professional service firms. Acad. Management Discoveries 6(3):436–454.Google Scholar
• Lehdonvirta V (2018) Flexibility in the gig economy: Managing time on three online piecework platforms. New Tech. Work Employment 33(1):13–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leidner R (1993) Fast Food, Fast Talk: Service Work and the Routinization of Everyday Life (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2007) Activating the informational capabilities of information technology for organizational change. Organ. Sci. 18(5):813–831.Link, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2011) When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 35(1):147–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM, Vaast E (2017) Social media and their affordances for organizing: A review and agenda for research. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):150–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM, Bailey DE, Diniz EH, Sholler D, Nardi B (2016) Multiplex appropriation in complex systems implementation: The case of brazil’s correspondent banking system. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 40(2):461–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy KE (2015) The contexts of control: Information, power, and truck-driving work. Inform. Soc. 31(2):160–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lifshitz-Assaf H (2017) Dismantling knowledge boundaries at NASA: From problem solvers to solution seekers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):746–782.Google Scholar
• Lindberg A, Levina N (2018) The evolution of a boundary organization in an online field. Presentation, Open and User Innovation Conference, Stern School of Business at New York University, New York, August 6–8.Google Scholar
• Litwin AS (2011) Technological change at work: The impact of employee involvement on the effectiveness of health information technology. ILR Rev. 64(5):863–888.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Litwin AS (2015) Nose to tail: Using the whole employment relationship to link worker participation to operational performance. Adv. Indust. Labor Relations 21:143–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Litwin AS, Eaton AE (2018) Complementary or conflictual? Formal participation, informal participation, and organizational performance. Human Resources Management 57(1):307–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu X, Batt R (2007) The economic pay-offs to informal training: Evidence from routine service work. ILR Rev. 61(1):75–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lopez SH (2010) Workers, managers, and customers: Triangles of power in work communities. Work Occupations 37(3):251–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacDuffie JP (1995) Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. ILR Rev. 48(2):197–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Griffith TL, Reetz DK, Alexy O (2018) Catalyst organizations as a new organization design for innovation: The case of hyperloop transportation technologies. Acad. Management Discovery 4(4):472–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Rice RE, Malhotra A, King N, Ba SL (2000) Digital technology introduction and integration: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 24(4):569–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazmanian M (2013) Avoiding the trap of constant connectivity: When congruent frames allow for heterogeneous practices. Acad. Management J. 56(5):1225–1250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazmanian MA, Orlikowski WJ, Yates JA (2013) The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1337–1357.Link, Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Myers JE (2020) Direct vs. indirect vendor channels and the scaling of worker voice around digital technologies. Academy of Management Proc. (Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY), 17349.Google Scholar
• Myers JE, Kellogg KC (2020) State actor orchestration for achieving workforce development at scale: Evidence from four US states. ILR Rev., ePub ahead of print June 20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y (2020) Digital innovation: Towards a transdisciplinary perspective. Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y, eds. Handbook of Digital Innovation (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK).Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S, Bechky B (2008) Boundary organizations: Enabling collaboration among unexpected allies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):422–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 11(4):404–428.Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2014) What happens when evaluation goes online? Exploring apparatuses of valuation in the travel sector. Organ. Sci. 25(3):868–891.Link, Google Scholar
• Pine K, Mazmanian M (2015) Emerging insights on building infrastructure for data-driven transparency and accountability of organizations. iConf. 2015 Proc. (University of California Irvine, Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences, University of California Irvine, Newport Beach, CA).Google Scholar
• Pine K, Mazmanian M (2017) Artful and contorted coordinating: The ramifications of imposing formal logics of task jurisdiction on situated practice. Acad. Management J. 60(2):720–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pine KH, Wolf C, Mazmanian M (2016) The work of reuse: Birth certificate data and healthcare accountability measurements. iConf. 2016 Proc. (College of Computing and Informatics, Drexel University, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Polykarpou S, Barrett M, Oborn E (2020) Place and organizing for emerging technologies: Challenges of scaling 3D printing in a UK hospital. Atinc G, ed. Proc. Acad. Management (Briafcliff Manor, NJ), 92.Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Oberg A, Korff V, Oelberger C, Kloos K (2017) Institutional analysis in a digital era: Mechanisms and methods to understand emerging fields. Krücken G, Mazza C, Meyer R, Walgenbach P, eds. New Themes in Institutional Analysis: Topics and Issues from European Research (Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Radaelli G, Currie G, Frattini F, Lettieri E (2017) The role of managers in enacting two‐step institutional work for radical innovation in professional organizations. J. Production Innovative Management 34(4):450–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rahman H, Valentine MA (2021) How client managers use collaborative leniency to keep control: Evidence from technologically-mediated ‘gigs’. Organ. Sci. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Ranganathan A (2018) Train them to retain them: Work readiness and the retention of first-time women actors in India. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):879–909.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ranganathan A, Benson A (2020) A numbers game: Quantification of work, auto-gamification and worker productivity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 85(4):573–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rousseau DM (1990) New hire perceptions of their own and their employers’ obligations: A study of psychological contracts. J. Organ. Behav. 11(5):389–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sabel CF, Zeitlin J (2008) Learning from difference: The new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU. Eur. Law J. 14(3):271–327.Google Scholar
• Sabel CF, Herrigel G, Kristensen PH (2018) Regulation under uncertainty: The co-evolution of industry and regulation. Regulation Governance 12(3):371–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sallaz J (2009) The Labor of Luck: Casino Capitalism in the United States and South Africa (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schultze U, Orlikowski WJ (2004) A practice perspective on technology-mediated network relations: The use of Internet-based self-serve technologies. Inform. Systems Res. 15(1):87–106.Link, Google Scholar
• Sergeeva AV, Faraj S, Huysman M (2020) Losing touch: An embodiment perspective on coordination in robotic surgery. Organ. Sci. 31(5):1248–1271.Link, Google Scholar
• Shestakofsky B (2017) Working algorithms: Software automation and the future of work. Work Occupation 44(4):376–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smets M, Morris T, von Nordenflycht A, Brock DM (2017) 25 years since ‘P2’: Taking stock and charting the future of professional firms. J. Professional Organ. 4(2):91–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Star SL, Strauss A (1999) Layers of silence, arenas of participation: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer supported cooperative work. J. Collaborative Comput. 8:9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Truelove E (2019) The changing nature of professional work inside an incumbent firm in the age of social media: Examining the challenge of coproduction. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Truelove E, Kellogg KC (2016) The radical flank effect and cross-occupational collaboration for technology development during a power shift. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(4):662–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turco CJ (2016) The Conversational Firm: Rethinking Bureaucracy in the Age of Social Media (Columbia University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vallas S, Schor JB (2020) What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annuual Rev. Sociol. 46:273–294.Google Scholar
• Yoo Y (2010) Computing in everyday life: A call for research on experiential computing. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 34(2):213–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) Research commentary—the new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Boland R, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A (2012) Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1398–1408.Link, Google Scholar
• Zeitlin J, ed. (2015) Extending Experimentalist Governance?: The European Union and Transnational Regulation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar