Division of Labor Through Self-Selection

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1449

References

  • Albright SC (1974) Optimal sequential assignments with random arrival times. Management Sci. 21(1):60–67.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Fahrenkopf E (2016) Knowledge transfer in organizations: The roles of members, tasks, tools, and networks. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 136(2016):146–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Ren YQ (2012) Transactive memory systems: A microfoundation of dynamic capabilities. J. Management Stud. 49(8):1375–1382.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bakker AB, Tims M, Derks D (2012) Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human Relations 65(10):1359–1378.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin CY (2015) In the shadow of the crowd: A comment on “Valve’s Way.” J. Organ. Design 4(2):5–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2006) The architecture of participation: Does code architecture mitigate free riding in the open source development model? Management Sci. 52(7):1116–1127.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baron JN, Kreps DM (1999) Strategic Human Resources: Frameworks for General Managers (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bearden JN, Murphy RO, Rapoport A (2005) A multi-attribute extension of the secretary problem: Theory and experiments. J. Math. Psych. 49(5):410–422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker GS (1962) Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. J. Political Econom. 70(5 Part 2):9–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berg JM, Grant AM, Johnson V (2010a) When callings are calling: Crafting work and leisure in pursuit of unanswered occupational callings. Organ. Sci. 21(5):973–994.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Berg JM, Wrzesniewski A, Dutton JE (2010b) Perceiving and responding to challenges in job crafting at different ranks: When proactivity requires adaptivity. J. Organ. Behav. 31(2‐3):158–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein E, Bunch J, Canner N, Lee M (2016) Beyond the Holacracy Hype. Harvard Bus. Rev. (July-August), https://hbr.org/2016/07/beyond-the-holacracy-hype.Google Scholar
  • Beshers SN, Fewell JH (2001) Models of division of labor in social insects. Annual Rev. Entomology 46(2001):413–440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chadwick C, Dabu A (2009) Human resources, human resource management, and the competitive advantage of firms: Toward a more comprehensive model of causal linkages. Organ. Sci. 20(1):253–272.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen MD, March JG, Olsen JP (1972) A garbage can model of organizational choice. Admin. Sci. Quart. 17(1):1–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chun YH, Sumichrast RT (2006) A rank-based approach to the sequential selection and assignment problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 174(2):1338–1344.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Derman C, Lieberman GJ, Ross SM (1972) A sequential stochastic assignment problem. Management Sci. 18(7):349–355.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ethiraj SK, Garg P (2012) The division of gains from complementarities in human-capital-intensive activity. Organ. Sci. 23(3):725–742.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Frank A (2005) On Kuhn’s Hungarian method—a tribute from Hungary. Naval Res. Logist. 52(1):2–5.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeland RF, Zuckerman EW (2018) The problems and promise of hierarchy: Voice rights and the firm. Sociol. Sci. 5(7):143–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gale D, Shapley LS (1962) College admissions and the stability of marriage. Amer. Math. Monthly 69(1):9–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghitulescu B (2007) Shaping tasks and relationships at work: Examining the antecedents and consequences of employee job crafting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  • Gibbons R, Waldman M (2004) Task-specific human capital. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(2):203–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haanigan TR, Haans RFJ, Vakili K, Tchalian H, Glaser VL, Wang MS, Kaplan S, Jennings PD (2019) Topic modeling in management research: Rendering new theory from textual data. Acad. Management Ann. 13(2):586–632.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haas MR, Criscuolo P, George G (2015) Which problems to solve? Online knowledge sharing and attention allocation in organizations. Acad. Management J. 58(3):680–711.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jeppesen LB, Lakhani KR (2010) Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1016–1033.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kamrani F, Ayani R, Karimson A (2010) Optimizing a business process model by using simulation. IEEE Workshop Principles. Advanced Distributed Simulation (IEEE, Atlanta), 1–8.Google Scholar
  • Kogut B, Metiu A (2001) Open‐source software development and distributed innovation. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy 17(2):248–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuhn HW (1955) The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. 2(1-2):83–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lakhani KR, Panetta JA (2007) The principles of distributed innovation. Innovations Tech. Governance Globalization 2(3):97–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lakhani KR, Von Hippel E (2003) How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Res. Policy 32(6):923–943.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lakhani KR, Wolf R (2005) Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. Feller J, Fitzgerald B, Hissam SA, Lakhani KR, eds. Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 3–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laloux F (2014) Reinventing Organizations (Nelson Parker, Brussels).Google Scholar
  • Lazear EP (2009) Firm-specific human capital: A skill-weights approach. J. Political Econom. 117(5):914–940.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee MY, Edmondson A (2017) Self-managing organizations: Exploring the limits of less-hierarchical organizing. Res. Organ. Behav. 37:35–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lerner J, Tirole J (2002) Some simple economics of open source. J. Indust. Econom. 50(2):197–234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Littlepage G, Robison W, Reddington K (1997) Effects of task experience and group experience on group performance, member ability, and recognition of expertise. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 69(2):133–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Littlepage GE, Silbiger H (1992) Recognition of expertise in decision-making groups: Effects of group size and participation patterns. Small Group Res. 23(3):344–355.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lomi A, Conaldi G, Tonellato M (2012) Organized anarchies and the network dynamics of decision opportunities in an open source software project. Lomi A, Harrison JR, eds. The Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice: Looking Forward at Forty, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 36 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, United Kingdom), 363–397.Google Scholar
  • Machkovek S (2020) Valve secrets spill over—including Half-Life 3—in new Steam documentary app. Ars Technica (July 9), https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2020/07/valve-secrets-spill-over-including-half-life-3-in-new-steam-documentary-app/.Google Scholar
  • Mintzberg H (1979) The Structuring of Organizations (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Niederle M, Roth AE, Sonmez T (2008) Matching and market design. Palgrave Macmillan, ed. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (Palgrave Macmillan, London), https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2313-1.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Puranam P, Håkonsson DD (2015) Valve’s way. J. Organ. Design 4(2):2–4.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Puranam P, Alexy O, Reitzig M (2014) What’s “new” about new forms of organizing? Acad. Management Rev. 39(2):162–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Puranam D, Narayan V, Kadiyali V (2017) The Effect of calorie posting regulation on consumer opinion: A flexible latent Dirichlet Allocation model with informative priors. Marketing Sci. 36(5):726–746.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Raveendran M, Puranam P, Warglien M (2016) Object salience in the division of labor: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. 62(7):2110–2128.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Robertson B (2015) Holacracy: The New Management System for a Rapidly Changing World (Henry Holt and Company, LLC, New York).Google Scholar
  • Rullani F, Haefliger S (2013) The periphery on stage: The intra-organizational dynamics in online communities of creation. Res. Policy 42(4):941–953.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salop J, Salop S (1976) Self-selection and turnover in the labor market. Quart. J. Econom. 90(4):619–627.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shah SK (2006) Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms. Management Sci. 52(7):1000–1014.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (1951) A formal theory of the employment relationship. Econometrica 19(3):293–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith A (1776) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (Penguin Classics, Edinburgh, Scotland).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spence M (1973) Job market signaling. Quart. J. Econom. 87(3):355–374.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teodoridis F (2018) Understanding team knowledge production: The interrelated roles of technology and expertise. Management Sci. 64(8):3625–3648.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Teodoridis F, Bikard M, Vakili K (2018) Creativity at the knowledge frontier: The impact of specialization in fast- and slow-paced domains. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(4):894–927.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Von Hippel E, von Krogh G (2003) Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organ. Sci. 14(2):209–223.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Von Krogh G, Spaeth S, Lakhani KR (2003) Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Res. Policy 32(7):1217–1241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasko MM, Faraj S (2000) “It is what one does”: Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 9(2–3):155–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wrzesniewski A, Dutton JE (2001) Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Acad. Management Rev. 26(2):179–201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wrzesniewski A, LoBuglio N, Dutton JE, Berg, JM (2013) Job crafting and cultivating positive meaning and identity in work. Bakker AB, ed. Advances in Positive Organizational Psychology, vol. 1 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, United Kingdom), 281–302.Google Scholar
  • Zenger TR (2015) Valve corporation: Composing internal markets. J. Organ. Design 4(2):20–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.