No Free Lunch After All: Corporate Political Connections and Firms’ Location Choices

References

• Agrawal A, Knoeber CR (2001) Do some outside directors play a political role? J. Law Econom. 44(1):179–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Yayavaram S (2011) Explaining influence rents: The case for an institutions-based view of strategy. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1631–1652.Link, Google Scholar
• Albino-Pimentel J, Dussauge P, Shaver JM (2018) Firm non-market capabilities and the effect of supranational institutional safeguards on the location choice of international investments. Strategic Management J. 39(10):2770–2793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcacer J, Chung W (2007) Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Management Sci. 53(5):760–776.Link, Google Scholar
• Alcacer J, Chung W (2014) Location strategies for agglomeration economies. Strategic Management J. 35(12):1749–1761.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ang YY (2016) How China Escaped the Poverty Trap (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ang YY, Jia N (2014) Perverse complementarity: Political connections and the use of courts among private firms in China. J. Politics 76(2):318–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron DP (1995) Integrated strategy: Market and nonmarket components. California Management Rev. 37:47–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron DP (1997) Integrated strategy and international trade disputes: The Kodak-Fujifilm case. J. Econom. Management Strategy 6(2):291–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron DP (2013) Business and Its Environment (Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Bombardini M, Trebbi F (2014) Is it whom you know or what you know? An empirical assessment of the lobbying process. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(12):3885–3920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Kramarz F, Schoar A, Thesmar D (2007) Politicians, firms and the political business cycle: Evidence from France. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Blanes i Vidal J, Draca M, Fons-Rosen C (2012) Revolving door lobbyists. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(7):3731–3748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonardi J-P (2011) Corporate political resources and the resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Organ. 9(3):247–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bueno de Mesquita B, Smith A, Siverson RM, Morrow JD (2004) The Logic of Political Survival (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Calomiris CW, Fisman R, Wang Y (2010) Profiting from government stakes in a command economy: Evidence from Chinese asset sales. J. Financial Econom. 96(3):399–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carvalho D (2014) The real effects of government-owned banks: Evidence from an emerging market. J. Finance 69(2):577–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen X, Lee C-WJ, Li J (2008) Government assisted earnings management in China. J. Accounting Public Policy 27(3):262–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi S-J, Jia N, Lu J (2015) The structure of political institutions and effectiveness of corporate political lobbying. Organ. Sci. 26(1):158–179.Link, Google Scholar
• Chung W, Alcacer J (2002) Knowledge seeking and location choice of foreign direct investment in the United States. Management Sci. 48(12):1534–1554.Link, Google Scholar
• Dixit AK (1996) The Making of Economic Policy: A Transaction-Cost Politics Perspective (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dorobantu S, Kaul A, Zelner B (2017) Non-market strategy: An integrative review and future directions. Strategic Management J. 38(1):114–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Downs A (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy (Harper and Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Du J, Xu C (2009) Which firms went public in China? A study of financial market regulation. World Development 37(4):812–824.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faccio M (2006) Politically connected firms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):369–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faccio M, Wasulis RW, McConnell JJ (2006) Political connections and corporate bailouts. J. Finance 61(6):2597–2635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan JPH, Li Z, Yang YG (2014) Relationship networks and earnings informativeness: Evidence from corruption cases. J. Bus. Finance Accounting. 41(7, 8):831–866.Google Scholar
• Fan JPH, Wong TJ, Zhang T (2012) Institutions and organizational structure: The case of state-owned corporate pyramids. J. Law Econom. Organ. 29(6):1217–1252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisman R (2001) Estimating the value of political connections. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(4):1095–1102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisman R, Wang Y (2015) The mortality cost of political connections. Rev. Econom. Stud. 82(4):1346–1382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haselmann R, Schoenherr D, Vig V (2017) Rent-seeking in elite networks. J. Political Econom. 126(4):1638–1690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haveman H, Jia N, Shi J, Wang Y (2017) The dynamics of political embeddedness in China. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(1):67–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Head K, Ries J, Swenson D (1995) Agglomeration benefits and location choice: Evidence from Japanese manufacturing investments in the United States. J. Internat. Econom. 38(3, 4):223–247.Google Scholar
• Henisz W, Zelner B (2003) The strategic organization of political risks and opportunities. Strategic Organ. 1(4):451–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Hitt MA (1999) Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):825–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang Y (1998) The industrial organization of Chinese government. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
• Jia N, Mayer K (2017) Political hazards and firms’ geographic concentration. Strategic Management J. 38(2):203–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jia R, Kudamatsu M, Seim D (2015) Political selection in China: The Complementary roles of connections and performance. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 13(4):631–668.Google Scholar
• Jia N, Shi J, Wang Y (2018) The interdependence of public and private stakeholder influence: A study of political patronage and corporate philanthropy in China. Adv. Strategic Management 38:69–93.Google Scholar
• Khwaja AI, Mian A (2005) Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market. Quart. J. Econom. 120(4):1371–1411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lei Y-H (2020) Quid pro quo? Government-firm relationships in China. Working paper, Yale-NUS College, University Town, Singapore.Google Scholar
• Leuz C, Oberholzer-Gee F (2006) Political relationships, global financing, and corporate transparency: Evidence from Indonesia. J. Financial Econom. 81(2):411–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy B, Spiller PT (1996) Regulations, Institutions and Commitment: Comparative Studies of Telecommunications (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H, Zhang Y (2007) The role of managers’ political networking and functional experience in new venture performance: Evidence from China’s transition economy. Strategic Management J. 28:791–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H, Zhou L-A (2005) Political turnover and economic performance: The incentive role of personnel control in China. J. Public Econom. 89:1743–1762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H, Meng L, Wang Q, Zhou L-A (2008) Political connections, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private entrepreneurs. J. Development Econom. 87(2):283–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahoney JT, McGahan AM (2007) The field of strategic management within the evolving science of strategic organization. Strategic Organ. 5(1):79–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahoney JT, McGahan AM, Pitelis CN (2009) The interdependence of private and public interests. Organ. Sci. 20(6):1034–1052.Link, Google Scholar
• Marshall A (1920) Principles of Economics (MacMillan, London).Google Scholar
• McFadden D ( 1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Zarembka P, ed. Frontiers in Econometrics (Academic Press, New York), 105–142.Google Scholar
• McGregor R (2009) The party organizer. Financial Times (September 30), https://www.ft.com/content/ae18c830-adf8-11de-87e7-00144feabdc0.Google Scholar
• McPherson JM, Smith-Lovin L (1987) Homophily in voluntary associations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 52(3):370–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nee V, Opper S (2012) Capitalism from Below: Markets and Institutional Change in China (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nordhaus WD (1975) The political business cycle. Rev. Econom. Stud. 42(2):169–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• North DC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piotroski J, Wong TJ, Zhang T (2015) Political incentives to suppress negative information: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. J. Accounting Res. 53(2):405–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piotroski J, Wong TJ, Zhang T (2020) Political networks and stock price co-movement: Evidence from network-connected firms in China. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Pistor K, Xu C (2005) Governing stock markets in transition economies: Lessons from China. Amer. Law Econom. Rev. 7(1):184–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoenherr D (2017) Political connections and allocative distortions. J. Finance 74(2):543–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shepsle KA, Weingast BR (1981) Political preferences for the pork barrel: A generalization. Amer. J. Political Sci. 25(1):96–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shih V, Adolph C, Liu M (2012) Getting ahead in the Communist Party: Explaining the advancement of Central Committee members in China. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 106(1):166–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1994) Politicians and firms. Quart. J. Econom. 109(4):995–1025.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shleifer A, Vishny R (1998) The Grabbing Hand: Government Pathologies and Their Cures (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Siegel J (2007) Contingent political capital and international alliances: Evidence from South Korea. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(4):621–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun P, Mellahi K, Thun E (2010) The dynamic value of MNE political embeddedness: The case of the Chinese automobile industry. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 41:1161–1182.Google Scholar
• Sun P, Hu HW, Hillman AJ (2016) The dark side of board political capital: Enabling blockholder rent appropriation. Acad. Management J. 59(5):1801–1822.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Svensson J (2005) Eight questions about corruption. J. Econom. Perspect. 19(3):19–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang D, Luo R (2019) Retire in peace: Officials’ political incentives and corporate diversification in China. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(4):773–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1996) The Mechanisms of Governance (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolfers J (2002) Are voters rational? Evidence from gubernatorial elections. Research Paper No.1730, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Xin KR, Pearce JL (1996) Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Acad. Management J. 39(6):1641–1658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu C (2011) The fundamental institutions of China’s reforms and development. J. Econom. Literature 49(4):1076–1151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao B, Ziedonis AA, Ziedonis RH (2017) State innovation programs and the retention of science and technology start-ups: Evidence from the Great Lakes Region. Working paper, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
• Zheng L (2007) Political embeddedness as a double-edged sword: Firms in China’s stock market. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, Stanford University.Google Scholar
• Zhou T (2009) Potential problems with commercial banks’ inter-region loans. Hainan Finance 6(247):82–83.Google Scholar