Living It Up at the Hotel California: Employee Mobility Barriers and Collaborativeness in Firms’ Innovation

References

• Adler PS, Kwon SW (2002) Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Management Rev. 27(1):17–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Ganco M, Ziedonis RH (2009) Reputations for toughness in patent enforcement: Implications for knowledge spillovers via inventor mobility. Strategic Management J. 30(13):1349–1374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):425–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aime F, Johnson S, Ridge JW, Hill AD (2010) The routine may be stable but the advantage is not: Competitive implications of key employee mobility. Strategic Management J. 31(1):75–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Al-Laham A, Tzabbar D, Amburgey TL (2011) The dynamics of knowledge stocks and knowledge flows: Innovation consequences of recruitment and collaboration in biotech. Indust. Corporate Change 20(2):555–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcácer J, Zhao M (2012) Local R&D strategies and multilocation firms: The role of internal linkages. Management Sci. 58(4):734–753.Link, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L (2013) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):150–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Silverman BS (2004) R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management J. 25(8‐9):929–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Goncalo JA (2007) Past success and creativity over time: A study of inventors in the hard disk drive industry. Management Sci. 53(1):1–15.Link, Google Scholar
• Bae J, Gargiulo M (2004) Partner substitutability, alliance network structure, and firm profitability in the telecommunications industry. Acad. Management J. 47(6):843–859.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Henkel J (2015) Modularity and intellectual property protection. Strategic Management J. 36(11):1637–1655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balsmeier B, Chavosh A, Li GC, Fierro G, Johnson K, Kaulagi A, O’Reagan D, Yeh B, Fleming L (2015) Automated disambiguation of US patent grants and applications. Working paper, KU Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
• Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Batt R (2002) Managing customer services: Human resource practices, quit rates, and sales growth. Acad. Management J. 45(3):587–597.Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1993) Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, 3rd ed. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bikard M, Murray F, Gans JS (2015) Exploring trade-offs in the organization of scientific work: Collaboration and scientific reward. Management Sci. 61(7):1473–1495.Link, Google Scholar
• Björkman I, Stahl GK, Vaara E (2007) Cultural differences and capability transfer in cross-border acquisitions: The mediating roles of capability complementarity, absorptive capacity, and social integration. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 38(4):658–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econometrics. 87(1):115–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bush GP, Hattery LH (1956) Teamwork and creativity in research. Admin. Sci. Quart. 1(3):361–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell BA, Coff R, Kryscynski D (2012) Rethinking sustained competitive advantage from human capital. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):376–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnabuci G, Operti E (2013) Where do firm’s recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firm’s ability to innovate through technological recombination. Strategic Management J. 34(13):1591–1613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chadwick C (2017) Toward a more comprehensive model of firms’ human capital rents. Acad. Management Rev. 42(3):499–519.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang S, Lee J, Song J (2012) The evolution of the inventor collaboration networks in Samsung electronics and Hynix. Acad. Management A Proc. 2012(1).Google Scholar
• Coff RW (1997) Human assets and management dilemmas: Coping with hazards on the road to resource-based theory. Acad. Management Rev. 22(2):374–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coff R, Kryscynski D (2011) Invited editorial: Drilling for micro-foundations of human capital-based competitive advantages. J. Management 37(5):1429–1443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper 7552, Duke University, Durham, NC.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conti R (2014) Do non-competition agreements lead firms to pursue risky R&D projects? Strategic Management J. 35(8):1230–1248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Contigiani A, Hsu DH, Barankay I (2018) Trade secrets and innovation: Evidence from the “inevitable disclosure” doctrine. Strategic Management J. 39(11):2921–2941.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crescenzi R, Nathan M, Rodríguez-Pose A (2016) Do inventors talk to strangers? On proximity and collaborative knowledge creation. Res. Policy 45(1):177–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cross R, Rebele R, Grant A (2016) Collaborative overload. Harvard Bus. Rev. 94(1-2):74–79.Google Scholar
• Ewens M, Marx M (2017) Founder replacement and startup performance. Rev. Financial Stud. 31(4):1532–1565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Sproull L (2000) Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. 46(12):1554–1568.Link, Google Scholar
• Flammer C, Kacperczyk A (2019) Corporate social responsibility as a defense against knowledge spillovers: Evidence from the inevitable disclosure doctrine. Strategic Management J. 40(8):1243–1267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. 25(8‐9):909–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Mingo S, Chen D (2007) Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):443–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Zeebroeck NV (2012) From wires to partners: How the Internet has fostered r&d collaborations within firms. Management Sci. 58(8):1549–1568.Link, Google Scholar
• Foss NJ, Pedersen T (2002) Transferring knowledge in mncs: The role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context. J. Internat. Management 8(1):49–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Funk RJ (2014) Making the most of where you are: Geography, networks, and innovation in organizations. Acad. Management J. 57(1):193–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganco M (2013) Cutting the gordian knot: The effect of knowledge complexity on employee mobility and entrepreneurship. Strategic Management J. 34(6):666–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganco M, Miller C, Toh PK (2020) From litigation to innovation: Firms’ ability to litigate and technological diversification through human capital. Strategic Management J. 41(13):2436–2473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garmaise MJ (2009) Ties that truly bind: Noncompetition agreements, executive compensation, and firm investment. J. Law Econom. Organ. 27(2):376–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilson RJ (1999) Legal infrastructure of high technology industrial districts: Silicon Valley, Route 128, and covenants not to compete. New York University Law Rev. 74(3):575–629.Google Scholar
• Grossman SJ, Hart O (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Polit. Econom. 94(4):691–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guler I, Nerkar A (2012) The impact of global and local cohesion on innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. 33(5):535–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen MT (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):82–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ, Smith JA (1999) The pre‐programme earnings dip and the determinants of participation in a social programme. Implications for simple programme evaluation strategies. Econom. J. (Lond.). 109(457):313–348.Google Scholar
• Henry E, Ruiz-Aliseda F (2011) The dynamics of protection and imitation of innovations. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 4486.Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Mortensen M (2005) Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ. Sci. 16(3):290–307.Link, Google Scholar
• Howard M, Steensma HK, Lyles M, Dhanaraj C (2016) Learning to collaborate through collaboration: How allying with expert firms influences collaborative innovation within novice firms. Strategic Management J. 37(10):2092–2103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huselid MA (1995) The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Acad. Management J. 38(3):635–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ichijo K. (2010) Creating growing and protecting knowledge-based competence: The case of Sharp’s LCD business. Hooijberg R, Unt JG, Antonakis J, Boal KB, Lane N, eds. Being There Even When You are Not: Leading Through Strategy, Structures, and Systems (Elsevier, New York), 87–102.Google Scholar
• Inkpen AC, Tsang EW (2005) Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Acad. Management Rev. 30(1):146–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James SD, Leiblein MJ, Lu S (2013) How firms capture value from their innovations. J. Management 39(5):1123–1155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn KA, Northcraft GB, Neale MA (1999) Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(4):741–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones BF (2009) The burden of knowledge and the “death of the renaissance man”: Is innovation getting harder? Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(1):283–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz JS, Martin BR (1997) What is research collaboration? Res. Policy 26(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman SA (1993) The Origins of Order: Self Organization and Selection in Evolution (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Song J, Lee K (2011) The paradox of Samsung’s rise. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89(7-8):142–147.Google Scholar
• Kim L (1997) The dynamics of Samsung’s technological learning in semiconductors. California Management Rev. 39(3):86–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klasa S, Ortiz-Molina H, Serfling M, Srinivasan S (2018) Protection of trade secrets and capital structure decisions. J. Financial Econom. 128(2):266–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kodama F (1992) Technology fusion and the new R&D. Harvard Bus. Rev. 70(4):70–78.Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1996) What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. 7(5):502–518.Link, Google Scholar
• Lashinsky A (2012) Inside Apple: How America’s Most Admired – and Secretive – Company Really Works (Business Plus, New York).Google Scholar
• Lavie D (2007) Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the U.S. Software industry. Strategic Management J. 28(12):1187–1212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leana III CR, Van Buren HJ (1999) Organizational social capital and employment practices. Acad. Management Rev. 24(3):538–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee S (2019) Learning-by-moving: Can reconfiguring spatial proximity between organizational members promote individual-level exploration. Organ. Sci. 30(3):467–488.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee S, Puranam P (2017) Incentive redesign and collaboration in organizations: Evidence from a natural experiment. Strategic Management J. 38(12):2333–2352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis K, Herndon B (2011) Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1254–1265.Link, Google Scholar
• Li GC, Lai R, D’Amour A, Doolin DM, Sun Y, Torvik VI, Yu AZ, Fleming L (2014) Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the U.S. Patent inventor database (1975–2010). Res. Policy 43(6): 941–955.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebeskind JP (1996) Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):93–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebeskind JP (1997) Keeping organizational secrets: Protective institutional mechanisms and their costs. Indust. Corporate Change. 6(3):623–663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marx M (2011) The firm strikes back: Non-compete agreements and the mobility of technical professionals. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 76(5):695–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marx M, Strumsky D, Fleming L (2009) Mobility, skills, and the michigan non-compete experiment. Management Sci. 55(6):875–889.Link, Google Scholar
• Mawdsley JK, Somaya D (2016) Employee mobility and organizational outcomes: An integrative conceptual framework and research agenda. J. Management 42(1):85–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDougal L (2005) Understanding spatiality. Turner P, Davenport E, eds. Spaces, Spatiality and Technology (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 67–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer BD (1995) Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 13(2):151–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris SS, Alvarez SA, Barney JB, Molloy JC (2017) Firm-specific human capital investments as a signal of general value: Revisiting assumptions about human capital and how it is managed. Strategic Management J. 38(4):912–919.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(2):242–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Nerkar A, Paruchuri S (2005) Evolution of R&D capabilities: The role of knowledge networks within a firm. Management Sci. 51(5):771–785.Link, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1):14–37.Link, Google Scholar
• Osterman P (1987) Choice of employment systems in internal labor markets. Indust. Relat. 26(1):46–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ (2002) A genealogical approach to organizational life chances: The parent-progeny transfer among Silicon Valley law firms, 1946 –1996. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(3):474–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Png IP, Samila S (2013) Trade Secrets Law and Engineer/Scientist Mobility: Evidence from “Inevitable Disclosure”. (WP Nat. U., Singapore).Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1996) What is strategy? Harvard Bus. Rev. 74(6):61–78.Google Scholar
• Qiu Y, Wang TY (2017) Skilled labor risk and compensation policies. Preprint, submitted March 20, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2935378.Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Argote L, Brooks D (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Sci. 51(6):869–881.Link, Google Scholar
• Reed R, DeFillippi RJ (1990) Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 15(1):88–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW (2000) Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. 46(6):824–844.Link, Google Scholar
• Rodan S, Galunic C (2004) More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management J. 25(6):541–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rønde T (2001) Trade secrets and information sharing. J. Econom. Management Strategy. 10(3):391–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosen B, Furst S, Blackburn R (2007) Overcoming barriers to knowledge sharing in virtual teams. Organ. Dynamics 3(36):259–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Almeida P (2003) Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. 49(6):751–766.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A (2001) Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. 22(4):287–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seo E (2020) The effect of internal collaboration on inventor mobility: Quasi-experimental evidence from an office consolidation. Working Paper, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 106:467–482.Google Scholar
• Singh J, Agrawal A (2011) Recruiting for ideas: How firms exploit the prior inventions of new hires. Management Sci. 57(1):129–150.Link, Google Scholar
• Singh J, Fleming L (2010) Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Sci. 56(1):41–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Singh H, Kryscynski D, Li X, Gopal R (2016) Pipes, pools, and filters: How collaboration networks affect innovative performance. Strategic Management J. 37(8):1649–1666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Somaya D, Williamson IO, Lorinkova N (2008) Gone but not lost: The different performance impacts of employee mobility between cooperators vs. competitors. Acad. Management J. 51(5):936–953.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song J, Almeida P, Wu G (2003) Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Sci. 49(4):351–365.Link, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Rivkin JW, Fleming L (2006) Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Res. Policy 35(7):994–1017.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starr EP, Bishara N, Prescott JJ (2015) Noncompetes in the U.S. Labor force. Preprint, submitted July 3, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2625714.Google Scholar
• Staw BM (1980) The consequences of turnover. J. Occupational Behav. 1(4):253–273.Google Scholar
• Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):27–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G, Jensen RJ (2006) Presumptive adaptation and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer. Strategic Management J. 27(10):937–957.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toh PK, Polidoro F (2013) A competition‐based explanation of collaborative invention within the firm. Strategic Management J. 34(10):1186–1208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M, Henderson R, Jaffe A (1997) University vs. corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 5(1):19–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang HC, Barney JB (2006) Employee incentives to make firm-specific investments: Implications for resource-based theories of corporate diversification. Acad. Management Rev. 31(2):466–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang HC, He J, Mahoney JT (2009) Firm‐specific knowledge resources and competitive advantage: the roles of economic‐and relationship‐based employee governance mechanisms. Strategic Management J. 30(12):1265–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wezel FC, Cattani G, Pennings JM (2006) Competitive implications of interfirm mobility. Organ. Sci. 17(6):691–709.Link, Google Scholar
• Williams C (2007) Transfer in context: Replication and adaptation in knowledge transfer relationships. Strategic Management J. 28(9):867–889.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Sci. 316(5827):1036–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Younge KA, Tong TW, Fleming L (2015) How anticipated employee mobility affects acquisition likelihood: Evidence from a natural experiment. Strategic Management J. 36(5):686–708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zander U, Kogut B (1995) Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organ. Sci. 6(1):76–92.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang ZX, Hempel PS, Han YL, Tjosvold D (2007) Transactive memory system links work team characteristics and performance. J. Applied Psychol. 92(6):1722–1730.Crossref, Google Scholar