Using Stretch Goals for Idea Generation Among Employees: One Size Does Not Fit All!

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1462

References

  • Ahuja G, Lampert CM (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):521–543.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
  • Amabile TM, Conti R (1999) Changes in the work environment for creativity during downsizing. Acad. Management J. 42(6):630–640.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson C, Galinsky AD (2006) Power, optimism, and risk-taking. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 36(4):511–536.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyris C (1985) Strategy, Change and Defensive Routines (Pitman Publishing, London).Google Scholar
  • Aufreiter NA, Lawver TL, Lun CD (2000) A new way to market. McKinsey Quart. 2:22–53.Google Scholar
  • Baer M, Frese M (2003) Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. J. Organ. Behav. 24(1):45–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A (1991) Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 50(2):248–287.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A, Locke EA (2003) Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. J. Appl. Psych. 88(1):87–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumann O, Stieglitz N (2014) Rewarding value-creating ideas in organizations: The power of low-powered incentives. Strategic Management J. 35(3):358–375.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bliese PD (2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SW, eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 349–381.Google Scholar
  • Brinol P, Petty RE, Valle C, Rucker DD, Becerra A (2007) The effects of message recipients’ power before and after persuasion: A self-validation analysis. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 93(6):1040–1053.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burgelman RA (1983) Corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management: Insights from a process study. Management Sci. 29(12):1349–1364.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burgelman RA (1991) Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organ. Sci. 2(3):239–262.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (1998) Regression Analysis of Count Data (Cambridge University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen A (1993) Age and tenure in relation to organizational commitment: A meta-analysis. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. 14(2):143–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collins JC, Porras JI (1994) Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies (Harper Business, New York).Google Scholar
  • Collins JC, Porras JI (2000) Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies, 3rd ed. (Random House Business, London).Google Scholar
  • Cooper RG, Edgett SJ, Kleinschmidt EJ (2004) Benchmarking best NPD practices. Res. Tech. Management 47(1):31–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Criscuolo P, Dahlander L, Grohsjean T (2017) Evaluating novelty: The role of panels in the selection of R & D projects. Acad. Management J. 60(2):433–460.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Croizet J-C, Claire T (1998) Extending the concept of stereotype and threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconimic backgrounds. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 24(6):588–594.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deichmann D, Jensen M (2018) I can do that alone … or not? How idea generators juggle between the pros and cons of teamwork. Strategic Management J. 39:458–475.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deichmann D, Stam D (2015) Leveraging transformational and transactional leadership to cultivate the generation of organization-focused ideas. Leadership Quart. 26:204–219.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deichmann D, Van Den Ende J (2014) Rising from failure and learning from success: The role of past experience in radical initiative taking. Organ. Sci. 25(3):670–690.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Denrell J, Fang C, Levinthal DA (2004) From T-mazes to labyrinths: Learning from model-based feedback. Management Sci. 50(10):1366–1378.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dunham AH, Burt CD (2011) Organizational memory and empowerment. J. Knowledge Management 15(5):851–868.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ethiraj SK, Levinthal D (2009) Hoping for A to Z while rewarding only A: Complex organizations and multiple goals. Organ. Sci. 20(1):4–21.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fast NJ, Chen S (2009) When the boss feels inadequate: Power, incompetence, and aggression. Psych. Sci. 20(11):1406–1413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foss NJ, Lyngsie J, Zahra SA (2013) The role of external knowledge sources and organizational design in the process of opportunity exploitation. Strategic Management J. 34(1):1453–1471.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freiberg K, Freiberg J (2001) Nuts!: Southwest Airlines’ Crazy Recipe for Business and Personal Success. (Pennsylvania State University, Texere).Google Scholar
  • Galinsky AD, Gruenfeld DH, Magee JC (2003) From power to action. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 85(3):453–466.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gary MS, Yang MM, Yetton PW, Sterman JD (2017) Stretch goals and the distribution of organizational performance. Organ. Sci. 28(3):395–410.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • George J, Zhou J (2007) Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Acad. Management J. 50(3):605–622.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilson LL, Shalley CE (2004) A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams’ engagement in creative processes. J. Management 30:453–470.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene WH (2012) Econometric Analysis, 7th ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Guinote A (2007) Power and goal pursuit. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 33(8):1076–1087.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamel G, Prahalad CK (1993) Strategy as stretch and leverage. Harvard Bus. Rev. 71(2):75–84.Google Scholar
  • Hansen MT, Birkinshaw J (2007) The innovation value chain. Harvard Bus. Rev. 85(6):121–130.Google Scholar
  • Hartline MD, Ferrell OC (1996) The management of customer-contact service employees: An empirical investigation. J. Marketing 60(October):52–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harvey JF (2012) Managing organizational memory with intergenerational knowledge transfer. J. Knowlegde Management 16(3):400–417.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heracleous LT, Wirtz J, Johnston R (2004) Cost-effective service excellence: Lessons from Singapore Airlines. Bus. Strategic Rev. 15(1):33–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hollenbeck JR, Klein HJ (1987) Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: Problems, prospects, and proposals for future research. J. Appl. Psych. 72(2):212–220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hu S, Bettis RA (2018) Multiple organization goals with feedback from shared technological task environments. Organ. Sci. 29(5):873–889.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • James LR, Demaree RG, Wolf G (1984) Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. 69:85–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jasmand C, Blazevic V, de Ruyter K (2012) Generating sales while providing service: A study of customer service representatives’ ambidextrous behavior. J. Marketing 76(1):20–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen MC (2001) Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. J. Appl. Corporate Finance 14(3):8–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M, Kim H (2015) The real Oscar curse: The negative consequences of positive status shifts. Organ. Sci. 26(1):1–21.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jordan AH, Audia PG (2012) Self-enhancement and learning from performance feedback. Acad. Management Rev. 37(2):211–231.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karriker JH, Williams ML (2009) Organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior: A mediated multifoci model. J. Management 35(1):112–135.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keith N, Frese M (2008) Effectiveness of error management training: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 93(1):59–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keltner D, Gruenfeld DH, Anderson C (2003) Power, approach, and inhibition. Psych. Rev. 110(2):265.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerr S, Landauer S (2004) Using stretch goals to promote organizational effectiveness and personal growth: General Electric and Goldman Sachs. Acad. Management Executive 18(4):134–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keum DD, See KE (2017) The influence of hierarchy on idea generation and selection in the innovation process. Organ. Sci. 28(4):653–669.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kuvaas B (2006) Work performance, affective commitment,and work motivation: The roles of pay administration and pay level. J. Organ. Behav. 27(3):365–385.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lahaie D (2005) The impact of corporate memory loss: What happens when a senior executive leaves? Leadership Health Services 18(3):35–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence BS, Zyphur MJ (2011) Identifying organizational faultlines with latent class cluster analysis. Organ. Res. Methods 14:32–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee C, Farh JL (2004) Joint effects of group efficacy and gender diversity on group cohesion and performance. J. Appl. Psych. 53(1):136–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewin AY, Massini S, Peeters C (2011) Microfoundations of internal and external absorptive capacity routines. Organ. Sci. 22(1):81–98.Google Scholar
  • Liu A (2002) Efficient estimation of two seemingly unrelated regression equations. J. Multivariate Anal. 82(2):445–456.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke EA, Latham GP (1990) A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Locke EA, Latham GP (2002) Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. Amer. Psych. 57(1):705–717.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke EA, Latham GP (2006) New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 15(1):265–268.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke EA, Latham GP (2009) Has goal setting gone wild, or have its attackers abandoned good scholarship? Acad. Management Perspect. 23(1):17–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke EA, Latham GP, eds. (2013) New Developments in Goal Setting and Task Performance (Routledge, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luttgens D, Pollok P, Antons D, Piller FT (2014) Wisdom of the crowd and capabilities of a few: Internal success factors of crowdsourcing for innovation. J. Bus. Econom. 84(3):339–374.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malhotra A, Majchrzak A, Bonfield W, Myers S (2020) Engaging customer care employees in internal collaborative crowdsourcing: Managing the inherent tensions and associated challenges. Human Resource Management 59:121–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer MW (2002) Rethinking Performance Measurement (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Meyer JP, Allen NJ (1991) A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Rev. 1(1):61–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mezias SJ, Chen YR, Murphy PR (2002) Aspiration-level adaptation in an American financial services organization: A field study. Management Sci. 48(10):1285–1300.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • North MS (2019) A GATE to understanding “older” workers: Generation, age, tenure, experience. Acad. Management Ann. 13(2):414–443.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ng TW, Feldman DC (2010) The relationships of age with job attitudes: A meta‐analysis. Personality Psych. 63(3):677–718.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ordóñez LD, Schweitzer ME, Galinsky AD, Bazerman MH (2009) Goals gone wild: The systematic side effects of overprescribing goal setting. Acad. Management Perspect. 23(1):6–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parker SK, Wall TD, Jackson PR (1997) That’s not my job: Developing flexible employee work orientations. Acad. Management J. 40:899–929.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peeters C, Massini S, Lewin AY (2014) Sources of variation in the efficiency of adopting management innovation: The role of absorptive capacity routines, managerial attention and organizational legitimacy. Organ. Stud. 35(9):1343–1371.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pierce JR, Aguinis H (2013) Detrimental citizenship behaviour: A multilevel framework of antecedents and consequences. Management Organ. Rev. 11(1):69–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pina e Cunha M, Giustiniano L, Rego A, Clegg S (2017) Mission impossible? The paradoxes of stretch goal setting. Management Learn. 48(2):140–157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rapp A, Bachrach DG, Flaherty KE, Hughes DE (2017) The role of the sales-service interface and ambidexterity in the evolving organization: A multilevel research agenda. J. Service Res. 20(1):59–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reitzig M, Sorenson O (2013) Biases in the selection stage of bottom-up strategy formulation. Strategic Management J. 34(7):782–799.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roper S, Du J, Love JH (2008) Modelling the innovation value chain. Res. Policy 37(6-7):961–977.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rousseau DM (1997) Organizational behavior in the new organizational era. Annual Rev. Psych. 48(1):515–546.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Russo B, Zhao J (2010) How the Toyota way went astray. Accessed December 15, 2020, http://autonews.gasgoo.com/interview_commentary/1014306.ht.Google Scholar
  • Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Amer. Psych. 55(1):68–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salter A, Criscuolo P, Ter Wal AL (2014) Coping with open innovation: Responding to the challenges of external engagement in R&D. Calif. Management Rev. 56(2):77–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schneider B, Bowen DE (1993) The service organization: Human resources management is crucial. Org. Dynamics 21(4):39–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott SG, Bruc RA (1994) Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Acad. Management J. 37(3):580–607.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shinkle GA (2012) Organizational aspirations, reference points, and goals: Building on the past and aiming for the future. J. Management 38(1):415–455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sitkin SB (1992) Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 14 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 231–266.Google Scholar
  • Sitkin SB, Miller CC, See KE (2017) The stretch goal paradox. Harvard Bus. Rev. 2017(January-February):92–100.Google Scholar
  • Sitkin SB, See KE, Miller CC, Lawless MW, Carton AM (2011) The paradox of stretch goals: Organizations in pursuit of the seemingly impossible. Acad. Management Rev. 36(3):544–566.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith PK, Trope Y (2006) You focus on the forest when you’re in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90(4):578–596.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steffens NK, Shemla M, Wegge J, Diestel S (2014) Organizational tenure and employee performance: A multilevel analysis. Group Organ. Management 39(6):664–690.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Takeuchi H, Osono E, Shimizu N (2008) The contradictions that drive Toyota’s success. Harvard Bus. Rev. 86(6):96–104.Google Scholar
  • Thompson KR, Hochwarter WA, Mathys NJ (1997) Stretch targets: What makes them effective? Acad. Management Executive 11(3):48–60.Google Scholar
  • Tierney P, Farmer SM (2002) Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1137–1148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tost LP, Gino F, Larrick RP (2013) When power makes others speechless: The negative impact of leader power on team performance. Acad. Management J. 56(5):1465–1486.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vakili K, Kaplan S (2020) Organizing for innovation: A contingency view on innovative team configuration. Strategic Management J., ePub ahead of print December 27, https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3264.Google Scholar
  • Van den Bos K, Lind EA (2002) Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 34(2002):1–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Ende J, Frederiksen L, Prencipe A (2014) The front end of innovation: Organizing search for ideas. J. Product Innovationb Management 32(4):482–487.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Wright TA, Bonett DG (2002) The moderating effects of employee tenure on the relation between organizational commitment and job performance: A metaanalysis. J. Appl. Psych. 87(6):1183–1190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yu T, Patterson PG, de Ruyter K (2013) Achieving service-sales ambidexterity. J. Service Res. 16(1):52–66.Google Scholar
  • Zellner A (1962) An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regression equations and tests for aggregation bias. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 57(298):348–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang Z, Jia M (2013) How can companies decrease the disruptive effects of stretch goals? The moderating role of interpersonal- and informational- justice climates. Human Relations 66(7):993–1020.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.