How Catastrophic Innovation Failure Affects Organizational and Industry Legitimacy: The 2014 Virgin Galactic Test Flight Crash

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1467

References

  • Aldrich HE, Fiol CM (1994) Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Acad. Management Rev. 19(4):645–670.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson P, Tushman ML (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):604–633.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anheier HK, ed. (1999) When things go wrong: Organizational failures and breakdowns (Sage Publications Ltd., Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Anthony C, Nelson AJ, Tripsas M (2016) “Who are you?… I really wanna know”: Product meaning and competitive positioning in the nascent synthesizer industry. Strategy Sci. 1(3):163–183.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ashforth BE, Gibbs BW (1990) The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organ. Sci. 1(2):177–194.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bartel CA, Garud R (2009) The role of narratives in sustaining organizational innovation. Organ. Sci. 20(1):107–117.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baum JA, Dahlin KB (2007) Aspiration performance and railroads’ patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes. Organ. Sci. 18(3):368–385.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boje DM (2001) Narrative Methods for Organizational and Communication Research (Sage Publications Ltd., Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Boje DM (2008) Storytelling Organizations (Sage Publications Ltd., Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Borup M, Brown N, Konrad K, Van Lente H (2006) The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Tech. Anal. Strategic Management 18(3–4):285–298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brewer MB (1991) The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 17(5):475–482.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bundy J, Pfarrer MD (2015) A burden of responsibility: The role of social approval at the onset of a crisis. Acad. Management Rev. 40(3):345–369.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cannon MD, Edmondson AC (2005) Failing to learn and learning to fail (intelligently): How great organizations put failure to work to innovate and improve. Long Range Planning 38(3):299–319.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charmaz K (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Research (Sage Publications Ltd, London).Google Scholar
  • Corbin JM, Strauss A (1990) Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociol. 13(1):3–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • David RJ, Sine WD, Haveman HA (2013) Seizing opportunity in emerging fields: How institutional entrepreneurs legitimated the professional form of management consulting. Organ. Sci. 24(2):356–377.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dowling J, Pfeffer J (1975) Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociol. Rev. 18(1):122–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson AC, McManus SE (2007) Methodological fit in management field research. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1155–1179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM (1989a) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM (1989b) Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. 32(3):543–576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elsbach KD (2003) Organizational perception management. Res. Organ. Behav. 25:297–332.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elsbach KD, Sutton RI, Principe KE (1998) Averting expected challenges through anticipatory impression management: A study of hospital billing. Organ. Sci. 9(1):68–86.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fiss PC, Zajac EJ (2006) The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Acad. Management J. 49(6):1173–1193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gartner WB (2007) Entrepreneurial narrative and a science of the imagination. J. Bus. Venturing 22(5):613–627.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garud R, Schildt HA, Lant TK (2014) Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1479–1492.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gegenhuber T, Naderer S (2019) When the petting zoo spawns into monsters: Open dialogue and a venture’s legitimacy quest in crowdfunding. Innovation 21(1):151–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gillespie N, Dietz G (2009) Trust repair after an organization-level failure. Acad. Management Rev. 34(1):127–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon AB, Douglas Y (2001) When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):476–501.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild PR, Sullivan BN (2002) Learning from complexity: Effects of prior accidents and incidents on airlines’ learning. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(4):609–643.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsu G, Grodal S (2020) The double-edged sword of oppositional category positioning: A study of the US E-cigarette category, 2007–2017. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(1):86–132.Google Scholar
  • Kaplan S, Tripsas M (2008) Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Res. Policy 37(5):790–805.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelley T, Littman J (2001) The Art of Innovation: Lessons in Creativity from IDEO, America’s Leading Design Firm, vol. 10 (Broadway Business).Google Scholar
  • Kennedy MT (2008) Getting counted: Markets, media, and reality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 73(2):270–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kennedy MT, Fiss PC (2013) An ontological turn in categories research: From standards of legitimacy to evidence of actuality. J. Management Stud. 50(6):1138–1154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khaire M, Wadhwani RD (2010) Changing landscapes: The construction of meaning and value in a new market category—Modern Indian art. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1281–1304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khanna R, Guler I, Nerkar A (2015) Fail often, fail big, and fail fast? Learning from small failures and RandD performance in the pharmaceutical industry. Acad. Management J. 59(2):436–459.Google Scholar
  • Lee BH, Hiatt SR, Lounsbury M (2017) Market mediators and the trade-offs of legitimacy-seeking behaviors in a nascent category. Organ. Sci. 28(3):447–470.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry, vol. 75 (Sage, London).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2001) Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management J. 22(6‐7):545–564.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2019) Cultural Entrepreneurship: A New Agenda for the Study of Entrepreneurial Processes and Possibilities (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madsen PM, Desai V (2010) Failing to learn? The effects of failure and success on organizational learning in the global orbital launch vehicle industry. Acad. Management J. 53(3):451–476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mathias BD, Huyghe A, Frid CJ, Galloway TL (2018) An identity perspective on coopetition in the craft beer industry. Strategic Management J. 39(12):3086–3115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath RG (2011) Failing by design. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89(4):76–83.Google Scholar
  • Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Navis C, Glynn MA (2010) How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(3):439–471.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Navis C, Glynn MA (2011) Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: Influence on investor judgments of new venture plausibility. Acad. Management. Rev. 36(3):479–499.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nerkar A, Shane S (2007) Determinants of invention commercialization: An empirical examination of academically sourced inventions. Strategic Management J. 28(11):1155–1166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petriglieri JL (2015) Co-creating relationship repair: Pathways to reconstructing destabilized organizational identification. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(3):518–557.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pettigrew AM (1990) Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organ. Sci. 1(3):267–292.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pratt MG (2009) From the editors: For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Acad. Management J. 52(5):856–862.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ravasi D, Tripsas M, Langley A (2020) Exploring the strategy-identity nexus. Strategic Organ. 18(1):5–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Riessman CK (1993) Qualitative Research Methods, vol. 30. Narrative analysis (Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Rindova VP, Fombrun CJ (2001) Entrepreneurial action in the creation of the specialty coffee niche. Schoonhoven CB, Romanelli E, eds. Entrepreneurship Dynamic (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 236–261.Google Scholar
  • Rosa JA, Porac JF, Runser-Spanjol J, Saxon MS (1999) Sociocognitive dynamics in a product market. J. Marketing 63(4, suppl 1)64–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rousseau DM (1997) Organizational behavior in the new organizational era. Annu. Rev. Psych. 48(1):515–546.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Santos FM, Eisenhardt KM (2009) Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Acad. Management J. 52(4):643–671.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scherer FM, Harhoff D (2000) Technology policy for a world of skew-distributed outcomes. Res. Policy 29(4–5):559–566.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott WR (1977) Effectiveness of organizational effectiveness studies. New Perspectives Organ. Effectiveness 63:95.Google Scholar
  • Siggelkow N (2007) Persuasion with case studies. Acad. Management J. 50(1):20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sitkin SB (1992) Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. Res. Organ. Behav. 14:231–266.Google Scholar
  • Sitkin SB, See KE, Miller CC, Lawless MW, Carton AM (2011) The paradox of stretch goals: Organizations in pursuit of the seemingly impossible. Acad. Management Rev. 36(3):544–566.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sonenshein S (2010) We’re changing—Or are we? Untangling the role of progressive, regressive, and stability narratives during strategic change implementation. Acad. Management J. 53(3):477–512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soublière J-F, Gehman J (2020) The legitimacy threshold revisited: How prior successes and failures spill over to other endeavors on kickstarter. Acad. Management J. 63(2):472–502.Google Scholar
  • Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):571–610.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomke SH (2003) Experimentation Matters: Unlocking the Potential of New Technologies for Innovation (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Tripsas M (2009) Technology, identity, and inertia through the lens of “The Digital Photography Company.” Organ. Sci. 20(2):441–460.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Turner BA (1976) The organizational and interorganizational development of disasters. Admin. Sci. Quart. 21(3):378–397.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turner BA (1978) Man-Made Disasters (Wykeham Publications, London).Google Scholar
  • Turner BA, Pidgeon NF (1997) Man-Made Disasters, 2nd ed. (Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vaughan D (1990) Autonomy, interdependence, and social control: NASA and the space shuttle Challenger. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(2):225–257.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vaughan D (1999) The dark side of organizations: Mistake, misconduct, and disaster. Annual. Rev. Sociol. 25(1):271–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vergne J-P, Wry T (2014) Categorizing categorization research: Review, integration, and future directions. J. Management Stud. 51(1):56–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Warden JA III (2011) Strategy and airpower. Air University Maxwell AFB Al Airpower J. 63–77.Google Scholar
  • Weber K, Heinze KL, DeSoucey M (2008) Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):529–567.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wolfe RM, Sharp LK (2002) Anti-vaccinationists past and present. BMJ 325(7361):430–432.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wry T, Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2011) Legitimating nascent collective identities: Coordinating cultural entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 22(2):449–463.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zahra SA, Nielsen AP (2002) Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization. Strategic Management J. 23(5):377–398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao EY, Ishihara M, Lounsbury M (2013) Overcoming the illegitimacy discount: Cultural entrepreneurship in the US feature film industry. Organ. Stud. 34(12):1747–1776.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao EY, Fisher G, Lounsbury M, Miller D (2017) Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 38(1):93–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao EY, Ishihara M, Jennings PD, Lounsbury M (2018) Optimal distinctiveness in the console video game industry: An exemplar-based model of proto-category evolution. Organ. Sci. 29(4):588–611.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zimmerman MA, Zeitz GJ (2002) Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Acad. Management Rev. 27(3):414–431.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zucker LG (1986) Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840-1920. Res. Organ. Behav. 8:53–111.Google Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW (2016) Optimal distinctiveness revisited: An integrative framework for understanding the balance between differentiation and conformity in individual and organizational identities. Michael GP, Majken S, Blake EA, Davide R, eds. Handbook of Organizational Identity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 183–199.Google Scholar
  • Zuzul T (2019) “Matter battles”: Cognitive representations, boundary objects, and the failure of collaboration in two smart cities. Acad. Management J. 62(3):739–764.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuzul T, Tripsas M (2020) Start-up inertia vs. flexibility: The role of founder identity in a nascent industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):395–433.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.