Ideal or Idiosyncratic? How Women Manage Work-Family Role Conflict with Focal and Peripheral Role Senders

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1472

References

  • Abu-Lughod L (1998) Remaking Women: Feminism and Modernity in the Middle East (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Acker J (1990) Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender Soc. 4(2):139–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agnew C, Van Lange C, Rusbult C, Langston A (1998) Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74:939–954.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anteby M, Chan CK, DiBenigno J (2016) Three lenses on occupations and professions in organizations: Becoming, doing, and relating. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):183–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aron A (2003) Self and Close Relationships. Leary MR, Price Tangney J, eds. Handbook of Self and Identity (Guilford Press, New York), 442–461Google Scholar
  • Ashforth BE (2001) Role Transitions in Organizational Life: An Identity-Based Perspective (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Ashforth BE, Kreiner GE, Fugate M (2000) All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Acad. Management Rev. 25(3):472–491.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashraf N, Bau N, Low C, McGinn K (2020) Negotiating a better future: How interpersonal skills facilitate intergenerational investment. Quart. J. Econom. 135(2):1095–1151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atkinson C, Hall L (2009) The role of gender in varying forms of flexible working. Gender Work Organ. 16(6):650–666.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bailyn L (2016) Breaking the Mold: Women, Men, and Time in the New Corporate World, New Edition (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bakker AB, Ten Brummelhuis LL, Prins JT, Van der Heijden FFMA (2011) Applying the job-demands resources model to the work-home interface: A study among junior doctors and their partners. J. Vocational Behav. 79(1):170–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley SR (1990) The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):61–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bear JB (2019) The caregiving ambition framework. Acad. Management Rev. 44(1):99–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bedeian AG, Burke BG, Moffett RG (1988) Outcomes of work-family conflict among married male and female professionals. J. Management 14(3):475–491.Google Scholar
  • Bell EE, Nkomo S (2001) Our Separate Ways: Black and White Women and the Struggle for Professional Identity (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Benard S, Correll SJ (2010) Normative discrimination and the motherhood penalty. Gender Soc. 24(5):616–646.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benson A (2014) Rethinking the two body problem: The segregation of women into geographically-dispersed occupations. Demography 41(4):1619–1639.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berdahl JL, Moon SH (2013) Workplace mistreatment of middle class workers based on sex, parenthood, and caregiving. J. Soc. Issues 69(2):341–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bittman M, Wajcman J (2000) The rush hour: The character of leisure time and gender equity. Soc. Forces 79(1):165–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blackden CM, Wodon Q (2006) Gender, time use, and poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank Working Paper No. 73, World Bank, Washington, DC.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blair-Loy M (1999) Career patterns of executive women in finance: An optimal matching analysis. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1346–1397.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blair-Loy M (2001) Cultural constructions of family schemas: The case of women finance executives. Gender Soc. 15(5):687–709.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blair-Loy M (2003) Competing Devotions: Career and Family Among Women Executives (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)Google Scholar
  • Booysen LA, Nkomo SM (2010) Gender role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics: The case of South Africa. Gender Management 25(4):285–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowles HR (2012) Claiming authority: How women explain their ascent to top business leadership positions. Res. Organ. Behav. 32:1–25.Google Scholar
  • Bowles HR, McGinn KL (2008) Gender in job negotiations: A two‐level game. Negotiation J. 24(4):393–410.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brehm JW (1966) A Theory of Psychological Reactance (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Brewer MB, Gardner W (1996) Who is this” We”? Levels of collective identity and self-representations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 71(1):83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brines J (1994) Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. Amer. J. Sociol. 100(3):652–688.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burke PJ, Reitzes DC (1991) An identity theory approach to commitment. Soc. Psych. Quart. 54(3):239–251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bursztyn L, González AL, Yanagizawa-Drott D (2018) Misperceived social norms: Female labor force participation in Saudi Arabia. (No. w24736). NBER Working Paper No. 24736, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Byrne A, Barling J (2017) When she brings home the job status: Wives’ job status, status leakage, and marital instability. Organ. Sci. 28(2):177–192.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Callero PL (1985) Role-identity salience. Soc. Psych. Quart. 48(3):203–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carr D (1996) Two paths to self-employment? Women’s and men’s self-employment in the United States, 1980. Work Occupations 23(1):26–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carrim NMH, Nkomo SM (2016) Wedding intersectionality theory and identity work in organizations: South African Indian women negotiating managerial identity. Gender Work Organ. 23(3).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charmaz K (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Chen YR, Leung K, Chen CC (2009) Bringing national culture to the table: Making a difference with cross-cultural differences and perspectives. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):217–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cinamon RG, Rich Y (2002) Gender differences in the importance of work and family roles. Sex Roles 47:531–541.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collins C (2019) Making Motherhood Work: How Women Manage Careers and Caregiving (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Correll SJ, Benard S, Paik I (2007) Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? Amer. J. Sociol. 112(5):1297–1338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dahl MS, Dezső CL, Ross DG (2012) Fatherhood and managerial style: How a male CEO’s children affect the wages of his employees. Admin. Sci. Quart 57(4):669–693.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Desai SD, Chugh D, Brief AP (2014) The implications of marriage structure for men’s workplace attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors toward women. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(2):330–365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drigotas SM, Rusbult CE, Wieselquist J, Whitton SW (1999) Close partner as sculptor of the ideal self: Behavioral affirmation and the Michelangelo phenomenon. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 77:293–323.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dumas TL, Stanko TL (2017) Married with children: How family role identification shapes leadership behaviors at work. Personsonnel Psych. 70(3):597–633.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duxbury LE, Higgins CA (1991) Gender differences in work-family conflict. J. Appl. Psych. 76(1):60–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eagly AH, Carli LL (2007) Through the Labyrinth: The Truth About How Women Become Leaders (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Edmondson AC, McManus SE (2007) Methodological fit in management field research. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1246–1264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elman MR, Gilbert LA (1984) Coping strategies for role conflict in married professional women with children. Family Relations 33(2):317–327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ely RJ, Stone P, Ammerman C (2014) Rethink what you “know” about high-achieving women. Harvard Bus. Rev. 92(12):100–109.Google Scholar
  • Emslie C, Hunt K (2009) ‘Live to work’ or ’work to live’? A qualitative study of gender and work–life balance among men and women in mid‐life. Gender Work Organ. 16(1):151–172.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feeney BC, Van Vleet M, Jakubiak BK, Tomlinson JM (2017) Predicting the pursuit and support of challenging life opportunities. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 43(8):1171–1187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman DC, Ng TW (2007) Careers: Mobility, embeddedness, and success. J. Management 33(3):350–377.Google Scholar
  • Ferrant G, Pesando LM, Nowacka K (2014) Unpaid care work: The missing link in the analysis of gender gaps in labour outcomes. Accessed October 12, 2017, www.oecd.org/dev/developmentgender/unpaid_care_work.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Folke O, Rickne J (2020) All the single ladies: Job promotions and the durability of marriage. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 12(1):260–287.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedman SD, Greenhaus JH (2000) Work and Family–Allies or Enemies?: What Happens When Business Professionals Confront Life Choices (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frye J (2016) The missing conversation about work and family: Unique challenges facing women of color. Report, Center for American Progress, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Gerson K (2004) Understanding work and family through a gender lens. Community Work Family 7(2):163–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gerson K (2010) The Unfinished Revolution: How a New Generation is Reshaping Family, Work, and Gender in America (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Gilbert LA, Holahan CK, Manning L (1981) Coping with conflict between professional and maternal roles. Family Relations 30(3):419–426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames, UK).Google Scholar
  • Glynn (2019) Breadwinning mothers continue to be the U.S. norm. Report, Center for American Progress, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Goffman E (1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
  • Goldin C (2014) A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(4):1091–1119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant AM (2007) Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):393–417.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant-Vallone EJ, Ensher EA (2010) Opting in between: Strategies used by professional women with children to balance work and family. J. Career Development 38(4):331–348.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenberg D, Ladge JJ (2019) Maternal Optimism: Forging Positive Paths Through Work and Motherhood (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenhaus JH, Beutell NJ (1985) Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Acad. Management Rev. 10(1):76–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenstein TN (1996) Husbands’ participation in domestic labor: Interactive effects of wives’ and husbands’ gender ideologies. J. Marriage Fam. 58(3):585–595.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Groysberg B (2010) Chasing Stars: The Myth of Talent and the Portability of Performance (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall DT (1972) A model of coping with role conflict: The role behavior of college educated women. Admin. Sci. Quart. 17(4):471–486.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall FS, Hall DT (1979) The Two Career Couple (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
  • Hays S (1996) The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  • Heaphy ED, Locke K, Booth B (2016) Embodied relational competence: Attending the body in the boundary-spanning work of patient advocates. Elsbach K, Bechky B, eds. Qualitative Organizational Research: Best Papers from the Davis Conference on Qualitative Research, vol. 3 (Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC), 161–197.Google Scholar
  • Heilman ME, Chen JJ (2003) Entrepreneurship as a solution: the allure of self-employment for women and minorities. Human Resource Management Rev. 13(2):347–364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A (2010) Most people are not WEIRD. Nature 466(7302):29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hertz R (1999) Working to place family at the center of life: Dual-earner and single-parent strategies. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 562:16–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hill E, Märtinson V, Ferris M (2004) New-concept part-time employment as a work-family adaptive strategy for women professionals with small children. Fam. Relat. 53(3):282–292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinde RA (1997) Relationships: A Dialectical Perspective (Psychology Press, London).Google Scholar
  • Hochschild AR (1989) The Second Shift (Penguin Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Hornung S, Rousseau DM (2008) Creating flexible work arrangements through idiosyncratic deals. J. Appl. Psych. 93(3):655–664.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • ILO (2016) Addressing gender gaps in Africa’s labour market. Accessed October 12, 2017, http://www.ilo.org/addisababa/media-centre/pr/WCMS_458102/lang–en/index.htm.Google Scholar
  • Kahn RL, Wolfe DM, Quinn RP, Snoek JD, Rosenthal RA (1964) Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Kelly EL, Ammons SK, Chermack K, Moen P (2010) Gendered challenge, gendered response: Confronting the ideal worker norm in a white-collar organization. Gender Soc. 24(3):281–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kmec JA (2011) Are motherhood penalties and fatherhood bonuses warranted? Comparing pro-work behaviors and conditions of mothers, fathers, and non-parents. Soc. Sci. Res. 40(2):444–459.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kossek E, Ozeki C (1998) Work–family conflict, policies, and the job–life satisfaction relationship: A review and directions for organizational behavior–human resources research. J. Appl. Psych. 83(2):139–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kray LJ, Thompson L, Galinsky A (2001) Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 80(6):942–958.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kroska A (2004) Divisions of domestic work: Revising and expanding the theoretical explanations. J. Family Issues 25(7):890–922.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ladge JJ, Clair JA, Greenberg D (2012) Cross-domain identity transition during liminal periods: Constructing multiple selves as professional and mother during pregnancy. Acad. Management J. 55(6):1449–1471.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ladge JJ, Humberd BK, Eddleston KA (2018) Retaining professionally employed new mothers: The importance of maternal confidence and workplace support to their intent to stay. Human Resource Management 57(4):883–900.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Landivar LC (2014) Opting out, scaling back, or business‐as‐usual? An occupational assessment of women’s employment. Sociol. Forum 29(1):189–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Livingston BA (2014) Bargaining behind the scenes: Spousal negotiation, labor, and work-family burnout. J. Management 40(4):949–977.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lovejoy M, Stone P (2012) Opting back in: The influence of time at home on professional women’s career redirection after opting out. Gender Work Organ. 19(6):631–653.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madsen SR, Scribner RT (2017) A perspective on gender in management: The need for strategic cross-cultural scholarship on women in management and leadership. Cross Cultural Strategic Management 24(2):231–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mainiero LA, Sullivan SE (2005) Kaleidoscope careers: An alternate explanation for the “opt-out” revolution. Acad. Management Perspect. 19(1):106–123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin J (1990) Deconstructing organizational taboos: The suppression of gender conflict in organizations. Organ. Sci. 1(4):339–359.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mescher S, Benschop Y, Doorewaard H (2010) Representations of work-life balance support. Human Relations 63(1):21–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Metcalfe B (2007) Gender and human resource management in the Middle East. Internat. J. Human Resource Management 18(1):54–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miles MB, Huberman AM (1984) Qualitative Data Analysis (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Moen P, Sweet S (2003) Time clocks: Work-hour strategies. Moen P, ed. It’s About Time: Career Strains, Strategies and Successes (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY), 17–34.Google Scholar
  • Moen P, Yu Y (2000) Effective work/life strategies: Working couples, work conditions, gender, and life quality. Soc. Problems 47(3):291–326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moghadam VM (2005) Globalizing Women: Transnational Feminist Networks (JHU Press, Baltimore).Google Scholar
  • Nadel SF (1957) A Theory of Social Structure (Cohen and West, London).Google Scholar
  • Nadeem S, Metcalf H (2007) Work–Life Policies in Great Britain: What Works, Where and How? Employment Relations Research Series No. 77 (Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, London).Google Scholar
  • Neeley TB (2013) Language matters: Status loss and achieved status distinctions in global organizations. Organ. Sci. 24(2):476–497.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nippert-Eng C (1996) Calendars and keys: The classification of “home” and “work.” Sociol. Forum 11(3):563–582.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Offenhauer P (2005) Women in Islamic societies: A selected review of social scientific literature. Report, Federal Research Division, Library of Congress, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Perlow LA, Kelly EL (2014) Toward a model of work redesign for better work and better life. Work Occupations 41(1):111–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petriglieri J (2019) Couples That Work: How Dual-Career Couples Can Thrive in Love and Work (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Petriglieri JL, Obodaru O (2018) Secure-base relationships as drivers of professional identity development in dual-career couples. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(3):694–736.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pixley JE (2009) Career prioritizing in dual-earner couples. Mousli B, RoustangStoller E-A, eds. Women, Feminism, and Femininity in the 21st Century: American and French Perspectives (Palgrave Macmillan, New York), 79–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pixley JE, Moen P (2003) Prioritizing careers. Moen P, ed. It’s About Time: Couples and Careers (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY), 183–202.Google Scholar
  • Polk DM (2008) Intersecting work and family: The influence of relational beliefs and behaviors on work–family integration. J. Management Organ. 14(4):345–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell GN, Greenhaus JH (2010) Sex, gender, and decisions at the family→ work interface. J. Management 36(4):1011–1039.Google Scholar
  • Pyke KD (1996) Class-based masculinities: The interdependence of gender, class, and interpersonal power. Gender Soc. 10(5):527–549.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reid E (2015) Embracing, passing, revealing, and the ideal worker image: How people navigate expected and experienced professional identities. Organ. Sci. 26(4):997–1017.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ridgeway CL (2011) Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Risman BJ (2018) Where the Millennials Will Take Us: A New Generation Wrestles with the Gender Structure (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothbard NP, Ollier-Malaterre A (2017) Boundary management. Allen TD, Eby LT, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Work and Family (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 109–124.Google Scholar
  • Rothbard NP, Phillips KW, Dumas TL (2005) Managing multiple roles: Work-family policies and individuals’ desires for segmentation. Organ. Sci. 16(3):243–258.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rousseau DM (2001) The idiosyncratic deal: Flexibility vs. fairness? Organ. Dyn. 29(4):260–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rousseau DM (2005) I-Deals, Idiosyncratic Deals Employees Bargain for Themselves (M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY)Google Scholar
  • Rousseau DM, Ho VT, Greenberg J (2006) I-deals: Idiosyncratic terms in employment relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 31(4):977–994.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rudman LA, Glick P (2001) Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):743–762.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sandberg S (2013) Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
  • Scarborough WJ, Sin R, Risman, B (2019) Attitudes and the stalled gender revolution: Egalitarianism, traditionalism, and ambivalence from 1977 through 2016. Gender Soc. 33(2):173–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sewell WH (1992) A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(1):1–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sluss DM, Ashforth BE (2007) Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 32(1):9–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sluss DM, Ployhart RE, Cobb MG, Ashforth BE (2012) Generalizing newcomers’ relational and organizational identifications: Processes and prototypicality. Acad. Management J. 55(4):949–975.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sonbol AEA (2003) Women of Jordan: Islam, Labor, and the Law (Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY).Google Scholar
  • Spain D, Bianchi S (1996) Balancing Act: Motherhood, Marriage, and Employment Among American Women (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
  • Spradley JP (1979) The Ethnographic Interview (Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont).Google Scholar
  • Stone P (2007) Opting Out?: Why Women Really Quit Careers and Head Home (University of California Press, Oakland).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stone P, Lovejoy M (2004) Fast-track women and the “choice” to stay home. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 596(1):62–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stone P, Lovejoy M (2019) Opting Back In: What Really Happens When Mothers Go Back to Work (University of California Press, Oakland).Google Scholar
  • Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research: Procedures and techniques for developing grounded theory, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Stryker S, Burke PJ (2000) The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Soc. Psych. Quart. 63:284–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stryker S, Statham A (1985) Symbolic interation and role theory. Lindsey G, Aronson E, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 1, 3rd ed. (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
  • Sturm S (2001) Second generation employment discrimination: A structural approach. Columbia Law Rev. 101:458–568.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teasdale N (2013) Fragmented sisters? The implications of flexible working policies for professional women’s workplace relationships. Gender Work Organ. 20(4):397–412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teasdale S, McKay S, Phillimore J, Teasdale N (2011) Exploring gender and social entrepreneurship: women's leadership, employment and participation in the third sector and social enterprises. Voluntary Sector Rev. 2(1):7–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ten Brummelhuis LL, Oosterwaal A, Bakker AB (2012) Dealing with family demands in teams: The role of social support at work. Group Organ. Management 7:376–403.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas DA, Gabarro JJ (1999) Breaking Through: The Making of Minority Executives in Corporate America (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Tichenor V (2005) Maintaining men’s dominance: Negotiating identity and power when she earns more. Sex Roles 53(3-4):191–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turco CJ (2010) Cultural foundations of tokenism: Evidence from the leveraged buyout industry. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(6):894–913.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wharton AS, Chivers S, Blair-Loy M (2008) Use of formal and informal work–family policies on the digital assembly line. Work Occupations 35(3):327–350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams J (2001) Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do About It (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Williams JC, Berdahl JL, Vandello JA (2016) Beyond work-life “integration.” Annual Rev. Psych. 67:515–539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams JC, Blair‐Loy M, Berdahl JL (2013) Cultural schemas, social class, and the flexibility stigma. J. Soc. Issues 69(2):209–234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wong JS (2017) Competing desires: How young adult couples negotiate moving for career opportunities. Gender Soc. 31(2):171–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • World Bank (2018) Labor force participation rate, female (% of female population ages 15+) (modeled ILO estimate). Accessed at https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.TLF.CACT.FE.Zs.Google Scholar
  • Young M, Schieman S (2018) Scaling back and finding flexibility: Gender differences in parents’ strategies to manage work–family conflict. J. Marriage Family 80(1):99–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zink T, Regan S, Jacobson CJ Jr, Pabst S (2003) Cohort, period, and aging effects: A qualitative study of older women’s reasons for remaining in abusive relationships. Violence Against Women 9(12):1429–1441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.