The Paradox of Awards: How Status Ripples Affect Who Benefits from CEO Awards

References

• Adams RB, Almeida H, Ferreira D (2005) Powerful CEOs and their impact on corporate performance. Rev. Financial Stud. 18(4):1403–1432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adut A (2005) A theory of scandal: Victorians, homosexuality, and the fall of Oscar Wilde. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(1):213–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ammann M, Horsch P, Oesch D (2016) Competing with superstars. Management Sci. 62(10):2842–2858.Link, Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bebchuk LA, Cohen A, Ferrell A (2009) What matters in corporate governance? Rev. Financial Stud. 22(2):783–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bednar MK (2012) Watchdog or lapdog? A behavioral view of the media as a corporate governance mechanism. Acad. Management J. 55(1):131–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellemare MF, Masaki T, Pepinsky TB (2017) Lagged explanatory variables and the estimation of causal effect. J. Politics 79(3):949–963.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belliveau MA, O’Reilly CA III, Wade JB (1996) Social capital at the top: Effects of social similarity and status on CEO compensation. Acad. Management J. 39(6):1568–1593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boivie S, Graffin SD, Pollock TG (2012) Time for me to fly: Predicting director exit at large firms. Acad. Management J. 55(6):1334–1359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boivie S, Bednar MK, Aguilera RV, Andrus JL (2016) Are boards designed to fail? The implausibility of effective board monitoring. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):319–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borjas GJ, Doran KB (2015) Prizes and productivity how winning the fields medal affects scientific output. J. Human Resources 50(3):728–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bothner MS, Kim Y-K, Smith EB (2012) How does status affect performance? Status as an asset vs. status as a liability in the PGA and NASCAR. Organ. Sci. 23(2):416–433.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown SJ, Warner JB (1985) Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. J. Financial Econom. 14(1):3–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byrne JA, Symonds WC, Siler JF (1991) CEO disease: Egotism can breed corporate disaster and the malady is spreading. Business Week (April 1), 52–60.Google Scholar
• Carpenter MA, Westphal JD (2001) The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Acad. Management J. 44(4):639–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler D, Haunschild PR, Rhee M, Beckman CM (2013) The effects of firm reputation and status on interorganizational network structure. Strategic Organ. 11(3):217–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen T, Harford J, Lin C (2015) Do analysts matter for governance? Evidence from natural experiments. J. Financial. Econ. 115(2):383–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Core JE, Guay W, Larcker DF (2008) The power of the pen and executive compensation. J. Financial Econ. 88(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dehejia RH, Wahba S (2002) Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Rev. Econom. Statist. 84(1):151–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Jong P, Goel L (2016) The influence of security analysts on CEO pay cuts. Internat. J. Disclosure Governance 13:26–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewan Y, Jensen M (2020) Catching the big fish: The role of scandals in making status a liability. Acad. Management J. 63(5):1652–1678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyck A, Zingales L (2002) The corporate governance role of the media. The Role of Mass Media in Economic Development (World Bank Institute, Washington, DC), 107–137.Google Scholar
• Dyck A, Volchkova N, Zingales L (2008) The corporate governance role of the media: Evidence from Russia. J. Finance 63(3):1093–1135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fahlenbrach R, Low A, Stulz RM (2010a) The dark side of outside directors: Do they quit when they are most needed? NBER Working Paper No. w15917, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Fahlenbrach R, Low A, Stulz RM (2010b) Why do firms appoint CEOs as outside directors? J. Financial Econom. 97(1):12–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fich EM, Shivdasani A (2007) Financial fraud, director reputation, and shareholder wealth. J. Financial Econom. 86(2):306–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fombrun CJ (1996) Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Frank RH, Cook PJ (1995) The Winner-Take-It-All Society: Why Few at the Top Get So Much More Than the Rest of Us (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Frey BS (2006) Giving and receiving awards. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 1(4):377–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallus J, Frey BS (2017) Awards as strategic signals. J. Management Inquiry 26(1):76–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geletkanycz MA, Boyd BK (2011) CEO outside directorships and firm performance: A reconciliation of agency and embeddedness views. Acad. Management J. 54(2):335–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geletkanycz MA, Hambrick DC (1997) The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):654–681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geletkanycz MA, Boyd BK, Finkelstein S (2001) The strategic value of CEO external directorate networks: Implications for CEO compensation. Strategic Management J. 22(9):889–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gomez-Mejia LR, Tosi H, Hinkin T (1987) Managerial control, performance, and executive compensation. Acad. Management J. 30(1):51–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gould RV (2002) The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(5):1143–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graffin SD, Pfarrer MD, Hill MW (2012) Untangling executive reputation and corporate reputation: Who made who? Barnett ML, Pollock TG, eds. Oxford Handbook of Corporate Reputation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 221–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graffin SD, Wade JB, Porac JF, McNamee RC (2008) The impact of CEO status diffusion on the economic outcomes of other senior managers. Organ. Sci. 19(3):457–474.Link, Google Scholar
• Greene G (2011) Econometric Analysis, 7th ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Han JH, Pollock T (2021) The two towers (or somewhere in between): The behavioral consequences of positional inconsistency across status hierarchies. Acad. Management J. 64(1):86–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Manage. Rev. 9:193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Finkelstein S (1987) Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Res. Organ. Behav. 9(2):369–406.Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Finkelstein S (1995) The effects of ownership structure on conditions at the top: The case of CEO pay raises. Strategic Management J. 16(3):175–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayward ML, Rindova VP, Pollock TG (2004) Believing one’s own press: The causes and consequences of CEO celebrity. Strateg. Manage. J. 25(7):637–653.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hubbard TD, Pollock TG, Pfarrer MD, Rindova VP (2018) Safe bets or hot hands? How status and celebrity influence strategic alliance formations by newly public firms. Acad. Management J. 61(5):1976–1999.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M (2003) The role of network resources in market entry: commercial banks’ entry into investment banking 1991–1997. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(3):466–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M (2006) Should we stay or should we go? Accountability, status anxiety, and client defections. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(1):97–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M (2008) The use of relational discrimination to manage market entry: When do status and structural holes work against you? Acad. Management J. 51(4):723–743.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Roy A (2008) Staging exchange partner choices: When do status and reputation matter? Acad. Management J. 51(3):495–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Kim H (2015) The real Oscar curse: The negative consequences of positive status shifts. Organ. Sci. 26(1):1–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Wang P (2018) Not in the same boat: How status inconsistency affects research performance in business schools. Acad. Management J. 61(3):1021–1049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Kim BK, Kim H (2011) The importance of status in markets: A market identity perspective. Pearce JL, ed. Status in Management and Organizations (Cambridge University Press, New York), 87–117.Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Kim H, Kim BK (2012) Meeting expectations: A role-theoretic perspective on reputation. Barnett ML, Pollock TG, eds. Oxford Handbook of Corporate Reputation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 140–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jonsson S, Greve HR, Fujiwara-Greve T (2009) Undeserved loss: The spread of legitimacy loss to innocent organizations in response to reported corporate deviance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(2):195–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge WQ, Zeithaml CP (1992) Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on board involvement in the strategic decision process. Acad. Manage. J. 35(4):766–794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kang E, Kroll M (2013) Deciding who will rule: examining the influence of outside noncore directors on executive entrenchment. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1662–1683.Link, Google Scholar
• Kaplan SN, Reishus D (1990) Outside directorships and corporate performance. J. Financial Econom. 27(2):389–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khurana R (2002) The curse of the superstar CEO. Harvard Bus. Rev. 80(9):60–66.Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Sharkey AJ (2014) The paradox of publicity: How awards can negatively affect the evaluation of quality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu B, McConnell JJ (2013) The role of the media in corporate governance: Do the media influence managers’ capital allocation decisions? J. Financial Econom. 110(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovelace JB, Bundy J, Hambrick DC, Pollock TG (2018) The shackles of CEO celebrity: Sociocognitive and behavioral role constraints on “star” leaders. Acad. Management J. 43(3):419–444.Google Scholar
• Malmendier U, Tate G (2009) Superstar CEOs. Quart. J. Econom. 124(4):1593–1638.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McNichols M, O’Brien PC (1997) Self-selection and analyst coverage. J. Accounting Res. 35:167–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mize TD (2019) Best practices for estimating, interpreting, and presenting nonlinear interaction effects. Sociol. Sci. 6:81–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker O, Krause R, Devers CE (2019) How firm reputation shapes managerial discretion. Acad. Management Rev. 44(2):254–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paruchuri S, Pollock TG, Kumar N (2019) On the tip of the brain: Understanding when negative reputational events can have positive reputation spillovers, and for how long. Strategic Management J. 40(12):1965–1983.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (1993) A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(4):829–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (1994) Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):458–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (2005) Status Signals (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Reschke BP, Azoulay P, Stuart TE (2018) Status spillovers: The effect of status-conferring prizes on the allocation of attention. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):819–847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts MR, Whited TM (2013) Endogeneity in empirical corporate finance. Constantinides GM, Harris M, Stulz RM, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Finance (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 493–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossman G, Schilke O (2014) Close, but no cigar the bimodal rewards to prize-seeking. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(1):86–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salancik GR, Pfeffer J (1974) The bases and use of power in organizational decision making: The case of a university. Admin. Sci. Quart. 19(4):453–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi W, Zhang Y, Hoskisson RE (2017) Ripple effects of CEO awards: Investigating the acquisition activities of superstar CEOs’ competitors. Strategic Management J. 38(10):2080–2102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shin T, You J (2017) Pay for talk: How the use of shareholder‐value language affects CEO compensation. J. Management Stud. 54(1):88–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stern I, Dukerich JM, Zajac E (2014) Unmixed signals: How reputation and status affect alliance formation. Strategic Management J. 35(4):512–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vergne JP, Wernicke G, Brenner S (2018) Signal incongruence and its consequences: A study of media disapproval and CEO overcompensation. Organ. Sci. 29(5):796–817.Link, Google Scholar
• Wade JB, Porac JF, Pollock TG, Graffin SD (2006) The burden of celebrity: The impact of CEO certification contests on CEO pay and performance. Acad. Management J. 49(4):643–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang P, Jensen M (2019) A bridge too far: Divestiture as a strategic reaction to status inconsistency. Management Sci. 65(2):859–878.Link, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Deephouse DL (2011) Avoiding bad press: Interpersonal influence in relations between CEOs and journalists and the consequences for press reporting about firms and their leadership. Organ. Sci. 22(4):1061–1086.Link, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (1993) Substance and symbolism in CEOs’ long-term incentive plans. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):367–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Park SH, McDonald ML, Hayward ML (2012) Helping other CEOs avoid bad press: Social exchange and impression management support among CEOs in communications with journalists. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(2):217–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiesenfeld BM, Wurthmann KA, Hambrick DC (2008) The stigmatization and devaluation of elites associated with corporate failures: A process model. Acad. Management Rev. 33(1):231–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood JV (1989) Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psych. Bull. 106(2):231–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge M (2009) An Introduction to Multiagent Systems (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Wright P, Ferris SP, Sarin A, Awasthi V (1996) Impact of corporate insider, blockholder, and institutional equity ownership on firm risk taking. Acad. Management J. 39(2):441–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra SA, Pearce JA (1989) Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. J. Management 15(2):291–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajac EJ, Westphal JD (1994) The costs and benefits of managerial incentives and monitoring in large US corporations: When is more not better? Strategic Management J. 15:121–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu DH, Westphal JD (2014) How directors’ prior experience with other demographically similar CEOs affects their appointments onto corporate boards and the consequences for CEO compensation. Acad. Management J. 57(3):791–813.Crossref, Google Scholar