Is Political Skill Always Beneficial? Why and When Politically Skilled Employees Become Targets of Coworker Social Undermining

References

• Anderson C, Kilduff GJ (2009) The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 18(5):295–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Willer R (2014) Do status hierarchies benefit groups? A bounded functionalist account of status. Cheng J, Tracy J, Anderson C, eds. The Psychology of Social Status (Springer, New York), 47–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Ames DR, Gosling SD (2008) Punishing hubris: The perils of overestimating one’s status in a group. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 34(1):90–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baer M, Frank EL, Matta FK, Luciano MM, Wellman N (2021) Under trusted, over trusted, or just right? The fairness of (in)congruence between trust wanted and trust received. Acad. Management J. 64(1):180–206.Google Scholar
• Baldwin MW (1992) Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psych. Bull. 112(3):461–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendersky C, Hays NA (2012) Status conflict in groups. Organ. Sci. 23(2):323–340.Link, Google Scholar
• Bendersky C, Pai J (2018) Status dynamics. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 5(1):183–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bing MN, Davison HK, Minor I, Novicevic MM, Frink DD (2011) The prediction of task and contextual performance by political skill: A meta-analysis and moderator test. J. Vocational Behav. 79(2):563–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blader SL, Chen Y-R (2011) What influences how higher-status people respond to lower-status others? Effects of procedural fairness, outcome favorability, and concerns about status. Organ. Sci. 22(4):1040–1060.Link, Google Scholar
• Blass FR, Ferris GR (2007) Leader reputation: The role of mentoring, political skill, contextual learning, and adaptation. Human Resources Management 46(1):5–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buchanan D, Badham R (2008) Power, Politics, and Organizational Change: Winning the Turf Game (Sage, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? Perspect. Psych. Sci. 6(1):3–5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castille C, Crawford W, Simmering M (2017) You gotta keep ‘em separated: The efficacy of proximal remedies for method variance. Paper presented at the Southern Management Association Conference, St. Petersburg, FL.Google Scholar
• Cheng JT, Tracy JL (2014) Toward a unified science of hierarchy: Dominance and prestige are two fundamental pathways to human social rank. Cheng J, Tracy J, Anderson C, eds. The Psychology of Social Status (Springer, New York), 3–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng JT, Tracy JL, Foulsham T, Kingstone A, Henrich J (2013) Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 104(1):103–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiaburu DS, Harrison DA (2008) Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. J. Appl. Psych. 93(5):1082–1103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Converse BA, Reinhard DA (2016) On rivalry and goal pursuit: Shared competitive history, legacy concerns, and strategy selection. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 110(2):191–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cullen KL, Fan J, Liu C (2014) Employee popularity mediates the relationship between political skill and workplace interpersonal mistreatment. J. Management 40(6):1760–1778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffy MK, Ganster DC, Pagon M (2002) Social undermining in the workplace. Acad. Management J. 45(2):331–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffy MK, Scott KL, Shaw JD, Tepper BJ, Aquino K (2012) A social context model of envy and social undermining. Acad. Management J. 55(3):643–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Lambert LS (2007) Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psych. Methods 12(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G (2009) Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods 41(4):1149–1160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferris GR, Perrewe PL, Douglas C (2002) Social effectiveness in organizations: Construct validity and research directions. J. Leadership Organ. Stud. 9(1):49–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferris GR, Treadway DC, Brouer RL, Munyon TP (2012) Political skill in the organizational sciences. Ferris GR, Treadway DC, eds. Politics in Organizations: Theory and Research Considerations (Routledge, London), 487–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferris GR, Treadway DC, Perrewé PL, Brouer RL, Douglas C, Lux S (2007) Political skill in organizations. J. Management 33(3):290–320.Google Scholar
• Ferris GR, Treadway DC, Kolodinsky RW, Hochwarter WA, Kacmar CJ, Douglas C, Frink DD (2005) Development and validation of the political skill inventory. J. Management 31(1):126–152.Google Scholar
• Fournier MA, Moskowitz D, Zuroff DC (2002) Social rank strategies in hierarchical relationships. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83(2):425–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frieder RE, Ferris GR, Perrewé PL, Wihler A, Brooks CD (2019) Extending the metatheoretical framework of social/political influence to leadership: Political skill effects on situational appraisals, responses, and evaluations by others. Personnel Psych. 72(4):543–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gervais WM, Jewell JA, Najle MB, Ng BK (2015) A powerful nudge? Presenting calculable consequences of underpowered research shifts incentives toward adequately powered designs. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 6(7):847–854.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert P (1989) Human Nature and Suffering (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Gilbert P (1992) Depression: The Evolution of Powerlessness (Guilford, New York).Google Scholar
• Gilbert P (1997) The evolution of social attractiveness and its role in shame, humiliation, guilt and therapy. British J. Medical Psych. 70(2):113–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert P (2000) Internal ‘social’ conflict and the role of inner warmth and compassion in cognitive therapy. Gilbert P, Bailey KG, eds. Genes on the Couch: Explorations in Evolutionary Psychotherapy (Brunner-Routledge, London), 118–150.Google Scholar
• Gilbert P (2003) Evolution, social roles, and the differences in shame and guilt. Soc. Res. 70(4):1205–1230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert P, Basran J (2019) The evolution of prosocial and antisocial competitive behavior and the emergence of prosocial and antisocial leadership styles. Frontiers Psych. 10:610–629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert P, Price J, Allan S (1995) Social comparison, social attractiveness and evolution: How might they be related? New Ideas Psych. 13(2):149–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant A (2014) The dark side of emotional intelligence. The Atlantic (January 2), https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/01/the-dark-side-of-emotional-intelligence/282720/.Google Scholar
• Grant A, Parker SK (2009) Redesigning work design theories: The rise of relational and proactive perspectives. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):317–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenbaum RL, Mawritz MB, Eissa G (2012) Bottom-line mentality as an antecedent of social undermining and the moderating roles of core self-evaluations and conscientiousness. J. Appl. Psych. 97(2):343–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hafer CL, Olson JM (2003) An analysis of empirical research on the scope of justice. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 7(4):311–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris KJ, Kacmar KM, Zivnuska S, Shaw JD (2007) The impact of political skill on impression management effectiveness. J. Appl. Psych. 92(1):278–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawker D, Boulton M (2001) Subtypes of peer harassment and their correlates. Juvonen J, Graham S, eds. Peer Harassment in School: The Plight of the Vulnerable and the Victimized (Guilford, New York), 378–397.Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to Mediation: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford, New York).Google Scholar
• Hays NA, Bendersky C (2015) Not all inequality is created equal: Effects of status vs. power hierarchies on competition for upward mobility. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 108(6):867–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogan J, Hogan R (2001) Leadership and sociopolitical intelligence. Riggio RE, Murphy SE, Pirozzolo FJ, eds. Multiple Intelligences and Leadership (Psychology Press, New York), 90–103.Google Scholar
• Kakkar H, Sivanathan N, Pettit NC (2019) The impact of dynamic status changes within competitive rank-ordered hierarchies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(46):23011–23020.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeves GD, Westphal JD, McDonald ML (2017) Those closest wield the sharpest knife: How ingratiation leads to resentment and social undermining of the CEO. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(3):484–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly AC, Zuroff DC, Leybman MJ, Martin A (2011) Leaders’ and followers’ social rank styles interact to predict group performance. Soc. Behav. Personality 39(7):963–977.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff GJ (2014) Driven to win: Rivalry, motivation, and performance. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 5(8):944–952.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff GJ, Galinsky AD (2017) The spark that ignites: Mere exposure to rivals increases Machiavellianism and unethical behavior. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 69:156–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff M, Chiaburu DS, Menges JI (2010b) Strategic use of emotional intelligence in organizational settings: Exploring the dark side. Res. Organ. Behav. 30:129–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff GJ, Elfenbein HA, Staw BM (2010a) The psychology of rivalry: A relationally dependent analysis of competition. Acad. Management J. 53(5):943–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff GJ, Galinsky AD, Gallo E, Reade JJ (2016) Whatever it takes to win: Rivalry increases unethical behavior. Acad. Management J. 59(5):1508–1534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kisamore JL, Jawahar I, Liguori EW, Mharapara TL, Stone TH (2010) Conflict and abusive workplace behaviors: The moderating effects of social competencies. Career Development Internat. 15(6):583–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kish-Gephart JJ, Harrison DA, Treviño LK (2010) Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. J. Appl. Psych. 95(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kouchaki M, Desai SD (2015) Anxious, threatened, and also unethical: How anxiety makes individuals feel threatened and commit unethical acts. J. Appl. Psych. 100(2):360–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ku G, Malhotra D, Murnighan JK (2005) Toward a competitive arousal model of decision-making: A study of auction fever in live and Internet auctions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 96(2):89–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee K, Kim E, Bhave DP, Duffy MK (2016) Why victims of undermining at work become perpetrators of undermining: An integrative model. J. Appl. Psych. 101(6):915–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leventhal G (1979) Effects of external conflict on resource allocation and fairness within groups and organizations. Austin WG, Worchel S, eds. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA), 237–251.Google Scholar
• Magee JC, Galinsky AD (2008) Social hierarchy: The self‐reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):351–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra D, Ku G, Murnighan JK (2008) When winning is everything. Harvard Bus. Rev. 86(5):78–86.Google Scholar
• Malik OF, Sattar A, Shahzad A, Faiz R (2020) Personal bullying and nurses’ turnover intentions in Pakistan: A mixed methods study. J. Interpersonal Violence 35(23–24):5448–5468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAllister CP, Ellen BP III, Ferris GR (2018) Social influence opportunity recognition, evaluation, and capitalization: Increased theoretical specification through political skill’s dimensional dynamics. J. Management 44(5):1926–1952.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meade AW, Craig SB (2012) Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psych. Methods 17(3):437–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menon T, Blount S (2003) The messenger bias: A relational model of knowledge valuation. Res. Organ. Behav. 25:137–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H (1983) Power in and Around Organizations (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Muller D, Judd CM, Yzerbyt VY (2005) When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 89(6):852–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mummolo J, Peterson E (2019) Demand effects in survey experiments: An empirical assessment. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 113(2):517–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Munyon TP, Summers JK, Thompson KM, Ferris GR (2015) Political skill and work outcomes: A theoretical extension, meta‐analytic investigation, and agenda for the future. Personnel Psych. 68(1):143–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray SL, Bellavia GM, Rose P, Griffin DW (2003) Once hurt, twice hurtful: How perceived regard regulates daily marital interactions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 84(1):126–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Opotow S (1990) Moral exclusion and injustice: An introduction. J. Soc. Issues 46(1):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Opotow S (1993) Animals and the scope of justice. J. Soc. Issues 49(1):71–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Opotow S (1995) Drawing the line: Social categorization, moral exclusion, and the scope of justice. Bunker BB, Rubin JZ, eds. Conflict, Cooperation, and Justice: Essays Inspired by the Work of Morton Deutsch (Jossey-Bass/Wiley, San Francisco), 347–369.Google Scholar
• Palan S, Schitter C (2018) Prolific.ac—a subject pool for online experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 17:22–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peer E, Brandimarte L, Samat S, Acquisti A (2017) Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 70:153–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettit NC (2012) The dysfunctional side of status. Acad. Management Proc. 2012(1):AMBPP.2012.235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettit NC, Yong K, Spataro SE (2010) Holding your place: Reactions to the prospect of status gains and losses. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 46(2):396–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (1981) Power in Organizations (Pitman, Boston).Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (1992) Understanding power in organizations. Calif. Management Rev. 34(2):29–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (2010) Power: Why Some People Have It —and Others Don’t (HarperBusiness, New York).Google Scholar
• Pierce JR, Kilduff GJ, Galinsky AD, Sivanathan N (2013) From glue to gasoline: How competition turns perspective takers unethical. Psych. Sci. 24(10):1986–1994.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pike BE, Kilduff GJ, Galinsky AD (2018) The long shadow of rivalry: Rivalry motivates performance today and tomorrow. Psych. Sci. 29(5):804–813.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pillemer J, Rothbard NP (2018) Friends without benefits: Understanding the dark sides of workplace friendship. Acad. Management Rev. 43(4):635–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pirlott AG, MacKinnon DP (2016) Design approaches to experimental mediation. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 66:29–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP (2012) Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Rev. Psych. 63:539–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF (2007) Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behav. Res. 42(1):185–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Price J, Sloman L, Gardner R, Gilbert P, Rohde P (1994) The social competition hypothesis of depression. British J. Psychiatry. 164(3):309–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reh S, Tröster C, Van Quaquebeke N (2018) Keeping (future) rivals down: Temporal social comparison predicts coworker social undermining via future status threat and envy. J. Appl. Psych. 103(4):399–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scheepers D, Ellemers N (2005) When the pressure is up: The assessment of social identity threat in low and high status groups. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 41(2):192–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherony KM, Green SG (2002) Coworker exchange: Relationships between coworkers, leader-member exchange, and work attitudes. J. Appl. Psych. 87(3):542–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siemsen E, Roth A, Oliveira P (2010) Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organ. Res. Methods 13(3):456–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith MB, Webster BD (2017) A moderated mediation model of Machiavellianism, social undermining, political skill, and supervisor-rated job performance. Personality Individual Differences 104:453–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Summers JK, Munyon TP, Brouer RL, Pahng P, Ferris GR (2020) Political skill in the stressor-strain relationship: A meta-analytic update and extension. J. Vocational Behav. 118:103372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tepper BJ, Moss SE, Duffy MK (2011) Predictors of abusive supervision: Supervisor perceptions of deep-level dissimilarity, relationship conflict, and subordinate performance. Acad. Management J. 54(2):279–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• To C, Kilduff GJ, Rosikiewicz B (2020) When interpersonal competition helps and when it harms: An integration via challenge and threat. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):908–934.Crossref, Google Scholar
• To C, Kilduff GJ, Ordoñez L, Schweitzer ME (2018) Going for it on fourth down: Rivalry increases risk taking, physiological arousal, and promotion focus. Acad. Management J. 61(4):1281–1306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Todd SY, Harris KJ, Harris RB, Wheeler AR (2009) Career success implications of political skill. J. Soc. Psych. 149(3):279–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Treadway DC, Ferris GR, Duke AB, Adams GL, Thatcher JB (2007) The moderating role of subordinate political skill on supervisors’ impressions of subordinate ingratiation and ratings of subordinate interpersonal facilitation. J. Appl. Psych. 92(3):848–855.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Troester C, Van Quaquebeke N (2021) When victims help their abusive supervisors: The role of LMX, self-blame, and guilt. Acad. Management J. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• UCLA Statistical Consulting Group (2020) How can I do moderated mediation in Stata? Accessed December 26, 2020, https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/stata/faq/how-can-i-do-moderated-mediation-in-stata/.Google Scholar
• Van Dyne L, LePine JA (1998) Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Acad. Management J. 41(1):108–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wei LQ, Chiang FF, Wu LZ (2012) Developing and utilizing network resources: Roles of political skill. J. Management Stud. 49(2):381–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu J, Balliet D, Van Lange PA (2015) When does gossip promote generosity? Indirect reciprocity under the shadow of the future. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 6(8):923–930.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu L-Z, Yim FH-k, Kwan HK, Zhang X (2012) Coping with workplace ostracism: The roles of ingratiation and political skill in employee psychological distress. J. Management Stud. 49(1):178–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu E, Huang X, Jia R, Xu J, Liu W, Graham L, Snape E (2020) The “evil pleasure”: Abusive supervision and third-party observers’ malicious reactions toward victims. Organ. Sci. 31(5):1115–1137.Google Scholar
• Yu L, Duffy MK, Tepper BJ (2018) Consequences of downward envy: A model of self-esteem threat, abusive supervision, and supervisory leader self-improvement. Acad. Management J. 61(6):2296–2318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zinko R, Ferris GR, Humphrey SE, Meyer CJ, Aime F (2012) Personal reputation in organizations: Two‐study constructive replication and extension of antecedents and consequences. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 85(1):156–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuroff DC, Fournier MA, Patall EA, Leybman MJ (2010) Steps toward an evolutionary personality psychology: Individual differences in the social rank domain. Canadian Psych. 51(1):58–66.Crossref, Google Scholar