The Aggregation–Learning Trade-off

References

• Adner R, Csaszar FA, Zemsky B (2014) Positioning on a multiattribute landscape. Management Sci. 60(11):2794–2815.Link, Google Scholar
• Afuah A, Tucci CL (2012) Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):355–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aggarwal VA, Hsu DH, Wu A (2020) Organizing knowledge production teams within firms for innovation. Strategy Sci. 5(1):1–16.Link, Google Scholar
• Aggarwal VA, Posen HE, Workiewicz M (2017) Adaptive capacity to technological change: A microfoundational approach. Strategic Management J. 38(6):1212–1231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Van Alstyne M (2011) The diversity-bandwidth trade-off. Amer. J. Sociol. 117(1):90–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Miron-Spektor E (2011) Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Management Sci. 22(5):1123–1137.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Argote L, McEvily B, Reagans R (2003) Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. 49(4):571–582.Link, Google Scholar
• Arrow K (1951) Social Choice and Individual Values (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Atanasov P, Rescober P, Stone E, Swift SA, Servan-Schreiber E, Tetlock P, Ungar L, Mellers B (2016) Distilling the wisdom of crowds: Prediction markets vs. prediction polls. Management Sci. 63(3):691–706.Link, Google Scholar
• Balinski M, Laraki R (2007) A theory of measuring, electing, and ranking. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104(21):8720–8725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberà S, Sonnenschein H, Zhou L (1991) Voting by committees. Econometrica 59(3):595–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J, Felin T (2013) What are microfoundations? Acad. Management Perspect. 27(2):138–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumann O (2015) Models of complex adaptive systems in strategy and organization research. Mind Soc. 14(2):169–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker HS (2017) Creativity is not a scarce commodity. Amer. Behav. Sci. 61(12):1579–1588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker J, Porter E, Centola D (2019) The wisdom of partisan crowds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(22):10717–10722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Yashar RC, Nitzan SI (1997) The optimal decision rule for fixed-size committees in dichotomous choice situations: The general result. Internat. Econom. Rev. 38(1):175–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein E, Shore J, Lazer D (2018) How intermittent breaks in interaction improve collective intelligence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115(35):8734–8739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bidwell M, Won S, Barbulescu R, Mollick E (2015) I used to work at Goldman Sachs! How firms benefit from organizational status in the market for human capital. Strategic Management J. 36(8):1164–1173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bodily SE (1979) A delegation process for combining individual utility functions. Management Sci. 25(10):1035–1041.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ (2012) Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1409–1427.Link, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton MD, Sorensen JB, Beckman CM (2002) Coming from good stock: Career histories and new venture formation. Lounsbury M, Ventresca MJ, eds. Social Structure and Organizations Revisited, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 19. (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 229–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carley KM (1991) Designing organizational structures to cope with communication breakdowns: A simulation model. Indust. Crisis Quart. 5(1):19–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji S, Sen A, Zeng H (2014) Random dictatorship domains. Games Econom. Behav. 86:212–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen G, Crossland C, Huang S (2016) Female board representation and corporate acquisition intensity. Strategic Management J. 37(2):303–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen J, Elfenbein D, Posen H, Wang MZ (2021) The problems and promise of entrepreneurial partnerships: Decision making, overconfidence, and learning in founding teams. Acad. Management Rev. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Christensen M, Knudsen T (2009) The architecture of knowledge organization. Foss NJ, Michailova S, eds. Knowledge Governance: Processes and Perspectives (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 47–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen M, Knudsen T (2010) Design of decision-making organizations. Management Sci. 56(1):71–89.Link, Google Scholar
• Clough DR, Piezunka H (2020) Tie dissolution in market networks: A theory of vicarious performance feedback. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(4):972–1017.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clough DR, Fang TP, Vissa B, Wu A (2019) Turning lead into gold: How do entrepreneurs mobilize resources to exploit opportunities? Acad. Management Ann. 13(1):240–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman JS (1990) Foundations of Social Theory (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Criscuolo P, Dahlander L, Grohsjean T, Salter A (2017) Evaluating novelty: The role of panels in the selection of R&D projects. Acad. Management J. 60(2):433–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2013) An efficient frontier in organization design: Organizational structure as a determinant of exploration and exploitation. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1083–1101.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Eggers JP (2013) Organizational decision making: An information aggregation view. Management Sci. 59(10):2257–2277.Link, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Blackwell, Malden, MA).Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, O’Mahony S (2011) Progressing to the center: Coordinating project work. Organ. Sci. 22(4):961–979.Link, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, Piezunka H (2020) Why crowdsourcing fails. J. Organ. Design 9(1):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis JP, Aggarwal VA (2020) Knowledge mobilization in the face of imitation: Microfoundations of knowledge aggregation and firm-level imitation. Strategic Management J. 41(11):1983–2014.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM (2011) Rotating leadership and collaborative innovation: Recombination processes in symbiotic relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(2):159–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J, Le Mens G (2007) Interdependent sampling and social influence. Psych. Rev. 114(2):398–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J, March JG (2001) Adaptation as information restriction: The hot stove effect. Organ. Sci. 12(5):523–538.Link, Google Scholar
• Dobrajska M, Billinger S, Becker M (2014) How firms make boundary decisions: the role of hierarchy span and expertise span. Meyer K, Kiyak T, eds. Proc. 56th Annual Meeting Acad. Internat. Bus., Vancouver (Academy of International Business, East Lansing, MI), 13.Google Scholar
• Eesley C, Lee YS (2020) Do university entrepreneurship programs promote entrepreneurship? Strategic Management J. 42(4):833–861.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eesley C, Li JB, Yang D (2016) Does institutional change in universities influence high-tech entrepreneurship? Evidence from China’s project 985. Organ. Sci. 27(2):446–461.Link, Google Scholar
• Fang C, Lee J, Schilling MA (2010) Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 21(3):625–642.Link, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Foss NJ, Ployhart RE (2015) The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):575–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Lakhani KR, Tushman ML (2017) Firms, crowds, and innovation. Strategic Organ. 15(2):119–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishburn PC (1974) Simple voting systems and majority rule. Behav. Sci. 19(3):166–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishburn PC, Gehrlein WV (1976) An analysis of simple two-stage voting systems. Behav. Sci. 21(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galton F (1907) Vox populi (the wisdom of crowds). Nature 75(7):450–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganco M, Honoré F, Raffiee J (2019) Entrepreneurial team assembly: Knowledge transfer, customer transfer, and matching models. Reuer FJ, Matusik SF, Jones J, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship and Collaboration (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 631–654.Google Scholar
• Garg S, Li Q, Shaw J (2018) Undervaluation of directors: Impact on turnover of directors (and CEO) in newly public firms. Strategic Management J. 39(2):429–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbard A (1977) Manipulation of schemes that mix voting with chance. Econometrica 45(3):665–681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Girotra K, Terwiesch C, Ulrich KT (2010) Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Sci. 56(4):591–605.Link, Google Scholar
• Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2003) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation & Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haleblian J, Finkelstein S (1993) Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Acad. Management J. 36(4):844–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen MT (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):82–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hastie R, Kameda T (2005) The robust beauty of majority rules in group decisions. Psych. Rev. 112(2):494–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoppmann J, Naegele F, Girod B (2019) Boards as a source of inertia: Examining the internal challenges and dynamics of boards of directors in times of environmental discontinuities. Acad. Management J. 62(2):437–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hwang EH, Singh PV, Argote L (2015) Knowledge sharing in online communities: Learning to cross geographic and hierarchical boundaries. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1593–1611.Link, Google Scholar
• Ingram P, Simons T (2002) The transfer of experience in groups of organizations: Implications for performance and competition. Management Sci. 48(12):1517–1533.Link, Google Scholar
• Jaspersen JG, Peter R (2017) Experiential learning, competitive selection, and downside risk: A new perspective on managerial risk taking. Organ. Sci. 28(5):915–930.Link, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen LB, Lakhani KR (2010) Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1016–1033.Link, Google Scholar
• Joseph J, Gaba V (2020) Organizational structure, information processing, and decision-making: A retrospective and road map for research. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):267–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• KC D, Staats BR, Gino F (2013) Learning from my success and from others’ failure: Evidence from minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 59(11):2435–2449.Link, Google Scholar
• Keum DD, See KE (2017) The influence of hierarchy on idea generation and selection in the innovation process. Organ. Sci. 28(4):653–669.Link, Google Scholar
• Keuschnigg M, Ganser C (2017) Crowd wisdom relies on agents’ ability in small groups with a voting aggregation rule. Management Sci. 63(3):818–828.Link, Google Scholar
• Klapper H, Piezunka H, Dahlander L (2021) Strategic behavior in online communities: Evidence from peer evaluations. Working paper, Rotterdam – Erasmus University.Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Levinthal DA (2007) Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organ. Sci. 18(1):39–54.Link, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Srikanth K (2014) Coordinated exploration: Organizing joint search by multiple specialists to overcome mutual confusion and joint myopia. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(3):409–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Marchiori D, Warglien M (2018) Hierarchical decision-making produces persistent differences in learning performance. Sci. Rep. 8(1):15782.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laureiro-Martinez D, Brusoni S, Tata A, Zollo M (2019) The manager’s notepad: Working memory, exploration, and performance. J. Management Stud. 56(8):1655–1682.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear E (2004) Balanced skills and entrepreneurship. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(2):208–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee S (2021) The myth of the flat startup: Reconsidering the organizational structure of startups. Job market paper. Strategic Management J. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Lee S, Csaszar FA (2021) Cognitive and structural antecedents of innovation: A large-sample study. Strategy Sci. 5(2):71–97.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee E, Puranam P (2016) The implementation imperative: Why one should implement even imperfect strategies perfectly. Strategic Management J. 37(8):1529–1546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Le Mens G, Denrell J (2011) Rational learning and information sampling: On the “naivety” assumption in sampling explanations of judgment biases. Psych. Rev. 118(2):379–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Le Mens G, Kovacs B, Avrahami J, Kareev Y (2018) How endogenous crowd formation undermines the wisdom of the crowd in online ratings. Psych. Sci. 29(9):1475–1490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1981) A model of adaptive organizational search. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 2(4):307–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luce RD (1959) On the possible psychophysical laws. Psych. Rev. 66(2):81–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mack DZ, Szulanski G (2017) Opening up: How centralization affects participation and inclusion in strategy making. Long Range Planning 50(3):385–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mannes A, Soll JB, Larrick RP (2014) The wisdom of select crowds. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 107(2):276–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG (1996) Learning to be risk averse. Psych. Rev. 103(2):309–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (2010) The Ambiguities of Experience (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miner AS, Mezias SJ (1996) Ugly duckling no more: Pasts and futures of organizational learning research. Organ. Sci. 7(1):88–99.Link, Google Scholar
• Mollick E, Nanda R (2016) Wisdom or madness? Comparing crowds with expert evaluation in funding the arts. Management Sci. 62(6):1533–1553.Link, Google Scholar
• Myers CG (2018) Coactive vicarious learning: Toward a relational theory of vicarious learning in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 43(4):610–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ober J (2009) Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S, Ferraro F (2007) The emergence of governance in an open source community. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1079–1106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett J, Powell WW (2012) The Emergence of Organizations and Markets (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Page S (2007) The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Piezunka H, Dahlander L (2015) Distant search, narrow attention: How crowding alters organizations’ filtering of user suggestions. Acad. Management J. 58(3):856–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piezunka H, Dahlander L (2019) Idea rejected, tie formed: Organizations’ feedback on crowdsourced ideas. Acad. Management J. 62(2):503–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piezunka H, Schilke O (2021) The effect of organizational aggregation structures on individuals’ voting behavior: An experimental investigation. Working paper.Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Levinthal DA (2012) Chasing a moving target: Exploitation and exploration in dynamic environments. Management Sci. 58(3):587–601.Link, Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Yi S, Lee J (2020) A contingency perspective on imitation strategies: When is “benchmarking” ineffective? Strategic Management J. 41(2):198–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Swamy M (2016) How initial representations shape coupled learning processes. Organ. Sci. 27(2):323–335.Link, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Gulati R, Bhattacharya S (2013) How much to make and how much to buy? An analysis of optimal plural sourcing strategies. Strategic Management J. 34(10):1145–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Stieglitz N, Osman M, Pillutla MM (2015) Modelling bounded rationality in organizations: Progress and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):337–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rahmandad H (2019) Interdependence, complementarity, and ruggedness of performance landscapes. Strategy Sci. 4(3):234–249.Link, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Argote L, Brooks D (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Sci. 51(6):869–881.Link, Google Scholar
• Reitzig M, Maciejovsky B (2015) Corporate hierarchy and vertical information flow inside the firm—A behavioral view. Strategic Management J. 36(13):1979–1999.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reitzig M, Sorenson O (2013) Biases in the selection stage of bottom‐up strategy formulation. Strategic Management J. 34(7):782–799.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2003) Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. 49(3):290–311.Link, Google Scholar
• Sah RK, Stiglitz JE (1986) The architecture of economic systems: Hierarchies and polyarchies. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(4):716–727.Google Scholar
• Schilke O (2018) A micro-institutional inquiry into resistance to environmental pressures. Acad. Management J. 61(4):1431–1466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sengul M, Obloj T (2017) Better safe than sorry: Subsidiary performance feedback and internal governance in multiunit firms. J. Management 43(8):2526–2554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1947) Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Dahl MS, Canales R, Burton MD (2021) Do startup employees earn more in the long run? Organ. Sci. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Stan M, Vermeulen F (2013) Selection at the gate: Difficult cases, spillovers, and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 24(3):796–812.Link, Google Scholar
• Stieglitz N, Knudsen T, Becker MC (2016) Adaptation and inertia in dynamic environments. Strategic Management J. 37(9):1854–1864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Surowiecki J (2005) The Wisdom of Crowds (Anchor Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Sutton R, Barto A (1998) Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Sutton RI, Callahan AL (1987) The stigma of bankruptcy: Spoiled organizational image and its management. Acad. Management J. 30(3):405–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tarakci M, Greer LL, Groenen PJF (2016) When does power disparity help or hurt group performance? J. Appl. Psych. 101(3):415–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tortoriello M, Perrone V, McEvily B (2011) Cooperation among competitors as status-seeking behavior: Network ties and status differentiation. Eur. Management J. 29(5):335–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turco C (2016) The Conversational Firm: Rethinking Bureaucracy in the Age of Social Media (Columbia University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vissa B (2010) A matching theory of entrepreneurs’ tie formation intentions and initiation of economic exchange. Acad. Management J. 54(1):137–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldinger F (2012) Peer effects in science: Evidence from the dismissal of scientists in Nazi Germany. Rev. Econom. Stud. 79(2):838–861.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Sci. 330(6004):686–688.Crossref, Google Scholar