Sustaining Effectiveness in Global Teams: The Coevolution of Knowledge Management Activities and Technology Affordances

References

• Alavi M, Leidner DE (2001) Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 25(1):107–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anand V, Manz CC, Glick WH (1998) An organizational memory approach to information management. Acad. Management Rev. 23:796–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR, Meyerson DE, Grodal S (2011) Email as a source and symbol of stress. Organ. Sci. 22:887–906.Link, Google Scholar
• Brenan M (2020) US workers discovering affinity for remote work. Gallup. Accessed October 5, 2020.Google Scholar
• Burke MJ, Dunlap WP (2002) Estimating interrater agreement with the average deviation index: A user’s guide. Organ. Res. Methods 5:159–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burke MJ, Finkelstein LM, Dusig MS (1999) On average deviation indices for estimating interrater agreement. Organ. Res. Methods 2:49–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burke CS, Stagl KC, Salas E, Pierce L, Kendall D (2006) Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model. J. Appl. Psych. 91:1189–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan D (1998) Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. J. Appl. Psych. 83:234–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charmaz K (2014) Constructing Grounded Theory (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Clark HH, Brennan SE (1991) Grounding in communication. Perspect. Socially Shared Cognition 13:127–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohendet P, Steinmueller WE (2000) The codification of knowledge: A conceptual and empirical exploration. Indust. Corporate Change 9:195–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins CG, Gibson CB (2014) Turning teams around: Creating transitions points in team performance. Presentation at the Annual Acad. Management Conf. (Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Collins CG, Gibson CB, Parker SK, Quigly N (2016) Team effectiveness trajectories: Archetypes of team change and catalysts for critical leverage points. Organ. Psych. Rev. 6:63–91.Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Creswell JD (2019) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Poth CN (2016) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Cronin MA, Weingart LR (2007) Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Acad. Management Rev. 32:761–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Lengel RH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. 32:554–571.Link, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CKW (2007) Cooperative outcome interdependence, task reflexivity, and team effectiveness: A motivated information processing perspective. J. Appl. Psych. 92(3):628–638.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeRosa DM, Hantula DA, Kock N, D'Arcy J (2004) Trust and leadership in virtual teamwork: A media naturalness perspective. Human Resource Management 43(2-3):219–232.Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G, Poole MS (1994) Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. 5(2):121–147.Link, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (2002) The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations. Organ. Sci. 13:128–146.Link, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, McManus SE (2007) Methodological fit in management field research. Acad. Management Rev. 32:1155–1179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Kwok RCW, Schroeder A (2014) Knowledge processes in virtual teams: Consolidating the evidence. Behav. Inform. Tech. 33:486–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Jarvenpaa SL, Majchrzak A (2011) Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22:1224–1239.Link, Google Scholar
• Fulk J (1993) Social construction of communication technology. Acad. Management J. 36:921–934.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geertz C (2008) Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. Oakes TS, Price PL, eds. The Cultural Geography Reader (Routledge, New York, NY), 39–49.Google Scholar
• Gibbs JL, Gibson CB, Grushina Y, Dunlop P (2021) Understanding orientations to participation: Overcoming status differences to foster engagement in global teams. Eur. J. Work Psych., ePub ahead of print January 11, https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2020.1844796.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbs JL, Grushina SV, Gibson CB, Dunlop P, Cordery J (2013) Encouraging participation in global teams: Unpacking the role of language, culture, and communication practices. Lee T, Trees K, Desai R, eds. Refereed Proc. Australian New Zealand Comm. Assoc. Conf. Global Networks-Global Divides: Bridging New Traditional Comm. Challenges.Google Scholar
• Gibson JJ (1977) A theory of affordances. Shaw R, Bransford J, eds. Perceiving, Acting and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 67–82.Google Scholar
• Gibson CB (2001) From knowledge accumulation to accommodation: Cycles of collective cognition in work groups. J. Organ. Behav. 22:121–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson CB (2017) Elaboration, generalization, triangulation, and interpretation: On enhancing the value of mixed method research. Organ. Res. Methods 20:193–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson CB (2020) From social distancing to care in connecting: An emerging organizational research agenda for turbulent times. Acad. Management Discoveries 6:165–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson CB, Earley PC (2007) Collective cognition in action: Accumulation, interaction, examination and accommodation in the development and operation of group efficacy beliefs in the workplace. Acad. Management Rev. 32:438–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson CB, Grushina SV (2021) A tale of two teams: Next generation strategies for increasing the effectiveness of global virtual teams. Organ. Dynam. 50(1):100823.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson CB, Vermeulen F (2003) A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48:202–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson CB, Dunlop P, Cordery JL (2019) Managing formalization to increase team effectiveness and meaningfulness of work in multinational organizations. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 50(6):1021–1052.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson CB, Dunlop P, Raghav S (2021) Navigating identities in global work: Antecedents and consequences of intrapersonal identity conflict. Human Relations 74(4):556–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson CB, McDaniel D, Szkudlarek B (2012) Tales from the (multicultural) field: Toward developing research conducive to proximal theory building. Ryan AM, Oswald FL, Leong FTL, eds. Conducting Multinational Research Projects in Organizational Psychology: Challenges and Opportunities (Michigan State University).Google Scholar
• Gibson CB, Huang L, Kirkman BL, Shapiro D (2014) Where global and virtual intersect: The value of examining both in 21st century teams. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. 1:217–244.Google Scholar
• Gibson CB, Gibbs JL, Stanko T, Tesluk P, Cohen SG (2011) Including the “I” in virtuality and modern job design: Extending the job characteristics model to include the moderating effect of individual experiences of electronic dependence and co-presence. Organ. Sci. 22:1481–1499.Link, Google Scholar
• Glaser BG (1992) Emergence Vs. Forcing: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis (Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA).Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss A (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory (Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London).Google Scholar
• Glover WJ, Farris JA, Van Aken EM (2014) Kaizen events: Assessing the existing literature and convergence of practices. Engrg. Management J. 26:39–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray P, Tehrani S (2003) Technologies for disseminating knowledge. Holsapple CW, ed. Handbook on Knowledge Management (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), 109–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hajro A, Gibson CB, Pudelko M (2017) Knowledge exchange processes in multicultural teams: Linking organizational diversity climates to teams’ effectiveness. Acad. Management J. 60:345–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey S (2014) Creative synthesis: Exploring the process of extraordinary team creativity. Acad. Management Rev. 39:324–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds P, Liu L, Lyon J (2011) Putting the global in global work: An intercultural lens on the practice of cross-national collaboration. Acad. Management Ann. 5:135–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsiao R-L, Tsai D-H, Lee C-F (2012) Collaborative knowing: The adaptive nature of cross-boundary spanning. J. Management Stud. 49(3):463–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang S, Cummings JN (2011) When critical knowledge is most critical: Centralization in knowledge-intensive teams. Small Group Res. 42:669–699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirkman BL, Gibson CB, Kim K (2012) Across borders and technologies: Advancements in virtual teams research.Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SW, ed. Oxford Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 1 (Oxford University Press, New York), 789–858.Google Scholar
• Knight AP (2015) Mood at the midpoint: Affect and change in exploratory search over time in teams that face a deadline. Organ. Sci. 26:99–118.Link, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2007) Activating the informational capabilities of information technology for organizational change. Organ. Sci. 18(5):813–831.Link, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2013) When does technology use enable network change in organizations? A comparative study of feature use and shared affordances. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37:749–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM, Neely T, Gerber PM (2012) How managers use multiple media: Discrepant events, power, and timing in redundant communication. Organ. Sci. 23(1):98–117.Link, Google Scholar
• Leung K, Bhagat R, Buchan N, Erez M, Gibson CB (2011) Beyond national culture and culture-centricism: An integrating perspective on the role of culture in international business. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 42:177–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry, vol. 75 (Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lister K (2020) Latest work-at-home/telecommuting/mobile work/remote work. Global Workplace Analytics. Retrieved October 5, 2020, https://globalworkplaceanalytics.com/telecommuting-statistics.Google Scholar
• Lorinkova NM, Pearsall MJ, Sims HP (2013) Examining the differential longitudinal performance of directive vs. empowering leadership in teams. Acad. Management J. 56:573–596.Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Markus ML (2014) Technology affordances and constraints theory (of MIS). Kessler E, ed. Encyclopedia of Management Theory (Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA), 832–836.Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Malhotra A, John R (2005) Perceived individual collaboration know-how development through information technology–enabled contextualization: Evidence from distributed teams. Inform. Systems Res. 16:9–27.Link, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Rice RE, Malhotra A, King N, Ba SL (2000) Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 24(4):569–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus ML (1994) Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organ. Sci. 5(4):502–527.Link, Google Scholar
• Maruping LM, Agarwal R (2004) Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: A task-technology fit perspective. J. Appl. Psych. 89:975–990.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu TM, Rapp T (2009) Laying the foundation for successful team performance trajectories: The roles of team charters and performance strategies. J. Appl. Psych. 94:90–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazmanian M (2013) Avoiding the trap of constant connectivity: When congruent frames allow for heterogeneous practices. Acad. Management J. 56:1225–1250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maznevski ML, Chudoba KM (2000) Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. 11:473–492.Link, Google Scholar
• Merkus S, Willems T, Schipper D, van Marrewijk A, Koppenjan J, Veenswijk M, Bakker H (2017) A storm is coming? Collective sensemaking and ambiguity in an inter-organizational team managing railway system disruptions. J. Change Management 17(3):228–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Metiu A, Rothbard NP (2013) Task bubbles, artifacts, shared emotion, and mutual focus of attention: A comparative study of the microprocesses of group engagement. Organ. Sci. 24:455–475.Link, Google Scholar
• O’Leary MB, Mortensen M, Woolley AW (2011) Multiple team membership: A theoretical model of its effects on productivity and learning for individuals and teams. Acad. Management Rev. 36:461–478.Google Scholar
• Ozimek A (2021) The future of remote work. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Paracer S, Ahmadjian V (2000) Symbiosis: An Introduction to Biological Associations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom).Google Scholar
• Paulhus L, Robins RW, Trzesniewski KH, Tracy JL (2004) Two replicable suppressor situations in personality research. Multivariate Behav. Res. 39:303–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quigley N, Collins CC, Gibson CB, Parker SK (2018) Team performance archetypes and contextual drivers: Toward a new conceptualization of team performance over time. Group Organ. Management 43(5):787–824.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saldaña J (2013) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Schippers M, West MA, Dawson JF (2012) Team reflexivity and innovation: The moderating role of team context. J. Management 41:769–788.Google Scholar
• Seidel VP, O’Mahony S (2014) Managing the repertoire: Stories, metaphors, prototypes, and concept coherence in product innovation. Organ. Sci. 25:691–712.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith-Crowe K, Burke MJ, Kouchaki M, Signal SM (2013) Assessing interrater agreement via the average deviation index given a variety of theoretical and methodological problems. Organ. Res. Methods 16:127–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sole D, Huysman M (2000) Knowledge, practice and the role of location. Huysman M, van Baalen P, eds. Communities of Practice: A Special Issue of Trends in Communication (Boom Publishers, Netherlands).Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1994) Grounded theory methodology. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research (Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA), 273–285.Google Scholar
• Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17:27–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G, Ringov D, Jensen RJ (2016) Overcoming stickiness: How the timing of knowledge transfer methods affects transfer difficulty. Organ. Sci. 27:304–322.Link, Google Scholar
• Te’Eni D (2001) A cognitive-affective model of organizational communication for designing IT. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 25:251–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tenzer H, Pudelko M (2016) Media choice in multilingual virtual teams. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 47:427–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Treem JW, Leonardi PM (2013) Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Ann. Internat. Comm. Assoc. 36:143–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyre MJ, Orlikowski WJ (1994) Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organ. Sci. 5:98–118.Link, Google Scholar
• Tzabbar D, Vestal A (2015) Bridging the social chasm in geographically distributed R & D teams: The moderating effects of relational strength and status asymmetry on the novelty of team innovation. Organ. Sci. 26:811–829.Link, Google Scholar
• Urquhart C, Lehmann H, Myers MD (2010) Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: Guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Inform. Systems J. 20(4):357–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J (1979) Reclaiming qualitative methods for organizational research: A preface. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24:520–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vashdi DR, Bamberger PA, Erez M (2013) Can surgical teams ever learn? The role of coordination, complexity, and transitivity in action team learning. Acad. Management J. 56:945–971.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh JP, Ungson GR (1991) Organizational memory. Acad. Management Rev. 16:57–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh JP, Henderson CM, Deighton J (1988) Negotiated belief structures and decision performance: An empirical investigation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 42:194–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson-Manheim MB, Bélanger F (2007) Communication media repertoires: Dealing with the multiplicity of media choices. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 31:267–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• West MA (1996) Reflexivity and work group effectiveness: A conceptual integration. West MA, ed. Handbook of Work Group Psychology (John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, United Kingdom), 555–579.Google Scholar
• West MA (2002) Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Appl. Psych. 51(3):355–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson J, Crisp CB, Mortensen M (2013) Extending construal-level theory to distributed groups: Understanding the effects of virtuality. Organ. Sci. 24:629–644.Link, Google Scholar
• Wolbers J, Boersma K (2013) The common operational picture as collective sensemaking. J. Contingencies Crisis Management 21(4):186–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Alavi M (2001) Media and group cohesion: Relative influences on social presence, task participation, and group consensus. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 25:371–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Boland R, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A (2012) Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23:1398–1408.Link, Google Scholar
• Zammuto RF, Griffith TL, Majchrzak A, Dougherty DJ, Faraj S (2007) Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. 18:749–762.Link, Google Scholar
• Zigurs I, Buckland BK (1998) A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 22:313–334.Crossref, Google Scholar