Taking Your Team Behind the Curtain: The Effects of Leader Feedback-Sharing and Feedback-Seeking on Team Psychological Safety

References

• Anseel F, Brutus S (2019) Checking in? A dyadic and dynamic perspective on feedback conversations. Steelman LA, Williams JR, eds. Feedback at Work (Springer, Switzerland), 29–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyris C, Schön D (1978) Organizational Learning (Addison-Wesley, MA).Google Scholar
• Aron A, Melinat E, Aron EN, Vallone RD, Bator RJ (1997) The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 23(4):363–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aronson E (1999) The power of self-persuasion. Amer. Psych. 54(11):875–884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aronson E, Willerman B, Floyd J (1966) The effect of a pratfall on increasing interpersonal attractiveness. Psychonomic Sci. 4:227–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ, Cummings LL (1983) Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 32(3):370–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ, Tsui AS (1991) Self-regulation for managerial effectiveness: The role of active feedback-seeking. Acad. Management J. 34(2):251–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ, Blatt R, VandeWalle DV (2003) Reflections on the looking glass: A review of research on feedback-seeking behavior in organizations. J. Management 29(6):773–799.Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ, De Stobbeleir K, Nujella M (2016) To seek or not to seek: Is that the only question? Recent developments in feedback-seeking literature. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 3:213–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ, Rothbard NP, Piderit SK, Dutton JE (1998) Out on a limb: The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):23–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ, Wellman N, Sully de Luque M, De Stobbeleir KE, Wollan M (2017) Two roads to effectiveness: CEO feedback-seeking, vision articulation, and firm performance. J. Organ. Behav. 39(1):82–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baer M, Frese M (2003) Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. J. Organ. Behav. 24(1):45–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellstrom K (2015) Why this Facebook exec shared her performance review with her team. Fortune Online (October 14), http://www.fortune.com.Google Scholar
• Black JS, Porter LW (1991) Managerial behaviors and job performance: A successful manager in Los Angeles may not succeed in Hong Kong. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 22(1):99–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blunden H, Logg JM, Brooks AW, John LK, Gino F (2019) Seeker beware: The interpersonal costs of ignoring advice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 150:83–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooks AW, Huang K, Abi-Esber N, Buell RW, Huang L, Hall B (2019) Mitigating malicious envy: Why successful individuals should reveal their failures. J. Experiment. Psych. General 148(4):667–687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown B (2015) Daring Greatly: How the Courage to be Vulnerable Transforms the Way We Live, Love, Parent, and Lead, 2nd ed. (Penguin Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Bruk A, Scholl SG, Bless H (2018) Beautiful mess effect: Self–other differences in evaluation of showing vulnerability. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 115(2):192–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bryant A (2013) Want to Know Me? Just Read My User Manual. New York Times Online (March 30), https://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/31/business/questbacks-lead-strategist-on-his-user-manual.html.Google Scholar
• Campbell DT, Stanley JL (1966) Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research (Rand McNally, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Castro DR, Anseel F, Kluger AN, Lloyd KJ, Turjeman-Levi Y (2018) Mere listening effect on creativity and the mediating role of psychological safety. Psych. Aesthetics Creativity Arts 12(4):489–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA (1989) Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Acad. Management Rev. 14(3):333–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christian MS, Bradley JC, Wallace JC, Burke MJ (2009) Workplace safety: A meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. J. Appl. Psych. 94(5):1103–1127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chun JU, Lee D, Sosik JJ (2018) Leader negative feedback-seeking and leader effectiveness in leader-subordinate relationships: The paradoxical role of subordinate expertise. Leadership Quart. 29(4):501–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohn J, Rangan US (2020) Why CEOs should model vulnerability. Harvard Bus. Rev. https://hbr.org/2020/05/why-ceos-should-model-vulnerability.Google Scholar
• Cojuharenco I, Karelaia N (2020) When leaders ask questions: Can humility premiums buffer the effects of competence penalties? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 156:113–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins NL, Miller LC (1994) Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psych. Bull. 116(3):457–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper WH, Richardson AJ (1986) Unfair comparisons. J. Appl. Psych. 71(2):179–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coté S (2005) A social interaction model of the effects of emotion regulation on work strain. Acad. Management Rev. 30(3):509–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeCelles KA, Aquino K (2020) Dark knights: When and why an employee becomes a workplace vigilante. Acad. Management Rev. 45(3):528–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeVellis RF (1991) Scale Development: Theories and Applications (Sage, Thousand Oaks,CA).Google Scholar
• De Vries G, Jehn KA, Terwel BW (2012) When employees stop talking and start fighting: The detrimental effects of pseudo voice in organizations. J. Bus. Ethics 105(2):221–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Detert JR, Burris ER (2007) Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Acad. Management J. 50(4):869–884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Detert JR, Edmondson AC (2011) Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Acad. Management J. 54(3):461–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diddams M, Chang GC (2012) Only human: Exploring the nature of weakness in authentic leadership. Leadership Quart. 23(3):593–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dindia K, Allen M (1992) Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. 112(1):106–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Heaphy ED (2003) The power of high-quality connections. Cameron KS, Dutton JE, Quinn RE, eds. Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline, vol. 3 (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., San Francisco, CA), 263–278.Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Ashford SJ, O’Neill RM, Hayes E, Wierba EE (1997) Reading the wind: How middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers. Strategic Management J. 18(5):407–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A (1996) Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 32(1):5–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (2003) Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. J. Management Stud. 40(6):1419–1452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (2004) Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: a group-level lens. Kramer RM, Cook KS, eds. Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches (Russell Sage Foundation, NY), 239–272.Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Lei Z (2014) Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 1(1):23–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):685–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ely RJ, Meyerson DE (2010) An organizational approach to undoing gender: The unlikely case of offshore oil platforms. Res. Organ. Behav. 30:3–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans JB, Slaughter JE, Ellis AP, Rivin JM (2019) Gender and the evaluation of humor at work. J. Appl. Psych. 104(8):1077–1087.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fast NJ, Burris ER, Bartel CA (2014) Managing to stay in the dark: Managerial self-efficacy, ego defensiveness, and the aversion to employee voice. Acad. Management J. 57(4):1013–1034.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frazier ML, Fainshmidt S, Klinger RL, Pezeshkan A, Vracheva V (2017) Psychological safety: A meta‐analytic review and extension. Personnel Psych. 70(1):113–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gates M (2019) The Moment of Lift: How Empowering Women Changes the World (Flatiron Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Gibson KR (2018) Can I tell you something? How disruptive self-disclosure changes who “we” are. Acad. Management Rev. 43(4):570–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson KR, Harari D, Marr JC (2018) When sharing hurts: How and why self-disclosing weakness undermines the task-oriented relationships of higher status disclosers. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 144:25–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Thomas JB, Clark SM, Chittipeddi K (1994) Symbolism and strategic change in academia: The dynamics of sensemaking and influence. Organ. Sci. 5(3):363–383.Link, Google Scholar
• Gnepp J, Klayman J, Williamson IO, Barlas S (2020) The future of feedback: Motivating performance improvement through future-focused feedback. PLoS One 15(6):e0234444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Doubleday, Garden City, NY).Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Wall TD (2009) The neglected science and art of quasi-experimentation: Why-to, when-to, and how-to advice for organizational researchers. Organ. Res. Methods 12(4):653–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard MC, Van Zandt EC (2020) The discriminant validity of honesty-humility: A meta-analysis of the HEXACO, Big Five, and Dark Triad. J. Res. Personality 87:103982.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang K, Yeomans M, Brooks AW, Minson J, Gino F (2017) It doesn’t hurt to ask: Question-asking increases liking. J Personality Soc. Psych. 113(3):430–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn WA (1990) Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad. Management J. 33(4):692–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaiser RB, Hogan J (2011) Personality, leader behavior, and overdoing it. Consulting Psych. J. 63(4):219–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly AE, McKillop KJ (1996) Consequences of revealing personal secrets. Psych. Bull. 120(3):450–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim S, Liu PJ, Min KE (2020) Reminder avoidance: Why people hesitate to disclose their insecurities to friends. J Personality Soc. Psych., ePub ahead of print July 27, https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000330.Google Scholar
• Klinger E, Cox WM (2004) Motivation and the theory of current concerns. Cox WM, Klinger E, eds. Handbook of Motivational Counseling (Wiley, New York), 3–27.Google Scholar
• Kluger AN, DeNisi A (1996) The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psych. Bull. 119(2):254–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koenig AM, Eagly AH, Mitchell AA, Ristikari T (2011) Are leader stereotype masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psych. Bull. 137(4):616–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kramer M, Allyn BJ, Blight JG, Welch DA (1990) Remembering the Cuban missile crisis: Should we swallow oral history? Internat. Security 15(1):212–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LeBreton JM, Senter JL (2008) Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organ. Res. Methods 11(4):815–852.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lord RG, de Vader CL, Alliger GM (1986) A meta-analysis of the relation between personality traits and leadership perceptions: An application of validity generalization procedures. J. Appl. Psych. 71(3):402–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin SL, Liao H, Campbell EM (2013) Directive vs. empowering leadership: A field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency and proactivity. Acad. Management J. 56(5):1372–1395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer RC, Davis JH (1999) The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. J. Appl. Psych. 84(1):123–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCambridge J, De Bruin M, Witton J (2012) The effects of demand characteristics on research participant behaviours in non-laboratory settings: A systematic review. PLoS One 7(6):e39116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFarlin DB, Sweeney PD (1996) Does having a say matter only if you get your way? Instrumental and value-expressive effects of employee voice. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. 18(3):289–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Source Book, 2nd ed. (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar
• Moore C, Lee SY, Kim K, Cable DM (2017) The advantage of being oneself: The role of applicant self-verification in organizational hiring decisions. J. Appl. Psych. 102(11):1493–1513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison EW (2011) Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):373–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison EW, Milliken FJ (2000) Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Acad. Management Rev. 25(4):706–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mulvey PW, Veiga JF, Elsass PM (1996) When teammates raise a white flag. Acad. Management Exec. 10(1):40–49.Google Scholar
• Murphy SE, Ensher EA (1999) The effects of leader and subordinate characteristics in the development of leader–member exchange quality. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 29(7):1371–1394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadler A, Ellis S, Bar I (2003) To seek or not to seek: The relationship between help seeking and job performance evaluations as moderated by task‐relevant expertise. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 33(1):91–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nembhard IM, Edmondson AC (2006) Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in healthcare teams. J. Organ. Behav. 27(7):941–966.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogelberg SG, Stanton JM (2007) Introduction: Understanding and dealing with organizational survey nonresponse. Organ. Res. Methods 10(2):195–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenthal R (1994) Interpersonal expectancy effects: A 30-year perspective. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 3(6):176–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosette AS, Leonardelli GJ, Phillips KW (2008) The white standard: Racial bias in leader categorization. J. Appl. Psych. 93(4):758–777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosette AS, Mueller JS, Lebel RD (2015) Are male leaders penalized for seeking help? The influence of gender and asking behaviors on competence perceptions. Leadership Quart. 26(5):749–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schein EH (2013) Humble Inquiry: The Gentle Art of Asking Instead of Telling (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Sherf EN, Morrison EW (2020) I do not need feedback! Or do I? Self-efficacy, perspective taking, and feedback-seeking. J. Appl. Psych. 105(2):146–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherf EN, Gajendran RS, Posner BZ (2020a) Seeking and finding justice: Why and when managers’ feedback-seeking enhances justice enactment. J. Organ. Behav. 42(6):741–766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherf EN, Parke MR, Isaakyan S (2020b) Distinguishing voice and silence at work: Unique relationships with perceived impact, psychological safety, and burnout. Acad. Management J. 64(1):114–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherf EN, Tangirala S, Venkataramani V (2019) Why managers do not seek voice from employees: The importance of managers’ personal control and long-term orientation. Organ. Sci. 30(3):447–466.Link, Google Scholar
• Simons T (2002) Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment between managers’ words and deeds as a research focus. Organ. Sci. 13(1):18–35.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith CA, Kirby LD (2009) Putting appraisal in context: Toward a relational model of appraisal and emotion. Cognition Emotion 23(7):1352–1372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Sutton RI, Rafaeli A (1988) Untangling the relationship between displayed emotions and organizational sales: The case of convenience stores. Acad. Management J. 31(3):461–487.Google Scholar
• Tynan R (2005) The effects of threat sensitivity and face giving on dyadic psychological safety and upward communication. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 35(2):223–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uhl-Bien M, Riggio RE, Lowe KB, Carsten MK (2014) Followership theory: A review and research agenda. Leadership Quart. 25(1):83–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE (2000) A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ. Res. Methods 3(1):4–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• VandeWalle D, Cron WL, Slocum JW Jr (2001) The role of goal orientation following performance feedback. J. Appl. Psych. 86(4):629–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Quaquebeke N, Felps W (2018) Respectful inquiry: A motivational account of leading through asking questions and listening. Acad. Management Rev. 43(1):5–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vaughan D (1996) The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Culture, Technology, and Deviance at NASA (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Walker AG, Smither JW (1999) A five‐year study of upward feedback: What managers do with their results matters. Personnel Psych. 52(2):393–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing, Topics in Social Psychology Series (McGraw-Hill Humanities, Columbus, OH).Google Scholar
• Wong SI (2019) Influencing upward: Subordinates’ responses to leaders’ (un)awareness of their empowerment expectations. Internat. J. Human Resources Management 30(10):1604–1634.Crossref, Google Scholar