Context and Aggregation: An Experimental Study of Bias and Discrimination in Organizational Decisions

References

• Adner R, Levinthal DA (2008) Doing vs. seeing: Acts of exploitation and perceptions of exploration. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 2(1):43–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agranov M, Schotter A (2012) Ignorance is bliss: An experimental study of the use of ambiguity and vagueness in the coordination games with asymmetric payoffs. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 4(2):77–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Axelrod R, Cohen MD (2001) Harnessing Complexity (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Barber BM, Odean T (2001) Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Quart. J. Econom. 116(1):261–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF (2003) Behavioural studies of strategic thinking in games. Trends Cognitive Sci. 7(5):225–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Lovallo D (1999) Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(1):306–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Ho TH, Chong JK (2004) A cognitive hierarchy model of games. Quart. J. Econom. 119(3):861–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen M, Knudsen T (2002) The Architecture of Economic Organization: Toward a General Framework (University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark).Google Scholar
• Christensen M, Knudsen T (2010) Design of decision-making organizations. Management Sci. 56(1):71–89.Link, Google Scholar
• Christensen M, Knudsen T (2013) How decisions can be organized and why it matters. J. Organ. Design 2(3):41–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen M, Knudsen T (2020) Division of roles and endogenous specialization. Indust. Corporate Change 29(1):105–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2012) Organizational structure as a determinant of performance: Evidence from mutual funds. Strategic Management J. 33(6):611–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2013) An efficient frontier in organization design: Organizational structure as a determinant of exploration and exploitation. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1083–1101.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Eggers JP (2013) Organizational decision making: An information aggregation view. Management Sci. 59(10):2257–2277.Link, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of The Firm (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Devetag G, Warglien M (2003) Games and phone numbers: Do short-term memory bounds affect strategic behavior? J. Econom. Psych. 24(2):189–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drucker PF (1967) The effective decision. Harvard Bus. Rev. 45:92–104.Google Scholar
• Fang C (2012) Organizational learning as credit assignment: A model and two experiments. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1717–1732.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal DA, Rivkin JW (2005) Strategy making in novel and complex worlds: The power of analogy. Strategic Management J. 26(8):691–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Greve HR, Levinthal DA, Ocasio W (2012) The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbons R, Roberts J (2013) The Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene WH (2018) Econometric Analysis, 8th ed. (Pearson, London).Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Lawrence PR, Puranam P (2005) Adaptation in vertical relationships: Beyond incentive conflict. Strategic Management J. 26(5):415–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
• Joseph J, Gaba V (2020) Organizational structure, information processing, and decision-making: A retrospective and road map for research. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):267–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Levinthal DA (2007) Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organ. Sci. 18(1):39–54.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (2011) A behavioral approach to strategy–What’s the alternative? Strategic Management J. 32(13):1517–1523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luce D (1959) Individual Choice Behavior (Wesley, New York).Google Scholar
• Marschak J, Radner R (1972) Economic Theory of Teams (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• McFadden DL (1976) Quantal choice analysis: A survey. Ann. Econom. Soc. Measurement 5(4):363–390.Google Scholar
• McKelvey RD, Palfrey TR (1995) Quantal response equilibria for normal form games. Games Econom. Behav. 10(1):6–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore EF, Shannon CE (1956a) Reliable circuits using less reliable relays, part I. J. Franklin Inst. 262(September):191–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore EF, Shannon CE (1956b) Reliable circuits using less reliable relays, part II. J. Franklin Inst. 262(October):281–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects models. Methods Ecology Evolution 4(2):133–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piezunka H, Schilke O (2021). The effect of organizational aggregation structures on individuals’ voting behavior: An experimental investigation. Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
• Puranam P (2018) The Microstructure of Organizations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Maciejovsky B (2020) Organizational structure and organizational learning. Argote L, Levine JM, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Group and Organizational Learning (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 521–533.Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Raveendran M, Knudsen T (2012) Organization design: The epistemic interdependence perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):419–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reitzig M, Maciejovsky B (2015) Corporate hierarchy and vertical information flow inside the firm—A behavioral view. Strategic Management J. 36(13):1979–1999.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2007) Patterned interactions in complex systems: Implications for exploration. Management Sci. 53(7):1068–1085.Link, Google Scholar
• Sah RK, Stiglitz JE (1985) Human fallibility and economic organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(2):292–297.Google Scholar
• Sah RK, Stiglitz JE (1986) The architecture of economic systems: Hierarchies and polyarchies. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(4):716–727.Google Scholar
• Sah RK, Stiglitz JE (1988) Committees, hierarchies and polyarchies. Econom. J. (London) 98(391):451–470.Google Scholar
• Samuel AL (1959) Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers. IBM J. Res. Development 3(3):210–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schotter A, Weigelt KW, Wilson C (1994) A laboratory investigation of multiperson rationality and presentation effects. Games Econom. Behav. 6(3):445–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorkin RD, West R, Robinson DE (1998) Group performance depends on majority rule. Psych. Sci. 9(6):456–463.Crossref, Google Scholar