When Reflection Hurts: The Effect of Cognitive Processing Types on Organizational Adaptation to Discontinuous Change

References

• Abernathy WJ, Utterback JM (1978) Patterns of industrial innovation. Tech. Rev. 80(7):40–47.Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Boyd BK, Pierce CA, Short JC, Salvato C, Rerup C(2011) Beyond collective entities: Multilevel research on organizational routines and capabilities. J. Management 37(2):468–490.Google Scholar
• Albers C, Lakens D (2018) When power analyses based on pilot data are biased: Inaccurate effect size estimators and follow-up bias. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 74:187–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Augier M, Teece DJ (2009) Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in business strategy and economic performance. Organ. Sci. 20(2):410–421.Link, Google Scholar
• Bago B, De Neys W (2017) Fast logic? Examining the time course assumption of dual process theory. Cognition 158:90–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bear A, Rand DG (2016) Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113(4):936–941.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ (2010) Securities analysts and incumbent response to radical technological change: Evidence from digital photography and internet telephony. Organ. Sci. 21(1):42–62.Link, Google Scholar
• Bingham CB, Eisenhardt KM (2011) Rational heuristics: The ‘simple rules’ that strategists learn from process experience. Strategic Management J. 32(13):1437–1464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brainerd CJ, Reyna VF (2002) Fuzzy-trace theory: Dual processes in memory, reasoning, and cognitive neuroscience. Adv. Child Development Behav. 28:41–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1997) The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brusoni S, Laureiro-Martínez D, Canessa N, Zollo M (2020) Exploring exploration: The role of affective states as forces that hinder change. Indust. Corporate Change 29(1):207–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caldwell A, Lakens D, DeBruine L, Love J, Aust F (2021) Superpower: Simulation-based power analysis for factorial designs. R package version 0.1.2.Google Scholar
• Cappelen AW, Konow J, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B (2013) Just luck: An experimental study of risk-taking and fairness. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(4):1398–1413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carden L, Wood W (2018) Habit formation and change. Current Opinion Behav. Sci. 20:117–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chambers CR, Baker WE (2020) Robust systems of cooperation in the presence of rankings: How displaying prosocial contributions can offset the disruptive effects of performance rankings. Organ. Sci. 31(2):287–307.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen MD, Bacdayan P (1994) Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. 5(4):554–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Cosmides L, Tooby J (1996) Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition 58(1):1–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dane E, Pratt MG (2007) Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Acad. Management Rev. 32(1):33–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2009) Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(3):413–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawes MA (2010) Triple-blind study. Salkind N, ed. Encyclopedia of Research Design, vol. 1 (SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA), 1542–1543.Google Scholar
• Dienes Z, Perner J (1999) A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge. Behav. Brain Sci. 22(5):735–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dijksterhuis A, Nordgren LF (2006) A theory of unconscious thought. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 1(2):95–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Di Stefano G, King AA, Verona G (2015) Sanctioning in the wild: Rational calculus and retributive instincts in gourmet cuisine. Acad. Management J. 58(3):906–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res. Policy 11(3):147–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton JE (1993) Interpretations on Automatic: A Different View of Strategic Issue Diagnosis. J. Management Stud. 30(3):339–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Kaplan S (2009) Cognition and renewal: Comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organ. Sci. 20(2):461–477.Link, Google Scholar
• Egidi M, Narduzzo A (1997) The emergence of path-dependent behaviors in cooperative contexts. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 15(6):677–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1105–1121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD, Kramer RM (2003) Assessing creativity in Hollywood pitch meetings: Evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgments. Acad. Management J. 46(3):283–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epstein S (2010) Demystifying intuition: What it is, what it does, and how it does it. Psych. Inquiry 21(4):295–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epstein S, Pacini R, Denes-Raj V, Heier H (1996) Individual differences in intuitive–experiential and analytical–rational thinking styles. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 71(2):390–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans JSTBT, Stanovich KE (2013) Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 8(3):223–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG (2009) Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods 41(4):1149–1160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Foss NJ, Heimeriks KH, Madsen TL (2012) Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: Individuals, processes, and structure. J. Management Stud. 49(8):1351–1374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galla BM, Duckworth AL (2015) More than resisting temptation: Beneficial habits mediate the relationship between self-control and positive life outcomes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 109(3):508–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garapin A, Hollard M (1999) Routines and incentives in group tasks. J. Evolutionary Econom. 9(4):465–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G (2005) Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organ. Sci. 16(6):599–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Gillan CM, Otto AR, Phelps EA, Daw ND (2015) Model-based learning protects against forming habits. Cognitive Affective Behav. Neuroscience 15(3):523–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Peteraf M (2015) Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. 36(6):831–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Finkelstein S, Mitchell W, Peteraf M, Singh H, Teece D, Winter SG (2007) Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations (Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA).Google Scholar
• Hoang H, Rothaermel FT (2010) Leveraging internal and external experience: Exploration, exploitation, and R&D project performance. Strategic Management J. 31(7):734–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson GP (1997) Cognitive inertia in a turbulent market: The case of UK residential estate agents. J. Management Stud. 34(6):921–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson GP, Healey MP (2011) Psychological foundations of dynamic capabilities: Reflexion and reflection in strategic management. Strategic Management J. 32(13):1500–1516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson GP, Healey MP (2014) Coming in from the cold: The psychological foundations of radical innovation revisited. Indust. Marketing Management 43(8):1306–1313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson GP, Sadler-Smith E (2018) The dynamics of intuition and analysis in managerial and organizational decision making. Acad. Management Perspect. 32(4):473–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson GP, Bown NJ, Maule AJ, Glaister KW, Pearman AD (1999) Breaking the frame: An analysis of strategic cognition and decision making under uncertainty. Strategic Management J. 20(10):977–985.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang L, Pearce JL (2015) Managing the unknowable: The effectiveness of early-stage investor gut feel in entrepreneurial investment decisions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(4):634–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Frederick S (2002) Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D, eds. Heuristics Biases (Cambridge University Press, New York), 49–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Klein G (2009) Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. Amer. Psych. 64(6):515–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kremser W, Blagoev B (2021) The dynamics of prioritizing: How actors temporally pattern complex role–routine ecologies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(2):339–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuo WJ, Sjostrom T, Chen YP, Wang YH, Huang CY (2009) Intuition and deliberation: Two systems for strategizing in the brain. Sci. 324(5926):519–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakens D (2020) Effect sizes and power for interactions in ANOVA designs. 20 Stat., http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/03/effect-sizes-and-power-for-interactions.html.Google Scholar
• Laureiro-Martinez D (2014) Cognitive control capabilities, routinization propensity, and decision-making performance. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1111–1133.Link, Google Scholar
• Laureiro‐Martínez D, Brusoni S (2018) Cognitive flexibility and adaptive decision‐making: Evidence from a laboratory study of expert decision makers. Strategic Management J. 39(4):1031–1058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12(1):1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee MD, Wagenmakers EJ (2013) Bayesian Cognitive Modeling: A Practical Course (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine SS, Bernard M, Nagel R (2017) Strategic intelligence: The cognitive capability to anticipate competitor behavior. Strategic Management J. 38(12):2390–2423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lieberman MD (2000) Intuition: A social cognitive neuroscience approach. Psych. Bull. 126(1):109–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lieberman MD (2007) Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Rev. Psych. 58(1):259–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lieberman MD, Jarcho JM, Satpute AB (2004) Evidence-based and intuition-based self-knowledge: An fMRI study. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 87(4):421–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linden A (2015) Conducting interrupted time-series analysis for single- and multiple-group comparisons. Stata J. Promoting Comm. Statist. Stata 15(2):480–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Liu Y, Rand DG, Heatherton TF, Han S (2015) Opposing oxytocin effects on intergroup cooperative behavior in intuitive and reflective minds. Neuropsychopharmacology 40(10):2379–2387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marcel JJ, Barr PS, Duhaime IM (2011) The influence of executive cognition on competitive dynamics. Strategic Management J. 32(2):115–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1981) Footnotes to organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 26(4):563–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Olsen JP (1979) Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations, 2nd ed. (Universitetsforlaget, Bergen, Norway).Google Scholar
• Melnikoff DE, Bargh JA (2018) The mythical number two. Trends Cognitive Sci. 22(4):280–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer AD, Brooks GR, Goes JB (1990) Environmental jolts and industry revolutions: Organizational responses to discontinuous change. Strategic Management J. 11:93–110.Google Scholar
• Miner AS, Bassoff P, Moorman C (2001) Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(2):304–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H (1994) The fall and rise of strategic planning. Havard Bus. Rev. 72(1):107–114.Google Scholar
• Nadkarni S, Barr PS (2008) Environmental context, managerial cognition, and strategic action: An integrated view. Strategic Management J. 29(13):1395–1427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer DM, Meyvis T, Davidenko N (2009) Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 45(4):867–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennycook G, Fugelsang JA, Koehler DJ (2015) What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement. Cognitive Psych. 80:34–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peysakhovich A, Rand DG (2016) Habits of virtue: Creating norms of cooperation and defection in the laboratory. Management Sci. 62(3):631–647.Link, Google Scholar
• Phillips WJ, Fletcher JM, Marks ADG, Hine DW (2016) Thinking styles and decision making: A meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. 142(3):260–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polidoro F (2020) Knowledge, routines, and cognitive effects in nonmarket selection environments: An examination of the regulatory review of innovations. Strategic Management J. 41(13):2400–2435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rand DG (2016) Cooperation, fast and slow: Meta-analytic evidence for a theory of social heuristics and self-interested deliberation. Psych. Sci. 27(9):1192–1206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rand DG, Greene JD, Nowak MA (2012) Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature 489(7416):427–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reber AS (1989) Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. J. Experiment. Psych. General 118(3):219–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reger RK, Palmer TB (1996) Managerial categorization of competitors: Using old maps to navigate new environments. Organ. Sci. 7(1):22–39.Link, Google Scholar
• Rouder JN, Speckman PL, Sun D, Morey RD, Iverson G (2009) Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 16(2):225–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A (2001) A theorist’s view of experiments. Eur. Econom. Rev. 45(4–6):615–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarta A, Durand R, Vergne JP (2021) Organizational adaptation. J. Management 47(1):43–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Satpute AB, Lieberman MD (2006) Integrating automatic and controlled processes into neurocognitive models of social cognition. Brain Res. 1079(1):86–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilke O (2014) On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Strategic Management J. 35(2):179–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schreyögg G, Sydow J (2010) Crossroads—Organizing for fluidity? Dilemmas of new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. 21(6):1251–1262.Link, Google Scholar
• Shiffrin RM, Schneider W (1977) Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psych. Rev. 84(2):127–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1947) Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Sloman SA (1996) The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psych. Bull. 119(1):3–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soenen G, Melkonian T, Ambrose ML (2017) To shift or not to shift? Determinants and consequences of phase shifting on justice judgments. Acad. Management J. 60(2):798–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stieglitz N, Knudsen T, Becker MC (2016) Adaptation and inertia in dynamic environments. Strategic Management J. 37(9):1854–1864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management J. 28(13):1319–1350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Sunstein CR, Balz JP (2012) Choice architecture. Shafir E, ed. The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 428–439.Google Scholar
• Trippas D, Handley SJ, Verde MF, Morsanyi K (2016) Logic brightens my day: Evidence for implicit sensitivity to logical validity. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 42(9):1448–1457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urbaniak GC, Plous S (2013) Research randomizer (version 4.0) [computer software], http://www.randomizer.org/.Google Scholar
• Wason PC, Evans JSTBT (1974) Dual processes in reasoning? Cognition 3(2):141–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Wiggins RR, Ruefli TW (2005) Schumpeter’s ghost: Is hypercompetition making the best of times shorter? Strategic Management J. 26(10):887–911.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter SG (2013) Habit, deliberation, and action: Strengthening the microfoundations of routines and capabilities. Acad. Management Perspect. 27(2):120–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wollersheim J, Heimeriks KH (2016) Dynamic capabilities and their characteristic qualities: Insights from a laboratory experiment. Organ. Sci. 27(2):233–248.Link, Google Scholar
• Wood W, Rünger D (2016) Psychology of habit. Annual Rev. Psych. 67(1):289–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. 13(3):339–351.Link, Google Scholar