Responsibility and Organization Science: Integrating Micro and Macro Perspectives

References

• Aguilera RV, Rupp DE, Williams CA, Ganapathi J (2007) Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):836–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Glavis A (2012) What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. J. Management 38(4):932–968.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andriopoulos C, Lewis MW (2009) Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organ. Sci. 20(4):696–717.Link, Google Scholar
• Arnaud A, Schminke M (2012) The ethical climate and context of organizations: A comprehensive model. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1767–1780.Link, Google Scholar
• Bethune A, Korinek A (2020) Covid-19 infection externalities: Trading off lives vs. livelihoods. NBER Working Paper No. 27009, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Schankerman M, Van Reenen J (2013) Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econometrica 81:1347–1393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Genakos C, Sadun R, Van Reenen J (2012) Management practices across firms and countries. Acad. Management Perspect. 20(1):12–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bode C, Singh J, Rogan M (2015) Corporate social initiatives and employee retention. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1702–1720.Link, Google Scholar
• Burbano VC (2016) Social responsibility messages and worker wage requirements: Field experimental evidence from online labor marketplaces. Organ. Sci. 27(4):1010–1028.Link, Google Scholar
• Chandler D (2014) Organizational susceptibility to institutional complexity: Critical events driving the adoption and implementation of the ethics and compliance officer position. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1722–1743.Link, Google Scholar
• Collins D (1997) The ethical superiority and inevitability of participatory management as an organizational system. Organ. Sci. 8(5):489–507.Link, Google Scholar
• Dacin T, Dacin P, Tracey P (2011) Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1203–1213.Link, Google Scholar
• Delgado M, Porter ME, Stern S (2010) Clusters and entrepreneurship. J. Econom. Geography 10(4):495–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feddersen TJ, Gilligan TW (2001) Saints and markets: Activists and the supply of credence goods. J. Econom. Management Strategy 10(1):149–171.Google Scholar
• Jones DA (2019) The psychology of CSR. McWilliams A, Rupp DE, Siegel DS, Stahl G, Waldman DA, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility: Psychological and Organizational Perspectives (Oxford University Press, London), 19–47.Google Scholar
• Jones TM, Ryan LV (1997) The link between ethical judgment and action in organizations: A moral approbation approach. Organ. Sci. 8(6):663–680.Link, Google Scholar
• Jones TM, Felps W, Bigley GA (2007) Ethical theory and stakeholder-related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture. Acad. Management Rev. 32(1):137–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Qian C (2014) Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: symbol or substance? Organ. Sci. 25:127–148.Link, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Toffel MW, Zhou Y (2016) Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure: A global study of greenwashing. Organ. Sci. 27(2):483–504.Link, Google Scholar
• McDonnell M (2016) Radical repertoires: The incidence and impact of corporate-sponsored social activism. Organ. Sci. 27(1):53–71.Link, Google Scholar
• McWilliams A, Siegel D (2001) Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 26(1):117–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mellahi K, Frynas JG, Sun P, Siegel D (2016) A review of the nonmarket strategy literature: Toward a multi-theoretical integration. J. Management 42(1):143–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miron-Spektor E, Ingram A, Keller J, Smith W, Lewis MW (2018) Microfoundations of organizational paradox: The problem is how we think about the problem. Acad. Management J. 61(1):26–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pless NM, Maak T, Waldman DA (2012) Different approaches toward doing the right thing: Mapping the responsibility orientations of leaders. Acad. Management Perspect. 26(4):51–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinecke J, Ansari S (2015) What is a “fair” price? Ethics as sensemaking. Organ. Sci. 26(3):867–888.Link, Google Scholar
• Robertson DC, Anderson E (1993) Control system and task environment effects on ethical judgment: An exploratory study of industrial salespeople. Organ. Sci. 4(4):617–644.Link, Google Scholar
• Rotundo M (2019) Corporate social irresponsibility in spite of efforts to act responsibly: The nature, measurement, and context antecedents of CSR and CSiR by organizations. McWilliams A, Rupp DE, Siegel DS, Stahl G, Waldman DA, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility: Psychological and Organizational Perspectives (Oxford University Press, London), 176–206.Google Scholar
• Siegel DS (2009) Green management matters only if it yields more green: An economic/strategic perspective. Acad. Management Perspect. 23(3):5–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siegel DS, Simons KL (2010) Assessing the effects of mergers and acquisitions on firm performance, plant productivity, and workers: New evidence from matched employer-employee data. Strategic Management J. 31(8):903–916.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siegel DS, Vitaliano DF (2007) An empirical analysis of the strategic use of corporate social responsibility. J. Econom. Management Strategy 16(3):773–792.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Lewis MW (2011) Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):381–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Tushman ML (2005) Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ. Sci. 16(5):522–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Sonenshein S (2009) Emergence of ethical issues during strategic change implementation. Organ. Sci. 20(1):223–239.Link, Google Scholar
• Stigler GJ (1971) The theory of economic regulation. Bell J. Econom. Management Sci. 3:21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sullivan BN, Haunschild P, Page K (2007) Organizations non gratae? The impact of unethical corporate acts on interorganizational networks. Organ. Sci. 18(1):55–70.Link, Google Scholar
• Umphress EE, Bingham JB (2011) When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organ. Sci. 22(3):621–640.Link, Google Scholar
• Vasudeva G (2013) Weaving together the normative and regulative roles of government: how the Norwegian sovereign wealth fund’s responsible conduct is shaping firms’ cross‐border investments. Organ. Sci. 24(6):1662–1682.Link, Google Scholar
• Waldman DA, Sully de Luque M, Wang D (2012) What can we really learn about management practices across firms and countries? Acad. Management Perspect. 26(1):34–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldman DA, Putnam LL, Miron-Spektor E, Siegel D (2019) The role of paradox theory in decision making and management research. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 155(1):1–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang H, Choi J, Li J (2008) Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Organ. Sci. 19(1):143–159.Link, Google Scholar
• Willness CR (2019) When CSR backfires: Understanding stakeholders’ negative responses to corporate social responsibility. McWilliams A, Rupp DE, Siegel DS, Stahl G, Waldman DA, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility: Psychological and Organizational Perspectives. (Oxford University Press, London), 207–238.Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Luo XR (2013) Dared to care: Organizational vulnerability, institutional logics, and MNCs’ social responsiveness in emerging markets. Organ. Sci. 34(6):1742–1764.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Marquis C, Qiao K (2016) Do political connections buffer firms from or bind firms to the government? A study of corporate charitable donations of Chinese firms. Organ. Sci. 27(5):1307–1324.Link, Google Scholar