Victorious and Hierarchical: Past Performance as a Determinant of Team Hierarchical Differentiation

References

• Allison PD (1990) Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociol. Methodology 20:93–114.Google Scholar
• Almaatouq A, Whiting ME, Becker J, Houghton JP, Paton N, Watts DJ (2021) Empirica: A virtual laboratory for high-throughput macro-level experiments. Behav. Res. Methods 1(1):1–14.Google Scholar
• Ancona DG, Okhuysen GA, Perlow LA (2001) Taking time to integrate temporal research. Acad. Management Rev. 26(4):512–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Brown CE (2010) The functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy. Res. Organ. Behav. 30:55–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Kilduff GJ (2009) Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 96(2):491–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Spataro SE, Flynn FJ (2008) Personality and organizational culture as determinants of influence. J. Appl. Psych. 93(3):702–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C, John OP, Keltner D, Kring AM (2001) Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(1):116–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arechar AA, Gächter S, Molleman L (2018) Conducting interactive experiments online. Experiment. Econom. 21(1):99–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Goncalo JA (2007) Past success and creativity over time: A study of inventors in the hard disk drive industry. Management Sci. 53(1):1–15.Link, Google Scholar
• Bales RF, Strodtbeck F, Mills T, Roseborough M (1951) Channels of communication in small groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 16(4):461–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckman CM, Haunschild PR, Phillips DJ (2004) Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organ. Sci. 15(3):259–275.Link, Google Scholar
• Bendersky C, Pai J (2018) Status dynamics. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 5:183–199.Google Scholar
• Bendersky C, Shah NP (2012) The downfall of extraverts and rise of neurotics: The dynamic process of status allocation in task groups. Acad. Management J. 56(2):387–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Cohen BP, Zelditch M (1972) Status characteristics and social interaction. Amer. J. Sociol. 37(3):241–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Rosenholtz SJ, Zelditch M (1980) Status organizing processes. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 6(1):479–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Ridgeway CL, Fisek MH, Norman RZ (1998) The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 63(3):379–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bligh MC, Kohles JC, Pillai R (2011) Romancing leadership: Past, present, and future. Leadership Quart. 22(6):1058–1077.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bligh MC, Kohles JC, Pearce CL, Justin JE, Stovall JF (2007) When the romance is over: Follower perspectives of aversive leadership. Appl. Psych. 56(4):528–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohner G, Bless H, Schwarz N, Strack F (1988) When do events trigger attributions? The impact of valence and subjective probability. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 18(May):335–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson JS (2003) Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(4):557–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson SJ, Van Der Vegt GS, Cantimur Y, Rink F (2016) Different views of hierarchy and why they matter: Hierarchy as inequality or as cascading influence. Acad. Management J. 59(4):1265–1289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calder BJ (1977) An attribution theory of leadership. Staw BM, Salancik G, eds. New Directions Organ. Behav. (St. Clair Press, Chicago), 179–204.Google Scholar
• Case C, Maner J (2014) Divide and conquer: When and why leaders undermine the cohesive fabric of their group. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 107(6):1033–1050.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chance M (1967) Attention structure as the basis of primate rank orders. Man 2(4):503–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chase ID (1980) Social process and hierarchy formation in small groups: A comparative perspective. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 45(6):905–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen JS, Garg P (2018) Dancing with the stars: Benefits of a star employee’s temporary absence for organizational performance. Strategic Management J. 39(5):1239–1267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng JT (2020) Dominance, prestige, and the role of leveling in human social hierarchy and equality. Current Opinion Psych. 33:238–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng JT, Tracy JL, Foulsham T, Kingstone A, Henrich J (2013) Two ways to the top: evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 104(1):103–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chizhik AW, Alexander MG, Chizhik EW, Goodman J (2003) The rise and fall of power and prestige orders: Influence of task structure. Soc. Psych. Quart. 66(3):303–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2013) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Psychology Pres, Hove, UK).Google Scholar
• Cronin MA, Weingart LR, Todorova G (2011) Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet? Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):571–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2013) An efficient frontier in organization design: Organizational structure as a determinant of exploration and exploitation. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1083–1101.Link, Google Scholar
• Cyert R, March J (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Day DV, Gordon S, Fink C (2012) The sporting life: Exploring organizations through the lens of sport. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):397–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Kwaadsteniet EW, Van Dijk E (2010) Social status as a cue for tacit coordination. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 46(3):515–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Waal FB (1986) The integration of dominance and social bonding in primates. Quart. Rev. Biology 61:459–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Suh JH (2019) Experience and behavior: How negative feedback in new vs. experienced domains affects firm action and subsequent performance. Acad. Management J. 62(2):309–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellis S, Mendel R, Nir M (2006) Learning from successful and failed experience: The moderating role of kind of after-event review. J. Appl. Psych. 91(3):669–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Everett MG, Krackhardt D (2012) A second look at Krackhardt’s graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations. Soc. Networks 34(2):159–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forsyth D, Kelley K (1994) Attribution in groups: Estimation of personal contributions to collective endeavors. Small Group Res. 25(3):367–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman LC (1979) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks 1(3):215–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gamson WA, Scotch NA (1964) Scapegoating in baseball. Amer. J. Sociol. 70(1):69–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick CJG, Hackman JR (1990) Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processing 47(1):65–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson CB (1999) Do they do what they believe they can? Ggroup efficacy and group effectiveness across tasks and cultures. Acad. Management J. 42(2):138–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilovich T, Vallone R, Tversky A (1985) The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive Psych. 17(3):295–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goncalo JA (2004) Past success and convergent thinking in groups: The role of group-focused attributions. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 34(4):385–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greer LL, de Jong BA, Schouten ME, Dannals JE (2018) Why and when hierarchy impacts team effectiveness: A meta-analytic integration. J. Appl. Psych. 103(6):591–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Håkonsson D, Eskildsen J, Argote L, Monster D, Burton R, Obel B (2016) Exploration vs. exploitation: Emotions and performance as antecedents and consequences of team decisions. Strategic Management J. 37:985–1001.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halevy N, Chou EY, Galinsky AD (2011) A functional model of hierarchy: Why, how, and when vertical differentiation enhances group performance. Organ. Psych. Rev. 1(1):32–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halevy N, Chou EY, Galinsky AD, Murnighan JK (2012) When hierarchy wins: Evidence from the National Basketball Association. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 3(4):398–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton VL (1978) Who is responsible?Toward a social psychology of responsibility attribution. Soc. Psych. (Gott.) 41(4):316–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hays NA, Bendersky C (2015) Not all inequality is created equal: Effects of status vs. power hierarchies on competition for upward mobility. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 108(6):867–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck JR, Beersma B, Schouten ME (2012) Beyond team types and taxonomies: A dimensional scaling conceptualization for team description. Acad. Management Rev. 37(1):82–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jordan J, Sivanathan N, Galinsky D (2012) Something to lose and nothing to gain: The role of stress in the interactive effect of power and stability on risk taking. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(4):530–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kakkar H, Sivanathan N, Gobel MS (2020) Fall from grace: The role of dominance and prestige in the punishment of high-status actors. Acad. Management J. 63(2):530–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelley H, Michela J (1980) Attribution theory and research. Annu. Rev. Psych. 31:457–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SWJ (2015) Advancing research on team process dynamics: Theoretical, methodological, and measurement considerations. Organ. Psych. Rev. 5(4):270–299.Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SWJ, Bell B (2013) Work groups and teams in organizations: Review update. Handbook Psych. 12:412–469.Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SWJ, Ilgen DR (2006) Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psych. Sci. Public Interest 7(3):77–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SWJ, Gully S, McHugh P, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers J, Ferris G, eds. (1996) Dynamic Theory of Team Leadership and Team Effectiveness: Developmental and Task Contingent Leader Roles. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 14:253–305.Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SWJ, Gully S, Nason E, Smith E, Ilgen DR, Pulakos E, eds. (1999) Developing Adaptive Teams: A Theory of Compilation and Performance Across Levels and Time. The changing nature of work performance: Implications for staffing, personnel actions, and development. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA), 240–292.Google Scholar
• Lant T, Montgomery D (1987) Learning from strategic success and failure. J. Bus. Res. 15:503–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Stettner U, Tushman ML (2010) Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):109–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Y, Vanhaverbeke W, Schoenmakers W (2008) Exploration and exploitation in innovation: Reframing the interpretation. Creative Innovative Management 17(2):107–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindsley D, Brass D, Thomas JB (1995) Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):645–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Magee JC, Galinsky ADD (2008) Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):1–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maner JK (2017) Dominance and prestige: A tale of two hierarchies. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 26(6):526–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maner JK, Mead NL (2010) The essential tension between leadership and power: when leaders sacrifice group goals for the sake of self-interest. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 99(3):482–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Marks M, Mathieu J, Zaccaro S (2001) A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Acad. Management Rev. 28(3):357–376.Google Scholar
• Marr JC, Thau S (2014) Falling from great (and not-so-great) heights: How initial status position influences performance after status loss. Acad. Management J. 57(1):223–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marr JC, Pettit N, Thau S (2019) After the fall: How perceived self-control protects the legitimacy of higher-ranking employees after status loss. Organ. Sci. 30(6):1165–1188.Link, Google Scholar
• Mathieu JE, Kukenberger MR, D’Innocenzo L, Reilly G (2015) Modeling reciprocal team cohesion–performance relationships, as impacted by shared leadership and members’ competence. J. Appl. Psych. 100(3):713–734.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meindl JR, Ehrlich S, Dukerich JM (1985) The romance of leadership. Admin. Sci. Quart. 30(1):78–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton R (1968) The Matthew effect in science. Science 159:56–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moussaïd M, Campero AN, Almaatouq A (2018) Dynamical networks of influence in small group discussions. PLoS One 13(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moussaïd M, Herzog SM, Kämmer JE, Hertwig R (2017) Reach and speed of judgment propagation in the laboratory. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 114(16):4117–4122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neeley TB (2012) Language matters: Status loss and achieved status distinctions in global organizations. Organ. Sci. 24(2):476–497.Link, Google Scholar
• Neeley TB, Dumas TL (2016) Unearned status gain: Evidence from a global language mandate. Acad. Management J. 59(1):14–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettit NC, Yong K, Spataro SE (2010) Holding your place: Reactions to the prospect of status gains and losses. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 46(2):396–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettit NC, Doyle SP, Lount RB, To C (2016) Cheating to get ahead or to avoid falling behind? The effect of potential negative vs. positive status change on unethical behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processing 137:172–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettit NC, Sivanathan N, Gladstone E, Marr JC (2013) Rising stars and sinking ships: Consequences of status momentum. Psych. Sci. 24(8):1579–1584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (1977) The ambiguity of leadership. Acad. Management Rev. 2(1):104–112.Google Scholar
• Puffer SM (1990) Attributions of charismatic leadership: The impact of decision style, outcome, and observer characteristics. Leadership Quart. 1:177–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rantilla AK (2000) Collective task responsibility allocation revisiting the group-serving bias. Small Group Res. 31(6):739–766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ronay R, Greenaway K, Anicich EM, Galinsky AD (2012) The path to glory is paved with hierarchy: When hierarchical differentiation increases group effectiveness. Psych. Sci. 23(6):669–677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scheepers D, Ellemers N (2005) When the pressure is up: The assessment of social identity threat in low and high status groups. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 41(2):192–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simpson B, Willer R, Ridgeway CL (2012) Status hierarchies and the organization of collective action. Sociol. Theory 30(3):149–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith-Jentsch KA, Cannon-Bowers JA, Tannenbaum SI, Salas E (2008) Guided team self-correction: Impacts on team mental models, processes, and effectiveness. Small Group Res. 39(3):303–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staw BM, Sandelands LE, Dutton JE (1981) Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 501–524.Google Scholar
• Tarakci M, Greer LL, Groenen PJF (2015) When does power disparity help or hurt group performance? Reconciliation of functionalist and conflict theories of power disparity. J. Appl. Psych. 101(3):415–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor SE, Fiske ST (1975) Point of view and perceptions of causality. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 32(3):439–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor SE, Fiske ST (1978) Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 11(C):249–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Romanelli E (1985) Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Res. Organ. Behav. 7:171–222.Google Scholar
• Van Vugt M, Hogan R, Kaiser RB (2008) Leadership, followership, and evolution: Some lessons from the past. Amer. Psych. 63(3):182–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villado AJ, Arthur W (2013) The comparative effect of subjective and objective after-action reviews on team performance on a complex task. J. Appl. Psych. 98(3):514–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walker H, Thomas G, Zelditch M (1986) Legitimation, endorsement, and stability. Soc. Forces 64(3):620–643.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Weber R, Camerer C, Rottenstreich Y, Knez M (2001) The illusion of leadership: Misattribution of cause in coordination games. Organ. Sci. 12(5):582–598.Link, Google Scholar
• Weinberger M (2016) Why this Microsoft exec totally shook up the team that makes one of its most important products. Business Insider, https://www.businessinsider.com./microsoft-office-team-reorganization-2016-6.Google Scholar
• Weiner B (1995) Inferences of responsibility and social motivation. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 27(C):1–47.Google Scholar
• Zhang L (2019) Who loses when a team wins? Better performance increases racial bias. Organ. Sci. 30(1):40–50.Link, Google Scholar
• Zitek EM, Tiedens LZ (2012) The fluency of social hierarchy: The ease with which hierarchical relationships are seen, remembered, learned, and liked. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 102(1):98–115.Crossref, Google Scholar