Bridging the Chasm Between Intentions and Behaviors: Developing and Testing a Construal Level Theory of Internal Whistle-Blowing

References

• Agerstrom J, Bjorklund F (2009) Moral concerns are greater for temporally distant events and are moderated by value strength. Soc. Cognition 27(2):261–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Gottfredson RK, Culpepper SA (2013) Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. J. Management 39(6):1490–1528.Google Scholar
• Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 50(2):179–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amernic J, Craig R (2013) Leadership discourse, culture, and corporate ethics: CEO-speak at news corporation. J. Bus. Ethics 118:379–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amit E, Algom D, Trope Y (2009) Distance-dependent processing of pictures and words. J. Experiment. Psych. General 138(3):400–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aquino K, Reed A (2002) The self-importance of moral identity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83(6):1423–1440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (2020) Report to the nations: 2020 global study on occupational fraud and abuse. Report, Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Finkenauer C, Vohs KD (2001) Bad is stronger than good. Rev. General Psych. 5(4):323–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellé N, Cantarelli P (2017) What causes unethical behavior? A meta‐analysis to set an agenda for public administration research. Public Admin. Rev. 77(3):327–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergemann P, Aven B (2023) Whistleblowing and group affiliation: The role of group cohesion and the locus of the wrongdoer in reporting decisions. Organ. Sci. 34(3):1243–1265.Link, Google Scholar
• Berson Y, Halevy N (2014) Hierarchy, leadership, and construal fit. J. Experiment. Psych. Appl. 20(3):232–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berson Y, Oreg S, Wiesenfeld B (2021) A construal level analysis of organizational change processes. Res. Organ. Behav. 41:100148.Google Scholar
• Berson Y, Halevy N, Shamir B, Erez M (2015) Leading from different psychological distances: A construal-level perspective on vision communication, goal setting, and follower motivation. Leadership Quart. 26(2):143–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhal KT, Dadhich A (2011) Impact of ethical leadership and leader–member exchange on whistle blowing: The moderating impact of the moral intensity of the issue. J. Bus. Ethics 103(3):485–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bliese PD, Wang M (2020) Results provide information about cumulative probabilities of finding significance: Let’s report this information. J. Management 46(7):1275–1288.Google Scholar
• Brehm JW (1966) A Theory of Psychological Reactance (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Brown ME, Treviño LK, Harrison DA (2005) Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 97:117–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter AB, Bobocel DR, Brockner J (2020) When to explain why or how it happened: Tailoring accounts to fit observers’ construal level. J. Experiment. Psych. 26(1):158–170.Google Scholar
• Cesario J, Grant H, Higgins ET (2004) Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from feeling right. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 86(3):388–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen L (2019) A review of research on whistle-blowing. Amer. J. Industrial Bus. Management 9(2):295–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng J, Bai H, Yang X (2019) Ethical leadership and internal whistleblowing: A mediated moderation model. J. Bus. Ethics 155(1):115–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiu RK (2003) Ethical judgment and whistleblowing intention: Examining the moderating role of locus of control. J. Bus. Ethics 43:65–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chordiya R, Sabharwal M, Relly JE, Berman EM (2020) Organizational protection for whistleblowers: A cross-national study. Public Management Rev. 22(4):527–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB (1996) Social influence and the triple tumor structure of organizational dishonesty. Messick DM, Tenbrunsel AE, eds. Codes of Conduct: Behavioral Research into Business Ethics (Russell Sage, New York), 44–58.Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Cortina JM, Dormann C, Markell HM, Keener SK (2023) Endogenous moderator models: What they are, what they aren’t, and why it matters. Organ. Res. Methods 26(3):499–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Craig R, Amernic J (2011) Detecting linguistic traces of destructive narcissism at-a-distance in a CEO’s letter to shareholders. J. Bus. Ethics 101:563–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Culiberg B, Mihelič KK (2017) The evolution of whistleblowing studies: A critical review and research agenda. J. Bus. Ethics 146:787–803.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhawan S, Mokha AK (2017) Whistle blowing: Facing challenges in India. Asian J. Management 8(3):635–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dozier JB, Miceli MP (1985) Potential predictors of whistle-blowing: A Prosocial behavior perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 10(4):823–836.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Lambert LS (2007) Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psych. Methods 12:1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Enders CK, Tofighi D (2007) Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psych. Methods 12(2):121–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethics and Compliance Initiative (2023) The state of ethics & compliance in the workplace. Report, Ethics and Compliance Initiative, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
• Ethics Resource Center (2013) National Business Ethics Survey: An Inside View of Private Sector Ethics (Ethics Resource Center, Arlington, VA).Google Scholar
• Eyal T, Liberman N, Trope Y (2008) Judging near and distant virtue and vice. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 44:1204–1209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF (1980) Agency problems and the theory of the firm. J. Political Econom. 88(2):288–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farmer SM, Van Dyne L, Kamdar D (2015) The contextualized self: How team–member exchange leads to coworker identification and helping OCB. J. Appl. Psych. 100(2):583–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferrell O, Fraedrich J, Ferrell L (2005) Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making and Cases (Dreamtech Press, New Delhi, India).Google Scholar
• Fritz JMH, Arnett RC, Conkel M (1999) Organizational ethical standards and organizational commitment. J. Bus. Ethics 20(4):289–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fujita K, Eyal T, Chaiken S, Trope Y, Liberman N (2008) Influencing attitudes toward near and distant objects. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 44(3):562–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gagliardi P (1986) The creation and change of organizational cultures: A conceptual framework. Organ. Stud. 7(2):117–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldsmith K, Newman GE, Dhar R (2016) Mental representation changes the evaluation of green product benefits. Nature Climate Change 6(9):847–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graf LK, Mayer S, Landwehr JR (2018) Measuring processing fluency: One vs. five items. J. Consumer Psych. 28(3):393–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberger DB, Miceli MP, Cohen DJ (1987) Oppositionists and group norms: The reciprocal influence of whistle-blowers and co-workers. J. Bus. Ethics 6:527–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen J, Wänke M (2010) Truth from language and truth from fit: The impact of linguistic concreteness and level of construal on subjective truth. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 36(11):1576–1588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Publications, New York).Google Scholar
• Hayes AF, Preacher KJ (2014) Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British J. Math. Statist. Psych. 67(3):451–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A (2010) Most people are not WEIRD. Nature 466(7302):29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herhausen D, Henkel S, Kipfelsberger P (2020) One size does not fit all: How construal fit determines the effectiveness of organizational brand communication. BRQ Bus. Res. Quart. 23(4):305–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hernandez JMdC, Wright SA, Ferminiano Rodrigues F (2015) Attributes vs. benefits: The role of construal levels and appeal type on the persuasiveness of marketing messages. J. Advertising 44(3):243–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herron TL, Gilbertson DL (2004) Ethical principles vs. ethical rules: The moderating effect of moral development on audit independence judgments. Bus. Ethics Quart. 14(3):499–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hess D (2007) A business ethics perspective on Sarbanes-Oxley and the organizational sentencing guidelines. Michigan Law Rev. 105(8):1781–1816.Google Scholar
• Higgins ET (2000) Making a good decision: Value from fit. Amer. Psych. 55(11):1217–1230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins ET (2006) Value from hedonic experience and engagement. Psych. Rev. 113(3):439–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofmann DA, Gavin MB (1998) Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. J. Management 24:623–641.Google Scholar
• Hrubes D, Ajzen I, Daigle J (2001) Predicting hunting intentions and behavior: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Leisure Sci. 23(3):165–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hussain I, Shu R, Tangirala S, Ekkirala S (2019) The voice bystander effect: How information redundancy inhibits employee voice. Acad. Management J. 62(3):828–849.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson D, Peters K, Andrew S, Edenborough M, Halcomb E, Luck L, Salamonson Y, et al. (2010) Understanding whistleblowing: Qualitative insights from nurse whistleblowers. J. Advising Nursing 66(10):2194–2201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johansson E, Carey P (2016) Detecting fraud: The role of the anonymous reporting channel. J. Bus. Ethics 139(2):391–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan SE, Pope KR, Samuels JA (2015) An examination of the effects of managerial procedural safeguards, managerial likeability, and type of fraudulent act on intentions to report fraud to a manager. Behav. Res. Accounting 27(2):77–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keenan JP (1990) Upper-level managers and whistleblowing: Determinants of perceptions of company encouragement and information about where to blow the whistle. J. Bus. Psych. 5(2):223–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keenan JP (1995) Whistleblowing and the first-level manager: Determinants of feeling obliged to blow the whistle. J. Soc. Behav. Personality 10(3):571–584.Google Scholar
• Kim TW, Duhachek A (2020) Artificial intelligence and persuasion: A construal-level account. Psych. Sci. 31(4):363–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim H, Rao AR, Lee AY (2008) It’s time to vote: The effect of matching message orientation and temporal frame on political persuasion. J. Consumer Res. 35(6):877–889.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kouchaki M, Desai SD (2015) Anxious, threatened, and also unethical: How anxiety makes individuals feel threatened and commit unethical acts. J. Appl. Psych. 100(2):360–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SW, Klein KJ (2000) A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ, eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 3–90.Google Scholar
• KPMG (2012) India Fraud Survey (KPMG, Amstelveen, Netherlands).Google Scholar
• Labroo AA, Lee AY (2006) Between two brands: A goal fluency account of brand evaluation. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):374–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LaHuis DM, Ferguson MW (2009) The accuracy of significance tests for slope variance components in multilevel random coefficient models. Organ. Res. Methods 12(3):418–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lai X, Li F, Leung K (2013) A Monte Carlo study of the effects of common method variance on significance testing and parameter bias in hierarchical linear modeling. Organ. Res. Methods 16(2):243–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laufer WS, Robertson DC (1997) Corporate ethics initiatives as social control. J. Bus. Ethics 16(10):1029–1047.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leavitt K, Qiu F, Shapiro DL (2021) Using electronic confederates for experimental research in organizational science. Organ. Res. Methods 24(1):3–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ledgerwood A, Trope Y, Chaiken S (2010) Flexibility now, consistency later: Psychological distance and construal shape evaluative responding. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 99(1):32–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee AY, Aaker JL (2004) Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 86(2):205–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee G, Fargher N (2013) Companies’ use of whistle-blowing to detect fraud: An examination of corporate whistle-blowing policies. J. Bus. Ethics 114(2):283–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee G, Xiao X (2018) Whistleblowing on accounting-related misconduct: A synthesis of the literature. J. Accounting Literature 41:22–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee AY, Keller PA, Sternthal B (2010) Value from regulatory construal fit: The persuasive impact of fit between consumer goals and message concreteness. J. Consumer Res. 36(5):735–747.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee G, Pittroff E, Turner MJ (2020) Is a uniform approach to whistle-blowing regulation effective? Evidence from the United States and Germany. J. Bus. Ethics 163:553–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang J, Farh CI, Farh J-L (2012) Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Acad. Management J. 55(1):71–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liberman N, Trope Y (1998) The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 75(1):5–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liberman N, Sagristano M, Trope Y (2002) The effect of temporal distance on level of construal. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 38:523–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liberman N, Trope Y, Stephan E (2007) Psychological distance. Kruglanski AW, Higgins ET, eds. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, vol. 2 (Guilford Press, New York), 353–383.Google Scholar
• Magee JC, Milliken FJ, Lurie AR (2010) Power differences in the construal of a crisis: The immediate aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 36(3):354–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malik MS, Nawaz MK (2018) The role of ethical leadership in whistleblowing intention among bank employees: Mediating role of psychological safety. Rev. Integrative Bus. Econom. Res. 7:238–252.Google Scholar
• Mansfield P (2004) Anomie and disaster in corporate culture: The impact of mergers and acquisitions on the ethical climate of marketing organizations. Marketing Management J. 14(2):88–99.Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Martin SR, Kish-Gephart JJ, Detert JR (2014) Blind forces: Ethical infrastructures and moral disengagement in organizations. Organ. Psych. Rev. 4(4):295–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer DM, Nurmohamed S, Treviño LK, Shapiro DL, Schminke M (2013) Encouraging employees to report unethical conduct internally: It takes a village. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 121:89–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKendall M, DeMarr B, Jones-Rikkers C (2002) Ethical compliance programs and corporate illegality: Testing the assumptions of the corporate sentencing guidelines. J. Bus. Ethics 37(4):367–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mesmer-Magnus JR, Viswesvaran C (2005) Whistleblowing in organizations: An examination of correlates of whistleblowing intentions, actions, and retaliation. J. Bus. Ethics 62:277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miceli MP, Near JP (1985) Characteristics of organizational climate and perceived wrongdoing associated with whistle-blowing decisions. Personality Psych. 38:525–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miceli MP, Near JP (1992) Blowing the Whistle: The Organizational and Legal Implications for Companies and Employees (Lexington, New York).Google Scholar
• Miceli MP, Near JP, Dworkin TM (2008) Whistle-Blowing in Organizations (Routledge, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moran RT, Abramson NR, Moran SV (2014) Managing Cultural Differences (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Morrison EW (2011) Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):373–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998–2015) Mplus User’s Guide, 7th ed. (Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
• Near JP, Miceli MP (1985) Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. J. Bus. Ethics 4:1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Near JP, Miceli MP (1996) Whistle-blowing: Myth and reality. J. Management 22(3):507–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Near JP, Baucus MS, Miceli MP (1993) The relationship between values and practice: Organizational climates for wrongdoing. Admin. Soc. 25(2):204–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nielsen RP (1987) What can managers do about unethical management? J. Bus. Ethics 6:309–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CAI, Chatman J, Caldwell DF (1991) People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Acad. Management J. 34(3):487–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park H, Blenkinsopp J (2009) Whistleblowing as planned behavior: A survey of South Korean police officers. J. Bus. Ethics 85:545–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP (2012) Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annu. Rev. Psych. 63:539–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended biases. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rest JR (1986) Development in Judging Moral Issues (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).Google Scholar
• Rothschild J, Miethe TD (1999) Whistle-blower disclosures and management retaliation: The battle to control information about organizational corruption. Work Occupation 26(1):107–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saunders DM, Sheppard BH, Knight V, Roth J (1992) Employee voice to supervisors. Employee Responsibility Rights J. 5(3):241–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schultz JJ, Johnson DA, Morris D, Dyrnes S (1993) An investigation of the reporting of questionable acts in an international setting. J. Accounting Res. 31:75–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz MS, Dunfee TW, Kline MJ (2005) Tone at the top: An ethics code for directors? J. Bus. Ethics 58:79–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schweitzer ME, Ordonez L, Douma B (2004) The role of goal setting in motivating unethical behavior. Acad. Management J. 47:422–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Semin GR, Smith ER (1999) Revisiting the past and back to the future: Memory systems and the linguistic representation of social events. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 76:877–892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skinner BF (1953) Science and Human Behavior (Macmillion, New York).Google Scholar
• Snijders T, Bosker R (1999) Multilevel Modeling: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Snijders TA, Bosker RJ (2012) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Spassova G, Lee AY (2013) Looking into the future: A match between self-view and temporal distance. J. Consumer Res. 40(1):159–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor SG, Griffith MD, Vadera AK, Folger R, Letwin CR (2019) Breaking the cycle of abusive supervision: How disidentification and moral identity help the trickle-down change course. J. Appl. Psych. 104(1):164–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tenbrunsel AE, Messick DM (1999) Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(4):684–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tenbrunsel AE, Messick DM (2004) Ethical fading: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Soc. Justice Res. 17:223–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tenbrunsel AE, Smith-Crowe K, Umphress EE (2003) Building houses on rocks: The role of the ethical infrastructure in organizations. Soc. Justice Res. 16(3):285–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tenbrunsel AE, Diekmann KA, Wade-Benzoni KA, Bazerman MH (2010) The ethical mirage: A temporal explanation as to why we are not as ethical as we think we are. Res. Organ. Behav. 30:153–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson DV, Hamilton RW (2006) The effects of information processing mode on consumers’ responses to comparative advertising. J. Consumer Res. 32(4):530–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Treviño LK (1986) Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Acad. Management Rev. 11(3):601–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Treviño LK, Butterfield KD, McCabe DL (1998) The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Bus. Ethics Quart. 8:447–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Treviño LK, den Nieuwenboer NA, Kish-Gephart JJ (2014) (Un) ethical behavior in organizations. Annu. Rev. Psych. 65:635–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trongmateerut P, Sweeney JT (2013) The influence of subjective norms on whistle-blowing: A cross-cultural investigation. J. Bus. Ethics 112:437–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N (2003) Temporal construal. Psych. Rev. 110(1):403–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psych. Rev. 117(2):440–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N, Wakslak C (2007) Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. J. Consumer Psych. 17(2):83–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vadera AK (2010) Comparing extrinsic and intrinsic processes of whistle-blowing: A multi-method approach. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
• Vadera AK, Aguilera RV, Caza BB (2009) Making sense of whistle-blowing’s antecedents: Learning from research on identity and ethics programs. Bus. Ethics Quart. 19:553–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Houwelingen G, van Dijke M, De Cremer D (2015) Getting it done and getting it right: Leader disciplinary reactions to followers’ moral transgressions are determined by construal level mindset. Leadership Quart. 26(5):878–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vanderstukken A, Schreurs B, Germeys F, Van den Broeck A, Proost K (2019) Should supervisors communicate goals or visions? The moderating role of subordinates’ psychological distance. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 49(11):671–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Victor B, Treviño LK, Shapiro DL (1993) Peer reporting of unethical behavior: The influence of justice evaluations and social context factors. J. Bus. Ethics 12:253–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Warren DE, Gaspar JP, Laufer WS (2014) Is formal ethics training merely cosmetic? A study of ethics training and ethical organizational culture. Bus. Ethics Quart. 24(1):85–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wen P, Chen C (2016) How does ethical leadership influence employees’ whistleblowing intention? Evidence from China. Soc. Behav. Personality 44(8):1255–1266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• White K, MacDonnell R, Dahl DW (2011) It’s the mind-set that matters: The role of construal level and message framing in influencing consumer efficacy and conservation behaviors. J. Marketing Res. 48(3):472–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiesenfeld BM, Reyt J-N, Brockner J, Trope Y (2017) Construal level theory in organizational research. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 4(1):367–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang L (2014) How effective are your CSR messages? The moderating role of processing fluency and construal level. Internat. J. Hospital Management 41:56–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Li G (2014) Determinants of energy-saving behavioral intention among residents in Beijing: Extending the theory of planned behavior. J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 6:053127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Liu L (2022) Unearthing consumers’ intention to adopt eco-friendly smart home services: An extended version of the theory of planned behavior model. J. Environment Planning Management 65(2):216–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Chiu RK, Wei L (2009) Decision-making process of internal whistleblowing behavior in China: Empirical evidence and implications. J. Bus. Ethics 88:25–41.Crossref, Google Scholar