In Search of Inspiration: External Mobility and the Emergence of Technology Intrapreneurs

References

• Agarwal R, Ganco M, Ziedonis RH (2009) Reputations for toughness in patent enforcement: Implications for knowledge spillovers via inventor mobility. Strategic Management J. 30(13):1349–1374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Lampert CM (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. 22(6-7):521–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ai C, Norton EC (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. 80(1):123–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldrich H, Ruef M (2018) Unicorns, gazelles, and other distractions on the way to understanding real entrepreneurship in the United States. Acad. Management Perspect. 32(4):458–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almeida P, Kogut B (1999) Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. 45(7):905–917.Google Scholar
• Anand N, Gardner HK, Morris T (2007) Knowledge-based innovation: Emergence and embedding of new practice areas in management consulting firms. Acad. Management J. 50(2):406–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antoncic B, Hisrich RD (2001) Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. J. Bus. Venturing 16(5):495–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antoncic B, Hisrich RD (2003) Clarifying the intrapreneurship concept. J. Small Bus. Enterprise Development 10(1):7–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Archambault A, Grudin J (2012) A longitudinal study of Facebook, LinkedIn, & Twitter use. CHI’12.Google Scholar
• Arthur MB, Rousseau DM (1996) The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arts S, Veugelers R (2015) Technology familiarity, recombinant novelty, and breakthrough invention. Indust. Corporate Change 24(6):1215–1246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Åstebro T, Thompson P (2011) Entrepreneurs, jacks of all trades or hobos? Res. Policy 40(5):637–649.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Stuart T, Wang Y (2014) Matthew: Effect or fable? Management Sci. 60(1):92–109.Link, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Jones BF, Kim JD, Miranda J (2020) Age and high-growth entrepreneurship. Amer. Econom. Rev. Insights 2(1):65–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barbalescu R, Bidwell MJ (2013) Do women choose different jobs from men? Mechanisms of application segregation in the market for managerial workers. Organ. Sci. 24(3):737–756.Link, Google Scholar
• Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benson A, Rissing BA (2020) Strength from within: Internal mobility and the retention of high performers. Organ. Sci. 31(6):1475–1496.Link, Google Scholar
• Bidwell MJ (2011) Paying more to get less: Specific skills, incomplete information and the effects of external hiring vs. internal mobility. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(3):369–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bidwell MJ (2013) What happened to long term employment? The role of worker power and environmental turbulence in explaining declines in worker tenure. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1061–1082.Link, Google Scholar
• Bidwell MJ, Keller JR (2014) Within or without? How firms combine internal and external labor markets to fill jobs. Acad. Management J. 57(4):1035–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bidwell MJ, Mollick E (2015) Shifts and ladders: Comparing the role of internal and external mobility in managerial careers. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1629–1645.Link, Google Scholar
• Bidwell MJ, Briscoe F, Fernandez-Mateo I, Sterling A (2013) The employment relationship and inequality: How and why changes in employment practices are reshaping rewards in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):61–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brett JM, Stroh LK (1997) Jumping ship: Who benefits from an external labor market career strategy? J. Appl. Psych. 82(3):331–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SL, Eisenhardt KL (1995) Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. 20(2):343–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgelman RA (1983) A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 28(2):223–244.Google Scholar
• Burton MD, Sorenson JB, Dobrev SD (2016) A careers perspective on entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 40(2):237–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell BA, Ganco M, Franco AM (2012) Who leaves, where to, and why worry? Employee mobility, entrepreneurship, and effects on source firm performance. Strategic Management J. 33(1):65–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell B, Saxton B, Banerjee P (2014) Resetting the shot clock: The disruptive effect of mobility on individual performance. J. Management 40(2):531–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campion MA, Cheraskin L, Stevens MJ (1994) Career-related antecedents and outcomes of job rotation. Acad. Management J. 37(6):1518–1542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelli P, Keller JR (2014) Talent management: Conceptual approaches and practical challenges. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 1(2014):305–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carland JW, Hoy F, Boulton WR, Carland JAC (1984) Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: A conceptualization. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):354–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter ME, Franco F, Tuna I (2019) Matching premiums in the executive labor market. Accounting Rev. 94(6):109–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ, Ranganathan A (2020) The production of merit: How managers understand and apply merit in the workplace. Organ. Sci. 31(4):909–935.Link, Google Scholar
• Catalini C, Guzman J, Stern S (2019) Passive vs. active growth: Evidence from founder choices and venture capital investment. MIT Sloan Working Paper, Boston.Google Scholar
• Chesbrough HW (2002) Making sense of corporate venture capital. Harvard Bus. Rev. 80(3):90–99.Google Scholar
• Coff RW (1997) Human assets and management dilemmas: Coping with hazards on the road to resource-based theory. Acad. Management Rev. 22(2):374–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coff RW (1999) When competitive advantage doesn’t lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organ. Sci. 10(2):119–133.Link, Google Scholar
• Conti R (2014) Do non-competition agreements lead firms to pursue risky R&D projects? Strategic Management J. 35(8):1230–1248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conti R, Gambardella A, Mariani M (2014) Learning to be Edison: Inventors, organizations, and breakthrough inventions. Organ. Sci. 25(3):833–849.Link, Google Scholar
• Covin JG, Miles MP (1999) Corporate entrepreneurship and the pursuit of competitive advantage. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 23(3):47–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Covin JG, Green KM, Slevin DP (2006) Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation-sales growth rate relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 30(1):57–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deeds DL, DeCarolis D, Coombs J (2000) Dynamic capabilities and new product development in high technology ventures: An empirical analysis of new biotechnology firms. J. Bus. Venturing 15(3):211–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeOrtentiis PS, Van Iddekinge CH, Ployhart RE, Heetderks TD(2018) Build or buy? The individual and unit-level performance of internally vs. externally selected managers over time. J. Appl. Psych. 103(8):916–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dokko G, Rosenkopf L (2010) Social capital for hire? Mobility of technical professionals and firm influence in wireless standards committees. Organ. Sci. 21(3):677–695.Link, Google Scholar
• Dokko G, Wilk SL, Rothbard NP (2009) Unpacking prior experience: How career history affects job performance. Organ. Sci. 20(1):51–68.Link, Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G, Shaver JM (2009) Limitations to interorganizational knowledge acquisition: The paradox of corporate venture capital. Strategic Management J. 30(10):1045–1064.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD, Kramer RM (2003) Assessing creativity in Hollywood pitch meetings: Evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgements. Acad. Management J. 46(3):283–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang C, Lee J, Schilling MA (2010) Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 21(3):625–642.Link, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Foss NJ, Ployhart RE (2015) The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):575–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I, Fernandez RM (2016) Bending the pipeline? Executive search and gender inequality in hiring for top management jobs. Management Sci. 62(12):3636–3655.Link, Google Scholar
• Fischer A (2011) Recognizing opportunities: Initiating service innovation in PSFs. J. Knowledge Management 15(6):915–927.Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2001) Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. 25(8):909–928.Google Scholar
• Galunic DC, Rodan S (1998) Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management J. 19(12):1193–1201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gambardella A, Ganco M, Honoré F (2015) Using what you know: Patented knowledge in incumbent firms and employee entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 26(2):456–474.Link, Google Scholar
• Ge C, Huang KW, Png IPL (2016) Engineer/scientist careers: Patents, online profiles, and misclassification bias. Strategic Management J. 37(1):232–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilson RJ (1999) The legal infrastructure of high technology industrial districts: Silicon Valley, Route 128, and covenants not to compete. New York Univ. Law Rev. 74:575–629.Google Scholar
• Groysberg B (2010) Chasing Stars: The Myth of Talent and the Portability of Performance (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Lee L-E (2009) Hiring stars and their colleagues: Exploration and exploitation in professional service firms. Organ. Sci. 20(4):740–758.Link, Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Lee L-E, Nanda A (2008) Can they take it with them? The portability of star knowledge workers’ performance. Management Sci. 54(7):1213–1230.Link, Google Scholar
• Guzman J, Kacperczyk A (2019) Gender gap in entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 48(7):1666–1680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guzman J, Stern S (2020) The state of American entrepreneurship: New estimates of the quantity and quality of entrepreneurship for 32 US states, 1988-2014. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 12(4):212–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Bechky BA (2006) When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organ. Sci. 17(4):484–500.Google Scholar
• Harris D, Helfat C (1997) Specificity of CEO human capital and compensation. Strategic Management J. 18(11):895–920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heneman RL, Werner JM (2005) Merit Pay: Linking Pay to Performance in a Changing World (IAP, Greenwich, CT).Google Scholar
• Hiltzik (1999) Dealers of Lightning: Xerox Parc and the Dawn of the Computer Age (HarperBusiness, New York).Google Scholar
• Hoang H, Gimeno J (2010) Becoming a founder: How founder role identity affects entrepreneurial transitions and persistence in founding. J. Bus. Venturing 25(1):41–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoetker G (2007) The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management J. 28(4):331–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hornsby JS, Kuratko DF, Zahra SA (2002) Middle managers’ perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: Assessing a measurement scale. J. Bus. Venturing 17(3):253–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hülsheger UR, Anderson N, Salgado JF (2009) Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. J. Appl. Psych. 94(5):1128–1145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hurst E, Pugsley BW (2011) What do small businesses do? Brookings Papers Econom. Activity 43:73–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk AJ (2012) Opportunity structures in established firms: Entrepreneurship vs. intrapreneurship in mutual funds. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(3):484–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Vakili K (2015) The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation. Strategic Management J. 36(10):1435–1457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller JR (2018) Posting and slotting: How hiring processes shape the quality of hire and compensation in internal labor markets. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):848–878.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller JR, Kehoe R, Bidwell M, Collings D, Myer A (2021) In with the old? Examining when boomerang employees outperform new hires. Acad. Management J., ePub ahead of print September 20, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2019.1340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim JD (2018) Is there a startup wage premium? Evidence from MIT graduates. Res. Policy 47(3):637–649.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knippen C (2017) What do post-it notes, Amazon drones and Gmail all have in common? They were developed with the same leadership technique. Entrepreneur Europe (October 6), https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/300647.Google Scholar
• Kochan TA, Katz HC, McKersie RB (1994) The Transformation of American Industrial Relations (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1996) What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. 7(5):502–518.Link, Google Scholar
• Kortum S, Lerner J (2000) Assessing the contribution of venture capital to innovation. RAND J. Econom. 31(4):674–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuratko DF, Montagno RV, Hornsby JS (1990) Developing an intrapreneurial assessment instrument for an effective corporate entrepreneurial environment. Strategic Management J. 11(190):49–58.Google Scholar
• Krippendorff K (2019) Driving Innovation from Within: A Guide for Internal Entrepreneurs (Columbia Business School Publishing, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear E (2004) Balanced skills and entrepreneurship. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(2):208–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine R, Rubinstein Y (2017) Smart and illicit: Who becomes an entrepreneur and do they earn more? Quart. J. Econom. 132(2):963–1018.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Organ. Sci. 14(S2):95–112.Google Scholar
• Lubenow GC (1985) Steve Jobs talks about his rise and fall. Newsweek (September 29), https://www.newsweek.com/jobs-talks-about-his-rise-and-fall-207016.Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Martin X, Mitchell W (1998) The influence of local search and performance heuristics on new design introduction in a new product market. Res. Policy 26(7-8):753–771.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marx M, Strumsky D, Fleming L (2009) Mobility, skills, and the Michigan non-compete experiment. Management Sci. 55(6):875–889.Link, Google Scholar
• Merluzzi J, Phillips DJ (2016) The specialist discount: Negative returns for MBAs with focused profiles in investment banking. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(1):87–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mueller JS, Melwani S, Goncalo JA (2012) The bias against creativity: Why people desire but reject creative ideas. Psych. Sci. 23(1):13–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy WH, Gorchels L (1996) How to improve product management effectiveness. Indust. Marketing Management 25(1):47–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neessen PCM, Caniels MJC, Vos B, de Jong JP (2019) The intrapreneurial employee: Toward an integrated model of intrapreneurship and research agenda. Internat. Entrepreneurship Management J. 15:545–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ng W, Sherman EL (2021) False-positive classification: A supervised machine learning measurement strategy for organizational research. National University of Singapore Working Paper, Singapore.Google Scholar
• Ng W, Stuart TE (2016) Of phases and phrases: Disentangling the classes and careers of technology-based entrepreneurs. National University of Singapore Working Paper, Singapore.Google Scholar
• Olmstead K, Lampe C, Ellison NB (2016) Social media and the workplace. Pew Research Center Working Paper, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Palomeras N, Melero E (2010) Markets for inventors: Learning-by-hiring as a driver of mobility. Management Sci. 56(5):881–895.Link, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith J, Mannucci PV (2017) From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Acad. Management Rev. 42(1):53–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phene A, Fladmoe-Lindquist K, Marsh L (2006) Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: The effects of technological space and geographic origin. Strategic Management J. 27(4):369–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinchot G (1985) Intrapreneuring: Why You Don’t Have to Leave the Corporation to Become an Entrepreneur (Harper and Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Rao H, Drazin R (2002) Overcoming resource constraints on product innovation by recruiting talent from rivals: A study of the mutual fund industry. Acad. Management J. 45(3):491–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rider CI, Thompson P, Kacperczyk A, Tåg J (2019) Experience and entrepreneurship: A career transition perspective. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 72(5):1149–1181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rink F, Kane AA, Ellemers N, van der Vegt G (2013) Team receptivity to newcomers: Five decades of evidence and future research themes. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):247–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW (2000) Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. 46(6):824–844.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Almeida P (2003) Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. 49(6):751–766.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A (2001) Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. 22(4):287–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Royal C, Althauser RP (2003) The labor markets of knowledge workers: Investment bankers’ careers in the wake of corporate restructuring. Work Occupations 30(2):214–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saxenian A (1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Schoar A (2010) The divide between subsistence and transformational entrepreneurship. Innovation Policy Econom. 10(2010):57–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoonhaven CB, Eisenhardt KM, Lyman K (1990) Speeding products to market: Waiting time to first product introduction in new firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):177–207.Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J (1934) The Theory of Economic Development (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Sevcenko V, Ethiraj S (2018) How do firms appropriate value from employees with transferable skills? A study of the appropriation puzzle in actively managed mutual funds. Organ. Sci. 29(5):775–795.Link, Google Scholar
• Shane S, Venkataraman S (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):217–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherman EL, Ng W (2021) Pipelines as pathways: How established firms contribute to the gender gap in entrepreneurship. London Business School Working Paper, London.Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1979) Rational decision making in organizations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 69(4):493–513.Google Scholar
• Singh J, Agrawal A (2011) Recruiting for ideas: How firms exploit the prior inventions of new hires. Management Sci. 57(1):129–150.Link, Google Scholar
• Song J, Almeida P, Wu G (2003) Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Sci. 49(4):351–365.Link, Google Scholar
• Sorenson JB, Sharkey AJ (2014) Entrepreneurship as a mobility process. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(2):328–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Stuart TE (2008) Entrepreneurship: A field of dreams? Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):517–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srivastava SB, Sherman EL (2015) Agents of change or cogs in the machine? Reexamining the influence of female managers on the gender wage gap. Amer. J. Sociol. 120(6):1778–1808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stevenson HH, Jarillo JC (1990) A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management J. 11(5):17–27.Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Huang H, Hybels R (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):315–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) competitive performance. Strategic Management J. 28(13):1319–1350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the LASSO. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 58(1):267–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uviebinene E (2019) ‘Intrapreneurs’ are the people driving corporate change. Financial Times (December 27), https://www.ft.com/content/fb6c6008-2181-11ea-b8a1-584213ee7b2b.Google Scholar
• Wezel FC, Cattani G, Pennings JM (2006) Competitive implications of interfirm mobility. Organ. Sci. 17(6):691–709.Link, Google Scholar
• Wiklund J, Shepherd D (2005) Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configural approach. J. Bus. Venturing 20(1):71–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra SA (1991) Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An exploratory study. J. Bus. Venturing 6(4):259–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra SA (1995) Corporate entrepreneurship and financial performance: The case of management leveraged buyouts. J. Bus. Venturing 10(3):225–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra SA, Covin JG (1995) Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. J. Bus. Venturing 10(1):43–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra SA, Jennings DF, Kuratko DF (1999) The antecedents and consequences of firm-level entrepreneurship: The state of the field. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 24(2):45–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra SA, Sapienza HJ, Davidsson P (2006) Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model, and research agenda. J. Management Stud. 43(4):917–955.Crossref, Google Scholar