Green to Gone? Regional Institutional Logics and Firm Survival in Moral Markets

References

• Agarwal R, Gort M (1996) The evolution of markets and entry, exit and survival of firms. Rev. Econom. Statist. 78(3):489–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allison PD (1995) Survival Analysis Using the SAS System: A Practical Guide (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).Google Scholar
• Amezcua A, Grimes MG, Bradley SW, Wiklund J (2013) Organizational sponsorship and founding environments: A contingency view on the survival of business-incubated firms, 1994–2007. Acad. Management J. 56(6):1628–1654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amezcua A, Ratinho T, Plummer LA, Jayamohan P (2020) Organizational sponsorship and the economics of place: How regional urbanization and localization shape incubator outcomes. J. Bus. Venturing 35(4):105967.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansari S, Wijen F, Gray B (2013) Constructing a climate change logic: An institutional perspective on the “tragedy of the commons.” Organ. Sci. 24(4):1014–1040.Link, Google Scholar
• Asensio OI, Delmas MA (2017) The effectiveness of US energy efficiency building labels. Nature Energy 2:17033.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin JR, Gorecki PK (1991) Firm entry and exit in the Canadian manufacturing sector, 1970-1982. Canadian J. Econom. 24(2):300–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett WP, Carroll GR (1987) Competition and mutualism among early telephone companies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 32(3):400–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett WP, Freeman J (2001) Too much of a good thing? Product proliferation and organizational failure. Organ. Sci. 12(5):539–558.Link, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Dorado S (2010) Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1419–1440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Lee M (2014) Advancing research on hybrid organizing—Insights from the study of social enterprises. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):397–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Besharov M, Mitzinneck B (2017) On hybrids and hybrid organizing: A review and roadmap for future research. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Lawrence TB, Meyer RE, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 2nd ed. (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 128–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JA, Mezias SJ (1992) Localized competition and organizational failure in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898-1990. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(4):580–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JA, Singh JV (1994) Organizational niches and the dynamics of organizational mortality. Amer. J. Sociol. 100(2):346–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayus BL, Agarwal R (2007) The role of pre-entry experience, entry timing, and product technology strategies in explaining firm survival. Management Sci. 53(12):1887–1902.Link, Google Scholar
• Besharov ML, Smith WK (2014) Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Acad. Management Rev. 39(3):364–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cantner U, Dreßler K, Krüger JJ (2006) Firm survival in the German automobile industry. Empirica 33(1):49–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlos WC, Lewis BW (2018) Strategic silence: Withholding certification status as a hypocrisy avoidance tactic. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(1):130–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll GR (1985) Concentration and specialization: Dynamics of niche width in populations of organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. 90(6):1262–1283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Hannan MT (2000) Why corporate demography matters: Policy implications of organizational diversity. Calif. Management Rev. 42(3):148–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Khessina OM (2006) The ecology of entrepreneurship. Alvarez SA, Agarwal R, Sorenson O, eds. Handbook of Entrepreneurial Research (Springer, New York), 167–200.Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Swaminathan A (2000) Why the microbrewery movement? Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the US brewing industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3):715–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen PL, Williams C, Agarwal R (2012) Growing pains: Pre-entry experience and the challenge of transition to incumbency. Strategic Management J. 33(3):252–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi KS, Lee JD, Baek C (2016) Growth of de alio and de novo firms in the new and renewable energy industry. Indust. Innovation 23(4):295–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conger M, McMullen JS, Bergman BJ Jr, York JG (2018) Category membership, identity control, and the reevaluation of prosocial opportunities. J. Bus. Venturing 33(2):179–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corbett J, Montgomery AW (2017) Environmental entrepreneurship and interorganizational arrangements: A model of social-benefit market creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 11(4):422–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahl MS, Sorenson O (2012) Home sweet home: Entrepreneurs’ location choices and the performance of their ventures. Management Sci. 58(6):1059–1071.Link, Google Scholar
• Dart R (2004) The legitimacy of social enterprise. Nonprofit Management Leadership 14(4):411–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deeds DL, Mang PY, Frandsen ML (2004) The influence of firms’ and industries’ legitimacy on the flow of capital into high-technology ventures. Strategic Organ. 2(1):9–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delgado M, Porter ME, Stern S (2015) Defining clusters of related industries. J. Econom. Geography 16(1):1–38.Google Scholar
• Delmas M, Russo MV, Montes-Sancho MJ (2007) Deregulation and environmental differentiation in the electric utility industry. Strategic Management J. 28(2):189–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dencker JC, Gruber M, Shah SK (2009) Pre-entry knowledge, learning, and the survival of new firms. Organ. Sci. 20(3):516–537.Link, Google Scholar
• DeTienne DR, Chirico F (2013) Exit strategies in family firms: How socioemotional wealth drives the threshold of performance. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 37(6):1297–1318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeTienne DR, McKelvie A, Chandler GN (2015) Making sense of entrepreneurial exit strategies: A typology and test. J. Bus. Venturing 30(2):255–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunn MB, Jones C (2010) Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: The contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967–2005. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):114–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunne T, Klimek SD, Roberts MJ, Xu DY (2013) Entry, exit, and the determinants of market structure. RAND J. Econom. 44(3):462–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Georgallis P (2018) Differential firm commitment to industries supported by social movement organizations. Organ. Sci. 29(1):154–171.Link, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Szostak B, Jourdan J, Thornton PH (2013) Institutional logics as strategic resources. Res. Sociol. Organ. 39(A):165–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eesley CE, Eberhart RN, Skousen BR, Cheng JLC (2018) Institutions and entrepreneurial activity: The interactive influence of misaligned formal and informal institutions. Strategy Sci. 3(2):393–407.Link, Google Scholar
• Frederick WC (1995) Values, Nature, and Culture in the American Corporation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Freeman JH, Audia PG (2006) Community ecology and the sociology of organizations. Annual Rev. Sociol. 32:145–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedland R (2002) Money, sex, and God: The erotic logic of religious nationalism. Sociol. Theory 20(3):381–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedland R, Alford RR (1991) Bringing society back. Powell WW, Dimaggio PJ, eds. Symbols, Practices and Institutional Contradictions, New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Chicago University Press, Chicago), 232–263.Google Scholar
• Ganco M, Agarwal R (2009) Performance differentials between diversifying entrants and entrepreneurial start-ups: A complexity approach. Acad. Management Rev. 34(2):228–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gehman J, Grimes M (2017) Hidden badge of honor: How contextual distinctiveness affects category promotion among certified B corporations. Acad. Management J. 60(6):2294–2320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Georgallis P, Durand R (2017) Achieving high growth in policy-dependent industries: Differences between startups and corporate-backed ventures. Long Range Planning 50(4):487–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Georgallis P, Lee BH (2020) Toward a theory of entry in moral markets: The role of social movements and organizational identity. Strategic Organ. 18(1):50–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Georgallis P, Dowell G, Durand R (2019) Shine on me: Industry coherence and policy support for emerging industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(3):503–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George G, Merrill RK, Schillebeeckx SJD (2021) Digital sustainability and entrepreneurship: How digital innovations are helping tackle climate change and sustainable development. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 45(5):999–1027.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geroski P (2003) The Evolution of New Markets (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert BA, McDougall PP, Audretsch DB (2008) Clusters, knowledge spillovers and new venture performance: An empirical examination. J. Bus. Venturing 23(4):405–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gimeno J, Folta TB, Cooper AC, Woo CY (1997) Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):750–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glynn MA, Lounsbury M (2005) From the critics’ corner: Logic blending, discursive change and authenticity in a cultural production system. J. Management Stud. 42(5):1031–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gras D, Conger M, Jenkins A, Gras M (2020) Wicked problems, reductive tendency, and the formation of (non-)opportunity beliefs. J. Bus. Venturing 35(3).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Suddaby R, Hinings CR (2002) Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Acad. Management J. 45(1):58–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Díaz AM, Li SX, Lorente JC (2010) The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organ. Sci. 21(2):521–539.Link, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Raynard M, Kodeih F, Micelotta ER, Lounsbury M (2011) Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):317–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2002) An ecological theory of spatial evolution: Local density dependence in Tokyo banking, 1894–1936. Soc. Forces 80(3):847–879.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR, Man Zhang C (2017) Institutional logics and power sources: Merger and acquisition decisions. Acad. Management J. 60(2):671–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grimes MG, Gehman J, Cao K (2018) Positively deviant: Identity work through B Corporation certification. J. Bus. Venturing 33(2):130–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grimes MG, Williams TA, Zhao EY (2019) Anchors aweigh: The sources, variety, and challenges of mission drift. Acad. Management Rev. 44(4):819–845.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grimes MG, McMullen JS, Vogus TJ, Miller TL (2013) Studying the origins of social entrepreneurship: Compassion and the role of embedded agency. Acad. Management Rev. 38(3):460–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guler I, Guillén MF (2010) Home country networks and foreign expansion: Evidence from the venture capital industry. Acad. Management J. 53(2):390–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman J (1989) Organizational Ecology (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Lieberman MB (2002) The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre-history. Indust. Corporate Change 11(4):725–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Carlos WC (2019) From farms to fuel tanks: Stakeholder framing contests and entrepreneurship in the emergent US biodiesel market. Strategic Management J. 40(6):865–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Park S (2021) Shared fate and entrepreneurial collective action in the U.S. wood pellet market. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print December 9, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1532.Link, Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Sine WD, Tolbert PS (2009) From Pabst to Pepsi: The deinstitutionalization of social practices and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(4):635–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Withers MC, Collins BJ (2009) Resource dependence theory: A review. J. Management 35(6):1404–1427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hockerts K, Wüstenhagen R (2010) Greening Goliaths vs. emerging Davids—Theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Venturing 25(5):481–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman A (2015) How Culture Shapes the Climate Change Debate (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
• Hoffman AJ (2018) The next phase of business sustainability. Stanford Soc. Innovation Rev. 16(2):34–39.Google Scholar
• Hoffman AJ, Henn R (2008) Overcoming the social and psychological barriers to green building. Organ. Environ. 21(4):390–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hopp C, Stephan U (2012) The influence of socio-cultural environments on the performance of nascent entrepreneurs: Community culture, motivation, self-efficacy and start-up success. Entrepreneurship Regional Development 24(9–10):917–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoppmann J, Vermeer B (2019) The double impact of institutions: Institutional spillovers and entrepreneurial activity in the solar photovoltaic industry. J. Bus. Venturing 35(3):105960.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville J, Buckle SJ, Hoskins BJ, George G (2014) Climate change and management. Acad. Management J. 57(3):615–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2018) Global warming of 1.5° C: An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner H-O, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, Péan C, Pidcock R, Connors S, Matthews JBR, Chen Y, Zhou X, Gomis MI, Lonnoy E, Maycock T, Tignor M, Waterfield T, eds. Report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva. In press.Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2021) Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C, Berger S, Caud N, Chen Y, Goldfarb L, Gomis MI, Huang M, Leitzell K, Lonnoy E, Matthews JBR, Maycock TK, Waterfield T, Yelekçi O, Yu R, and Zhou B, eds. Report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski P, Smets M, Bednarek R, Burke G, Spee P (2013) Institutional ambidexterity: Leveraging institutional complexity in practice. Lounsbury M, Boxenbaum E, eds. Institutional Logics in Action Part B, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 39 (Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., Bingley, UK), 37–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones J, York JG, Vedula S, Conger M, Lenox M (2019) The collective construction of green building: industry transition toward environmentally beneficial practices. Acad. Management Perspect. 33(4):425–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Josefy MA, Harrison JS, Sirmon DG, Carnes C (2017) Living and dying: Synthesizing the literature on firm survival and failure across stages of development. Acad. Management Ann. 11(2):770–799.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn ME (2007) Do greens drive Hummers or hybrids? Environmental ideology as a determinant of consumer choice. J. Environ. Econom. Management 54(2):129–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Furr NR (2015) Complementarities and competition: Unpacking the drivers of entrants’ technology choices in the solar photovoltaic industry. Strategic Management J. 36(3):416–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khayesi JN, George G (2011) When does the socio-cultural context matter? Communal orientation and entrepreneurs’ resource accumulation efforts in Africa. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 84(3):471–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khessina OM, Carroll GR (2008) Product demography of de novo and de alio firms in the optical disk drive industry, 1983-1999. Organ. Sci. 19(1):25–38.Link, Google Scholar
• Kraatz MS, Block ES (2008) Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Suddaby R, Sahlin K, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (SAGE Publications Ltd., New York), 243–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krider RE, Putler DS (2013) Which birds of a feather flock together? Clustering and avoidance patterns of similar retail outlets. Geographical Anal. 45(2):123–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee BH (2009) The infrastructure of collective action and policy content diffusion in the organic food industry. Acad. Management J. 52(6):1247–1269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee MDP, Lounsbury M (2015) Filtering institutional logics: Community logic variation and differential responses to the institutional complexity of toxic waste. Organ. Sci. 26(3):847–866.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee BH, Hiatt S, Lounsbury M (2017) Market mediators and the tradeoffs of legitimacy-seeking behaviors in a nascent category. Organ. Sci. 28(3):447–470.Link, Google Scholar
• Lin J, Si SX (2010) Can Guanxi be a problem? Contexts, ties, and some unfavorable consequences of social capital in China. Asia Pacific J. Management 27(3):561–581.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lockwood C (2006) Building the green way. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(6):129–137.Google Scholar
• Lomi A (1995) The population ecology of organizational founding: Location dependence and unobserved heterogeneity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):111–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M (2007) A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Acad. Management J. 50(2):289–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Crumley ET (2007) New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organ. Stud. 28(7):993–1012.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2001) Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):545–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Ventresca M, Hirsch PM (2003) Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: A cultural–political perspective on US recycling. Socio-Econom. Rev. 1(1):71–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lubell M (2002) Environmental activism as collective action. Environ. Behav. 34(4):431–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lumpkin GT, Bacq S (2019) Civic wealth creation: A new view of stakeholder engagement and societal impact. Acad. Management Perspect. 33(4):383–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malerba F, Orsenigo L (1996) The dynamics and evolution of industries. Indust. Corporate Change 5(1):51–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mannix EA, Neale MA, Northcraft GB (1995) Equity, equality, or need? The effects of organizational culture on the allocation of benefits and burdens. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 63(3):276–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markman GD, Waldron TL (2014) Small entrants and large incumbents: A framework of micro entry. Acad. Management Perspect. 28(2):179–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markman GD, Waldron TL, Gianiodis PT, Espina MI (2019) E pluribus unum: Impact entrepreneurship as a solution to grand challenges. Acad. Management Perspect. 33(4):371–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Lounsbury M (2007) Vive la résistance: Competing logics and the consolidation of US community banking. Acad. Management J. 50(4):799–820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Glynn MA, Davis GF (2007) Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):925–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathias BD, Huyghe A, Frid CJ, Galloway TL (2018) An identity perspective on coopetition in the craft beer industry. Strategic Management J. 39(12):3086–3115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKendrick DG, Jaffee J, Carroll GR, Khessina OM (2003) In the bud? Disk array producers as a (possibly) emergent organizational form. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):60–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meek WR, Pacheco DF, York JG (2010) The impact of social norms on entrepreneurial action: Evidence from the environmental entrepreneurship context. J. Bus. Venturing 25(5):493–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Micelotta E, Lounsbury M, Greenwood R (2017) Pathways of institutional change: An integrative review and research agenda. J. Management 43(6):1885–1910.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I, Amore MD, Minichilli A, Corbetta G (2017) Institutional logics, family firm governance and performance. J. Bus. Venturing 32(6):674–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mongelli L, Rullani F, Ramus T, Rimac T (2019) The bright side of hybridity: Exploring how social enterprises manage and leverage their hybrid nature. J. Bus. Ethics 159:301–305.Google Scholar
• Morgan WR, Sawyer J (1979) Equality, equity, and procedural justice in social exchange. Soc. Psych. Quart. 42(1):71–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris MH, Kuratko DF, Allen JW, Ireland RD, Schindehutte M (2010) Resource acceleration: Extending resource-based theory in entrepreneurial ventures. J. Appl. Management Entrepreneurship 15(2):4–25.Google Scholar
• Munir K, Ansari S, Brown D (2021) From Patañjali to the “gospel of sweat”: Yoga’s remarkable transformation from a sacred movement into a thriving global market. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(3):854–899.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nalewaik A, Venters V (2010) Cost benefits of building green. IEEE Engrg. Management Rev. 38(2):77–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Navis C, Glynn MA (2010) How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990-2005. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(3):439–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newbert SL, Tornikoski ET (2013) Resource acquisition in the emergence phase: Considering the effects of embeddedness and resource dependence. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 37(2):249–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (2012) Situated attention, loose and tight coupling, and the garbage can model. Res. Sociol. Organ. 36:293–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Neil I, Ucbasaran D (2016) Balancing “what matters to me” with “what matters to them”: Exploring the legitimation process of environmental entrepreneurs. J. Bus. Venturing 31(2):133–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social ecological systems. Sci. 325(5939):419–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pache AC, Santos F (2013a) Embedded in hybrid contexts: How individuals in organizations respond to competing institutional logics. Res. Sociol. Organ. 39:3–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pache AC, Santos F (2013b) Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Acad. Management J. 56(4):972–1001.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pacheco DF, Dean TJ (2015) Firm responses to social movement pressures: A competitive dynamics perspective. Strategic Management J. 36(7):1093–1104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pacheco DF, York JG, Hargrave TJ (2014) The coevolution of industries, social movements, and institutions: Wind power in the United States. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1609–1632.Link, Google Scholar
• Paolella L, Durand R (2015) Category spanning, evaluation, and performance: Revised theory and test on the corporate law market. Acad. Management J. 59(1):330–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peredo AM, Chrisman JJ (2006) Toward a theory of community-based enterprise. Acad. Management Rev. 31(2):309–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM, Stuart TE, Hannan MT (1996) Networks, knowledge, and niches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984–1991. Amer. J. Sociol. 102(3):659–689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ranger-Moore J, Breckenridge RS, Jones DL (1995) Patterns of growth and size-localized competition in the New York state life insurance industry, 1860–1985. Soc. Forces 73(3):1027–1049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2003) Institutional change in toque ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in french gastronomy. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(4):795–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Morrill C, Zald MN (2000) Power plays: How social movements and collective action create new organizational forms. Res. Organ. Behav. 22:237–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Renski H (2011) External economies of localization, urbanization and industrial diversity and new firm survival. Papers Regional Sci. 90(3):473–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruef M, Scott WR (1998) A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4):877–904.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russo MV (2003) The emergence of sustainable industries: Building on natural capital. Strategic Management J. 24(4):317–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santos FM (2012) A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Ethics 111(3):335–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott WR (1995) Institutions and Organizations, vol. 2. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Seo MG, Creed WD (2002) Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 27(2):222–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shepherd DA, Zacharakis A (2003) A new venture’s cognitive legitimacy: An assessment by customers. J. Small Bus. Management 41(2):148–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shrader RC, Oviatt BM, McDougall PP (2000) How new ventures exploit trade-offs among international risk factors: Lessons for the accelerated internationalization of the 21st century. Acad. Management J. 43(6):1227–1247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sine WD, Lee BH (2009) Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the U.S. wind energy sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1):123–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sine WD, Haveman HA, Tolbert PS (2005) Risky business? Entrepreneurship in the new independent-power sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(2):200–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smets M, Jarzabkowski P (2013) Reconstructing institutional complexity in practice: A relational model of institutional work and complexity. Human Relations 66(10):1279–1309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Besharov ML (2019) Bowing before dual gods: How structured flexibility sustains organizational hybridity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(1):1–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith BR, Stevens CE (2010) Different types of social entrepreneurship: The role of geography and embeddedness on the measurement and scaling of social value. Entrepreneurship Regional Development 22(6):575–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solomon SJ, Mathias BD (2020) The artisans’ dilemma: Artisan entrepreneurship and the challenge of firm growth. J. Bus. Venturing 35(5):106044.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Audia PG (2000) The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–19891. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(2):424–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steen M, Weaver T (2017) Incumbents’ diversification and cross-sectorial energy industry dynamics. Res. Policy 46(6):1071–1086.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teller C, Alexander A, Floh A (2016) The impact of competition and cooperation on the performance of a retail agglomeration and its stores. Indust. Marketing Management 52:6–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH (2002) The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: Conflict and conformity in institutional logics. Acad. Management J. 45(1):81–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH (2004) Markets from Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W (1999) Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. Amer. J. Sociol. 105(3):801–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W (2008) Institutional logics. Greenwood R, ed. Sage Handbook on Organizational Institutionalism (SAGE Publications, London), 99–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M (2012) The Institutional Logics Perspective (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tolbert PS, David RJ, Sine WD (2011) Studying choice and change: The intersection of institutional theory and entrepreneurship research. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1332–1344.Link, Google Scholar
• Tracey P, Phillips N, Jarvis O (2011) Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organ. Sci. 22(1):60–80.Link, Google Scholar
• Vaessen P, Keeble D (1995) Growth-oriented SMEs in unfavourable regional environments. Regional Stud. 29(6):489–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vedula S, Fitza M (2019) Regional recipes: A configurational analysis of the regional entrepreneurial ecosystem for US venture capital-backed startups. Strategy Sci. 4(1):4–24.Link, Google Scholar
• Vedula S, Frid CJ (2019) Community social capital and the venture gestation process. Reuer JJ, Matusik SF, Jones J, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship and Collaboration (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Vedula S, Kim PH (2018) Marching to the beat of the drum: The impact of the pace of life in US cities on entrepreneurial work effort. Small Bus. Econom. 50(3):569–590.Google Scholar
• Vedula S, Kim PH (2019) Gimme shelter or fade away: The impact of regional entrepreneurial ecosystem quality on venture survival. Indust. Corporate Change 28(4):827–854.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vedula S, Matusik SF (2017) Geographic, network, and competitor social cues: Evidence from US venture capitalists internationalization decisions. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 11(4):393–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vedula S, York JG, Corbett AC (2019) Through the looking-glass: The impact of regional institutional logics and knowledge pool characteristics on opportunity recognition and market entry. J. Management Stud. 56(7):1414–1451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vedula S, Doblinger C, Pacheco D, York J, Bacq S, Russo M, Dean, T (2021) Entrepreneurship for the public good: A review, critique, and path forward for social and environmental entreprenuerhsip research. Acad. Management Ann., ePub ahead of print October 21, https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2019.0143.Google Scholar
• Vergne J, Wry T (2014) Categorizing categorization research: Review, integration, and future directions. J. Management Stud. 51(1):56–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villanueva J, Van de Ven AH, Sapienza HJ (2012) Resource mobilization in entrepreneurial firms. J. Bus. Venturing 27(1):19–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldron TL, Navis C, Aronson O, York JG, Pacheco DF (2019) Values-based rivalry: A theoretical framework of rivalry between activists and firms. Acad. Management Rev. 44(4):800–818.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wallace-Wells D (2019) The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Weber K, Heinze KL, DeSoucey M (2008) Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):529–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wennberg K, Wiklund J, DeTienne DR, Cardon MS (2010) Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial exit: Divergent exit routes and their drivers. J. Bus. Venturing 25(4):361–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Western B, Rosenfeld J (2011) Unions, norms, and the rise in US wage inequality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 76(4):513–537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson AT, Malin N, Piepkorn M, Atlee J (2007) GreenSpec Directory: Product Listings and Guideline Specifications, 7th ed. (BuildingGreen, Brattleboro, VT).Google Scholar
• Wry T, York JG (2017) An identity-based approach to social enterprise. Acad. Management Rev. 42(3):437–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wry T, Zhao EY (2018) Taking trade-offs seriously: Examining the contextually contingent relationship between social outreach intensity and financial sustainability in global microfinance. Organ. Sci. 29(3):507–528.Link, Google Scholar
• York JG, Lenox MJ (2014) Exploring the sociocultural determinants of de novo vs. de alio entry in emerging industries. Strategic Management J. 35(13):1930–1951.Crossref, Google Scholar
• York JG, Hargrave TJ, Pacheco DF (2016a) Converging winds: Logic hybridization in the Colorado wind energy field. Acad. Management J. 59(2):579–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• York JG, O’Neil I, Sarasvathy SD (2016b) Exploring environmental entrepreneurship: Identity coupling, venture goals, and stakeholder incentives. J. Management Stud. 53(5):695–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• York JG, Vedula S, Lenox M (2018) It’s not easy building green: The impact of public policy, private actors, and regional logics on voluntary standards adoption. Acad. Management J. 61(4):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao EY, Wry T (2016) Not all inequality is equal: Deconstructing the societal logic of patriarchy to understand microfinance lending to women. Acad. Management J. 59(6):1994–2020.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao EY, Ishihara M, Lounsbury M (2013) Overcoming the illegitimacy discount: Cultural entrepreneurship in the US feature film industry. Organ. Stud. 34(12):1747–1776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zimmerman MA, Zeitz GJ (2002) Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Acad. Management Rev. 27(3):414–431.Crossref, Google Scholar