From Lock-In to Transformation: A Path-Centric Theory of Emerging Technology and Organizing

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1543

References

  • Abbott O (2020) The Self, Relational Sociology, and Morality in Practice, Palgrave Studies in Relational Sociology (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 11–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson P, Tushman ML (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):604–633.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aral S (2020) The Hype Machine: How Social Media Disrupts Our Elections, Our Economy, and Our Health—and How We Must Adapt (Currency, New York).Google Scholar
  • Archer MS (1982) Morphogenesis vs. structuration: On combining structure and action. British J. Sociol. 33(4):455–483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arthur WB (2009) The Nature of Technology: What IT Is and How IT Evolves (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bailey D, Faraj S, Hinds P, Von Krogh G, Leonardi P (2019) Special issue of organization science: Emerging technologies and organizing. Organ. Sci. 30(3):642–646.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barley SR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1):78–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley SR (1990a) Images of imaging: Notes on doing longitudinal field work. Organ. Sci. 1(3):220–247.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barley SR (1990b) The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):61–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barrett M, Oborn E, Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2012) Reconfiguring boundary relations: Robotic innovations in pharmacy work. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1448–1466.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bax ET (1994) Algorithms to count paths and cycles. Inform. Processing Lett. 52(5):249–252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baygi RM, Introna L, Hultin L (2021) Everything flows: Studying continuous socio- technological transformation in a fluid and dynamic digital world digital world. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 45(1):423–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berente N, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y, King JL (2016) Routines as shock absorbers during organizational transformation: Integration, control, and NASA’s Enterprise Information System. Organ. Sci. 27(3):551–572.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bonner JT (1952) Morphogenesis: An Essay on Development (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Bonney R, Cooper CB, Dickinson J, Kelling S, Phillips T, Rosenberg KV, Shirk J (2009) Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. Bioscience 59(11):977–984.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borenstein S (2021) Science Chief Wants Next Pandemic Vaccine Ready in 100 Days. PBS News Hour (June 2), https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/science-chief-wants-next-pandemic-vaccine-ready-in-100-days.Google Scholar
  • Borgatti SP, Mehra A, Brass DJ, Labianca G (2009) Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323(5916):892–895.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buckley W (1967) Sociology and Modern Systems Theory (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes. The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton-Jones A, Straub DW Jr (2006) Reconceptualizing system usage: An approach and empirical test. Inform. Systems Res. 17(3):228–246.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Callaway E (2020) ‘It will change everything’: Deepmind’s AI makes gigantic leap in solving protein structures. Nature 588(7837):203–204.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Callon M (1984) Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. Sociol. Rev. 32(S1):196–233.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chaudhari R, Fong LW, Tan Z, Huang B, Zhang S (2020) An up-to-date overview of computational polypharmacology in modern drug discovery. Expert Opinion Drug Discovery 15(9):1025–1044.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chemero A (2003) An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psych. 15(2):181–195.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi K, Gitelman Y, Asch DA (2018) Subscribing to your patients—reimagining the future of electronic health records. New England J. Medicine 378(21):1960–1962.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christensen CM, Raynor ME, Mcdonald R (2015) What is disruptive innovation. Harvard Bus. Rev. 93(12):44–53.Google Scholar
  • Christensen CM, Anthony SD, Berstell G, Nitterhouse D (2007) Finding the right job for your product. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 48(3):38.Google Scholar
  • Ciborra C, Braa K, Cordella A, Dahlbom B, Hepsø V, Failla A, Hanseth O, Ljungberg J, Monteiro E (2000) From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cui W, Aouidate A, Wang S, Yu Q, Li Y, Yuan S (2020) Discovering anti-cancer drugs via computational methods. Frontiers Pharmacology 11:733, 10.3389/fphar.2020.00733.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Czarniawska B (2004) On time, space, and action nets. Organization 11(6):773–791.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Damiani M (2017) Building the digital biotech company: Why and how digitization is mission-critical for Moderna [white paper]. Accessed, November 10, 2020, https://www.modernatx.com/sites/default/files/Moderna_The_Digital_Biotech_Company_White_Paper_6.22.17_FINAL.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Danner-Schröder A, Geiger D (2016) Unravelling the motor of patterning work: Toward an understanding of the microlevel dynamics of standardization and flexibility. Organ. Sci. 27(3):633–658.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2007) Developing theory through simulation methods. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):480–499.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Desanctis G, Poole MS (1994) Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. 5(2):121–147.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dougherty D, Dunne DD (2012) Digital science and knowledge boundaries in complex innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1467–1484.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Edman P, Begg G (1967) A protein sequenator. Eur. J. Biochemistry 1(1):80–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Emirbayer M (1997) Manifesto for a relational sociology. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(2):281–317.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faulkner P, Runde J (2019) Theorizing the digital object. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 43(4):1279–1302.Google Scholar
  • Feldman MS, Pentland BT, D’Adderio L, Lazaric N (2016) Beyond routines as things: Introduction to the special issue on routine dynamics. Organ. Sci. 27(3):505–513.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS, Worline M, Baker N, Bredow VL (2021) EXPRESS: Continuity as patterning: A process perspective on continuity. Strategic Organ., ePub ahead of print September 7, https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270211046878.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fulk J, Desanctis G (1995) Electronic communication and changing organizational forms. Organ. Sci. 6(4):337–349.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Garud R, Karnøe P (2001) Path creation as a process of mindful deviation. Garud R, Karnoe P, eds. Path Dependence and Creation (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York), 1–38.Google Scholar
  • Garud R, Kumaraswamy A, Karnøe P (2010) Path dependence or path creation? J. Management Stud. 47(4):760–774.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibson JJ (1977) The theory of affordances. Shaw R, Bransford J, eds. Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology (John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, NJ), 67–82.Google Scholar
  • Goh KT, Pentland BT (2019) From actions to paths to patterning: Toward a dynamic theory of patterning in routines. Acad. Management J. 62(6):1901–1929.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gomez PL, Robinson JM (2018) Vaccine manufacturing. Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA, Offit PA, Edwards KM, eds. Plotkin's Vaccines (Seventh Edition) (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 51–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen MT (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):82–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henfridsson O, Nandhakumar J, Scarbrough H, Panourgias N (2018) Recombination in the open-ended value landscape of digital innovation. Inform. Organ. 28(2):89–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ingold T (2016) Lines: A Brief History. (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  • Karahanna E, Straub DW, Chervany NL (1999) Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 23(2):183–213.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kester KE, Danilo C, Sanjay G, Derosa F (2020) The promise of mRNA vaccines: A biotech and industrial perspective. NPJ Vaccines 5(1):1–11.Google Scholar
  • Kono N, Arakawa K (2019) Nanopore sequencing: Review of potential applications in functional genomics. Development Growth Differentiation 61(5):316–326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Latour B (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Law J (1992) Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice 5(4):379–393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2010) Digital materiality? How artifacts without matter, matter. First Monday 15(6-7), https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/download/3036/2567.Google Scholar
  • Leonardi PL (2011) When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 35(1):147–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2013) When does technology use enable network change in organizations? A comparative study of feature use and shared affordances. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(3):749–775.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM, Bailey DE (2008) Transformational technologies and the creation of new work practices: Making implicit knowledge explicit in task-based offshoring. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 32(2):411–436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM, Barley SR (2010) What’s under construction here? Social action, materiality, and power in constructivist studies of technology and organizing. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):1–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM, Vaast E (2017) Social media and their affordances for organizing: A review and agenda for research. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):150–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin X, Li X, Lin X (2020) A review on applications of computational methods in drug screening and design. Molecules 25(6):1375.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malhotra A, Majchrzak A, Lyytinen K (2021) Socio-technical affordances for large-scale collaborations: Introduction to a virtual special issue. Organ. Sci. 32(5):1371–1390.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Malone TW, Yates J, Benjamin RI (1987) Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies: Effects of information technology on market structure and corporate strategies. Comm. ACM 30:484–497.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moody J, Mcfarland D, Bender-Demoll S (2005) Dynamic network visualization. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(4):1206–1241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ng R (2004) Drugs: From Discovery to Approval (Wiley-Liss, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Oh O, Eom C, Rao HR (2015) Research note—role of social media in social change: An analysis of collective sense making during the 2011 Egypt revolution. Inform. Systems Res. 26(1):210–223.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ (1992) The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 3(3):398–427.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 11(4):404–428.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ (2007) Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organ. Stud. 28(9):1435–1448.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ, Iacono CS (2001) Research commentary: Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research—a call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inform. Systems Res. 12(2):121–134.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2008) 10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):433–474.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2014) What happens when evaluation goes online? Exploring apparatuses of valuation in the travel sector. Organ. Sci. 25(3):868–891.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Page S (2011) On Diversity and Complexity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Pardi N, Hogan MJ, Porter FW, Weissman D (2018) mRNA vaccines—a new era in vaccinology. Nature Rev. Drug Discovery 17(4):261–279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland BT, Feldman MS (2007) Narrative networks: Patterns of technology and organization. Organ. Sci. 18(5):781–795.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland BT, Recker J, Wyner G (2017) Rediscovering handoffs. Acad. Management Discovery 3(3):284–301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland BT, Feldman MS, Becker MC, Liu P (2012) Dynamics of organizational routines: A generative model. J. Management Stud. 49(8):1484–1508.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland BT, Liu P, Kremser W, Hærem T (2020a) The dynamics of drift in digitized processes. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 44(1):19–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland BT, Mahringer C, Dittrich K, Feldman MS, Ryan Wolf J (2020b) Process multiplicity and process dynamics: Weaving the space of possible paths. Organ. Theory 1(3):1–21.Google Scholar
  • Perrow C (1967) A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 32(2):194–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pina AS, Hussain A, Roque ACA (2010) An historical overview of drug discovery. Roque ACA, ed. Ligand-Macromolecular Interactions in Drug Discovery, Methods in Molecular Biology (Methods and Protocols), vol. 572 (Humana Press, Totowa, NJ), 3–12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rerup C, Spencer B (2021) Carnegie School experiential learning and routine dynamics. Feldman MS, Pentland BT, D'Adderio L, Dittrich D, Rerup C, Seidl D, eds. Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom), 445–459.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers EM (1983) Diffusion of Innovations (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Rossetti G, Cazabet R (2018) Community discovery in dynamic networks: A survey. ACM Comput. Surveys 51(2):35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Selander L, Jarvenpaa SL (2016) Digital action repertoires and transforming a social movement organization. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 40(2):331–352.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Senior AW, Evans R, Jumper J, Kirkpatrick J, Sifre L, Green T, Qin C, Žídek A, Nelson AW, Bridgland A (2020) Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning. Nature 577(7792):706–710.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sergeeva AV, Faraj S, Huysman M (2020) Losing touch: An embodiment perspective on coordination in robotic surgery. Organ. Sci. 31(5):1248–1271.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sia SK, Soh C (2007) An assessment of package–organisation misalignment: Institutional and ontological structures. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 16(5):568–583.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Silver MS (1988) User perceptions of decision support system restrictiveness: An experiment. J. Management Inform. Systems 5(1):51–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strong DM, Volkoff O, Johnson SA, Pelletier LR, Tulu B, Bar-On I, Trudel J, Garber L (2014) A theory of organization-EHR affordance actualization. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 15(2):53–85.Google Scholar
  • Swanson EB (2019) Technology as routine capability. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 43(3):1007–1024.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sydow J, Schreyögg G, Koch J (2009) Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Acad. Management Rev. 34(4):689–709.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas LDW, Tee R (2021) Generativity: A systematic review and conceptual framework. Internat. J. Management Rev. 1–24.Google Scholar
  • Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sørensen C (2010) Research commentary—digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):748–759.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Turner SF, Rindova VP (2018) Watching the clock: Action timing, patterning, and routine performance. Acad. Management J. 61(4):1253–1280.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vaast E, Safadi H, Lapointe L, Negoita B (2017) Social media affordances for connective action: An examination of microblogging use during the Gulf of Mexico Oil spill. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(4):1179–1205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vamathevan J, Clark D, Czodrowski P, Dunham I, Ferran E, Lee G, Li B, et al. (2019) Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development. Nature Rev. Drug Discovery 18(6):463–477.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van De Ven AH, Poole MS (1990) Methods for studying innovation development in the Minnesota innovation research program. Organ. Sci. 1(3):313–335.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 27(3):425–478.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Volkoff O, Strong DM (2013) Critical realism and affordances: Theorizing IT-associated organizational change processes. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(3):819–834.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684):440–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Woodward J (1965) Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice (Oxford University Press, London).Google Scholar
  • Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) Research commentary: The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zammuto RF, Griffith TL, Majchrzak A, Dougherty DJ, Faraj S (2007) Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. 18(5):749–762.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zittrain JL (2006) The generative internet. Harvard Law Rev. 119:1974–2040.Google Scholar
  • Zuboff S (1988) In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.