In the Land of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man Is King: Knowledge Brokerage in the Age of Learning Algorithms

References

• Ajunwa I (2020) The “black box” at work. Big Data Soc. 7(2):1–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1992) Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Q. 37(4):634–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anthony C (2021) When knowledge work and analytical technologies collide: The practices and consequences of black boxing algorithmic technologies. Admin. Sci. Quart., ePub ahead of print June 4, https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392211016755.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bader V, Kaiser S (2019) Algorithmic decision-making? The user interface and its role for human involvement in decisions supported by artificial intelligence. Organ. 26(5):655–672.Google Scholar
• Bailey DE, Barley SR (2020) Beyond design and use: How scholars should study intelligent technologies. Inform. Organ. 30(2):100286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balzer D (2014) Curationism: How Curating Took over the Art World and Everything Else (Coach House Books, Toronto).Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1):78–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1996) Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organizational studies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(3):404–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR, Bechky BA (1994) In the backrooms of science: The work of technicians in science labs. Work Occupations 21(1):85–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barredo AA, Díaz-Rodríguez N, Del Ser J, Bennetot A, Tabik S, Barbado A, Garcia S, et al. (2020) Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Inform. Fusion 58:82–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boari C, Riboldazzi F (2014) How knowledge brokers emerge and evolve: The role of actors’ behaviour. Res. Policy 43(4):683–695.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolin G, Andersson Schwarz J (2015) Heuristics of the algorithm: Big Data, user interpretation and institutional translation. Big Data Soc. 2(2):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brayne S (2020) Predict and Surveil: Data, Discretion, and the Future of Policing (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Duguid P (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. 2(1):40–57.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Duguid P (1998) Organizing knowledge. California Management Rev. 40(3):90–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Duguid P (2001) Knowledge and organization: A social practice perspective. Organ. Sci. 12(2):198–213.Link, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A (2017) The business of artificial intelligence. Harvard Bus. Rev. (July 18), https://hbr.org/2017/07/the-business-of-artificial-intelligence.Google Scholar
• Burgess N, Currie G (2013) The knowledge brokering role of the hybrid middle level manager: The case of healthcare. British J. Management 24(S1):S132–S142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burrell J (2016) How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data Soc. 3(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Callon M (1984) Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. Sociol. Rev. 32:196–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carah N (2014) Curators of databases: Circulating images, managing attention and making value on social media. Media Internat. Australia 150(1):137–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5):555–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Chiambaretto P, Massé D, Mirc N (2019) “All for one and one for all?” - Knowledge broker roles in managing tensions of internal coopetition: The Ubisoft case. Res. Policy 48(3):584–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christin A (2020) The ethnographer and the algorithm: Beyond the black box. Theor. Soc. 49:897–918.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christin A, Brayne S (2020) Technologies of crime prediction: The reception of algorithms in policing and criminal courts. Soc. Problems 68(3):608–624.Google Scholar
• Ciuk S, James P (2015) Interlingual translation and the transfer of value-infused practices: An in-depth qualitative exploration. Management Learning 46(5):565–581.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cook SDN, Brown JS (1999) Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organ. Sci. 10(4):381–400.Link, Google Scholar
• Czarniawska B, Joerges B (1996) Travels of ideas. Czarniawska B, Sevón G, eds. Translating Organizational Change (De Gruyter, New York), 13–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Czarniawska B, Sevón G (2005) Translation is a vehicle, imitation its motor, and fashion sits at the wheel. Czarniawska B, Sevón G, eds. Global Ideas: How Ideas, Objects and Practices Travel in the Global Economy (Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press, Malmö, Sweden), 7–12.Google Scholar
• Davenport T (2018) The AI Advantage: How to Put the Artificial Intelligence Revolution to Work (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P (1993) Nadel's paradox revisited: Relational and cultural aspects of organizational structures. Nohria N, Eccles R, eds. Networks and Organization (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Doorewaard H, van Bijsterveld M (2001) The osmosis of ideas: An analysis of the integrated approach to IT management from a translation theory perspective. Organ. 8(1):55–76.Google Scholar
• Doran D, Schulz S, Besold TR (2017) What does explainable AI really mean? A new conceptualization of perspectives. Preprint, submitted October 2, https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.00794.Google Scholar
• Dougherty D (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. 3(2):179–202.Link, Google Scholar
• Durán JM, Jongsma KR (2021) Who is afraid of black box algorithms? On the epistemological and ethical basis of trust in medical AI. J. Medical Ethics 47(5):329–335.Google Scholar
• Edacott CG, Leonardi PM (2020) Keep them apart or join them together? How identification processes shape orientations to network brokerage. Comm. Res., ePub ahead of print August 14, https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220947316.Google Scholar
• Evers HD, Menkhoff T (2004) Expert knowledge and the role of consultants in an emerging knowledge‐based economy. Human Systems Management 23(2):123–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Pachidi S, Sayegh K (2018) Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm. Inform. Organ. 28(1):62–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, von Krogh G, Monteiro E, Lakhani KR (2016) Online community as space for knowledge flows. Inform. Systems. Res. 27(4):668–684.Link, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I (2007) Who pays the price of brokerage? Transferring constraints through price setting in the staffing sector. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 72(2):291–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Gould RV (1994) A dilemma of state power: Brokerage and influence in the National Health Policy domain. Amer. J. Sociol. 99(6):1455–1491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher G, Aguinis H (2017) Using theory elaboration to make theoretical advancements. Organ. Res. Methods 20(3):438–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Waguespack DM (2007) Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organ. Sci. 18(2):165–180.Link, Google Scholar
• Forsythe DE (1993) The construction of work in artificial intelligence. Sci. Tech. Human Values 18(4):460–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furusten S (1999) Popular Management Books: How They Are Made and What They Mean for Organizations (Routledge, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gal U, Jensen TB, Stein MK (2020) Breaking the vicious cycle of algorithmic management: A virtue ethics approach to people analytics. Inform. Organ. 30(2):100301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glikson E, Woolley AW (2020) Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):627–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gould RV, Fernandez RM (1989) Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociol. Methodology 19:89–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grady R, Pratt J (2000) The UK technology transfer system: Calls for stronger links between higher education and industry. J. Tech. Transfer 25(2):205–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray ML, Suri S (2019) Ghost Work: How to Stop Silicon Valley from Building a New Global Underclass (HMH Books, Boston).Google Scholar
• Haas A (2015) Crowding at the frontier: Boundary spanners, gatekeepers and knowledge brokers. J. Knowledge Management 19(5):1029–1047.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heaphy ED (2013) Repairing breaches with rules: Maintaining institutions in the face of everyday disruptions. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1291–1315.Link, Google Scholar
• Heimer CA, Stevens ML (1997) Caring for the organization: Social workers as frontline risk managers in neonatal intensive care units. Work Occupations 24(2):133–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henke N, Levine K, McInerney P (2018) You don’t have to be a data scientist to fill this must-have analytics role. Harvard Bus. Rev. (February 5), https://hbr.org/2018/02/you-dont-have-to-be-a-data-scientist-to-fill-this-must-have-analytics-role.Google Scholar
• Heusinkveld S, Benders J (2005) Contested commodification: Consultancies and their struggle with new concept development. Human Relations 58(3):283–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huising R, Silbey SS (2011) Governing the gap: Forging safe science through relational regulation. Regulation Governance 5(1):14–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huysman M (2020) Information systems research on artificial intelligence and work: A commentary on “Robo-Apocalypse cancelled? Reframing the automation and future of work debate”. J. Inform. Tech. 35(4):307–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Introna LD (2016) Algorithms, governance, and governmentality: On governing academic writing. Sci. Tech. Human Values 41(1):17–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johri A (2008) Boundary spanning knowledge broker: An emerging role in global engineering firms. Proc. 38th Annual Frontiers Ed. Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 7–12.Google Scholar
• Karasti H, Baker KS, Halkola E (2006) Enriching the notion of data curation in e-science: Data managing and information infrastructuring in the long term ecological research (LTER) network. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work 15(4):321–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC (2014) Brokerage professions and implementing reform in an age of experts. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(5):912–941.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC, Valentine M, Christin A (2020) Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):366–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim B, Koopmanschap I, Mehrizi MHR, Huysman M, Ranschaert E (2021) How does the radiology community discuss the benefits and limitations of artificial intelligence for their work? A systematic discourse analysis. Eur. J. Radiology 136:109566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirsch A (2017) Explain to whom? Putting the user in the center of explainable AI. Proc. First Internat. Workshop Comprehensibility Explanation AI ML, Bari, Italy, November 16–17.Google Scholar
• Kissling-Naf I (2009) From a learned society to a 21st-century broker: The Swiss Academy of Sciences as a partner in the dialogue with society. Internat. J. Tech. Management 46(1–2):120–131.Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A, Lindberg K, Mørk BE, Nicolini D, Raviola E, Walter L (2019) Boundary work among groups, occupations, and organizations: From cartography to process. Acad. Management Ann. 13(2):704–736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latour B (1986) The powers of associations. Law J, ed. Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? (Routledge, London), 264–280.Google Scholar
• Latour B (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lave J (1988) Cognition in Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Law J (2002) Aircraft Stories: Decentering the Object in Technoscience (Duke University Press, Durham, NC).Google Scholar
• Lebovitz S, Levina N, Lifshitz-Assaf H (2019) Doubting the diagnosis: How artificial intelligence increases ambiguity during professional decision making. Working paper, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
• Lebovitz S, Levina N, Lifshitz-Assaf H (2021) Is AI ground truth really “true”? The dangers of training and evaluating AI tools based on experts’ know-what. MIS Quart. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM, Bailey DE (2017) Recognizing and selling good ideas: Network articulation and the making of an offshore innovation hub. Acad. Management Discoveries 3(2):116–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levina N, Vaast E (2005) The emergency of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quart. 29(2):335–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lingo EL, O’Mahony S (2010) Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):47–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lipton ZC (2018) The mythos of model interpretability. Queue 16(3):31–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer M (2010) The rise of the knowledge broker. Sci. Comm. 32(1):118–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Michalski RS, Carbonell JG, Mitchell TM (2013) Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach (Springer, Cham, Switzerland).Google Scholar
• Miller T (2019) Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artificial Intelligence 267:1–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mittelstadt B, Russell C, Wachter S (2019) Explaining explanations in AI. Proc. Conf. Fairness Accountability Transparency (ACM, New York), 279–288.Google Scholar
• Mueller F, Whittle A (2011) Translating management ideas: A discursive devices analysis. Organ. Stud. 32(2):187–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muller MJ, Milien DR, Feinberg J (2009) Information curators in an enterprise file-sharing service. Proc. 11th Eur. Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (Springer, London), 403–410.Google Scholar
• Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Nielsen JA, Mathiassen L, Newell S (2014) Theorization and translation in information technology institutionalization: Evidence from Danish home care. MIS Quart. 38(1):165–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1):14–37.Link, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I, von Krogh G (2009) Perspective—Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organ. Sci. 20(3):635–652.Link, Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D (2005) Social networks, the tertius iungens and orientation involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):100–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obstfeld DS, Borgatti P, Davis JP (2014) Brokerage as a process: Decoupling third party action from social network structure. Brass DJ, Labianca G, Mehra A, Halgin DS, Borgatti SP, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Emerald Books, Bingley, UK), 135–159.Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S, Bechky BA (2008) Boundary organizations: Enabling collaboration among unexpected allies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):422–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2002) Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. 13(3):249–273.Link, Google Scholar
• Orr J (1996) Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job (ILP Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
• Østerlund C, Carlile PR (2005) Relations in practice: Sorting through practice theories on knowledge sharing in complex organizations. Inform. Soc. 21(2):91–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pachidi S, Berends H, Faraj S, Huysman M (2021) Make way for the algorithms: Symbolic actions and change in a regime of knowing. Organ. Sci. 32(1):18–41.Link, Google Scholar
• Pasquale F (2015) The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paul S, Whittam G (2010) Business angel syndicates: An exploratory study of gatekeepers. Venture Capital 12(3):241–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pawlowski SD, Robey D (2004) Bridging user organizations: Knowledge brokering and the work of information technology professionals. MIS Quart. 28(4):645–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preece A, Harborne D, Braines D, Tomsett R, Chakraborty S (2018) Stakeholders in explainable AI. Preprint, submitted September 29, https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.00184.Google Scholar
• Reagans R, McEvily B (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):240–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rezazade Mehrizi MH, van Ooijen P, Homan M (2020) Applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnostic radiology: A technography study. Eur. Radiology 31:1805–1811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robbins S (2019) A misdirected principle with a catch: Explicability for AI. Minds Machines 29:495–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Røvik KA (2016) Knowledge transfer as translation: Review and elements of an instrumental theory. Internat. J. Management Rev. 18(3):290–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sachs SE (2020) The algorithm at work? Explanation and repair in the enactment of similarity in art data. Inform. Comm. Soc. 23(11):1689–1705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Safadi H, Johnson L, Faraj S (2021) Who contributes knowledge? Core-periphery tension in online innovation communities. Organ. Sci. 32(3):752–775.Link, Google Scholar
• Saka A (2004) The cross-national diffusion of work systems: Translation of Japanese operations in the UK. Organ. Stud. 25(2):209–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shestakofsky B, Kelkar S (2020) Making platforms work: Relationship labor and the management of publics. Theory Soc. 49(5):863–896.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soundarajan V, Khan Z, Tarba SY (2018) Beyond brokering: Sourcing agents, boundary work and working conditions in global supply chains. Human Relations 71(4):481–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stovel K, Shaw L (2012) Brokerage. Annual Rev. Sociol. 38(1):139–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sturdy A, Wright C (2011) The active client: The boundary-spanning roles of internal consultants as gatekeepers, brokers and partners of their external counterparts. Management Learning 42(5):485–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Suddaby R, Greenwood R (2001) Colonizing knowledge: Commodification as a dynamic of jurisdictional expansion in professional service firms. Human Relations 54(7):933–953.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teather JL (1990) The museum keepers: The Museums Association and the growth of museum professionalism. Museum Management Curatorship 9(1):25–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1998) Capturing value from knowledge assets. California Management Rev. 40(3):55–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H (2003) Do we really understand tacit knowledge? Easterby-Smith M, Lyles M, eds. The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 410–427.Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Katz R (1980) External communication and project performance: An investigation into the role of gatekeepers. Management Sci. 26(11):1071–1085.Link, Google Scholar
• Van den Broek E, Sergeeva A, Huysman M (2021) When the machine meets the expert: An ethnography of developing AI for hiring. MIS Quart. 45(3b):1557–1580.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J (1973) Observations on the making of policemen. Human Organ. 32(4):407–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vogel A, Kaghan WN (2001) Bureaucrats, brokers, and the entrepreneurial university. Organ. 8(2):358–364.Google Scholar
• Von Hippel E (1994) “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Sci. 40(4):429–439.Link, Google Scholar
• Von Krogh G (2018) Artificial intelligence in organizations: New opportunities for phenomenon-based theorizing. Acad. Management Discoveries 4(4):404–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waardenburg L, Huysman M, Agterberg M (2021) Managing AI Wisely: From Development to Organizational Change in Practice (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wenger E (1999) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Zarsky T (2016) The trouble with algorithmic decisions. Sci. Tech. Human Values 41(1):118–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Nandhakumar J, Hummel JT, Waardenburg L (2020) Addressing the key challenges of developing machine learning AI systems for knowledge-intensive work. MIS Quart. Executive 19(4):221–238.Crossref, Google Scholar