Crowd-Based Accountability: Examining How Social Media Commentary Reconfigures Organizational Accountability

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1546

References

  • Adorjan MC, Ricciardelli R (2021) Synoptic prudentialism: The police, social media, and bureaucratic resistance. Canadian J. Sociol. 46(1):59–84.Google Scholar
  • Adut A (2019) Reign of Appearances: The Misery and Splendor of the Public Sphere (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Albu OB, Etter M (2016) Hypertextuality and social media: A study of the constitutive and paradoxical implications of organizational Twitter use. Management Comm. Quart. 30(1):5–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aratani L (2018) A year after the infamous United dragging incident, has anything changed for airline travelers? Washington Post Online (April 9), https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/dr-gridlock/wp/2018/04/09/a-year-after-the-infamous-united-dragging-incident-has-anything-changed-for-airlines-travelers/.Google Scholar
  • Augustine G (2021) We’re not like those crazy hippies: The dynamics of jurisdictional drift in externally mandated occupational groups. Organ. Sci. 32(4):1056–1078.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barnett ML, Henriques I, Husted BW (2020) The rise and stall of stakeholder influence: How the digital age limits social control. Acad. Management Perspect. 34(1):48–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA, Okhuysen GA (2011) Expecting the unexpected? How SWAT officers and film crews handle surprises. Acad. Management J. 54(2):239–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA, O’Mahony S (2015) Leveraging comparative field data for theory generation. Elsbach KD, Kramer RM, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research, Innovative Pathways and Methods (Routledge, New York), 168–176.Google Scholar
  • Bergsteiner H (2012) Accountability Theory Meets Accountability Practice (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK).Google Scholar
  • Bolino MC, Turnley WH (2003) More than one way to make an impression: Exploring profiles of impression management. J. Management 29(2):141–160.Google Scholar
  • Borch C, Schiermer B (2021) Crowd and collective behavior. Abrutyn S, Lizardo O, eds. Handbook of Classical Sociological Theory (Springer, New York), 439–465.Google Scholar
  • Brandtner C (2017) Plurality in organizational evaluation. Sociol. Theory 35(3):200–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brighenti AM (2010) Visibility in Social Theory and Social Research (Palgrave Macmillan, London, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bryne JA (2021) Former B-school dean indicted on fraud charges in MBA rankings scandal. Poets & Quants Online (April 16), https://poetsandquants.com/2021/04/16/former-b-school-dean-indicted-on-fraud-charges-in-mba-rankings-scandal/?pq-category=business-school-news.Google Scholar
  • Bundy J, Pfarrer MD (2015) A burden of responsibility: The role of social approval at the onset of a crisis. Acad. Management Rev. 40(3):345–369.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bundy J, Iqbal F, Pfarrer MD (2021) Reputations in flux: How a firm defends its multiple reputations in response to different violations. Strategic Management J. 42(6):1109–1138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Busenbark JR, Lange D, Certo ST (2017) Foreshadowing as impression management: Illuminating the path for security analysts. Strategic Management J. 38(12):2486–2507.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charmaz K (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis (Sage Publications Ltd, London).Google Scholar
  • Chaney PK, Philipich KL (2002) Shredded reputation: The cost of audit failure. J. Accounting Res. 40(4):1221–1245.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatterji AK, Toffel MW (2010) How firms respond to being rated. Strategic Management J. 31(9):917–945.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chu J (2021) Cameras of merit or engines of inequality? College ranking systems and the enrollment of disadvantaged students. Amer. J. Sociol. 126(6):1307–1346.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cotter M, Snyder W (1998) How guide books affect restaurant behavior. J. Restaurant Foodservice Marketing 3(1):69–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dobbin F, Kelly EL (2007) How to stop harassment: Professional construction of legal compliance in organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. 112(4):1203–1243.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dubnick M (2005) Accountability and the promise of performance: In search of mechanisms. Public Performance Management Rev. 28(3):376–417.Google Scholar
  • Espeland WN, Sauder M (2007) Ranking and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(1):1–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Espeland WN, Sauder M (2016) Engines of Anxiety: Academic Rankings, Reputation, and Accountability (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
  • Espeland WN, Vannebo B (2007) Accountability, quantification, and law. Annual Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 3(1):21–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Etter M, Ravasi D, Colleoni E (2019) Social media and the formation of organizational reputation. Acad. Management Rev. 44(1):28–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferrara E, Yang Z (2015) Measuring emotional contagion in social media. PLoS One 10(11):e0142390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frink DD, Hall AT, Perryman AA, Ranft AL, Hochwarter WA, Ferris GR, Todd Royle M (2008) Meso-level theory of accountability in organizations. Martocchio JJ, ed. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 177–245.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibson JJ (1977) The Theory of Affordances (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Gioia DA, Corley KG (2002) Being good vs. looking good: Business school rankings and the Circean transformation from substance to image. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 1(1):107–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodman M (2014) Twitter storm forces Chimerix’s hand in compassionate use request. Nature Biotechnology 32:503–504.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gutek BA, Cherry B, Bhappu AD, Schneider S, Woolf L (2000) Features of service relationships and encounters. Work Occupations 27(3):319–352.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hallett T (2010) The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(1):52–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hill K (2012) McDStories: When a hashtag becomes a bashtag. Forbes Online (January 24), http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2012/01/24/mcdstories-when-a-hashtagbecomes-a-bashtag.Google Scholar
  • Huising R (2015) To hive or to hold? Producing professional authority through scut work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(2):263–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hultin L, Introna L (2019) On receiving asylum seekers: Identity working as a process of material-discursive interpellation. Organ. Stud. 40(9):1361–1386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jeacle I, Carter C (2011) In TripAdvisor we trust: Rankings, calculative regimes and abstract systems. Accounting Organ. Soc. 3(4):293–309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kane GC, Alavi M, LaBianca GJ, Borgatti S (2014) What’s different about social media networks? A framework and research agenda. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(1):275–304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim A (2020) An Oregon police department is asking residents to stop calling 911 because they’ve run out of toilet paper. CNN Online (March 16), https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/16/us/newport-911-toilet-paper-trnd/index.html.Google Scholar
  • King BG (2008) A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):395–421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kinstler L (2018) How TripAdvisor changed travel. The Guardian. Accessed May 11, 2020, https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/aug/17/how-tripadvisor-changed-travel.Google Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2014) Social media, knowledge sharing, and innovation: Toward a theory of communication visibility. Inform. Systems Res. 25(4):796–816.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2018) Social media and the development of shared cognition: The roles of network expansion, content integration, and triggered recalling. Organ. Sci. 29(4):547–568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM, Treem JW (2020) Behavioral visibility: A new paradigm for organization studies in the age of digitization, digitalization, and datafication. Organ. Stud. 41(12):1601–1625.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM, Vaast E (2017) Social media and their affordances for organizing: A review and agenda for research. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):150–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lerner JS, Tetlock PE (1999) Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psych. Bull. 125(2):255–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levy K, Barocas S (2018) Privacy at the margins refractive surveillance: Monitoring customers to manage workers. Internat. J. Comm. 12:1166–1188.Google Scholar
  • Majchrzak A, Faraj S, Kane GC, Azad B (2013) The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. 19(1):38–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mathiesen T (1997) The viewer society: Michel Foucault’s panopticon revisited. Theoretical Criminology 1(2):215–234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McDonnell MH, King B (2013) Keeping up appearances: Reputational threat and impression management after social movement boycotts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(3):387–419.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McDonnell MH, Werner T (2016) Blacklisted businesses: Social activists’ challenges and the disruption of corporate political activity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(4):584–620.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milan S (2015) Mobilizing in times of social media. From a politics of identity to a politics of visibility. Dencik L, Leistert O, eds. Critical Perspectives on Social Media and Protest (Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD), 53–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller P, Rose N (2008) Governing the Present: Administering Economic, Social and Personal Life (Polity Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Nader R (1965) Unsafe at Any Speed: The Designed-in Dangers of the American Automobile (Grossman Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
  • O’Connor P (2010) Managing a hotel’s image on TripAdvisor. J. Hospitality Marketing Management 19(7):754–772.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2014) What happens when evaluation goes online? Exploring apparatuses of valuation in the travel sector. Organ. Sci. 25(3):868–891.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pfarrer MD, Smith KG, Bartol KM, Khanin DM, Zhang X (2008) Coming forward: The effects of social and regulatory forces on the voluntary restatement of earnings subsequent to wrongdoing. Organ. Sci. 19(3):386–403.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J, Zorbach T, Carley KM (2014) Understanding online firestorms: Negative word-of-mouth dynamics in social media networks. J. Marketing Comm. 20(1–2):117–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pollock TG, Rindova VP (2003) Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Acad. Management J. 46(5):631–642.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter TM (1995) Trust in Numbers: Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Power M (1996) Making things auditable. Accounting, Organizations and Soc. 21(2–3):289–315.Google Scholar
  • Power M (1997) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Proserpio D, Zervas G (2017) Online reputation management: Estimating the impact of management responses on consumer reviews. Marketing Sci. 36(5):645–665.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pugh HB, Brady MK, Hopkins LM (2018) A customer scorned: Effects of employee reprimands in frontline service encounters. J. Service Res. 21(2):219–234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rahman HA (2021) The invisible cage: Workers’ reactivity to opaque algorithmic evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(4):945–988.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ravasi D, Rindova V, Etter M, Cornelissen J (2018) The formation of organizational reputation. Acad. Management Ann. 12(2):574–599.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reinstein J (2018) Dunkin’ Donuts is under fire for a sign that people are calling racist. Accessed May 15, 2019, https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/juliareinstein/dunkin-donuts-sign-racist-english.Google Scholar
  • Rao H (1998) Caveat emptor: The construction of nonprofit consumer watchdog organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(4):912–961.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts J (1991) The possibilities of accountability. Accounting Organ. Soc. 16(4):355–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts J (2009) No one is perfect: The limits of transparency and an ethic for “intelligent” accountability. Accounting Organ. Soc. 34(8):957–970.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sandholtz KW (2012) Making standards stick: A theory of coupled vs. decoupled compliance. Organ. Stud. 33(5–6):655–679.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sauder M, Espeland WN (2009) The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):63–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sharkey AJ, Bromley P (2015) Can ratings have indirect effects? Evidence from the organizational response to peers’ environmental ratings. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(1):63–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shestakofsky B, Kelkar S (2020) Making platforms work: Relationship labor and the management of publics. Theory Soc. 49(5):863–896.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott SV, Orlikowski WJ (2012) Reconfiguring relations of accountability: Materialization of social media in the travel sector. Accounting Organ. Soc. 37(1):26–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shore C, Wright S (1999) Audit culture and anthropology: Neo-liberalism in British higher education. J. Roy. Anthropological Inst. 5(4):557–575.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shore C, Wright S (2015) Audit culture revisited: Rankings, ratings, and the reassembling of society. Current Anthropology 56(3):421–444.Google Scholar
  • Stevens M (2018) Starbucks C.E.O. apologizes after arrests of 2 black men. New York Times Online (April 15), https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/15/us/starbucks-philadelphia-black-men-arrest.html.Google Scholar
  • Strathern M (2000) The tyranny of transparency. British Ed. Res. J. 26(3):309–321.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suchman L (1993) Working relations of technology production and use. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work 2(1–2):21–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suddaby R, Greenwood R (2005) Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):35–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tetlock PE, Vieider FM, Patil SV, Grant AM (2013) Accountability and ideology: When left looks right and right looks left. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 122(1):22–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson JB (2005) The new visibility. Theory Culture Soc. 22(6):31–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Toubiana M, Zietsma C (2017) The message is on the wall? Emotions, social media and the dynamics of institutional complexity. Acad. Management J. 60(3):922–953.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Treem JW (2015) Social media as technologies of accountability: Explaining resistance to implementation within organizations. Amer. Behav. Sci. 59(1):53–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Treem JW, Leonardi PM (2013) Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Ann. Internat. Comm. Assoc. 36(1):143–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsugawa S, Ohsaki H (2017) On the relation between message sentiment and its virality on social media. Soc. Network Anal. Mining 7(1):19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turco C (2016) The Conversational Firm: Rethinking Bureaucracy in the Age of Social Media (Columbia University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uldam J (2018) Social media visibility: Challenges to activism. Media Culture Soc. 40(1):41–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Victor D, Stevens M (2017) United Airlines passenger is dragged from an overbooked flight. New York Times Online (April 10), https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/10/business/united-flight-passenger-dragged.html.Google Scholar
  • Wilbers S, Brankovic J (2021) The emergence of university rankings: A historical-sociological account. Higher Ed., ePub ahead of print November 20, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00776-7.Google Scholar
  • Xie KL, Zhang Z, Zhang Z (2014) The business value of online consumer reviews and management response to hotel performance. Internat. J. Hospitality Management 43(1):1–12.Google Scholar
  • Wang X, Reger RK, Pfarrer M (2021) Faster, hotter, and more Linked In: Managing social disapproval in the social media era. Acad. Management Rev. 46(2):275–298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zavyalova A, Pfarrer MD, Reger RK (2017) Celebrity and infamy? The consequences of media narratives about organizational identity. Acad. Management Rev. 42(3):461–480.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zavyalova A, Pfarrer MD, Reger RK, Shapiro DL (2012) Managing the message: The effects of firm actions and industry spillovers on media coverage following wrongdoing. Acad. Management J. 55(5):1079–1101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.