Going Alone or Together? A Configurational Analysis of Solo Founding vs. Cofounding
References
- (2016) What do I take with me? The mediating effect of spin-out team size and tenure on the founder–firm performance relationship. Acad. Management J. 59(3):1060–1087.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Teams. Gartner WB, Shaver KG, Carter NM, Reynolds PD, eds. Handbook of Entrepreneurial Dynamics: The Process of Business Creation (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 299–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Organizations Evolving, 3rd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA). Google Scholar
- (2007) Small worlds, infinite possibilities? How social networks affect entrepreneurial team formation and search. Strategic Entrepreneurship. J. 1(1–2):147–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Unicorns, gazelles, and other distractions on the way to understanding real entrepreneurship in the United States. Acad. Management Perspect. 32(4):458–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) How entrepreneurial firms can benefit from alliances with large partners. Acad. Management Perspect. 15(1):139–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) The effects of TMT size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. J. Management 23(4):495–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Business model configurations and performance: A qualitative comparative analysis in Formula One racing, 2005–2013. Indust. Corporate Change 24(3):655–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(3):329–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Acad. Management J. 49(4):741–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Early teams: The impact of team demography on VC financing and going public. J. Bus. Venturing 22(2):147–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Attracting early‐stage investors: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. J. Finance 72(2):509–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Rational heuristics: The ‘simple rules’ that strategists learn from process experience. Strategic Management J. 32(13):1437–1464.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Anticipatory learning. Strategic Entrepreneurship. J. 8(2):101–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Do founder CEOs tune out their teams? MIT Sloan Management Rev. (October 26), https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/do-founder-ceos-tune-out-their-teams/.Google Scholar
- (2019) Capability creation: Heuristics as microfoundations. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 13(2):121–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Reaping the benefits of task conflict in teams: The critical role of team psychological safety climate. J. Appl. Psych. 97(1):151–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Effects of initial teamwork capability and initial relational capability on the development of new technology‐based firms. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 5(1):37–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Decoupling revisited: Common pressures, divergent strategies in the U.S. nonprofit sector. M@n@gement 15(5):468–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Owner founders, nonowner founders and helpers. Reynolds PD, Curtin RT, eds. New Firm Creation in the United States, International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol. 23 (Springer, New York), 115–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Antecedents, moderators, and performance consequences of membership change in new venture teams. J. Bus. Venturing 20(5):705–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Turning lead into gold: How do entrepreneurs mobilize resources to exploit opportunities? Acad. Management Ann. 13(1):240–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. J. Management 23(3):239–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) The role of accelerator designs in mitigating bounded rationality in new ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(4):810–854.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. J. Bus. Venturing 9(5):371–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Predicting stakeholder orientation in the multinational enterprise: A midrange theory. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 42:694–717.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Faking it or muddling through? Understanding decoupling in response to stakeholder pressures. Acad. Management J. 55(6):1429–1448.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) The dark side of valuation: Firms with no earnings, no history and no comparables. Working paper, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
- (2011) Rotating leadership and collaborative innovation: Recombination processes in symbiotic relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(2):159–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. J. Management 32(1):83–107.Google Scholar
- (2018) I can do that alone… or not? How idea generators juggle between the pros and cons of teamwork. Strategic Management J. 39(2):458–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) How lead founder personality affects new venture performance: The mediating role of team conflict. J. Management 39(7):1825–1854.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Editors’ comments: Styles of theorizing and the social organization of knowledge. Acad. Management Rev. 38(3):325–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Acad. Management J. 39(4):802–835.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Does experience matter? The effect of founding team experience on the survival and sales of newly founded ventures. Strategic Organ. 4(3):215–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) The effects of opportunities and founder experience on new firm performance. Strategic Management J. 36(7):1035–1052.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Scaling: Organizing and growth in entrepreneurial ventures. Acad. Management Ann. 11(2):640–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories. Acad. Management J. 36(6):1196–1250.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Gender-inclusive gatekeeping: How (mostly male) predecessors influence the success of female CEOs. Acad. Management J. 61(2):379–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Are you experienced or are you talented? When does innate talent vs. experience explain entrepreneurial performance? Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 6(3):207–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Theory building from cases. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(3):504–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: Cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance. J. Bus. Venturing 17(4):365–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Founding strategy and performance: A comparison of high and low growth high tech firms. Strategic Management J. 11(2):87–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Acad. Management J. 54(2):393–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Effects of team inputs and intrateam processes on perceptions of team viability and member satisfaction in nascent ventures. Strategic Management J. 27(4):389–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Friendship within entrepreneurial teams and its association with team and venture performance. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 25(2):5–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Capturing causal complexity: Heuristics for configurational theorizing. Acad. Management Rev. 46(4):778–799.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1229–1249.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) On the origin of strategy: Action and cognition over time. Organ. Sci. 18(3):420–439.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) The geographic origins of radical technological paradigms. Res. Policy 44(2):311–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Alliance strategies of small firms. Small Bus. Econom. 9:33–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) CEO compensation in relation to worker compensation across countries: The configurational impact of country‐level institutions. Strategic Management J. 37(4):793–815.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis: Best practices in strategy and organization research. Strategic Organ. 16(4):482–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) From minds to markets: How human capital endowments shape market opportunity identification of technology start-ups. J. Management 38(5):1421–1449.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) LinkedIn cofounder: Start with a team, not an idea. Entrepreneurship & Innovation Exchange. Accessed March 25, 2019, https://eiexchange.com/content/301-linkedincofounder-start-with-a-team-not-an-ideaGoogle Scholar
- (1998) The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Admin. Sci. Quart. 781–814.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Acad. Management J. 36(4):844–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 39(12):3163–3192.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Booyah: When a business makes its first million dollars in revenue. CNN Money (July 11), https://money.cnn.com/2011/07/11/smallbusiness/first_million_dollars/index.htm.Google Scholar
- (2001) Resource complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational alliances. J. Management 27(6):679–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) The first deal: The division of founder equity in new ventures. Management Sci. 63(8):2647–2666.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) How much do TMTs matter in founder‐led firms? Strategic Management J. 40(6):959–986.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) Retrospective reports of strategic‐level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management J. 6(2):171–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):602–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Entrepreneurial team composition characteristics and new venture performance: A meta-analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 41(5):743–771.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) How do entrepreneurial founding teams allocate task positions? Acad. Management J. 60(1):264–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Alliance capability, stock market response, and long‐term alliance success: The role of the alliance function. Strategic Management J. 23(8):747–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Should investors bet on the jockey or the horse? Evidence from the evolution of firms from early business plans to public companies. J. Finance 64(1):75–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) New venture teams: A review of the literature and roadmap for future research. J. Management 40(1):226–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Start-up teams: A multidimensional conceptualization, integrative review of past research, and future research agenda. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):231–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Serial entrepreneurship: Learning by doing? J. Labor Econom. 34(S2):S217–S254.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Acad. Management Rev. 23(2):325–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Entrepreneurial team formation. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):29–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
- (2001) A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Acad. Management Rev. 26(3):356–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Understanding startup valuation. DataDrivenInvestor (October 1), https://medium.datadriveninvestor.com/understanding-startup-valuation-a393f6fadc6f.Google Scholar
- (1986) Sense of community. J. Community Psych. 14(1):6–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Acad. Management J. 36(6):1175–1195.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
- (1978) Organization Strategy, Structure, and Process (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
- (1981) Toward a new contingency approach: The search for organizational gestalts. J. Management Stud. 18(1):1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1986) Configurations of strategy and structure: Toward a synthesis. Strategic Management J. 7(3):233–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Challenging trends in configuration research: Where are the configurations? Strategic Organ. 16(4):453–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1979) The Structure of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research (Prentice-Hall, New York).Google Scholar
- (2014) Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms. Acad. Management J. 57(6):1681–1705.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Embracing causal complexity: The emergence of a neo-configurational perspective. J. Management 43(1):255–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Strategic alliances of entrepreneurial firms: Value enhancing then value destroying. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 10(2):153–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Schocken Books, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1):33–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Fuzzy Set Social Science (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
- (2008) Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Net effects analysis vs. configurational analysis: An empirical demonstration. Ragin CC, ed. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Set Relations in Social Research (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 190–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Configurational Comparative Analysis (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
- (2015) Founder or joiner? The role of preferences and context in shaping different entrepreneurial interests. Management Sci. 61(9):2160–2184.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) The Entrepreneurial Group: Social Identities, Relations, and Collective Action (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Venture advocate behaviors and the emerging enterprise. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 10(1):107–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Jewels in the crown: Exploring the motivations and team building processes of employee entrepreneurs. Strategic Management J. 40(9):1417–1452.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Research on organizational configurations: Past accomplishments and future challenges. J. Management 34(6):1053–1079.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall, and the renaissance of Liz Claiborne. Acad. Management J. 44(4):838–857.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Evolution toward fit. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1):125–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1986) Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(2):171–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) The team scaling fallacy: Underestimating the declining efficiency of larger teams. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 118(2):132–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1965) Social structure and organizations. March JG, ed. Handbook of Organizations (Routledge, Abingdon, UK), 142–193.Google Scholar
- (2011) Introduction to special topic forum: Where are the new theories of organization? Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):236–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) How we got our first $1 million in sales. Forbes (December 10), https://www.forbes.com/sites/miketempleman/2015/12/10/how-we-got-our-first-1-million-in-sales/?sh=3e50d990f9ef.Google Scholar
- (2003) Entrepreneurial founder teams: Factors associated with member entry and exit. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 28(2):107–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) How your startup can quickly hit $1 million in revenue. Inc. (December 28), https://www.inc.com/sangram-vajre/how-your-startup-can-quickly-hit-1-million-in-revenue.html.Google Scholar
- (1990) New Venture Strategies (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
- (2009) Leveraging ties: The contingent value of entrepreneurial teams’ external advice networks on Indian software venture performance. Strategic Management J. 30(11):1179–1191.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Stewards, agents, and the founder discount: Executive compensation in new ventures. Acad. Management J. 49(5):960–976.Google Scholar
- (2012) The Founder’s Dilemmas: Anticipating and Avoiding the Pitfalls That Can Sink a Startup (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) The throne vs. the kingdom: Founder control and value creation in startups. Strategic Management J. 38(2):255–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Knowledge‐based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium‐sized businesses. Strategic Management J. 24(13):1307–1314.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) The paradox of resource provision in entrepreneurial teams: Between self-interest and the collective enterprise. Organ. Sci. 31(6):1336–1358.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) How to do better case studies. Bickman L, Rog DJ, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 254–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Unlocking founding team prior shared experience: A transactive memory. J. Bus. Venturing 27(5):577–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Acad. Management Rev. 27(3):414–431.Crossref, Google Scholar

