He’s Overqualified, She’s Highly Committed: Qualification Signals and Gendered Assumptions About Job Candidate Commitment

References

• Abele AE (2003) The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: Findings from a prospective study. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 85(4):768–776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abele AE, Hauke N, Louvet E, Szymkow A, Duan Y (2016) Facets of the fundamental content dimensions: Agency with competence and assertiveness—Communion with warmth and morality. Frontiers Psych. 7(1810):1–17.Google Scholar
• Abraham ML (2020) Gender-role incongruity and audience-based gender bias: An examination of networking among entrepreneurs. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(1):151–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aven B, Morse L, Iorio A (2018) The valley of trust: The effect of relational strength on monitoring quality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 166:179–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barbulescu R, Bidwell M (2013) Do women choose different jobs from men? Mechanisms of application segregation in the market for managerial workers. Organ. Sci. 24(3):737–756.Link, Google Scholar
• Bear JB, Glick P (2017) Breadwinner bonus and caregiver penalty in workplace rewards for men and women. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 8(7):780–788.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker H (1960) Notes on the concept of commitment. Amer. J. Sociol. 66(1):32–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Behfar K, Okhuysen GA (2018) Perspective-discovery within validation logic: Deliberately surfacing, complementing, and substituting abductive reasoning in hypothetico-deductive inquiry. Organ. Sci. 29(2):323–340.Link, Google Scholar
• Benard S, Correll SJ (2010) Normative discrimination and the motherhood penalty. Gender Soc. 24(5):616–646.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berinsky AJ, Huber GA, Lenz GS (2012) Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Anal. 20(3):351–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bidwell M, Won S, Barbulescu R, Mollick E (2015) I used to work at Goldman Sachs! How firms benefit from organizational status in the market for human capital. Strategic Management J. 36:1164–1173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bielby DD, Bielby WT (1984) Work commitment, sex-role attitudes, and women’s employment. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 49(2):234–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bielby DD, Bielby WT (1988) She works hard for the money: Household responsibilities and the allocation of work effort. Amer. J. Sociol. 93(5):1031–1059.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bielby WT, Bielby DD (1992) I will follow him: Family ties, gender-role beliefs, and reluctance to relocate for a better job. Amer. J. Sociol. 97(5):1241–1267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biernat M, Kobrynowicz D (1997) Gender- and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 72(3):544–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bills D (1992) The mutability of educational credentials as hiring criteria. Work Occupations 19(1):79–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohren JA, Imas A, Rosenberg M (2019) The dynamics of discrimination: Theory and evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(10):3395–3436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boorstin J (2018) Survey: It’s still tough to be a woman on Wall Street—But men don’t always notice. CNBC (June 26), https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/25/surveyon-wall-street-workplace-biases-persist---but-men-dont-see-t.html.Google Scholar
• Botelho T, Abraham M (2017) Pursuing quality: How search costs and uncertainty magnify gender-based double standards in a multi-stage evaluation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(4):698–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brands RA, Fernandez-Mateo I (2017) Leaning out: How negative recruitment experiences shape women’s decisions to compete for executive roles. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(3):405–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brass DJ (1985) Men’s and women’s networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Acad. Management J. 28(2):327–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budig MJ, England P (2001) The wage penalty for motherhood. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 66(2):204–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive yet high-quality data? Perspect. Psych. Sci. 6(1):3–5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell EL, Chow R, Aven B (2020) From exception to exceptional: How gender and tenure impact sponsor effectiveness. Acad. Management Proc. 2020(1). https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/AMBPP.2020.21151abstract.Google Scholar
• Campbell B, Coff R, Kryscynski D (2012) Rethinking sustained competitive advantage from human capital. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):376–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campero S, Fernandez RM (2018) Gender composition of labor queues and gender disparities in hiring. Soc. Forces 97(4):1487–1516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carli LL, Alawa L, Lee Y, Zhao B, Kim E (2016) Stereotypes about gender and science: Women =/= scientists. Psych. Women Quart. 40(2):244–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carson K, Bedeian A (1994) Career commitment: Construction of a measure and examination of its psychometric properties. J. Vocational Behav. 44(3):237–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Catalyst (2021) Women in the workforce: Quick take. (February 11), https://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-workforce-global.Google Scholar
• Coltrane S (2004) Elite careers and family commitment: It’s (still) about gender. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 596(1):214–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coltrane S, Miller EC, DeHaan T, Stewart L (2013) Fathers and the flexibility stigma. J. Soc. Issues 69(2):279–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ (2004) Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69:93–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ, Benard S, Paik I (2007) Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? Amer. J. Sociol. 112(5):1297–1338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeArmond S, Tye M, Chen PY, Krauss A, Rogers DA, Sintek E (2006) Age and gender stereotypes: New challenges in a changing workplace and workforce. J. Appl. Social Psych. 36(9):2184–2214.Google Scholar
• Di Stasio V (2017) Who is ahead in the labor market queue? Institutions’ and employers’ perspective on overeducation, undereducation, and horizontal mismatches. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 90(2):109–126.Google Scholar
• Di Stefano G, Gutierrez C (2019) Under a magnifying glass: On the use of experiments in strategy research. Strategic Organ. 17(4):497–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dumas TL, Sanchez-Burks J (2015) The professional, the personal, and the ideal worker: Pressures and objectives shaping the boundary between life domains. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):803–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunne DD, Dougherty D (2016) Abductive reasoning: How innovators navigate in the labyrinth of complex product innovation. Organ. Stud. 37(2):131–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly A, Nater C, Miller DI, Kaufman M, Sczesny S (2020) Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. Amer. Psychologist 75(3):301–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• England P, Bearak J, Budig MJ, Hodges MJ (2016) Do highly paid, highly skilled women experience the largest motherhood penalty? Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(6):1161–1189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epstein CF, Seron C, Oglensky B, Saute R (1999) The Part-Time Paradox: Time Norms, Professional Life, Family, and Gender (Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, New York).Google Scholar
• Erdogan B, Bauer TN (2021) Overqualification at work: A review and synthesis of the literature. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 8:259–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Campero S (2017) Gender sorting and the glass ceiling in high-tech firms. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 70(1):73–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske S, Stevens LE (1993) What’s So Special About Sex? Gender Stereotyping and Discrimination (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Fiske S, Cuddy AJC, Glick P, Xu J (2002) A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 82(6):878–902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foschi M (2000) Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annual Rev. Sociol. 26:21–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank RH (1978) Why women earn less: The theory and estimation of differential overqualification. Amer. Econom. Rev. 68(3):360–373.Google Scholar
• Galperin R, Hahl O, Sterling AD, Guo J (2020) Too good to hire? Capability and inferences about commitment in labor markets. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):275–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldin C, Rouse C (2000) Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):715–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE (2012) Applied Thematic Analysis (Sage Publications Inc, Los Angeles).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahl O (2016) Turning back the clock on baseball: The increased prominence of extrinsic rewards and demand for authenticity. Organ. Sci. 27(4):929–953.Link, Google Scholar
• Hahl O, Zuckerman EW (2014) The denigration of heroes? How the status attainment process shapes attributions of considerateness and authenticity. Amer. J. Sociol. 120(2):504–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hakim C (2018) Models of the Family in Modern Societies: Ideals and Realities (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Harari MB, Manapragada A, Viswesvaran C (2017) Who thinks they’re a big fish in a small pond and why does it matter? A meta-analysis of perceived overqualification. J. Vocational Behav. 102:28–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME (2012) Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Res. Organ. Behav. 32:113–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Okimoto TG (2007) Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. J. Appl. Psych. 92(1):81–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Wallen AS, Fuchs D, Tamkins MM (2004) Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. J. Appl. Psych. 89(3):416–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodges MJ, Budig MJ (2010) Who gets the daddy bonus? Organizational hegemonic masculinity and the impact of fatherhood on earnings. Gender Soc. 24(6):717–745.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodson G, Dovidio JF, Gaertner SL (2002) Processes in racial discrimination: Differential weighting of conflicting information. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 28(4):460–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoobler JM, Hu J, Wilson M (2010) Do workers who experience conflict between the work and family domains hit a “glass ceiling?”: A meta-analytic examination. J. Vocational Behav. 77(3):481–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hultin M (2003) Some take the glass escalator, some hit the glass ceiling? Career consequences of occupational sex segregation. Work Occupations 30(1):30–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H (1992) Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(3):422–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Indiviglio D (2010) The overqualified worker problem. Atlantic (March 29), https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2010/03/the-overqualified-worker-problem/38164/.Google Scholar
• Johnson GJ, Johnson WR (2000) Perceived overqualification and dimensions of job satisfaction: A longitudinal analysis. J. Psych. 134(5):537–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Killewald A (2012) A reconsideration of the fatherhood premium: Marriage, coresidence, biology, and fathers’ wages. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 78(1):96–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King M, Ortenblad M, Ladge JL (2018) What will it take to make finance more gender balanced? Harvard Bus. Rev. (December 10), https://hbr.org/2018/12/what-will-it-take-to-make-finance-more-gender-balanced.Google Scholar
• Kite ME, Deaux K, Miele M (1991) Stereotypes of young and old: Does age outweigh gender? Psych. Aging 6(1):19–27.Google Scholar
• Leslie LM, Manchester CF, Dahm PC (2017) Why and when does the gender gap reverse? Diversity goals and the pay premium for high potential women. Acad. Management J. 60(2):402–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leung MD (2014) Dilettante or renaissance person? How the order of job experiences affects hiring in an external labor market. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(1):136–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Litman L, Robinson J, Abberbock T (2017) TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 49(2):433–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lundberg S, Rose E (2002) The effects of sons and daughters on men’s labor supply and wages. Rev. Econom. Statist. 84(2):251–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lutter M (2015) Do women suffer from network closure? The moderating effect of social capital on gender inequality in a project-based labor market, 1929 to 2010. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(2):329–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGoldrick K, Robst J (1996) Gender differences in overeducation: A test of the theory of differential overqualification. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(2):280–284.Google Scholar
• Merluzzi J, Phillips DJ (2016) The specialist discount: Negative returns for MBAs with focused profiles in investment banking. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(1):87–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milkman KL, Akinola M, Chuch D (2015) What happens before? A field experiment exploring how pay and representation differentially shape bias on the pathway into organizations. J. Appl. Psych. 100(6):1678–1712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohr TS (2014) Why women don’t apply for jobs unless they’re 100% qualified. Harvard Bus. Rev. (August 25), https://hbr.org/2014/08/why-women-dont-apply-for-jobs-unless-theyre-100-qualified.Google Scholar
• Moss-Racusin CA, Dovidio JF, Brescoll VL, Graham MJ, Handelsman J (2012) Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(41):16474–16479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagel R (1995) Unraveling the guessing games: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(5):1313–1326.Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center (2015) Women in leadership positions. Report. (January 14), https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2015/01/14/women-and-leadership/.Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center (2018) The data on women leaders. (September 13), https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/fact-sheet/the-data-on-women-leaders/.Google Scholar
• Preacher K, Hayes A (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav. Res. Methods Instruments Comput. 36(4):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher K, Rucker D, Hayes A (2007) Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behav. Res. 42(1):185–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pronin E (2007) Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment. Trends Cognitive Sci. 11(1):37–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pronin E, Lin DY, Ross L (2002) The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self vs. others. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 28:369–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quadlin N (2018) The mark of a woman’s record: Gender and academic performance in hiring. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 83(2):331–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reid E (2015) Embracing, passing, revealing, and the ideal worker image: How people navigate expected and experienced professional identities. Organ. Sci. 26(4):997–1017.Link, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C (2001) Gender, status, and leadership. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):637–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C (2011) Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C, Correll SJ (2004a) Motherhood as a status characteristic. J. Soc. Issues 60(4):683–700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C, Correll SJ (2004b) Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender Soc. 18(4):510–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivera LA (2012) Hiring as cultural matching: The case of elite professional service firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 77(6):999–1022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivera LA, Tilcsik A (2016) Class advantage, commitment penalty: The gendered effect of social class signals in an elite labor market. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 181(6):1097–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rose S (2017) Mismatch: How many workers with a bachelor’s degree are overqualified for their jobs? Report, Urban Institute. (February 1), https://www.urban.org/research/publication/mismatch-how-many-workers-bachelors-degree-are-overqualified-their-jobs/view/full_report.Google Scholar
• Rosette AS, Tost LP (2010) Agentic women and communal leadership: How role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders. J. Appl. Psych. 95(2):221–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Mescher K (2013) Penalizing men who request family leave: Is flexibility stigma a femininity stigma? J. Soc. Issues 69(2):322–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Moss-Racusin CA, Phelan JE, Nauts S (2012) Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 48:165–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarsons H, Gerxhani K, Reuben E, Schram A (2021) Gender differences in recognition for group work. J. Political Econom. 129(1):101–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schein VE (1973) The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. J. Appl. Psych. 57(2):95–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schein VE (1975) Relationships between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. J. Appl. Psych. 60(3):340–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schein VE (2001) A global look at the psychological barriers to women’s progress in management. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):675–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen K, Kuhn P (2013) Gender discrimination in job ads: Evidence from China. Quart. J. Econom. 128(1):287–336.Google Scholar
• Spence AM (1974) Market Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes, vol. 143. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Spencer SJ, Zanna MP, Fong GT (2005) Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 89(6):845–851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stahl DO, Wilson PW (1994) Experimental evidence on players’ models of other players. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 25(3):309–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stahl DO, Wilson PW (1995) On players’ models of other players: Theory and experimental evidence. Games Econom. Behav. 10:218–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stroh LK, Brett JM, Reilly AH (1992) All the right stuff: A comparison of female and male managers’ career progression. J. Appl. Psych. 77(3):251–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan D, Rider C (2017) Let them go? How losing employees to competitors can enhance firm status. Strategic Management J. 38:1848–1874.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tesch BJ, Wood HM, Helwig AL (1995) Promotion of women physicians in academic medicine: Glass ceiling or sticky floor? JAMA 273(13):1022–1025.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Townsend NW (2002) The Package Deal: Marriage, Work, and Fatherhood in Men’s Lives (Temple University Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Turco CJ (2010) Cultural foundations of tokenism: Evidence from the leveraged buyout industry. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(6):894–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uhlmann E, Cohen GL (2005) Constructed criteria: Redefining merit to justify discrimination. Psych. Sci. 16(6):474–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldfogel J (1997) The effect of children on women’s wages. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 62(2):209–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Warner J, Corley D (2017) The Women’s Leadership Gap (American Progress Organization).Google Scholar
• Weisshaar K (2018) From opt out to blocked out: The challenges for labor market re-entry after family-related employment lapses. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 83(1):34–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams J (2000) Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do About It (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom).Google Scholar
• Woehler ML, Cullen-Lester KL, Porter CM, Frear KA (2021) Whether, how, and why networks influence men’s and women’s careers: Review and research agenda. J. Management 47(1):207–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wynn AT, Cornell SJ (2017) Gendered perceptions of fit in technology companies. Soc. Sci. 6(2):45–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW, Kim T, Ukanwa K, von Rittmann J (2003) Robust identities or nonentities? Typecasting in the feature‐film labor market. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(5):1018–1073.Crossref, Google Scholar