Expanding the Locus of Resistance: Understanding the Co-constitution of Control and Resistance in the Gig Economy

References

• Aloisi A (2015) Commoditized workers: Case study research on labor law issues arising from a set of on-demand/gig economy platforms. Comparative Labor Law Policy J. 37(3):653–690.Google Scholar
• Alsever J (2021) How “right to repair” laws could affect Tesla and Apple. Fortune Online (August 2), https://fortune.com/2021/07/09/right-to-repair-order-biden-apple-tesla-hacks/.Google Scholar
• Anteby M, Chan CK (2018) A self-fulfilling cycle of coercive surveillance: Workers’ invisibility practices and managerial justification. Organ. Sci. 29(2):247–263.Link, Google Scholar
• Bain P, Taylor P (2000) Entrapped by the ‘electronic panopticon’? Worker resistance in the call centre. New Tech. Work Employment 15(1):2–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1996) Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organization studies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(3):404–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR, Kunda G (2004) Gurus, Hired Guns, and Warm Bodies: Itinerant Experts in a Knowledge Economy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Barley SR, Bechky B, Milliken F (2017) From the editors: The changing nature of work: Careers, identities, and work lives in the 21st century. Acad. Management Discoveries 3(2):111–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Batt R (1999) Work organization, technology, and performance in customer service and sales. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 52(4):539–564Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA, O’Mahony S (2015) Leveraging Comparative Field Data for Theory Generation. Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research (Routledge, Oxfordshire, UK).Google Scholar
• Bolton SC, Houlihan M (2005) The (mis)representation of customer service. Work Employment Soc. 19(4):685–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bond S (2020) “We’re out there” so protect us, protesting workers tell Amazon, Target, Instacart. NPR (May 1), retrieved October 5, 2020, https://www.npr.org/2020/05/01/849218750/workers-walk-off-jobs-demand-safer-working-conditions.Google Scholar
• Burawoy M (1979) Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process Under Monopoly Capitalism (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Burrell J (2016) How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data Soc. 3(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calo R, Rosenblat A (2017) The taking economy: Uber, information, and power. Columbia Law Rev. 117(6):1623–1690.Google Scholar
• Cameron L (2022) “Making out” while driving: The relational and efficiency game in the gig economy. Organ. Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Cameron L (2021) (Relative) freedom in algorithms: How digital platforms repurpose workplace consent. Acad. Management Proc. 2021(1):1–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron L, Anteby M, Chan C (2021) Heroes from above and below: Workers responses to the moralization of their work. Working Paper.Google Scholar
• Cameron L, Thomason B, Conzon V (2022) Risky business: Gig workers’ and the navigation of ideal worker expectations during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Appl. Psych. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Cappelli P, Keller JR (2013) Classifying work in the new economy. Acad. Management Rev. 38(4):575–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardinal LB, Kreutzer M, Miller CC (2017) An Aspirational View of Organizational Control Research: Re-invigorating Empirical Work to Better Meet the Challenges of 21 st Century Organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 11(2):559–592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll WR (2008) The effects of electronic performance monitoring on performance outcomes: a review and meta-analysis. Employee. Rights. & Employment. Policy’y J. 12(1):29–47.Google Scholar
• Chapman L, Mehrotra K (2020) Instacart shoppers say they are battling order grabbing bots that cut their profits Fortune Online (August 1), https://fortune.com/2020/08/01/instacart-shoppers-bots-orders/.Google Scholar
• Charmaz K (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis, 1st ed. (Sage Publications Ltd, London).Google Scholar
• Chen JY (2018) Thrown under the bus and outrunning it! The logic of Didi and taxi drivers’ labour and activism in the on-demand economy. New Media Soc. 20(8):2691–2711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christin A (2020) The ethnographer and the algorithm: Beyond the black box. Theory Soc. 49:897–918.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conger K (2021) A worker-owned cooperative tries to compete with Uber and Lyft. New York Times Online (May 28), https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/28/technology/nyc-uber-lyft-the-drivers-cooperative.html.Google Scholar
• Corbin J, Strauss A (2014) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 4th ed. (Sage Publications, Inc., Los Angeles).Google Scholar
• Curchod C, Patriotta G, Cohen L, Neysen N (2019) Working for an algorithm: Power asymmetries and agency in online work settings. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(3):644–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dourish P (2016) Algorithms and their others: Algorithmic culture in context. Big Data Soc. 3(2):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubal V (2017) Wage slave or entrepreneur? Contesting the dualism of legal worker identities. California Law Rev. 105:65–123.Google Scholar
• Dzieza J (2015) The rating game: How Uber and its peers turned us into horrible bosses. The Verge Online (October 28), http://www.theverge.com/2015/10/28/9625968/rating-system-on-demand-economy-uber-olive-garden.Google Scholar
• Edwards RC (1978) The social relations of production at the point of production. Insurgent Sociol. 8(2–3):109–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Pachidi S (2021) Beyond Uberization: The co-constitution of technology and organizing. Organ. Theory 2(1):1–14.Google Scholar
• Finn E (2017) What Algorithms Want: Imagination in the Age of Computing (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming P, Rhodes C, Yu KH (2019) On why Uber has not taken over the world. Econom. Soc. 48(4):488–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fuller L, Smith V (1991) Consumers’ reports: Management by customers in a changing economy. Work Employment Soc. 5(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garg N, Johari R (2021) Designing informative rating systems: Evidence from an online labor market. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(3):589–605.Link, Google Scholar
• Gillespie T (2018) Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media, illustrated ed. (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Griswold A (2018) Uber’s secret weapon is its team of economists. Quartz. Accessed December 8, 2020, https://qz.com/1367800/ubernomics-is-ubers-semi-secret-internal-economics-department/.Google Scholar
• Groth M (2005) Customers as good soldiers: Examining citizenship behaviors in internet service deliveries. J. Management 31(1):7–27.Google Scholar
• Hall DT (1996) Protean careers of the 21st century. Acad. Management Executive (1993-2005) 10(4):8–16.Google Scholar
• Hiltzik M (2020) How millions from Uber and Lyft are funding the harassment of a critic. LA Times. Accessed June 21, 2020, https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2020-09-02/uber-lyft-veena-dubal-twitter-bullying.Google Scholar
• Hirsch JS (1969) Strike insurance and collective bargaining. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 22(3):399–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodson R (1995) Worker resistance: An underdeveloped concept in the sociology of work. Econom. Indust. Democracy 16(1):79–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollander JA, Einwohner RL (2004) Conceptualizing resistance. Sociol. Forum 19(4):533–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holman D, Chissick C, Totterdell P (2002) The effects of performance monitoring on emotional labor and well-being in call centers. Motivation Emotion 26(1):57–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hyman L, Groshen E, Litwin AS, Wells M, Thompson K, Chernyshov K (2020) Platform driving in Seattle (Cornell University, ILR School, Institute for Workplace Studies).Google Scholar
• Irani L (2015) Difference and dependence among digital workers: The case of Amazon Mechanical Turk. South Atlantic Quart. 114(1):225–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isaac M (2017) How Uber deceives authorities. The New York Times Online (March 3), https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/03/technology/uber-greyball-program-evade-authorities.html.Google Scholar
• Isaac M (2019) Super Pumped: The Battle for Uber (WW. Norton & Co., New York).Google Scholar
• Keller MH (2018) The flourishing business of fake YouTube views. The New York Times Online (August 11), https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/08/11/technology/youtube-fake-view-sellers.html.Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC, Valentine MA, Christin A (2020) Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):366–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr D (2020) Uber and Lyft paid $400K to firm conducting “independent studies” on Proposition 22. CNET. Accessed June 20, 2021, https://www.cnet.com/news/uber-and-lyft-paid-400k-to-firm-conducting-independent-studies-on-proposition-22/.Google Scholar
• Kinder E, Jarrahi MH, Sutherland W (2019) Gig platforms, tensions, alliances and ecosystems: An actor-network perspective. Lampinen A, Gergle D, Shamma DA, eds. Proc. ACM Human Comput. Interactions (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 212:1–212:26.Google Scholar
• Korczynski M (2009) The mystery customer: Continuing absences in the sociology of service work. Sociol. 43(5):952–967.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Korczynski M (2013) The customer in the sociology of work: Different ways of going beyond the management–worker dyad. Work Employment Soc. 27(6):NP1–NP7.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Korczynski M, Shire K, Frenkel S, Tam M (2000) Service work in consumer capitalism: Customers, control and contradictions. Work Employment Soc. 14(4):669–687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kornberger M, Pflueger D, Mouritsen J (2017) Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization. Accounting Organ. Soc. 60:79–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee JE, Batt R, Moynihan LM (2019) Strategic dilemmas: How managers use HR practices to meet multiple goals. British J. Indust. Relations 57(3):513–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee MK, Kusbit D, Metsky E, Dabbish L (2015) Working with machines: The impact of algorithmic and data-driven management on human workers. Proc. 33rd Annual ACM Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM Press, Seoul, Republic of Korea), 1603–1612.Google Scholar
• Lei YW (2021) Delivering solidarity: Platform architecture and collective contention in China’s platform economy. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 86(2):279–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leidner R (1993) Fast Food, Fast Talk: Service Work and the Routinization of Everyday Life (University of California Press, Oakland, CA).Google Scholar
• Leung MD (2014) Dilettante or renaissance person? How the order of job experiences affects hiring in an external labor market. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(1):136–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lopez SH (2010) Workers, managers, and customers: Triangles of power in work communities. Work Occupations 37(3):251–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luedke T (2010) Driving lives: An ethnography of Chicago taxi drivers. Industry Studies Association Working Paper Series, 2010-03.Google Scholar
• Maffie MD (2020) The perils of laundering control through customers: A study of control and resistance in the ride-hail industry. Indust. Labor Relations Rev., ePub ahead of print December 7, https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793920972679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1987) Three fragments from a sociologist’s notebooks: Establishing the phenomenon, specified ignorance, and strategic research materials. Annual Rev. Sociol. 13(1):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milkman R, Elliott-Negri L, Griesbach K, Reich A (2020) Gender, class, and the gig economy: The case of platform-based food delivery. Critical Sociol. 47(3):357–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Möhlmann M, Zalmanson L, Henfridsson O, Gregory R (2020) Algorithmic management of work on online labor platforms: When matching meets control. MIS Quarterly 54(4):1999–2022.Google Scholar
• Morrill C, Zald MN, Rao H (2003) Covert political conflict in organizations: Challenges from below. Annual Rev. Sociol. 29(1):391–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Brien SA, Yurieff K (2020) People are luring Instacart shoppers with big tips—And then changing them to zero. CNN Online (April 9), https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/09/tech/instacart-shoppers-tip-baiting/index.html.Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S, Bechky BA (2006) Stretchwork: Managing the career progression paradox in external labor markets. Acad. Management J. 49(5):918–941.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2014) What happens when evaluation goes online? Exploring apparatuses of valuation in the travel sector. Organ. Sci. 25(3):868–891.Link, Google Scholar
• Pallais A (2014) Inefficient hiring in entry-level labor markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(11):3565–3599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pasquale F (2015) The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paules GF (1991) Dishing It Out: Power and Resistance Among Waitresses in a New Jersey Restaurant (Temple University Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Pope DG (2009) Reacting to rankings: Evidence from “America’s best hospitals.” J. Health Econom. 28(6):1154–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prasad A, Prasad P (1998) Everyday struggles at the workplace: The nature and implications of routine resistance in contemporary organizations. Res. Sociol. Organ. 15(2):225–257.Google Scholar
• Prasad P, Prasad A (2000) Stretching the iron cage: The constitution and implications of routine workplace resistance. Organ. Sci. 11(4):387–403.Link, Google Scholar
• Purcell C, Brook P (2020) At least i’m my own boss! Explaining consent, coercion and resistance in platform work. Work Employment Soc. 00(0):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rahman HA (2021) The invisible cage: Workers’ reactivity to opaque algorithmic evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(4):945–988.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rahman HA, Barley SR (2017) Situated redesign in creative occupations—An ethnography of architects. Acad. Management Discoveries 3(4):404–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rahman HA, Valentine MA (2021) How managers maintain control through collaborative repair: Evidence from platform-mediated “gigs.” Organ. Sci. 32(5):1300–1326.Link, Google Scholar
• Ranganathan A, Benson A (2020) A numbers game: Quantification of work, auto-gamification, and worker productivity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 85(4):573–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravenelle AJ (2019) Hustle and Gig: Struggling and Surviving in the Sharing Economy (University of California Press, Oakland, CA).Google Scholar
• Rizzo M, Atzeni M (2020) Workers’ power in resisting precarity: Comparing transport workers in Buenos Aires and Dar es Salaam. Work Employment Soc. 34(6):1114–1130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenblat A (2018) Uberland: How Algorithms Are Rewriting the Rules of Work (University of California Press, Oakland, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenblat A, Stark L (2016) Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber’s drivers. Internat. J. Comm. 10:3758–3784.Google Scholar
• Rosenthal P (2004) Management control as an employee resource: The case of front-line service workers. J. Management Stud. 41(4):601–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothbard NP, Wilk SL (2011) Waking up on the right or wrong side of the bed: Start-of-workday mood, work events, employee affect, and performance. Acad. Management. J. 54(5):959–980.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roy DF (1959) “Banana time”: Job satisfaction and informal interaction. Human Organ. 18(4):158–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saha GC, Theingi T (2009) Service quality, satisfaction, and behavioural intentions: A study of low‐cost airline carriers in Thailand. Managing Service Quality 19(3):350–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scheiber N (2018) Gig economy business model dealt a blow in California ruling. The New York Times Online (April 30), https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/30/business/economy/gig-economy-ruling.html.Google Scholar
• Schor J (2020) After the Gig: How the Sharing Economy Got Hijacked and How to Win It Back (University of California Press, Oakland, CA).Google Scholar
• Schor JB, Attwood-Charles W, Cansoy M, Ladegaard I, Wengronowitz R (2020) Dependence and precarity in the platform economy. Theory Soc. 49(5–6):833–861.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah S, Corley K (2006) Building better theories by bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide. J. Management Stud. 43(8):1821–1835.Google Scholar
• Shapiro A (2017) Between autonomy and control: Strategies of arbitrage in the “on-demand” economy. New Media Soc. 20(8):2954–2971.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherman R (2007) Class Acts: Service and Inequality in Luxury Hotels (University of California Press, Oakland, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soper S (2020) Amazon drivers are hanging smartphones in trees to get more work. Bloomberg Online (September 1), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-09-01/amazon-drivers-are-hanging-smartphones-in-trees-to-get-more-work.Google Scholar
• Spradley JP, Mann BJ (1975) The Cocktail Waitress: Woman’s Work in a Man’s World (McGraw-Hill Humanities, New York).Google Scholar
• Spreitzer GM, Cameron L, Garrett L (2017) Alternative work arrangements: Two images of the new world of work. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 4:473–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stark D, Pais I (2021) Algorithmic management in the platform economy. Sociologica 14(3):47–72.Google Scholar
• Sutton RI, Rafaeli A (1988) Untangling the relationship between displayed emotions and organizational sales: The case of convenience stores. Acad. Management J. 31(3):461–487.Google Scholar
• Thomason S, Jacobs K, Jan S (2019) Estimating the coverage of California’s new AB 5 law. Report, UC Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
• Thompson P (1989) The Nature of Work: An Introduction to Debates on the Labour Process, 2nd ed. (Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ticona J, Mateescu A (2018) Trusted strangers: Carework platforms’ cultural entrepreneurship in the on-demand economy. New Media Soc. 20(11):4384–4404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ticona J, Mateescu A, Rosenblat A (2018) Beyond disruption: How tech shapes labor across domestic work & ridehailing. Report, Data & Society (New York).Google Scholar
• Vallas S, Schor JB (2020) What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annual Rev. Sociol. 46(1):273–294.Google Scholar
• Van den Broek D (2002) Monitoring and surveillance in call centres: Some responses from Australian workers. Labour & Industry 12(3):43–58.Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J (1991) The smile factory: Work at Disneyland. Frost PJ, ed. Reframing Organizational Culture (Sage Publications, London).Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J, Barley SR (1984) Occupational communities: Culture and control in organizations. Staw BM, Cummins LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 287–365.Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J, Kunda G (1989) Real feelings—Emotional expression and organizational culture. Res. Organ. Behav. 11:43–103.Google Scholar
• Wood AJ, Graham M, Lehdonvirta V, Hjorth I (2019) Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work Employment Soc. 33(1):56–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuboff S (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power, 1st ed. (Public Affairs, New York).Google Scholar