Alternative Futures for the Digital Transformation: A Macro-Level Schumpeterian Perspective

References

• Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2020) The wrong kind of AI? Artificial intelligence and the future of labour demand. Cambridge J. Regions Econom. Society 13(1):25–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adler PS (2001) Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organ. Sci. 12(2):215–234.Link, Google Scholar
• Adler PS, Heckscher C (2018) Collaboration as an organization design for shared purpose. Res. Soc. Organ. 57:81–111.Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Lampert CM, Tandon V (2008) Moving beyond Schumpeter: Management research on the determinants of technological innovation. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):1–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albu OB, Flyverbom M (2019) Organizational transparency: Conceptualizations, conditions, and consequences. Bus. Soc. 58(2):268–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altman EJ, Nagle F, Tushman ML (2021) The translucent hand of managed ecosystems: Engaging communities for value creation and capture. Acad. Management Ann., ePub ahead of print May 27, https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Tushman ML (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):604–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashkenas R, Ulrich D, Jick T, Kerr S (2015) The Boundaryless Organization: Breaking the Chains of Organizational Structure (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Barley SR, Kunda G (1992) Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(3):363–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney JB, Hansen MH (1994) Trusworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. 15:175–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barzelay M (2001) The New Public Management (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Belleflamme P, Lambert T, Schwienbacher A (2014) Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. J. Bus. Venturing 29(5):585–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellovin SM, Clark DD, Perrig A, Song D (2006) A clean-slate design for the next-generation secure Internet. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Benaich N, Hogarth I (2021) State of AI report. Accessed November 22, 2021, https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1ZUimafgXCBSLsgbacd6-a-dqO7yLyzIl1ZJbiCBUUT4/edit#slide=id.g557254d430_0_0.Google Scholar
• Benkler Y (2006) The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Bernstein J (2006) All Together Now: Common Sense for a Fair Economy (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, CA).Google Scholar
• Bodrožić Z (2008) Post-Industrial Intervention: An Activity-Theoretical Expedition Tracing the Proximal Development of Forms of Conducting Interventions (University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland).Google Scholar
• Bodrožić Z, Adler PS (2018) The evolution of management models: A neo-Schumpeterian theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(1):85–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borowiak C, Ji M (2019) Taxi co‐ops vs. Uber: Struggles for workplace democracy in the sharing economy. J. Labor Society 22(1):165–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brannon VC (2019) Regulating big tech: Legal implications. Accessed November 22, 2021, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/LSB10309.pdf.Google Scholar
• Bresnahan TF, Trajtenberg M (1995) General purpose technologies ‘Engines of growth’? J. Econometrics 65(1):83–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A (2014) The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies (WW Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Cahill D, Cooper M, Konings M, Primrose D (2018) The SAGE Handbook of Neoliberalism (Sage, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castells M (2011) The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture (Wiley-Blackwell, New York).Google Scholar
• Chandler AD, Hikino T (1990) Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chesbrough HW (2006) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conboy K (2009) Agility from first principles: Reconstructing the concept of agility in information systems development. Inform. Systems Res. 20(3):329–354.Link, Google Scholar
• Cooper MC, Lambert DM, Pagh JD (1997) Supply chain management: More than a new name for logistics. Internat. J. Logist. Management 8(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corporate Europe Observatory (2020) Big Tech brings out the big guns in fight for future of EU tech regulation. Accessed November 22, 2021, https://corporateeurope.org/en/2020/12/big-tech-brings-out-big-guns-fight-future-eu-tech-regulation.Google Scholar
• Csanadi M (2016) China in Between Varieties of Capitalism and Communism (Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences).Google Scholar
• Dattée B, Alexy O, Autio E (2018) Maneuvering in poor visibility: How firms play the ecosystem game when uncertainty is high. Acad. Management J. 61(2):466–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davenport TH, Short JE (1990) The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business process redesign. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 31(4):11–27.Google Scholar
• Davenport TH, Prusak L, Wilson HJ (2003) What’s the Big Idea? Creating and Capitalizing on the Best Management Thinking (Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA).Google Scholar
• David PA (1990) The dynamo and the computer: An historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(2):355–361.Google Scholar
• David PA, Greenstein S (1990) The economics of compatibility standards: An introduction to recent research. Econom. Innovative New Tech. 1(1-2):3–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• David PA, Wright G (1999) General Purpose Technologies and Surges in Productivity: Historical Reflections on the Future of the ICT Revolution. Discussion Papers in Economic and Social History (University of Oxford, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Dosi G, Marengo L (2007) On the evolutionary and behavioral theories of organizations: A tentative roadmap. Organ. Sci. 18(3):491–502.Link, Google Scholar
• Dubb S (2016) Community wealth building forms: What they are and how to use them at the local level. Acad. Management Perspective 30(2):141–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eizaguirre S, Pradel-Miquel M, García M (2017) Citizenship practices and democratic governance: ‘Barcelona en Comú’as an urban citizenship confluence promoting a new policy agenda. Citizenship Stud. 21(4):425–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Jarvenpaa SL, Majchrzak A (2011) Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1224–1239.Link, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Pachidi S, Sayegh K (2018) Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm. Inform. Organ. 28(1):62–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farjoun M (2008) Strategy making, novelty and analogical reasoning—Commentary on Gavetti, Levinthal, and Rivkin (2005). Strategic Management J. 29(9):1001–1016.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman C (1982) The Economics of Industrial Innovation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Freeman C, Louça F (2001) As Time Goes By: From the Industrial Revolutions to the Information Revolution (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Friedman M (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine (September 13), https://www.nytimes.com/1970/09/13/archives/a-friedman-doctrine-the-social-responsibility-of-business-is-to.html.Google Scholar
• Garcia-Dastugue SJ, Lambert DM (2003) Internet-enabled coordination in the supply chain. Industry Marketing Management 32(3):251–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garrett LE, Spreitzer GM, Bacevice PA (2017) Co-constructing a sense of community at work: The emergence of community in coworking spaces. Organ. Stud. 38(6):821–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gassmann O (2006) Opening up the innovation process: Toward an agenda. R&D Management 36(3):223–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon RJ (2000) Interpreting the “one big wave” in US long-term productivity growth. van Ark B, Kuipers SK, Kuper GH, eds. Productivity, Technology and Economic Growth (Springer, Boston, MA), 19–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guillen M (1994) Models of Management: Work, Authority, and Organization in a Comparative Perspective (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Hammer M (1990) Reengineering work: Don’t automate, obliterate. Harvard Bus. Rev. 68(4):104–112.Google Scholar
• Hanelt A, Bohnsack R, Marz D, Antunes Marante C (2021) A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. J. Management Stud. 58(5):1159–1197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey D (2007a) A Brief History of Neoliberalism (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Harvey D (2007b) Neoliberalism as creative destruction. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 610(1):22–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat C (2007) Stylized facts, theory development and empirical research in management. Strategic Organ. 5:185–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hess DJ, Gottlieb R (2009) Localist Movements in a Global Economy: Sustainability, Justice, and Urban Development in the United States (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirschman AO (2002) Shifting Involvements: Private Interest and Public Action (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman AJ, Jennings PD (2021) Institutional-political scenarios for Anthropocene society. Bus. Soc. 60(1):57–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horan H (2019) Uber’s path of destruction. Amer. Affairs 3(2):108–133.Google Scholar
• Hughes TP (1987) The evolution of large technological systems. Bijker WE, Hughes TP, Pinch TE, eds. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 51–82.Google Scholar
• Hughes TP (1993) Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930 (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD).Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Cennamo C, Gawer A (2018) Toward a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2255–2276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacoby S (1985) Employing Bureaucracy: Managers, Unions, and the Transformation of Work in American Industry 1900-1945 (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Jaworski T, Fishback PV (2018) Two World Wars in American Economic History, vol. 2. The Oxford Handbook of American Economic History (Oxford University Press, New York), 391–419.Google Scholar
• Kaldor M (2021) War and transition. Res. Policy 50(10):104344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kattel R, Mergel I (2019) Estonia's digital transformation: Mission mystique and the hiding hand. Accessed November 22, 2021, https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public-purpose/sites/public-purpose/files/iipp-wp-2018-09_estonias_digital_transformation.pdf.Google Scholar
• Kenney M, Zysman J, Bearson D (2020) Transformation or structural change? What Polanyi can teach us about the platform economy. Sociologica 14(3):227–240.Google Scholar
• Khalil L (2020) Digital Authoritarianism, China and COVID (Lowy Institute for International Policy, Sydney, Australia).Google Scholar
• Kondratieff ND (1979) The long waves in economic life. Rev. J. Fernand Braudel Center Study of Econom., Historical Systems, Civilizations 2(4):519–562.Google Scholar
• Kuhn TS (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Kushida KE, Zysman J (2009) The services transformation and network policy: The new logic of value creation 1. Rev. Policy Res. 26(1‐2):173–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lanzolla G, Lorenz A, Miron-Spektor E, Schilling M, Solinas G, Tucci CL (2020) Digital transformation: What is new if anything? Emerging patterns and management research. Acad. Management Discovery 8(1):341–350.Google Scholar
• Leung MD, Sharkey A (2014) Out of sight, out of mind? The audience-side effect of multi-category membership in markets. Organ. Sci. 25(1):171–184.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewin AY, Long CP, Carroll TN (1999) The coevolution of new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. 10(5):535–550.Link, Google Scholar
• Lund H, Østergaard PA, Connolly D, Mathiesen BV (2017) Smart energy and smart energy systems. Energy 137:556–565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lundvall B-Å, Rikap C (2022) China’s catching-up in artificial intelligence seen as a co-evolution of corporate and national innovation systems. Res. Policy 51(1):104395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macdonald S, Anderson P, Kimbel D (2000) Measurement or management? Revisiting the productivity paradox of information technology. Vierteljahrshefte Wirtschaftsforschung 69(4):601–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mager NH (1987) The Kondratieff Waves (Praeger, New York).Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Malhotra A (2020) Unleashing the Crowd (Springer, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Wang Q (1996) Breaking the functional mind-set in process organizations. Harvard Bus. Rev. 74(5):93–99.Google Scholar
• May PJ, Jochim AE (2013) Policy regime perspectives: Policies, politics, and governing. Policy Stud. J. 41(3):426–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazzucato M (2015) The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths (Anthem Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Mazzucato M (2018) Mission-oriented research & innovation in the European Union. Accessed November 22, 2021, https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public-purpose/publications/2020/jan/mission-oriented-research-innovation-european-union.Google Scholar
• Mazzucato M (2021) Mission Economy: A Moonshot Guide to Changing Capitalism (Harper Business, New York).Google Scholar
• Miller D (1992) Environmental fit vs. internal fit. Organ. Sci. 3(2):159–178.Link, Google Scholar
• Miller F (2017) Aristotle’s political theory. Accessed November 22, 2021, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/aristotle-politics/.Google Scholar
• Murray A, Kuban S, Josefy M, Anderson J (2022) Contracting in the smart era: The implications of blockchain and decentralized autonomous organizations for contracting and corporate governance. Acad. Management Perspective, Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Nambisan S, Wright M, Feldman M (2019) The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Res. Policy 48(8):103773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR (1995) Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. J. Econom. Literature 33(1):48–90.Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Nozick R (1974) Anarchy, State, and Utopia (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Nyland C (1998) Taylorism and the mutual-gains strategy. Industry Relations 37(4):519–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Flynn J (2007) From new public management to public value: Paradigmatic change and managerial implications. Australian J. Public Admin. 66(3):353–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parenti C (2020) Radical Hamilton: Economic Lessons from a Misunderstood Founder (Verso, New York).Google Scholar
• Perez C (2003) Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK).Google Scholar
• Perez C (2009) The double bubble at the turn of the century: Technological roots and structural implications. Cambridge J. Econom. 33(4):779–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perez C (2010) Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms. Cambridge J. Econom. 34(1):185–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perez C (2019) Transitioning to smart green growth: lessons from history. Fouquet R, ed. Handbook on Green Growth (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 447–463Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perez C, Leach TM (2018) Smart & green. A new “European way of life” as the path for growth, jobs and well-being. Council for Research and Technology Development, ed. Re-Thinking Europe. Positions on Shaping an Idea. (Holzhausen, Vienna, Austria), 208–223.Google Scholar
• Polanyi K (1968) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (Beacon Press, Boston, MA).Google Scholar
• Polyakova A, Meserole C (2019) Exporting digital authoritarianism: The Russian and Chinese models. Policy Brief, Democracy and Disorder Series (Brookings, Washington, DC), 1–22.Google Scholar
• Puffert DJ (2003) Review of ‘technology revolutions and financial capital: The dynamics of bubbles and golden ages’ by Carlota Perez. J. Econom. History 63(2):615–616.Google Scholar
• Radziwill N (2018) Blockchain revolution: How the technology behind Bitcoin is changing money, business, and the world. Qualitative Management J. 25(1):64–65.Google Scholar
• Ranger S (2020) What is the IoT? Everything you need to know about the Internet of Things right now. Accessed November 22, 2021, https://www.zdnet.com/article/what-is-the-internet-of-things-everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-iot-right-now/.Google Scholar
• Rikap C, Lundvall B-Å (2020) Big tech, knowledge predation and the implications for development. Innovation Development, ePub ahead of print December 7, https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2020.1855825.Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1979) Technological interdependence in the American economy. Tech. Culture 20(1):25–50.Google Scholar
• Saad-Filho A, Johnston D (2005) Neoliberalism: A Critical Reader (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Schneider N (2016) Denver taxi drivers are turning Uber’s disruption on its head. The Nation (September 7), https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/denver-taxi-drivers-are-turning-ubers-disruption-on-its-head/.Google Scholar
• Scholz T (2017) Platform cooperativism vs. the sharing economy. Douay N, Wan AW, eds. Big Data & Civic Engagement (Planum, Rome), 47–76.Google Scholar
• Scholz T, Schneider N (2017) Ours to Hack and to Own: The Rise of Platform Cooperativism, a New Vision for the Future of Work and a Fairer Internet (OR books, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schor J (2020) After the Gig: How the Sharing Economy Got Hijacked and How to Win It Back (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Schot J, Kanger L (2018) Deep transitions: Emergence, acceleration, stabilization and directionality. Res. Policy 47(6):1045–1059.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schot J, Steinmueller WE (2018) Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Res. Policy 47(9):1554–1567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J (1927) The explanation of the business cycle. Economica (New Series) 21:286–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1934) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle, 2nd ed. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1939) Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1942) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Schwaber K, Beedle M (2002) Agile Software Development with Scrum (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Scott SG, Bruce RA (1994) Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Acad. Management J. 37(3):580–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snow CC, Strauss DR, Culpan R (2009) Community of firms: a new collaborative paradigm for open innovation and an analysis of Blade.org. Internat. J. Strategic Business Alliances 1(1):53–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solow RM (1987) We'd better watch out. New York Times Book Review. Accessed November 22, 2021, http://www.standupeconomist.com/pdf/misc/solow-computer-productivity.pdf.Google Scholar
• Soskice D (2020) The American Knowledge Economy (LSE International Inequalities Institute, London).Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi C, Bodrožić Z, Scaratti G, Ivaldi S (2019) “Coworking is about community”: But what is “community” in coworking? J. Bus. Tech. Comm. 33(2):112–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan D (2019) The antitrust case against Facebook: A monopolist’s journey toward pervasive surveillance in spite of consumers’ preference for privacy. Berkeley Bus. Law J. 16:39.Google Scholar
• Srinivasan D (2020) Why Google dominates advertising markets. Stanford Tech. Law Rev. 24(1):55–175.Google Scholar
• Stern RN, Barley SR (1996) Organizations and social systems: Organization theory’s neglected mandate. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1): 146–162.Google Scholar
• Sturgeon T, Lester R (2002) Upgrading East Asian Industries: New Challenges for Local Suppliers (Industrial Performance Center, MIT, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• The Economist (2020) Computer-generated realities are becoming ubiquitous. The Economist (October 1), https://www.economist.com/technology-quarterly/2020/10/01/computer-generated-realities-are-becoming-ubiquitous.Google Scholar
• Umeh J (2016) Blockchain double bubble or double trouble? Itnow 58(1):58–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vaaler PM, McNamara G (2010) Are technology-intensive industries more dynamically competitive? No and yes. Organ. Sci. 21(1):271–289.Link, Google Scholar
• Verweij M, Pelizzo R (2009) Singapore: Does authoritarianism pay? J. Democracy 20(2):18–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vial G (2019) Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. J. Strategic Inform. Systews 28(2):118–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whittaker DH, Sturgeon T, Okita T, Zhu T (2020) Compressed Development: Time and Timing in Economic and Social Development (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson MR (2016) Destructive Creation: American Business and the Winning of World War II (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Winston C (2006) Government Failure vs. Market Failure (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum (2020) The Future of Jobs Report 2020 (World Economic Forum, Geneva).Google Scholar
• Yang DL (2006) Economic transformation and its political discontents in China: authoritarianism, unequal growth, and the dilemmas of political development. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 9:143–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuboff S (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for the Future at the New Frontier of Power (Public Affairs, New York).Google Scholar