Building Status in an Online Community

References

• Anderson C, Kilduff GJ (2009) The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 18(5):295–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson SW, Baggett LS, Widener SK (2009) The impact of service operations on customer satisfaction: Evidence on how failures and their source affect what matters to customers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 11(1):52–69.Link, Google Scholar
• Askin N, Bothner MS (2016) Status-aspirational pricing: The “Chivas Regal” strategy in US higher education, 2006-2012. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(2):217–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Fons-Rosen C, Graff-Ziven JS (2019) Does science advance one funeral at a time? Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(8):2889–2920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendersky C, Shah NP (2012) The cost of status enhancement: Performance effects of individuals’ status mobility in task groups. Organ. Sci. 23(2):308–322.Link, Google Scholar
• Benjamin BA, Podolny JM (1999) Status, quality, and social order in the California wine industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(3):563–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Cohen BP, Zelditch M Jr (1972) Status characteristics and social interaction. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 37(3):241–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bianchi AJ, Kang SM, Stewart D (2012) The organizational selection of status characteristics: Status evaluations in an open source community. Organ. Sci. 23(2):341–354.Link, Google Scholar
• Bidwell M, Won S, Barbulescu R, Mollick E (2015) I used to work at Goldman Sachs! How firms benefit from organizational status in the market for human capital. Strategic Management J. 36(8):1164–1173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bol T, de Vaan M, van de Rijt A (2018) The Matthew effect in funding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115(19):4887–4890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Botelho T (2018) Here’s an opportunity: Knowledge sharing among competitors as a response to buy-in uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 29(6):1033–1055.Link, Google Scholar
• Bower GH (1981) Mood and memory. Amer. Psych. 36(2):129–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowers A, Prato M (2018) The structural origins of unearned status: How arbitrary chances in categories affect status position and market impact. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(3):668–699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect. Psych. Sci. 6(1):3–5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao J, Smith EB (2021) Why do high-status people have larger social networks? Belief in status-quality coupling as a driver of network-broadening behavior and social network size. Organ. Sci. 32(1):111–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Capiluppi A, Serebrenik A, Singer L (2013) Assessing technical candidates on the social web. IEEE Software 30(1):45–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler J, Shapiro D (2016) Conducting clinical research using crowdsourced convenience samples. Annual Rev. Clinical Psych. 12:53–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen L, Baird A, Straub D (2019) Why do participants continue to contribute? Evaluation of usefulness voting and commenting motivational affordances within an online knowledge community. Decision Support Systems 118:21–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Constant D, Sproull L, Kiesler S (1996) The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organ. Sci. 7(2):119–135.Link, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ, Ridgeway C, Zuckerman EW, Jank S, Jordan-Bloch S, Nakagawa S (2017) It’s the conventional thought that counts: How third-order inference produces status advantage. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(2):297–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, O’Mahony S (2011) Progressing to the center: Coordinating project work. Organ. Sci. 22(4):961–979.Link, Google Scholar
• Danner L, Ristic R, Johnson TE, Meiselman HL, Hoek AC, Jeffery DW, Bastian SEP (2016) Context and wine quality effects on consumers’ mood, emotions, liking and willingness to pay for Australian Shiraz wines. Food Res. Internat. 89(1):254–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J, Fang C, Liu C (2019) In search of behavioral opportunities from misattributions of luck. Acad. Management Rev. 44(4):896–915.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einhorn EJ, Hogarth RM (1978) Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. Psych. Rev. 85(5):395–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ertug G, Yogev T, Lee YG, Hedstrom P (2016) The art of representation: How audience-specific reputations affect success in the contemporary art field. Acad. Management J. 59(1):113–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Waguespack DM (2007) Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organ. Sci. 18(2):165–180.Link, Google Scholar
• Gould RV (2002) The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(5):1143–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahl O, Zuckerman EW (2014) The denigration of heroes? How the status attainment process shapes attributions of considerateness and authenticity. Amer. J. Sociol. 120(2):504–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Polos L, Carroll GR (2007) Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henrich J, Gil-White FJ (2001) The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution Human Behav. 22(3):165–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu DH (2004) What do entrepreneurs pay for venture capital affiliation? J. Finance 59(4):1805–1844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hwang EH, Singh PV, Argote L (2015) Knowledge sharing in online communities: Learning to cross geographic and hierarchical boundaries. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1593–1611.Link, Google Scholar
• Jensen M (2006) Should we stay or should we go? Accountability, status anxiety, and client defections. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(1):97–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen LB, Frederiksen L (2006) Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organ. Sci. 17(1):45–63.Link, Google Scholar
• Johnson EJ, Tversky A (1983) Affect generalization and the perception of risk. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 45(1):20–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1973) On the psychology of prediction. Psych. Rev. 80(4):237–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim JW, King BG (2014) Seeing stars: Matthew effects and status bias in Major League Baseball umpiring. Management Sci. 60(11):2619–2644.Link, Google Scholar
• Klapper H, Reitzig M (2018) On the effects of authority on peer motivation: Learning from Wikipedia. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2178–2203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klayman J, Ha YW (1987) Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psych. Rev. 94(2):211–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakhani KR, von Hippel E (2003) How open source software works: ‘Free’ user-to-user assistance. Res. Policy 32(6):923–943.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakhani KR, Wolf RG (2005) Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. Feller J, Fitzgerald B, Hissam S, Lakhani K, et al. Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynn FB, Podolny JM, Tao L (2009) A sociological (de)construction of the relationship between status and quality. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3):755–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mamykina L, Manoim B, Mittal M, Hripcsak G, Hartmann B (2011) Design lessons from the fastest Q&A site in the west. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 2857–2866.Google Scholar
• McCall MM (1975) The sociology of female artists: A study of female painters, sculptors, and printmakers in St. Louis. Doctoral thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign.Google Scholar
• McDonnell MH, King BG (2018) Order in the court: How firm status and reputation shape the outcomes of employment discrimination suits. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 83(1):61–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science 159(3810):56–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nam KK, Ackerman MS, Adamic LA (2009) Questions in, knowledge in? A study of Naver’s question answering community. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 779–788.Google Scholar
• Nanda R, Samila S, Sorenson O (2020) The persistent effect of initial success: Evidence from venture capital. J. Financial Econom. 137(1):231–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S, Ferraro F (2007) The emergence of governance in an open source community. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1079–1106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penoyer S, Reynolds B, Marshall B, Cardon PW (2018) Impact of users’ motivation on gamified crowdsourcing systems: A case of StackOverflow. Issues Inform. Systems 19(2):33–40.Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ, Zuckerman EW (2001) Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(2):379–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ, Turco CJ, Zuckerman EW (2013) Betrayal as a market barrier: Identity-based limits to diversification among high-status corporate law firms. Amer. J. Sociol. 118(4):1023–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (1993) A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(4):829–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM, Phillips DJ (1996) The dynamics of organizational status. Indust. Corporate Change 5(2):453–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Alexy O, Reitzig M (2014) What’s ‘new’ about new forms of organizing? Acad. Management Rev. 39(2):162–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reschke BP, Azoulay P, Stuart TE (2018) Status spillovers: The effect of status-conferring prizes on the allocation of attention. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):819–847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C (1981) Nonconformity, competence, and influence in groups: A test of two theories. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 46(3):333–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C (1991) The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Soc. Forces 70(2):367–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C, Erickson KG (2000) Creating and spreading status beliefs. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3):579–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riecken HW (1958) The effect of talkativeness on ability to influence group solutions of problems. Sociometry 21(4):309–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts PW, Khaire M, Rider CI (2011) Isolating the symbolic implications of employee mobility: Price increases after hiring winemakers from prominent wineries. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(3):147–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salganik MJ, Dodds PS, Watts DJ (2006) Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Sci. 311(5762):854–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauder M, Lynn F, Podolny JM (2012) Status: Insights from organizational sociology. Annual Rev. Sociol. 38:267–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sengupta S, Haythornthwaite C (2020) Learning with comments: An analysis of comments and community on stack overflow. Proc. 53rd Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (HICSS, Maui, HI), 2898–2907.Google Scholar
• Sgourev SV, Althuizen N (2014) “Notable” or “not able”: When are acts of inconsistency rewarded? Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(2):282–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simcoe TS, Waguespack DM (2011) Status, quality, and attention: What’s in a (missing) name? Management Sci. 57(2):274–290.Link, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O (2014) Status and reputation: Synonyms or separate concepts? Strategic Organ. 12(1):62–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Hoang H, Hybels RC (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):315–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swinyard WR (1993) The effects of mood, involvement, and quality of store experience on shopping intentions. J. Consumer Res. 20(2):271–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan D, Rider CI (2017) Let them go? How losing employees to competitors can enhance firm status. Strategic Management J. 38(9):1848–1874.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tausczik YR, Pennebaker JW (2012) Participation in an online mathematics community: Differentiating motivations to add. Proc. ACM 2012 Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (ACM, New York), 207–216.Google Scholar
• Waguespack DM, Salomon R (2015) Quality, subjectivity, and sustained superior performance at the Olympic Games. Management Sci. 62(1):286–300.Link, Google Scholar
• Wasko M, Faraj S (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quart. 29(1):35–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wason PC (1960) On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quart. J. Experiment. Psych. 12(3):129–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Willer R (2009) Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):23–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright WF, Bower GH (1992) Mood effects on subjective probability assessment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 52(2):276–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu L, Nian T, Cabral L (2020) What makes geeks tick? A study of stack overflow careers. Management Sci. 66(2):587–604.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Wang S, Tse-Hsun PC, Hassan AE (2019) Reading answers on stack overflow: Not enough! IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. 47:1–15.Google Scholar