Trailblazing Motivation and Marginalized Group Members: Changing Expectations to Pave the Way for Others

References

• Alakhunova N, Diallo O, Martin del Campo I, Tallarico W (2015) Defining marginalization: An assessment tool. A product of the partnership between four development professionals at the Elliot School of International Affairs. The Word Fair Trade Organization-Asia. The George Washington University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Amanatullah ET, Morris MW (2010) Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women’s fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 98(2):256–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Archbold CA, Schulz DM (2008) Making rank: The lingering effects of tokenism on female police officers’ promotion aspirations. Police Quart. 11(1):50–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arnold HJ, Feldman DC (1981) Social desirability response bias in self-report choice situations. Acad. Management J. 24(2):377–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aron A, Aron EN, Smollan D (1992) Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 63(4):596–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ, Rothbard NP, Piderit SK, Dutton JE (1998) Out on a limb: The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):23–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atewologun D, Sealy R, Vinnicombe S (2016) Revealing intersectional dynamics in organizations: Introducing ‘intersectional identity work’. Gender Work Organ. 23(3):223–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrick MR, Stewart GL, Piotrowski M (2002) Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. J. Appl. Psych. 87(1):43–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Batson CD (1987) Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 20 (Academic Press, New York), 65–122.Google Scholar
• Batson CD, Powell AA (2003) Altruism and prosocial behavior. Millon T, Lerner MJ, eds. Handbook of Psychology, vol. 5 (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 463–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Leary MR (1995) The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psych. Bull. 117(3):497–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell MP, Özbilgin MF, Beauregard TA, Sürgevil O (2011) Voice, silence, and diversity in 21st century organizations: Strategies for inclusion of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender employees. Human Resources Management 50(1):131–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benson A, Li D, Shue K (2021) “Potential” and the gender promotion gap. Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Bergeron DM (2007) The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: Good citizens at what cost? Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1078–1095.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergeron DM, Shipp AJ, Rosen B, Furst SA (2013) Organizational citizenship behavior and career outcomes: The cost of being a good citizen. J. Management 39(4):958–984.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Binning KR, Kaufmann N, McGreevy EM, Fotuhi O, Chen S, Marshman E, Kalender ZY, Limeri LB, Betancur L, Singh C (2020) Changing social contexts to foster equity in college science courses: An ecological-belonging intervention. Psych. Sci. 31(9):1059–1070.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bono JE, Colbert AE (2005) Understanding responses to multi‐source feedback: The role of core self‐evaluations. Personnel Psych. 58(1):171–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowles HR, Babcock L, Lai L (2007) Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(1):84–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brehm JW (1966) A Theory of Psychological Reactance (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Brockner J, Higgins ET (2001) Regulatory focus theory: Implications for the study of emotions at work. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 86(1):35–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bryer A (2020) Making organizations more inclusive: The work of belonging. Organ. Stud. 41(5):641–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson JS, Thompson JA (2009) The call of the wild: Zookeepers, callings, and the double-edged sword of deeply meaningful work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1):32–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butler‐Barnes ST, Leath S, Williams A, Byrd C, Carter R, Chavous TM (2018) Promoting resilience among African American girls: Racial identity as a protective factor. Child Development 89(6):e552–e571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell DT, Fiske DW (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psych. Bull. 56(2):81–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cha SE, Roberts LM (2019) Leveraging minority identities at work: An individual-level framework of the identity mobilization process. Organ. Sci. 30(4):735–760.Link, Google Scholar
• Chang CH, Ferris DL, Johnson RE, Rosen CC, Tan JA (2012) Core self-evaluations: A review and evaluation of the literature. J. Management 38(1):81–128.Google Scholar
• Chatman JA, Boisnier AD, Spataro SE, Anderson C, Berdahl JL (2008) Being distinctive vs. being conspicuous: The effects of numeric status and sex-stereotyped tasks on individual performance in groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 107(2):141–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen S, Binning KR, Manke KJ, Brady ST, McGreevy EM, Betancur L, Limeri LB, Kaufmann N (2021) Am I a science person? A strong science identity bolsters minority students’ sense of belonging and performance in college. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 47(4):593–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin WW, Salisbury WD, Pearson AW, Stollak MJ (1999) Perceived cohesion in small groups: Adapting and testing the perceived cohesion scale in a small-group setting. Small Group Res. 30(6):751–766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen GL, Garcia J (2005) I am us: Negative stereotypes as collective threats. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 89(4):566–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Derks B, Van Laar C, Ellemers N (2016) The queen bee phenomenon: Why women leaders distance themselves from junior women. Leadership Quart. 27(3):456–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diefendorff JM, Kenworthy ME, Lee FC, Nguyen LK (2022) Work motivation. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Donaldson SI, Grant-Vallone EJ (2002) Understanding self-report bias in organizational behavior research. J. Bus. Psych. 17(2):245–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donnellan MB, Oswald FL, Baird BM, Lucas RE (2006) The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the big five factors of personality. Psych. Assessment 18(2):192–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dufner M, Gebauer JE, Sedikides C, Denissen JJA (2019) Self-enhancement and psychological adjustment: A meta-analytic review. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 23(1):48–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duguid M (2011) Female tokens in high-prestige work groups: Catalysts or inhibitors of group diversification? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 116(1):104–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duguid M, Loyd DL, Tolbert PS (2012) The impact of categorical status, numeric representation, and work group prestige on preference for demographically similar others: A value threat approach. Organ. Sci. 23(2):386–401.Link, Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Ashford SJ (1993) Selling issues to top management. Acad. Management Rev. 18(3):397–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Ashford SJ, Lawrence KA, Miner-Rubino K (2002) Red light, green light: Making sense of the organizational context for issue selling. Organ. Sci. 13(4):355–369.Link, Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Ashford SJ, O’Neill RM, Lawrence KA (2001) Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change. Acad. Management J. 44(4):716–736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eden D (1984) Self-fulfilling prophecy as a management tool: Harnessing Pygmalion. Acad. Management Rev. 9(1):64–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards MR (2005) Organizational identification: A conceptual and operational review. Internat. J. Management Rev. 7(4):207–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ely RJ, Thomas DA (2001) Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(2):229–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faniko K, Ellemers N, Derks B, Lorenzi-Cioldi F (2017) Nothing changes, really: Why women who break through the glass ceiling end up reinforcing it. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 43(5):638–651.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG (2009) Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods 41(4):1149–1160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferris DL, Johnson RE, Rosen CC, Djurdjevic E, Chang CHD, Tan JA (2013) When is success not satisfying? Integrating regulatory focus and approach/avoidance motivation theories to explain the relation between core self-evaluation and job satisfaction. J. Appl. Psych. 98(2):342–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferris DL, Rosen CR, Johnson RE, Brown DJ, Risavy SD, Heller D (2011) Approach or avoidance (or both?): Integrating core self‐evaluations within an approach/avoidance framework. Personnel Psych. 64(1):137–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fuller JB, Marler LE, Hester K (2006) Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: Exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design. J. Organ. Behav. 27(8):1089–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gardner DM, Ryan AM (2020) What’s in it for you? Demographics and self-interest perceptions in diversity promotion. J. Appl. Psych. 105(9):1062–1072.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson CE, Losee J, Vitiello C (2014) A replication attempt of stereotype susceptibility (Shih, Pittinsky, & Ambady, 1999): Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Soc. Psych. 45(3):194–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM (2007) Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):393–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM (2008a) Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. J. Appl. Psych. 93(1):48–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM (2008b) The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. J. Appl. Psych. 93(1):108–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Shandell MS (2022) Social motivation at work: The organizational psychology of effort for, against, and with others. Annual Rev. Psych. 73:301–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Sumanth JJ (2009) Mission possible? The performance of prosocially motivated employees depends on manager trustworthiness. J. Appl. Psych. 94(4):927–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Wrzesniewski A (2010) I won’t let you down… or will I? Core self-evaluations, other-orientation, anticipated guilt and gratitude, and job performance. J. Appl. Psych. 95(1):108–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Campbell EM, Chen G, Cottone K, Lapedis D, Lee K (2007) Impact and the art of motivation maintenance: The effects of contact with beneficiaries on persistence behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(1):53–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenhaus JH, Parasuraman S, Wormley WM (1990) Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Acad. Management J. 33(1):64–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gresky DM, Ten Eyck LL, Lord CG, McIntyre RB (2005) Effects of salient multiple identities on women’s performance under mathematics stereotype threat. Sex Roles 53(9):703–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta VK, Turban DB, Pareek A (2013) Differences between men and women in opportunity evaluation as a function of gender stereotypes and stereotype activation. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 37(4):771–788.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guynn J (2019) Black Facebook employees complain racism, discrimination have gotten worse. USA Today Online (November 8), https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2019/11/08/facebooks-current-and-former-black-employees-allege-growing-racism/2534615001/.Google Scholar
• Hackman JR, Oldham GR (1975) Development of the job diagnostic survey. J. Appl. Psych. 60(2):159–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall EV, Hall AV, Galinsky AD, Phillips KW (2019) MOSAIC: A model of stereotyping through associated and intersectional categories. Acad. Management Rev. 44(3):643–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison CK, Stone J, Shapiro J, Yee S, Boyd JA, Rullan V (2009) The role of gender identities and stereotype salience with the academic performance of male and female college athletes. J. Sport Soc. Issues 33(1):78–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME (2012) Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Res. Organ. Behav. 32:113–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hekman DR, Johnson SK, Foo M-D, Yang W (2017) Does diversity-valuing behavior result in diminished performance ratings for non-white and female leaders? Acad. Management J. 60(2):771–797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins ET (1998) Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 30 (Academic Press, New York), 1–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinkin TR (1998) A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organ. Res. Methods 1(1):104–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoyt CL, Johnson SK, Murphy SE, Skinnell KH (2010) The impact of blatant stereotype activation and group sex-composition on female leaders. Leadership Quart. 21(5):716–732.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hussain I, Tangirala S, Sherf EN (2022) Signaling legitimacy: Why mixed-gender coalitions outperform single-gender coalitions in advocating for gender equity. Acad. Management J. 66(4):1233–1262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H, Carter NM, Silva C (2010) Why men still get more promotions than women. Harvard Bus. Rev. 88(9):80–85.Google Scholar
• Jackson PB, Thoits PA, Taylor HF (1995) Composition of the workplace and psychological well-being: The effects of tokenism on America’s Black elite. Soc. Forces 74(2):543–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jobst LJ, Bader M, Moshagen M (2023) A tutorial on assessing statistical power and determining sample size for structural equation models. Psych. Methods 28(1):207–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson RE, Rosen CC, Levy PE (2008) Getting to the core of core self-evaluation: A review and recommendations. J. Organ. Behav. 29(3):391–413.Google Scholar
• Jost JT, Banaji MR, Nosek BA (2004) A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psych. 25(6):881–919.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Locke EA, Durham CC (1997) The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Res. Organ. Behav. 19:151–188.Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Erez A, Bono JE, Thoresen CJ (2003) The core self‐evaluations scale: Development of a measure. Personnel Psych. 56(2):303–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaiser CR, Miller CT (2001) Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 27(2):254–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanter RM (1977) Men and Women of the Corporation (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• King EB, Hebl MR, George JM, Matusik SF (2010) Understanding tokenism: Antecedents and consequences of a psychological climate of gender inequity. J. Management 36(2):482–510.Google Scholar
• Kirgios EL, Chang EH, Milkman KL (2020) Going it alone: Competition increases the attractiveness of minority status. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 161:20–33.Google Scholar
• Kline RB (2023) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (Guilford Publications, New York).Google Scholar
• Knapp JR, Smith BR, Sprinkle TA (2014) Clarifying the relational ties of organizational belonging: Understanding the roles of perceived insider status, psychological ownership, and organizational identification. J. Leadership Organ. Stud. 21(3):273–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knowlton K, Carton AM, Grant AM (2022) Help (un)wanted: Why the most powerful allies are the most likely to stumble—and when they fulfill their potential. Res. Organ. Behav. 42:100180.Google Scholar
• Konrath S, Ho MH, Zarins S (2016) The strategic helper: Narcissism and prosocial motives and behaviors. Current Psych. 35(2):182–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kray LJ, Thompson L, Galinsky A (2001) Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 80(6):942–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kray LJ, Reb J, Galinsky AD, Thompson L (2004) Stereotype reactance at the bargaining table: The effect of stereotype activation and power on claiming and creating value. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 30(4):399–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambert NM, Stillman TF, Hicks JA, Kamble S, Baumeister RF, Fincham FD (2013) To belong is to matter: Sense of belonging enhances meaning in life. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 39(11):1418–1427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lammers J, Dubois D, Rucker DD, Galinsky AD (2013) Power gets the job: Priming power improves interview outcomes. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 49(4):776–779.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landau J (1995) The relationship of race and gender to managers’ ratings of promotion potential. J. Organ. Behav. 16(4):391–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leary MR, Kowalski RM (1990) Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psych. Bull. 107(1):34–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lebel RD, Patil SV (2018) Proactivity despite discouraging supervisors: The powerful role of prosocial motivation. J. Appl. Psych. 103(7):724–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lei RF, Leshin RA, Rhodes M (2020) The development of intersectional social prototypes. Psych. Sci. 31(8):911–926.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leigh A, Melwani S (2019) #BlackEmployeesMatter: Mega-threats, identity fusion, and enacting positive deviance in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 44(3):564–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leslie LM (2019) Diversity initiative effectiveness: A typological theory of unintended consequences. Acad. Management Rev. 44(3):538–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis AC, Sherman SJ (2003) Hiring you makes me look bad: Social-identity based reversals of the ingroup favoritism effect. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 90(2):262–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liao H, Su R, Ptashnik T, Nielsen J (2022) Feeling good, doing good, and getting ahead: A meta-analytic investigation of the outcomes of prosocial motivation at work. Psych. Bull. 148(3–4):158–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin MH, Kwan VS, Cheung A, Fiske ST (2005) Stereotype content model explains prejudice for an envied outgroup: Scale of anti-Asian American stereotypes. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 31(1):34–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu S, Liu P, Wang M, Zhang B (2021) Effectiveness of stereotype threat interventions: A meta-analytic review. J. Appl. Psych. 106(6):921–949.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lykken DT (1968) Statistical significance in psychological research. Psych. Bull. 70(3):151–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matheson K, Foster MD, Bombay A, McQuaid RJ, Anisman H (2019) Traumatic experiences, perceived discrimination, and psychological distress among members of various socially marginalized groups. Frontiers Psych. 10:416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu JE, Taylor SR (2006) Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in organizational behavior. J. Organ. Behav. 27(8):1031–1056.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAdams DP, de St Aubin ED, Logan RL (1993) Generativity among young, midlife, and older adults. Psych. Aging 8(2):221–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McClure JP, Brown JM (2008) Belonging at work. Human Resource Development Internat. 11(1):3–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFarland D, Pals H (2005) Motives and contexts of identity change: A case for network effects. Soc. Psych. Quart. 68(4):289–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McNatt DB (2000) Ancient Pygmalion joins contemporary management: A meta-analysis of the result. J. Appl. Psych. 85(2):314–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McNulty Y, McPhail R, Inversi C, Dundon T, Nechanska E (2018) Employee voice mechanisms for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender expatriation: The role of employee-resource groups (ERGs) and allies. Internat. J. Human Resource Management 29(5):829–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menges JI, Tussing DV, Wihler A, Grant AM (2017) When job performance is all relative: How family motivation energizes effort and compensates for intrinsic motivation. Acad. Management J. 60(2):695–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1948) The self-fulfilling prophecy. Antioch Rev. 8(2):193–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyerson DE, Scully MA (1995) Crossroads tempered radicalism and the politics of ambivalence and change. Organ. Sci. 6(5):585–600.Link, Google Scholar
• Mezulis AH, Abramson LY, Hyde JS, Hankin BL (2004) Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psych. Bull. 130(5):711–747.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miceli MP, Near JP, Rehg MT, Van Scotter JR (2012) Predicting employee reactions to perceived organizational wrongdoing: Demoralization, justice, proactive personality, and whistle-blowing. Human Relations 65(8):923–954.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell TR, Daniels D (2003) Motivation. Borman WC, Ilgen DR, Klimoski RJ, eds. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Handbook of Psychology, vol. 12 (John Wiley, New York), 225–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moshagen M, Erdfelder E (2016) A new strategy for testing structural equation models. Structural Equation Model. 23(1):54–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy MC, Steele CM, Gross JJ (2007) Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psych. Sci. 18(10):879–885.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murrell AJ, Blake-Beard S, Porter DM Jr (2021) The importance of peer mentoring, identity work and holding environments: A study of African American leadership development. Internat. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18(9):4920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muthén LK, Muthén B (2010) Mplus 6.0 (Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
• Nadal KL (2013) That’s So Gay! Microaggressions and the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Community (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson JL, Johnson TD (2023) How White workers navigate racial difference in the workplace: Social-emotional processes and the role of workplace racial composition. Work Occupations, ePub ahead of print June 12, https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884231176833.Google Scholar
• Neubert MJ, Kacmar KM, Carlson DS, Chonko LB, Roberts JA (2008) Regulatory focus as a mediator of the influence of initiating structure and servant leadership on employee behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 93(6):1220–1233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nguyen HHD, Ryan AM (2008) Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. J. Appl. Psych. 93(6):1314–1334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nishii LH, Khattab J, Shemla M, Paluch RM (2018) A multi-level process model for understanding diversity practice effectiveness. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):37–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nurmohamed S (2020) The underdog effect: When low expectations increase performance. Acad. Management J. 63(4):1106–1133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nurmohamed S, Kundro TG, Myers CG (2021) Against the odds: Developing underdog vs. favorite narratives to offset prior experiences of discrimination. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 167:206–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson CA, Becker BE (1983) Sex discrimination in the promotion process. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 36(4):624–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oxford English Dictionary (2019) Blaze. Online OED. Oxford University Press. Accessed November 2019, http://www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/20006.Google Scholar
• Petriglieri JL (2011) Under threat: Responses to and the consequences of threats to individuals’ identities. Acad. Management Rev. 36(4):641–662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff NP, LePine JA, LePine MA (2007) Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 92(2):438.Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pronin E, Steele CM, Ross L (2004) Identity bifurcation in response to stereotype threat: Women and mathematics. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 40(2):152–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purdie-Vaughns V, Eibach RP (2008) Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles 59(5–6):377–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragins BR, Cornwell JM (2001) Pink triangles: Antecedents and consequences of perceived workplace discrimination against gay and lesbian employees. J. Appl. Psych. 86(6):1244–1261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Randel AE, Galvin BM, Gibson CB, Batts SI (2021) Increasing career advancement opportunities through sponsorship: An identity-based model with illustrative application to cross-race mentorship of African Americans. Group Organ. Management 46(1):105–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Resh WG, Marvel JD, Wen B (2018) The persistence of prosocial work effort as a function of mission match. Public Admin. Rev. 78(1):116–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova V, Barry D, Ketchen DJ Jr (2009) Entrepreneuring as emancipation. Acad. Management Rev. 34(3):477–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberson L, Kulik CT (2007) Stereotype threat at work. Acad. Management Perspect. 21(2):24–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts LM, Creary SJ (2011) Positive identity construction: Insights from classical and contemporary theoretical perspectives. Cameron KS, Spreitzer G, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship (Oxford University Press, New York), 70–83.Google Scholar
• Roberts LM, Creary SJ (2013) Navigating the self in diverse work contexts. Roberson QM, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Diversity and Work (Oxford University Press, New York), 73–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogelberg SG, Stanton JM (2007) Introduction: Understanding and dealing with organizational survey nonresponse. Organ. Res. Methods 10(2):195–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosette AS, Akinola M, Ma A (2018) Subtle discrimination in the workplace: Individual-level factors and processes. Colella AJ, King EB, eds. Oxford Library of Psychology. The Oxford Handbook of Workplace Discrimination (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 7–24.Google Scholar
• Rosette AS, Carton AM, Bowes-Sperry L, Hewlin PF (2013) Why do racial slurs remain prevalent in the workplace? Integrating theory on intergroup behavior. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1402–1421.Link, Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Amer. Psych. 55(1):68–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rydell RJ, McConnell AR, Beilock SL (2009) Multiple social identities and stereotype threat: Imbalance, accessibility, and working memory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 96(5):949–966.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmader T (2002) Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women’s math performance. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 38(2):194–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmader T, Johns M, Forbes C (2008) An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psych. Rev. 115(2):336–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sellers RM, Copeland‐Linder N, Martin PP, Lewis RLH (2006) Racial identity matters: The relationship between racial discrimination and psychological functioning in African American adolescents. J. Res. Adolescence 16(2):187–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shih M, Pittinsky TL, Ambady N (1999) Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psych. Sci. 10(1):80–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spencer SJ, Logel C, Davies PG (2016) Stereotype threat. Annual Rev. Psych. 67:415–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spencer SJ, Steele CM, Quinn DM (1999) Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 35(1):4–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steele CM (1997) A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. Amer. Psych. 52(6):613–629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steele CM, Aronson J (1995) Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 69(5):797–811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sue DW, Capodilupo CM, Torino GC, Bucceri JM, Holder A, Nadal KL, Esquilin M (2007) Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. Amer. Psych. 62(4):271–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suppes A, Napier JL, van der Toorn J (2019) The palliative effects of system justification on the health and happiness of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 45(3):372–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swann WB Jr, Buhrmester MD (2015) Identity fusion. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 24(1):52–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swann WB, Jetten J, Gómez Á, Whitehouse H, Bastian B (2012) When group membership gets personal: A theory of identity fusion. Psych. Rev. 119(3):441–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Target (2020) The Honey Pot commercial. Accessed July 31, 2024, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BMNQiYHrUI.Google Scholar
• Thomas DA (2001) The truth about mentoring minorities. Race matters. Harvard Bus. Rev. 79(4):98–107.Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vallerand RJ (1997) Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 29 (Academic Press, New York), 271–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vallerand RJ, Ratelle CF (2002) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A hierarchical model. Deci EL, Ryan RM, eds. Handbook of Self-determination Research, vol. 128 (University of Rochester Press, Rochester, NY), 37–63.Google Scholar
• van Breen JA, Spears R, Kuppens T, de Lemus S (2017) A multiple identity approach to gender: Identification with women, identification with feminists, and their interaction. Front. Psychol. 8:1019.Google Scholar
• van Breen JA, Spears R, Kuppens T, de Lemus S (2018) Subliminal gender stereotypes: Who can resist? Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 44(12):1648–1663.Google Scholar
• Van Der Vegt GS, Bunderson JS (2005) Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Acad. Management J. 48(3):532–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Dyne L, LePine JA (1998) Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Acad. Management J. 41(1):108–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Dyne L, Graham JW, Dienesch RM (1994) Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. 37(4):765–802.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veldman J, Van Laar C, Meeussen L, Lo Bue S (2021) Daily coping with social identity threat in outgroup-dominated contexts: Self-group distancing among female soldiers. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 47(1):118–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vroom VH (1964) Work and Motivation, vol. 54 (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Walton GM, Cohen GL (2011) A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science 331(6023):1447–1451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watkins MB, Simmons A, Umphress E (2018) It’s not black and white: Toward a contingency perspective on the consequences of being a token. Acad. Management Perspect. 33(3):334–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations, vol. 3 (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Welbourne TM, Rolf S, Schlachter S (2015) Employee resource groups: An introduction, review and research agenda. Academy of Management Proceedings (Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY).Crossref, Google Scholar
• White-Johnson RL, Ford KR, Sellers RM (2010) Parental racial socialization profiles: Association with demographic factors, racial discrimination, childhood socialization, and racial identity. Cultural Diversity Ethnic Minority Psych. 16(2):237–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wicklund RA (1974) Freedom and Reactance (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Wolf EJ, Harrington KM, Clark SL, Miller MW (2013) Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Ed. Psych. Measurement 73(6):913–934.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yeager DS, Henderson MD, Paunesku D, Walton GM, D’Mello S, Spitzer BJ, Duckworth AL (2014a) Boring but important: A self-transcendent purpose for learning fosters academic self-regulation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 107(4):559–580.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yeager DS, Purdie-Vaughns V, Garcia J, Apfel N, Brzustoski P, Master A, Hessert W, Williams ME, Cohen GL (2014b) Breaking the cycle of mistrust: Wise interventions to provide critical feedback across the racial divide. J. Experiment. Psych. General 143(2):804–824.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Ng TW, Lam SS (2019) Promotion-and prevention-focused coping: A meta-analytic examination of regulatory strategies in the work stress process. J. Appl. Psychol. 104(10):1296.Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Chen T, Wang J, Wang M, Johnson RE, Jin Y (2021) How critical activities within COVID-19 intensive care units increase nurses’ daily occupational calling. J. Appl. Psych. 106(1):4–14.Crossref, Google Scholar