How Mixed Performance Feedback Shapes Exploration: The Moderating Role of Self-Enhancement

References

• Audia PG, Brion S (2007) Reluctant to change: Self-enhancing responses to diverging performance measures. Organ. Behav. Human Decisions 102(2):255–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Greve HR (2006) Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry. Management Sci. 52(1):83–94.Link, Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Greve HR (2021) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Multiple Goals, 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Brion S, Greve HR (2015) Self-assessment, self-enhancement, and the choice of comparison organizations for evaluating organizational performance. Gavetti G, Ocasio W, eds. Cognition and Strategy, Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 32 (Emerald, Leeds, UK), 89–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Dahlin KB (2007) Aspiration performance and railroads’ patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes. Organ. Sci. 18(3):368–385.Link, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Rowley TJ, Shipilov AV, Chuang YT (2005) Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(4):536–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumann O, Stieglitz N (2014) Rewarding value-creating ideas in organizations: The power of low-powered incentives: Rewarding value-creating ideas in organizations. Strategic Management J. 35(3):358–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumann O, Eggers JP, Stieglitz N (2019) Colleagues and competitor: How internal social comparisons shape organizational search and adaptation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(2):275–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blagoeva RR, Mom TJM, Jansen JJP, George G (2020) Problem-solving or self-enhancement? A power perspective on how CEOs affect R&D search in the face of inconsistent feedback. Acad. Management J. 63(2):332–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blanes i Vidal J, Nossol M (2011) Tournaments without prizes: Evidence from personnel records. Management Sci. 57(10):1721–1736.Link, Google Scholar
• Blettner DP, He ZL, Hu S, Bettis RA (2015) Adaptive aspirations and performance heterogeneity: Attention allocation among multiple reference points. Strategic Management J. 36(7):987–1005.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyle E, Shapira Z (2012) The liability of leading: Battling aspiration and survival goals in the Jeopardy! tournament of champions. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1100–1113.Link, Google Scholar
• Bromiley P, Harris JD (2014) A comparison of alternative measures of organizational aspirations. Strategic Management J. 35(3):338–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton MD, O’Reilly CA (2021) Management systems for exploration and exploitation. Beckman CM, ed. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 53–77.Google Scholar
• Chen WR, Miller KD (2007) Situational and institutional determinants of firms’ R&D search intensity. Strategic Management J. 28(4):369–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen DL, Schonger M, Wickens C (2016) oTree: An open-source platform for laboratory, online and field experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 9:88–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen G, Freese J, Miguel E (2019) Transparent and Reproducible Social Science Research: How to Do Open Science (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Cyert R, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Daw ND, O’Doherty JP, Dayan P, Seymour B, Dolan RJ (2006) Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans. Nature 441(7095):876–879.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J, March JG (2001) Adaptation as information restriction: The hot stove effect. Organ. Sci. 12(5):523–538.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, March JG (1981) Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Admin. Sci. Quart. 26(2):171–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fjeldstad ØD, Snow CC, Miles RE, Lettl C (2012) The architecture of collaboration. Strategic Management J. 33(6):734–750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaba V, Greve HR (2019) Safe or profitable? The pursuit of conflicting goals. Organ. Sci. 30(4):647–667.Link, Google Scholar
• Gaba V, Joseph J (2013) Corporate structure and performance feedback: Aspirations and adaptation in M-form firms. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1102–1119.Link, Google Scholar
• Gaba V, Lee S, Meyer Doyle P, Zaho-Ding A (2023) Prior experience of managers and maladaptive responses to performance feedback: Evidence from mutual funds. Organ. Sci. 34(2):894–915.Link, Google Scholar
• García MF, Triana MDC, Peters AN, Sánchez M (2009) Self‐enhancement in a job search context. Internat. J. Selection Assessment 17(3):290–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G (2012) Perspective—Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organ. Sci. 23(1):267–285.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Greve HR, Levinthal DA, Ocasio W (2012) The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (1998) Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):58–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2002) Sticky aspirations: Organizational time perspective and competitiveness. Organ. Sci. 13(1):1–17.Link, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2003) Investment and the behavioral theory of the firm: Evidence from shipbuilding. Indust. Corporate Change 12(5):1051–1076.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR, Gaba V (2020) Performance feedback in organizations and groups: Common themes. Argote L, Levine JM, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Group and Organizational Learning (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 315–335.Google Scholar
• Guenther CL, Zhang Y, Sedikides C (2024) The authentic self is the self-enhancing self: A self-enhancement framework of authenticity. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 50(8):1182–1196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckscher C, Adler P (2006) The Firm as a Collaborative Community: Reconstructing Trust in the Knowledge Economy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu S, He ZL, Blettner DP, Bettis RA (2017) Conflict inside and outside: Social comparisons and attention shifts in multidivisional firms. Strategic Management J. 38(7):1435–1454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacobucci D, Posavac SS, Kardes FR, Schneider MJ, Popovich DL (2015) Toward a more nuanced understanding of the statistical properties of a median split. J. Consumer Psych. 25(4):652–665.Google Scholar
• Jordan AH, Audia PG (2012) Self-enhancement and learning from performance feedback. Acad. Management Rev. 37(2):211–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph J, Gaba V (2015) The fog of feedback: Ambiguity and firm responses to multiple aspiration levels. Strategic Management J. 36(13):1960–1978.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk A, Balachandran C (2018) Vertical and horizontal wage dispersion and mobility outcomes: Evidence from the Swedish microdata. Organ. Sci. 29(1):17–38.Link, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk A, Beckman CM, Moliterno TP (2015) Disentangling risk and change: Internal and external social comparison in the mutual fund industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(2):228–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (1992) Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 51(2):296–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keil T, Posen HE, Workiewicz M (2023) Aspirations, beliefs and a new idea: Building on March’s other model of performance feedback. Acad. Management Rev. 48(4):749–771.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff GJ (2014) Driven to win: Rivalry, motivation, and performance. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 5(8):944–952.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff GJ, Elfenbein HA, Staw BM (2010) The psychology of rivalry: A relationally dependent analysis of competition. Acad. Management J. 53(5):943–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Srikanth K (2014) Coordinated exploration: Organizing joint search by multiple specialists to overcome mutual confusion and joint myopia. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(3):409–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolbjørnsrud V (2018) Collaborative organizational forms: On communities, crowds, and new hybrids. J. Organ. Design 7(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SW, Klein KJ (2000) A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ, eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 3–90.Google Scholar
• Lant TK (1992) Aspiration level adaptation: An empirical exploration. Management Sci. 38(5):623–644.Link, Google Scholar
• Laureiro-Martínez D, Brusoni S, Canessa N, Zollo M (2015) Understanding the exploration-exploitation dilemma: An fMRI study of attention control and decision-making performance. Strategic Management J. 36(3):319–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee S (2019) Learning-by-moving: Can reconfiguring spatial proximity between organizational members promote individual-level exploration? Organ. Sci. 30(3):467–488.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee S, Meyer Doyle P (2017) How performance incentives shape individual exploration and exploitation: Evidence from microdata. Organ. Sci. 28(1):19–38.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, Newark DA (2023) Putting the individual in the organizational context: A Carnegie perspective on decision making. Frontiers Psych. 14:1165713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D, Rerup C (2006) Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 17(4):502–513.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, Rerup C (2021) The plural of goal: Learning in a world of ambiguity. Organ. Sci. 32(3):527–543.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewin AY, Chiu CY, Fey CF, Levine SS, McDermott G, Murmann JP, Tsang E (2016) The critique of empirical social science: New policies at Management and Organization Review. Management Organ. Rev. 12(4):649–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim E, Audia PG (2020) Problem-solving or self-enhancing? Influences of diversification and bright spot on corporate resource allocation responses to performance shortfalls. Strategy Sci. 5(4):348–368.Link, Google Scholar
• Lucas GJM, Knoben J, Meeus MTH (2018) Contradictory yet coherent? Inconsistency in performance feedback and R&D investment change. J. Management 44(2):658–681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mansfield ER, Helms BP (1982) Detecting multicollinearity. Amer. Statist. 36(3):158–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG (1994) Limited rationality. A Primer on Decision-Making—How Decisions Happen (Free Press, New York), 1–33.Google Scholar
• March JG (1996) Learning to be risk averse. Psych. Rev. 103(2):309–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1999) The Pursuit of Organizational Intelligence: Decisions and Learning in Organizations (Blackwell, Maiden, MA).Google Scholar
• March JG, Olsen JP (1975) The uncertainty of the past: Organizational learning under ambiguity. Eur. J. Political Res. 3(2):147–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Sevón G (1984) Gossip, information and decision-making. Larkey PD, Sproull LS, eds. Advances in Information Processing in Organizations, vol. 1 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 95–107.Google Scholar
• Mezias SJ, Chen YR, Murphy PR (2002) Aspiration-level adaptation in an American financial services organization: A field study. Management Sci. 48(10):1285–1300.Link, Google Scholar
• Miketta S, Friese M (2019) Debriefed but still troubled? About the (in)effectiveness of postexperimental debriefings after ego threat. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 117(2):282–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moliterno TP, Beck N, Beckman CM, Meyer M (2014) Knowing your place: Social performance feedback in good times and bad times. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1684–1702.Link, Google Scholar
• Newark DA (2014) Indecision and the construction of self. Organ. Behav. Human Decisions 125(2):162–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newark DA (2018) Leadership and the logic of absurdity. Acad. Management Rev. 43(2):198–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newark DA (2020) Desire and pleasure in choice. Rationality Soc. 32(2):168–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA, Tushman ML (2013) Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Acad. Management Perspect. 27(4):324–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Fong CT (2005) Building organization theory from first principles: The self-enhancement motive and understanding power and influence. Organ. Sci. 16(4):372–388.Link, Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Levinthal DA (2012) Chasing a moving target: Exploitation and exploration in dynamic environments. Management Sci. 58(3):587–601.Link, Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Keil T, Kim S, Meissner FD (2018) Renewing research on problemistic search—A review and research agenda. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):208–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Swamy M (2016) How initial representations shape coupled learning processes. Organ. Sci. 27(2):323–335.Link, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Stieglitz N, Osman M, Pillutla MM (2015) Modelling bounded rationality in organizations: Progress and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):337–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reiff JS, Zhang JC, Gallus J, Dai H, Pedley NM, Vangala S, Leuchter RK, et al. (2022) When peer comparison information harms physician well-being. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119(29):e2121730119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ritchie T, Sedikides C, Skowronski J (2017) Does a person selectively recall the good or the bad from their personal past? It depends on the recall target and the person’s favourability of self-views. Memory 25(8):934–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rousseau DM (1985) Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Cummings LL, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 1–37.Google Scholar
• Rowley TJ, Shipilov AV, Greve HR (2017) Board reform vs. profits: The impact of ratings on the adoption of governance practices. Strategic Management J. 38(4):815–833.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sedikides C, Gregg AP (2008) Self-enhancement: Food for thought. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 3(2):102–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sedikides C, Strube MJ (1995) The multiply motivated self. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 21(12):1330–1335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Levinthal DA (2003) Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. 14(6):650–669.Link, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW (2006) When exploration backfires: Unintended consequences of mutilevel organizational search. Acad. Management J. 49(4):779–795.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1947) Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations (The Free Press: Macmillan, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Stark O, Hyll W (2011) On the economic architecture of the workplace: Repercussions of social comparisons among heterogeneous workers. J. Labor Econom. 29(2):349–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephan E, Sedikides C, Heller D, Shidlovski D (2015) My fair future self: The role of temporal distance and self-enhancement in prediction. Soc. Cognition 33(2):149–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton RS, Barto AG (2018) Introduction to Reinforcement Learning, 2nd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Taylor SE, Gollwitzer PM (1995) Effects of mindset on positive illusions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 69(2):213.Google Scholar
• Taylor SE, Lerner J, Sherman DK, Sage R, McDowell NK (2003a) Are self-enhancing cognitions associated with healthy or unhealthy biological profiles? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 84(4):605–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor SE, Lerner JS, Sherman DK, Sage RM, McDowell NK (2003b) Portrait of the self-enhancer: Well adjusted and well liked or maladjusted and friendless? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 84(1):165–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veneziani C, Fuochi G, Voci A (2017) Self-compassion as a healthy attitude toward the self: Factorial and construct validity in an Italian sample. Personality Individual Differences 119:60–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman M, O’Loughlin RE (2006) Self-enhancement by social comparison: A prospective analysis. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 32(6):751–760.Crossref, Google Scholar