Cognitive Economy and Product Categorization

References

• AcousticBrainz (2022) AcousticBrainz data. Accessed May 30, 2022, https://acousticbrainz.org/data.Google Scholar
• Alexa (2022) Discogs.com. Accessed April 15, 2022, https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/discogs.com.Google Scholar
• Anderson JR (1991) The adaptive nature of human categorization. Psych. Rev. 98(3):409–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong SJ, Overton TS (1977) Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. 14(3):396–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Askin N, Mauskapf M (2017) What makes popular music popular? Product features and optimal differentiation in music. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(5):910–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barlow MA, Verhaal JC, Angus RW (2019) Optimal distinctiveness, strategic categorization, and product market entry on the Google Play app platform. Strategic Management J. 40(8):1219–1242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barlow MA, Verhaal JC, Hoskins JD (2018) Guilty by association: Product-level category stigma and audience expectations in the U.S. craft beer industry. J. Management 44(7):2934–2960.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE (1980) Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity (Wiley, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bodoff D, Vaknin E (2016) Priming effects and strategic influences in social tagging. Human Comput. Interact. 31(2):133–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bogdanov D, Herrera P (2012) Taking advantage of editorial metadata to recommend music. Aramaki M, Barthet M, Kronland-Martinet R, Ystad S, eds. vol. 7900, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Springer, Berlin), 618–632.Google Scholar
• Bowker GC, Star SL (2000) Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer MB (1991) The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Pers. Soc. Psych. Bull. 17(5):475–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caplin A, Dean M, Martin D (2011) Search and satisficing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(7):2899–2922.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnabuci G, Operti E, Kovács B (2015) The categorical imperative and structural reproduction: Dynamics of technological entry in the semiconductor industry. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1734–1751.Link, Google Scholar
• Cattani G, Porac JF, Thomas H (2017) Categories and competition. Strategic Management J. 38(1):64–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chi MT, Feltovich PJ, Glaser R (1981) Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cogn. Sci. 5(2):121–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Criado C, Alamo N, Rabal H, Cap N (2011) Decision and classification problems using Mahalanobis statistical distance. Ding Y, Li Y, Fan Z, Li S, Wang L, eds. Proc. 8th Internat. Conf. Fuzzy Systems Knowledge Discovery (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1012–1016.Google Scholar
• Cudennec A, Durand R (2023) Valuing spanners: Why category nesting and expertise matter. Acad. Management J. 66(1):335–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse DL (1999) To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management J. 20(2):147–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J, Kovács B (2008) Selective sampling of empirical settings in organizational studies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(1):109–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J, Kovács B (2020) The ecology of management concepts. Strategy Sci. 5(4):293–310.Link, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P (1987) Classification in art. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 52(4):440–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Discogs (2018) Overview of how Discogs is built. Accessed May 29, 2022, https://support.discogs.com/hc/en-us/articles/360008545114-Overview-Of-How-Discogs-Is-Built.Google Scholar
• Durand R, Khaire M (2017) Where do market categories come from and how? Distinguishing category creation from category emergence. J. Management 43(1):87–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Rao H, Monin P (2007) Code and conduct in French cuisine: Impact of code changes on external evaluations. Strategic Management J. 28(5):455–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epley N, Keysar B, Van Boven L, Gilovich T (2004) Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. J. Pers. Soc. Psych. 87(3):327–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Jarvenpaa SL, Majchrzak A (2011) Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1224–1239.Link, Google Scholar
• Ferguson J-P, Carnabuci G (2017) Risky recombinations: Institutional gatekeeping in the innovation process. Organ. Sci. 28(1):133–151.Link, Google Scholar
• Ferrer-i-Cancho R, Del Prado Martín FM (2011) Information content vs. word length in random typing. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2011(12):L12002.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fieller EC (1954) Some problems in interval estimation. J. R. Stat. Soc. B. 16(2):175–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Formilan G, Boari C (2021) The reluctant preference: Communities of enthusiasts and the diffusion of atypical innovation. Indust. Corporate Change 30(3):823–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gleitman LR, Gleitman H, Miller C, Ostrin R (1996) Similar, and similar concepts. Cognition 58(3):321–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberg A, Hannan MT, Kovács B (2016) What does it mean to span cultural boundaries? Variety and atypicality in cultural consumption. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(2):215–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldenstein J, Hunoldt M, Oertel S (2019) How optimal distinctiveness affects new ventures’ failure risk: A contingency perspective. J. Bus. Venturing 34(3):477–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granqvist N, Grodal S, Woolley JL (2013) Hedging your bets: Explaining executives’ market labeling strategies in nanotechnology. Organ. Sci. 24(2):395–413.Link, Google Scholar
• Haans RF (2019) What’s the value of being different when everyone is? The effect of distinctiveness on performance in homogeneous vs. heterogeneous categories. Strategic Management J. 40(1):3–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haans RF, Pieters C, He ZL (2016) Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U- and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management J. 37(7):1177–1195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hampton JA (2007) Typicality, graded membership, and vagueness. Cogn. Sci. 31(3):355–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Le Mens G, Hsu G, Kovács B, Negro G, Pólos L, Pontikes EG, Sharkey AJ (2019) Concepts and Categories: Foundations for Sociological and Cultural Analysis (Columbia University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G (2006) Jacks of all trades and masters of none: Audiences’ reactions to spanning genres in feature film production. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3):420–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Grodal S (2015) Category taken-for-grantedness as a strategic opportunity: The case of light cigarettes, 1964 to 1993. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(1):28–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Hannan MT, Koçak Ö (2009) Multiple category memberships in markets: An integrative theory and two empirical tests. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):150–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunt JM, Kernan JB, Bonfield EH (1992) Memory structure in the processing of advertising messages: How is unusual information represented? J. Psych. 126(4):343–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson MD, Fornell C (1987) The nature and methodological implications of the cognitive representation of products. J. Consumer Res. 14(2):214–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones C, Maoret M, Massa FG, Svejenova S (2012) Rebels with a cause: Formation, contestation, and expansion of the de novo category “modern architecture,” 1870–1975. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1523–1545.Link, Google Scholar
• Jonides J, Lewis RL, Nee DE, Lustig CA, Berman MG, Moore KS (2008) The mind and brain of short-term memory. Annual Rev. Psych. 59:193–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy MT (2008) Getting counted: Markets, media, and reality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 73(2):270–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy MT, Fiss PC (2013) An ontological turn in categories research: From standards of legitimacy to evidence of actuality. J. Management Stud. 50(6):1138–1154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khaire M (2017) The importance of being independent: The role of intermediaries in creating market categories. Durand R, Granqvist N, Tyllström A, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 51 (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 259–293.Google Scholar
• Khessina OM, Reis S (2016) The limits of reflected glory: The beneficial and harmful effects of product name similarity in the U.S. network TV program industry, 1944–2003. Organ. Sci. 27(2):411–427.Link, Google Scholar
• Koçak Ö, Hannan MT, Hsu G (2014) Emergence of market orders: Audience interaction and vanguard influence. Organ. Stud. 35(5):765–790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Sharkey AJ (2015) The paradox of publicity: How awards can negatively affect the evaluation of quality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Carnabuci G, Wezel FC (2021) Categories, attention, and the impact of inventions. Strategic Management J. 42(5):992–1023.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuilman JG, Van Driel H (2013) You too, Brutus? Category demise in Rotterdam warehousing, 1871–2011. Indust. Corporate Change 22(2):511–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kurzban R, Duckworth A, Kable JW, Myers J (2013) An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. Behav. Brain Sci. 36(6):661–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lieder F, Griffiths TL (2020) Resource-rational analysis: Understanding human cognition as the optimal use of limited computational resources. Behav. Brain Sci. 43:E1.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lind JT, Mehlum H (2010) With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship. Oxf. Bull. Econom. Stat. 72(1):109–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lo JY-C, Fiss PC, Rhee EY, Kennedy MT (2020) Category viability: Balanced levels of coherence and distinctiveness. Acad. Management Rev. 45(1):85–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Rao H (2004) Sources of durability and change in market classifications: A study of the reconstitution of product categories in the American mutual fund industry, 1944–1985. Soc. Forces 82(3):969–999.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Zarembka P, ed. Frontiers in Econometrics (Academic Press, New York), 105–142.Google Scholar
• Medin DL, Schaffer MM (1978) Context theory of classification learning. Psych. Rev. 85(3):207–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montauti M (2019) Anchors in rough seas: Understanding category spanning as a source of market coordination. J. Management Stud. 56(4):823–853.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montauti M, Wezel FC (2016) Charting the territory: Recombination as a source of uncertainty for potential entrants. Organ. Sci. 27(4):954–971.Link, Google Scholar
• Navis C, Glynn MA (2010) How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(3):439–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Negro G, Hannan MT, Fassiotto M (2015) Category signaling and reputation. Organ. Sci. 26(2):584–600.Link, Google Scholar
• Negro G, Hannan MT, Rao H (2010) Categorical contrast and audience appeal: Niche width and critical success in winemaking. Indust. Corporate Change 19(5):1397–1425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Negro G, Hannan MT, Rao H (2011) Category reinterpretation and defection: Modernism and tradition in Italian winemaking. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1449–1463.Link, Google Scholar
• Oberauer K, Kliegl R (2006) A formal model of capacity limits in working memory. J. Mem. Lang. 55(4):601–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozcan P, Gurses K (2018) Playing cat and mouse: Contests over regulatory categorization of dietary supplements in the United States. Acad. Management J. 61(5):1789–1820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piazzai M, Wijnberg NM (2019) Product proliferation, complexity, and deterrence to imitation in differentiated-product oligopolies. Strategic Management J. 40(6):945–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG (2012) Two sides of the same coin: How ambiguous classification affects multiple audiences’ evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):81–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG (2018) Category strategy for firm advantage. Strategy Sci. 3(4):620–631.Link, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG, Barnett WP (2015) The persistence of lenient market categories. Organ. Sci. 26(5):1415–1431.Link, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG, Kim R (2017) Strategic categorization. Durand R, Granqvist N, Tyllström A, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 51 (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 71–111.Google Scholar
• Porter A, Bogdanov D, Kaye R, Tsukanov R, Serra X (2015) AcousticBrainz: A community platform for gathering music information obtained from audio. Müller M, Wiering F, eds. Proc. 16th Internat. Soc. Music Inform. Retrieval Conf. (ISMIR, Canada), 786–792.Google Scholar
• Pothos EM, Chater N (2002) A simplicity principle in unsupervised human categorization. Cogn. Sci. 26(3):303–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2003) Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(4):795–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhee EY, Lo JY, Kennedy MY, Fiss PC (2017) Things that last? Category creation, imprinting, and durability. Durand R, Granqvist N, Tyllström A, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 51 (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 295–395.Google Scholar
• Rosa JA, Porac JF, Runser-Spanjol J, Saxon MS (1999) Sociocognitive dynamics in a product market. J. Marketing 63(4):64–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosch EH (1978) Principles of categorization. Rosch EH, Lloyd BB, eds. Cognition and Categorization (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 27–48.Google Scholar
• Rosch EH, Mervis CB, Gray WD, Johnson DM, Boyes-Braem P (1976) Basic objects in natural categories. Cognit. Psych. 8(3):382–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruef M, Patterson K (2009) Credit and classification: The impact of industry boundaries in nineteenth-century America. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(3):486–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sgourev SV, Aadland E, Formilan G (2023) Relations in aesthetic space: How color enables market positioning. Admin. Sci. Quart. 68(1):146–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shepard RG, Hovland CI, Jenkins HM (1961) Learning and memorization of classifications. Psych. Monogr. Gen. Appl. 75(13):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. 69(1):99–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slavich B, Svejenova S, Opazo MP, Patriotta G (2020) Politics of meaning in categorizing innovation: How chefs advanced molecular gastronomy by resisting the label. Organ. Stud. 41(2):267–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith EB, Chae H (2016) “We do what we must, and call it by the best names”: Can deliberate names offset the consequences of organizational atypicality? Strategic Management J. 37(6):1021–1033.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith EB, Chae H (2017) The effect of organizational atypicality on reference group selection and performance evaluation. Organ. Sci. 28(6):1134–1149.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith JD, Minda JP (2002) Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning. J. Exp. Psych. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 28(4):800–811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soublière J-F, Lo JY, Rhee EY (2023) Coherence within and across categories: The dynamic viability of product categories on Kickstarter. Acad. Management J. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Taeuscher K, Rothe H (2021) Optimal distinctiveness in platform markets: Leveraging complementors as legitimacy buffers. Strategic Management J. 42(2):435–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taeuscher K, Zhao EY, Lounsbury M (2022) Categories and narratives as sources of distinctiveness: Cultural entrepreneurship within and across categories. Strategic Management J. 43(10):2101–2134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1973) Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognit. Psych. 5(2):207–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Unkelbach C (2006) The learned interpretation of cognitive fluency. Psych. Sci. 17(4):339–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Venrooij A (2015) A community ecology of genres: Explaining the emergence of new genres in the U.K. field of electronic/dance music, 1985–1999. Poetics 52:104–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vergne JP, Wry T (2014) Categorizing categorization research: Review, integration, and future directions. J. Management Stud. 51(1):56–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verhaal JC, Pontikes EG (2022) Shaping cultural meanings in markets with category strategy and optimal distinctiveness: An agency-based perspective. Lockwood C, Soublière J-F, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 80 (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 179–191.Google Scholar
• Verhaal JC, Khessina OM, Dobrev SD (2015) Oppositional product names, organizational identities, and product appeal. Organ. Sci. 26(5):1466–1484.Link, Google Scholar
• Verheyen S, Ameel E, Storms G (2007) Determining the dimensionality in spatial representations of semantic concepts. Behav. Res. Methods 39(3):427–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wry T, Lounsbury M (2013) Contextualizing the categorical imperative: Category linkages, technology focus, and resource acquisition in nanotechnology entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Venturing 28(1):117–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Younkin P, Kashkooli K (2020) Stay true to your roots? Category distance, hierarchy, and the performance of new entrants in the music industry. Organ. Sci. 31(3):604–627.Link, Google Scholar
• Zanella P, Cillo P, Verona G (2021) Whatever you want, whatever you like: How incumbents respond to changes in market information regimes. Strategic Management J. 43(7):1258–1286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao EY, Ishihara M, Lounsbury M (2013) Overcoming the illegitimacy discount: Cultural entrepreneurship in the US feature film industry. Organ. Stud. 34(12):1747–1776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao EY, Fisher G, Lounsbury M, Miller D (2017) Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 38(1):93–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao EY, Ishihara M, Jennings PD, Lounsbury M (2018) Optimal distinctiveness in the console video game industry: An exemplar-based model of proto-category evolution. Organ. Sci. 29(4):588–611.Link, Google Scholar
• Zipf GK (1949) Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort (Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (2016) Optimal distinctiveness revisited. Pratt MG, Schultz M, Ashforth BE, Ravasi D, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Identity (Oxford University Press, New York), 183–199.Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (2017) The categorical imperative revisited: Implications of categorization as a theoretical tool. Durand R, Granqvist N, Tyllström A, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 51 (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 31–68.Google Scholar
• Zunino D, Suarez FF, Grodal S (2019) Familiarity, creativity, and the adoption of category labels in technology industries. Organ. Sci. 30(1):169–190.Link, Google Scholar