Self-Disclosure and Respect: Understanding the Engagement of Value Minorities

References

• Alexander MG, Chizhik AW, Chizhik EW, Goodman JA (2009) Lower-status participation and influence: Task structure matters. J. Soc. Issues 65(2):365–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arnett RD (2023) Uniting through difference: Rich cultural-identity expression as a conduit to inclusion. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print January 16, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1648.Google Scholar
• Anderson G (2020) Survey identifies ‘Dangerous’ student self-censorship. Accessed July 20, 2023, https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2020/04/29/survey-identifies-‘dangerous’-student-self-censorship.Google Scholar
• Bain K, Kreps TA, Meikle NL, Tenney ER (2021) Amplifying voice in organizations. Acad. Management J. 64(4):1288–1312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bauer DJ, Preacher KJ, Gil KM (2006) Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psych. Methods 11(2):142–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Leary MR (1995) The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psych. Bull. 117(3):497–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendersky C, Brockner J (2020) Mistreatment from peers can reduce the effects of respectful treatment from bosses, and respectful peers can offset mistreatment from bosses. J. Organ. Behav. 41(8):722–736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bermiss YS, McDonald R (2018) Ideological misfit? Political affiliation and employee departure in the private-equity industry. Acad. Management J. 61(6):2182–2209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biernat M, Vescio TK, Theno SA, Crandall CS (1996) Values and prejudice: Toward understanding the impact of American values on outgroup attitudes. Seligman C, Olson JM, Zanna MP, eds. The Psychology of Values (Erlbaum, Mahway, NJ), 153–189.Google Scholar
• Blader SL, Tyler TR (2009) Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 94(2):445–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blader SL, Yu S (2017) Are status and respect different or two sides of the same coin? Acad. Management Ann. 11(2):800–824.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bliese PD (2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ, eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 349–381.Google Scholar
• Boezeman EJ, Ellemers N (2007) Volunteering for charity: Pride, respect, and the commitment of volunteers. J. Appl. Psych. 92(3):771–785.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bond MH (1994) Finding universal dimensions of individual variation in multicultural studies of values: The Rokeach and Chinese value surveys. Puka B, ed. New Research in Moral Development, vol. 5 (Garland Publishing, New York), 385–391.Google Scholar
• Bono JE, Glomb TM, Shen W, Kim E, Koch AJ (2013) Building positive resources: Effects of positive events and positive reflection on work stress and health. Acad. Management J. 56(6):1601–1627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borman WC, Motowidlo SM (1993) Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Schmitt N, WC Borman, eds. Personnel Selection in Organizations (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 71–98.Google Scholar
• Brewer MB (1991) The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 17(5):475–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brief AP, Motowidlo SJ (1986) Prosocial organizational behaviors. Acad. Management Rev. 11(4):710–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byrne D (1961) Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 62(3):713–715.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byrne DE (1971) The Attraction Paradigm (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Cable DM, Kay VS (2012) Striving for self-verification during organizational entry. Acad. Management J. 55(2):360–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capell B, Tzafrir SS, Enosh G, Dolan SL (2018) Explaining sexual minorities’ disclosure: The role of trust embedded in organizational practices. Organ. Stud. 39(7):947–973.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chambers JR, Schlenker BR, Collisson B (2013) Ideology and prejudice: The role of value conflicts. Psych. Sci. 24(2):140–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charoensap-Kelly P, Mestayer CL, Knight GB (2020) To come out or not to come out: Minority religious identity self-disclosure in the United States workplace. Management Comm. Quart. 34(2):213–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen S, Lee-Chai AY, Bargh JA (2001) Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 80(2):173–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chizhik AW, Alexander MG, Chizhik EW, Goodman JA (2003) The rise and fall of power and prestige orders: Influence of task structure. Soc. Psych. Quart. 66(3):303–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clair JA, Beatty JE, MacLean TL (2005) Out of sight but not out of mind: Managing invisible social identities in the workplace. Acad. Management Rev. 30(1):78–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen GL, Garcia J (2008) Identity, belonging, and achievement: A model, interventions, implications. Current Directives Psych. Sci. 17(6):365–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins NL, Miller LC (1994) Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psych. Bull. 116(3):457–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper D (2013) Dissimilarity and learning in teams: The role of relational identification and value dissimilarity. Internat. J. Intercultural Relations 37(5):628–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cozby PC (1972) Self-disclosure, reciprocity and liking. Sociometry 35(1):151–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cozby PC (1973) Self-disclosure: A literature review. Psych. Bull. 79(2):73–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cunningham GB (2010) The influence of religious personal identity on the relationships among religious dissimilarity, value dissimilarity, and job satisfaction. Soc. Justice Res. 23(1):60–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cunningham JL, Gino F, Cable DM, Staats BR (2021) Seeing oneself as a valued contributor: Social worth affirmation improves team information sharing. Acad. Management J. 64(6):1816–1841.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CKW (2002) Team innovation and team effectiveness: The importance of minority dissent and reflexivity. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psych. 11(3):285–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CKW, De Vries NK (1997) Minority dissent in organizations. De Dreu CKW, Van de Vliert E, eds. Using Conflict in Organizations (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 72–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CKW, De Vries NK, Franssen H, Altink WMM (2000) Minority dissent in organizations: Factors influencing willingness to dissent. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 30(12):2451–2466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deeds Pamphile V, Ruttan RL (2022) The (bounded) role of stated-lived value congruence and authenticity in employee evaluations of organizations. Organ. Sci. ePub ahead of print April 26, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1578.Link, Google Scholar
• Demerouti E, Bakker AB, Nachreiner F, Schaufeli WB (2001) The job demands-resources model of burnout. J. Appl. Psych. 86(3):499–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doblhofer DS, Hauser A, Kuonath A, Haas K, Agthe M, Frey D (2019) Make the best out of the bad: Coping with value incongruence through displaying facades of conformity, positive reframing, and self-disclosure. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psych. 28(5):572–593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duguid MM, Loyd DL, Tolbert PS (2012) The impact of categorical status, numeric representation, and work group prestige on preference for demographically similar others: A value threat approach. Organ. Sci. 23(2):386–401.Link, Google Scholar
• Dumas TL, Phillips KW, Rothbard NP (2013) Getting closer at the company party: Integration experiences, racial dissimilarity, and workplace relationships. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1377–1401.Link, Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Cable DM (2009) The value of value congruence. J. Appl. Psych. 94(3):654–677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Lambert LS (2007) Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psych. Methods 12(1):1.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Cable DM, Williamson IO, Lambert LS, Shipp AJ (2006) The phenomenology of fit: Linking the person and environment to the subjective experience of person-environment fit. J. Appl. Psych. 91(4):802–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellemers N, Doosje B, Spears R (2004) Sources of respect: The effects of being liked by ingroups and outgroups. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 34(2):155–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellemers N, Sleebos E, Stam D, Gilder D (2013) Feeling included and valued: How perceived respect affects positive team identity and willingness to invest in the team. British J. Management 24(1):21–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ely RJ, Thomas DA (2001) Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(2):229–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ensher EA, Grant-Vallone EJ, Marelich WD (2002) Effects of perceived attitudinal and demographic similarity on protégés’ support and satisfaction gained from their mentoring relationships. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 32(7):1407–1430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feather NT (1996) Values, deservingness, and attitudes toward high achievers: Research on tall poppies. Seligman C, Olson JM, Zanna MP, eds. The Psychology of Values: The Ontario Symposium, vol. 8 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 215–251.Google Scholar
• Feinberg M, Willer R (2013) The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psych. Sci. 24(1):56–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feinberg M, Willer R (2019) Moral reframing: A technique for effective and persuasive communication across political divides. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 13:e12501.Google Scholar
• Ferrin DL, Dirks KT, Shah PP (2006) Direct and indirect effects of third-party relationships on interpersonal trust. J. Appl. Psych. 91(4):870–883.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Follmer EH, Talbot DL, Kristof-Brown AL, Astrove SL, Billsberry J (2018) Resolution, relief, and resignation: A qualitative study of responses to misfit at work. Acad. Management J. 61(2):440–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frable DE, Blackstone T, Scherbaum C (1990) Marginal and mindful: Deviants in social interactions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 59:140–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fredrickson BL (1998) What good are positive emotions? Rev. General Psych. 2(3):300–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fredrickson BL (2001) The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Amer. Psych. 56(3):218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frimer JA, Skitka LJ, Motyl M (2017) Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to avoid exposure to one another’s opinions. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 72:1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson JL, Sutherland JL (2020) Keeping your mouth shut: Spiraling self-censorship in the United States. Preprint, submitted July 16, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3647099.Google Scholar
• Gibson KR (2018) Can I tell you something? How disruptive self-disclosure changes who “we” are. Acad. Management Rev. 43(4):570–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson KR, Harari D, Marr JC (2018) When sharing hurts: How and why self-disclosing weakness undermines the task-oriented relationships of higher status disclosers. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 144:25–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goar C, Sell J (2005) Using task definition to modify racial inequality within task groups. Sociol. Quart. 46(3):525–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity (Simon & Shuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Grant A (2016) An online interview. https://review.firstround.com/adam-grant-on-interviewing-to-hire-trailblazers-nonconformists-and-originals.Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Campbell EM (2007) Doing good, doing harm, being well and burning out: The interactions of perceived prosocial and antisocial impact in service work. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 80(4):665–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruenfeld DH (1995) Status, ideology, and integrative complexity on the U.S. Supreme Court: Rethinking the politics of political decision making. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 68(1):5–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruenfeld DH, Thomas-Hunt MC, Kim PH (1998) Cognitive flexibility, communication strategy, and integrative complexity in groups: Public vs. private reactions to majority and minority status. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 34(2):202–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haidt J (2011) The bright future of post-partisan social psychology. In talk given at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Price KH, Bell MP (1998) Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Acad. Management J. 41(1):96–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Price KH, Gavin JH, Florey AT (2002) Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Acad. Management J. 45(5):1029–1045.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2015) An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behav. Res. 50(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2018) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, 2nd ed. (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• He Y, Costa PL, Walker JM, Miner KN, Wooderson RL (2019) Political identity dissimilarity, workplace incivility, and declines in well-being: A prospective investigation. Stress Health 35:256–266.Google Scholar
• Heltzel G, Laurin K (2020) Polarization in America: Two possible futures. Current Opinion Behav. Sci. 34:179–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hewlin PF (2009) Wearing the cloak: Antecedents and consequences of creating facades of conformity. J. Appl. Psych. 94(3):727–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hewlin PF, Dumas TL, Burnett MF (2017) To thine own self be true? Facades of conformity, values incongruence, and the moderating impact of leader integrity. Acad. Management J. 60(1):178–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitlin S (2003) Values as the core of personal identity: Drawing links between two theories of self. Soc. Psych. Quart. 66(2):118–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho A, Hancock J, Miner AS (2018) Psychological, relational, and emotional effects of self-disclosure after conversations with a chatbot. J. Comm. 68(4):712–733.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hobman EV, Bordia P (2006) The role of team identification in the dissimilarity-conflict relationship. Group Process. Intergroup Relations 9(4):483–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hobman EV, Bordia P, Gallois C (2003) Consequences of feeling dissimilar from others in a work team. J. Bus. Psych. 17(3):301–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hobman EV, Bordia P, Gallois C (2004) Perceived dissimilarity and work group involvement the moderating effects of group openness to diversity. Group Organ. Management 29(5):560–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofmann DA (1997) An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. J. Management 23(6):723–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Honeycutt N, Freberg L (2017) The liberal and conservative experience across academic disciplines: An extension of Inbar and Lammers. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 8(2):115–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang JH, DeJong W, Schneider SK, Towvim LG (2011) Endorsed reasons for not drinking alcohol: A comparison of college student drinkers and abstainers. J. Behav. Medicine 34(1):64–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huo YJ, Binning KR, Molina LE (2010) Testing an integrative model of respect: Implications for social engagement and well-being. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 36(2):200–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jourard SM, Lasakow P (1958) Some factors in self-disclosure. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 56(1):91–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Ferris GR (1992) The elusive criterion of fit in human resources staffing decisions. Human Resource Planning 15(4):47–67.Google Scholar
• Kahn WA (1990) Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad. Management J. 33(4):692–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein KJ, Knight AP, Ziegert JC, Lim BC, Saltz JL (2011) When team members’ values differ: The moderating role of team leadership. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 114(1):25–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kouzakova M, Ellemers N, Harinck F, Scheepers D (2012) The implications of value conflict: How disagreement on values affects self-involvement and perceived common ground. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 38(6):798–807.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lankau MJ, Ward A, Amason A, Ng T, Sonnenfeld JA, Agle BA (2007) Examining the impact of organizational value dissimilarity in top management teams. J. Management Issue 19(1):11–34.Google Scholar
• Laurenceau JP, Barrett LF, Pietromonaco PR (1998) Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74(5):1238–1251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LeBreton JM, Senter JL (2008) Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organ. Res. Methods 11(4):815–852.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liao H, Chuang A, Joshi A (2008) Perceived deep-level dissimilarity: Personality antecedents and impact on overall job attitude, helping, work withdrawal, and turnover. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 106(2):106–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu R, Chatman JA, Goldberg A, Srivastava SB (2023) Two-sided cultural fit: The differing behavioral consequences of cultural congruence based on values vs. perceptions. Organ. Sci. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Luijters K, van der Zee KI, Otten S (2008) Cultural diversity in organizations: Enhancing identification by valuing differences. Internat. J. Intercultural Relations 32(2):154–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Williams J (2004) Confidence limits for the indirect effect. Multivariate Behav. Res. 39(1):99–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maio GR, Olson JM (1995) Relations between values, attitudes, and behavioral intentions: The moderating role of attitude function. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 31(3):266–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maio GR, Olson JM (2000) What is a “value-expressive” attitude? Maio GR, Olson JM, eds. Why We Evaluate: Functions of Attitudes (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ), 249–269.Google Scholar
• Marsden PV (1990) Network data and measurement. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 16:435–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matz DC, Wood W (2005) Cognitive dissonance in groups: The consequences of disagreement. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 88(1):22–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCoy J, Rahman T, Somer M (2018) Polarization and the global crisis of democracy: Common patterns, dynamics, and pernicious consequences for democratic polities. Amer. Behav. Sci. 62(1):16–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath JE, Berdahl JL, Arrow H (1995) Traits, expectations, culture, and clout: The dynamics of diversity in work groups. Jackson SE, Ruderman MN, eds. Diversity in Work Teams: Research Paradigms for a Changing Workplace (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC), 17–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27:415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meglino BM, Ravlin EC (1998) Individual values in organizations: Concepts, controversies, and research. J. Management 24(3):351–389.Google Scholar
• Miner KN, Costa PL, He Y, Wooderson RL (2021) Your politics are making me sick! Political identity-based workplace incivility and physical health complaints during two US presidential elections. Occupational Health Sci. 5(3):361–389.Google Scholar
• Montoya RM, Horton RS, Kirchner J (2008) Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. J. Soc. Personality Relations 25(6):889–922.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Motyl M (2016) Liberals and conservatives are (geographically) dividing. Valdesolo P, Graham J, eds. Social Psychology of Political Polarization (Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, New York), 7–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Motyl M, Iyer R, Oishi S, Trawalter S, Nosek BA (2014) How ideological migration geographically segregates groups. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 51:1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy MC, Taylor VJ (2012) The role of situational cues in signaling and maintaining stereotype threat. Inzlicht M, Schmader T, eds. Stereotype Threat: Theory, Process, and Application (Oxford University Press, New York), 17–33.Google Scholar
• Nemeth CJ, Wachtler J (1983) Creative problem solving as a result of majority vs minority influence. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 13(1):45–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nijstad BA, Berger-Selman F, De Dreu CKW (2014) Innovation in top management teams: Minority dissent, transformational leadership, and radical innovations. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psych. 23(2):310–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Omarzu J (2000) A disclosure decision model: Determining how and when individuals will self-disclose. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 4(2):174–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Organ DW (1988) Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome (Lexington Books, Blue Ridge Summit, PA).Google Scholar
• Packer DJ (2011) The dissenter’s dilemma, and a social identity solution. Jetten J, Hornsey MJ, eds. Rebels in Groups: Dissent, Deviance, Difference and Defiance (Wiley-Blackwell, New York), 281–301.Google Scholar
• Pagliaro S, Ellemers N, Barreto M (2011) Sharing moral values: Anticipated ingroup respect as a determinant of adherence to morality-based (but not competence-based) group norms. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 37(8):1117–1129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peer E, Brandimarte L, Samat S, Acquisti A (2017) Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 70:153–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perdue BC, Summers JO (1986) Checking the success of manipulations in marketing experiments. J. Marketing Res. 23(4):317–326.Google Scholar
• Perrigino MB, Jenkins M (2022) Antecedents of facades of conformity: When can employees “be themselves”? J. Humanities Appl. Soc. Sci. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JHASS-04-2022-0045/full/pdf?title=antecedents-of-facades-of-conformity-when-can-employees-be-themselves.Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Loyd DL (2006) When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 99(2):143–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Kim-Jun SY, Shim SH (2011) The value of diversity in organizations: A social psychological perspective. De Cremer D, van Dick R, Murnighan JK, eds. Social Psychology and Organizations. Organization and Management Series (Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, New York), 253–271.Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Rothbard NP, Dumas TL (2009) To disclose or not to disclose? Status distance and self-disclosure in diverse environments. Acad. Management Rev. 34(4):710–732.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pillemer J, Rothbard NP (2018) Friends without benefits: Understanding the dark sides of workplace friendship. Acad. Management Rev. 43(4):635–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polzer JT, Milton LP, Swann WB (2002) Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small work groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(2):296–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF (2006) Prior attitudes, salient value similarity, and dimensionality: Toward an integrative model of trust in risk regulation. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 36(7):1674–1700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Selig JP (2012) Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Comm. Methods Measures 6(2):77–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragins BR (2008) Disclosure disconnects: Antecedents and consequences of disclosing invisible stigmas across life domains. Acad. Management Rev. 33(1):194–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS (2002) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (SAGE).Google Scholar
• Reeves DW, Draper TW (1984) Abstinence or decreasing consumption among adolescents: Importance of reasons. Internat. J. Addiction 19(7):819–825.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reis HT, Shaver P (1988) Intimacy as an interpersonal process. Duck S, Hay DF, Hobfoll SE, Ickes W, Montgomery BM, eds. Handbook of Personal Relationships: Theory, Research and Interventions (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 367–389.Google Scholar
• Rich BL, Lepine JA, Crawford ER (2010) Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Acad. Management J. 53(3):617–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Sanchez AM, Schaufeli W, Salanova M, Cifre E, Sonnenschein M (2011) Enjoyment and absorption: An electronic diary study on daily flow patterns. Work Stress 25(1):75–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rokeach M (1973) The Nature of Human Values (Free Press, Glencoe, IL).Google Scholar
• Rothbard NP (2001) Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):655–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothbard NP, Patil SV (2012) Work engagement. Cameron KS, Spreitzer GM, Cameron KS, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship (Oxford University Press, New York), 56–68.Google Scholar
• Sackett PR, Larson JR Jr (1990) Research strategies and tactics in industrial and organizational psychology. Dunnette MD, Hough LM, eds. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 1, 2nd ed. (Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA), 419–489.Google Scholar
• Schachter S (1951) Deviation, rejection, and communication. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 46(2):190–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB (2004) Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. J. Organ. Behav. 25(3):293–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schultz H (2023) The USA Today article was written by Maria Bartiromo (September 15), https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/columnist/bartiromo/2013/09/15/starbucks-bartiromo-schultz-coffee/2809663/.Google Scholar
• Schwartz SH, Bilsky W (1987) Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 53(3):550–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schweiger DM, Sandberg WR, Rechner PL (1989) Experiential effects of dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy and consensus approaches to strategic decision making. Acad. Management J. 32(4):745–772.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siegrist M, Cvetkovich G, Roth C (2000) Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk Analysis 20(3):353–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon B, Stürmer S (2003) Respect for group members: Intragroup determinants of collective identification and group-serving behavior. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 29(2):183–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skinner N, Feather NT, Freeman T, Roche A (2007) Stigma and discrimination in health-care provision to drug users: The role of values, affect, and deservingness judgments. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 37(1):163–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sleebos E, Ellemers N, de Gilder D (2006) The carrot and the stick: Affective commitment and acceptance anxiety as motives for discretionary group efforts by respected and disrespected group members. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 32(2):244–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith SA, Brunner SR (2017) To reveal or conceal: Using communication privacy management theory to understand disclosures in the workplace. Management Comm. Quart. 31(3):429–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spears R, Ellemers N, Doosje B, Branscombe N (2006) The individual within the group: Respect! Postmes T, Jetten J, eds. Individuality and the Group: Advances in Social Identity (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 175–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sprecher S, Treger S, Wondra JD, Hilaire N, Wallpe K (2013) Taking turns: Reciprocal self-disclosure promotes liking in initial interactions. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 49(5):860–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swaab RI, Phillips KW, Schaerer M (2016) Secret conversation opportunities facilitate minority influence in virtual groups: The influence on majority power, information processing, and decision quality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 133:17–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swann WB Jr, Milton LP, Polzer JT (2000) Should we create a niche or fall in line? Identity negotiation and small group effectiveness. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79(2):238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swann WB, Kwan VS, Polzer JT, Milton LP (2003) Fostering group identification and creativity in diverse groups: The role of individuation and self-verification. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 29(11):1396–1406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tam T, Hewstone M, Harwood J, Voci A, Kenworthy J (2006) Intergroup contact and grandparent-grandchild communication: The effects of self-disclosure on implicit and explicit biases against older people. Group Processing Intergroup Relations 9(3):413–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tardy CH, Dindia K (2006) Self-disclosure: Strategic revelation of information in personal and professional relationships. Hargie O, ed. The Handbook of Communication Skills, 3rd ed. (Routledge, New York), 229–266.Google Scholar
• Thomas-Hunt MC, Phillips KW (2004) When what you know is not enough: Expertise and gender dynamics in task groups. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 30(12):1585–1598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tierney J (2011) Social scientist sees bias within. New York Times (February 7), https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/2011/02/08/science/08tier.html.Google Scholar
• Tilcsik A, Anteby M, Knight CR (2015) Concealable stigma and occupational segregation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(3):446–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyler TR, Blader SL (2002a) Autonomous vs. comparative status: Must we be better than others to feel good about ourselves? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 89(1):813–838.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyler TR, Blader SL (2002b) Terms of engagement: Why do people invest themselves in work? Sondak H, ed. Toward Phenomenology of Groups and Group Membership, vol. 4 (Elsevier Science, New York), 115–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyler TR, Blader SL (2003) The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 7(4):349–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Dyne L, Saavedra R (1996) A naturalistic minority influence experiment: Effects of divergent thinking, conflict and originality in work-groups. British J. Soc. Psych. 35(1):151–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkataramani V, Dalal RS (2007) Who helps and harms whom? Relational antecedents of interpersonal helping and harming in organizations. J. Appl. Psych. 92(4):952–966.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vogel RM, Rodell JB, Lynch JW (2016) Engaged and productive misfits: How job crafting and leisure activity mitigate the negative effects of value incongruence. Acad. Management J. 59(5):1561–1584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walton GM, Cohen GL (2007) A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 92(1):82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walton GM, Cohen GL (2011) A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science 331(6023):1447–1451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walton GM, Murphy MC, Ryan AM (2015) Stereotype threat in organizations: Implications for equity and performance. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 2:523–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang CS, Whitson JA, Anicich EM, Kray LJ, Galinsky AD (2017) Challenge your stigma: How to reframe and revalue negative stereotypes and slurs. Current Directives Psych. Sci. 26(1):75–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheeler AR, Halbesleben JRB, Shanine K (2013) Exploring the middle range of person-environment fit theories through a conservation of resources perspective. Kristof-Brown AL, Billsberry J, eds. Organizational Fit: Key Issues and New Directions (Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ), 170–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheeless LR, Grotz J (1976) Conceptualization and measurement of reported self-disclosure. Human Comm. Res. 2(4):338–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolf LJ, Weinstein N, Maio GR (2019) Anti-immigrant prejudice: Understanding the roles of (perceived) values and value dissimilarity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 117(5):925–953.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood W, Pool GJ, Leck K, Purvis D (1996) Self-definition, defensive processing, and influence: The normative impact of majority and minority groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 71(6):1181–1193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood W, Lundgren S, Ouellette JA, Busceme S, Blackstone T (1994) Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psych. Bull. 115(3):323–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zipay KP, Mitchell MS, Baer MD, Sessions H, Bies RJ (2021) Lenient reactions to misconduct: Examining the self-conscious process of being lenient to others at work. Acad. Management J. 64(2):351–377.Crossref, Google Scholar