Accounting for Negative Attention: Status and Costs in the Market for Audit Services

References

• Ai C, Norton E (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. 80(1):123–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adut A (2008) On Scandal: Moral Disturbances in Society, Politics, and Art (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Arellano M (1987) Computing robust standard errors for within-groups estimators. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. 49(4):431–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 51(6):1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartley T, Child C (2014) Shaming the corporation: The social production of targets and the anti-sweatshop movement. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(4):653–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JA, Oliver C (1992) Institutional embeddedness and the dynamics of organizational populations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 57(4):540–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bermiss YS, Zajac E, King B (2014) Under construction: How commensuration and management fashion affect corporate reputation rankings. Organ. Sci. 25(2):591–608.Link, Google Scholar
• Bidwell M, Won S, Barbulescu R, Mollick E (2015) I used to work at Goldman Sachs! How firms benefit from organizational status in the market for human capital. Strategic Management J. 36(8):1164–1173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bothner MS, Kim YK, Smith EB (2012) How does status affect performance? Status as an asset vs. status as a liability in the PGA and NASCAR. Organ. Sci. 23(2):416–433.Link, Google Scholar
• Bowers A, Prato M (2018) The structural origins of unearned status: How arbitrary changes in categories affect status positions and market impact. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(3):668–699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown B, Perry S (1994) Removing the financial performance halo from Fortune’s “most admired” companies. Acad. Management J. 37(5):1347–1359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burks J (2011) Are investors confused by restatements after Sarbanes-Oxley? Accounting Rev. 86(2):507–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castellucci F, Ertug G (2010) What’s in it for them? Advantages of higher-status partners in exchange relationships. Acad. Management J. 53(1):149–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen G, Hambrick DC, Pollock TG (2008) Puttin’ on the Ritz: Pre-IPO enlistment of prestigious affiliates as deadline-induced remediation. Acad. Management J. 51(5):954–975.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cook J, Kowaleski Z, Minnis M, Sutherland A, Zehms K (2020) Auditors are known by the company they keep. J. Accounting Econom. 70(1):101314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donelson DC, Ege M, Leiby J (2019) Audit firm reputational consequences of alleged non-accounting misconduct by clients: How bargaining power temporarily shifts around securities litigation. Auditing 38(4):77–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donelson D, Kadous K, McInnis J (2014) Research on litigation against auditors. Hay D, Knechel WR, Willekens M, eds. The Routledge Companion to Auditing (Routledge, London), 54–66.Google Scholar
• Dyck A, Morse A, Zingales L (2010) Who blows the whistle on corporate fraud? J. Finance 65(6):2213–2253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eaglesham J (2019) PwC clients more likely to revise financial statements. Wall Street Journal (December 17), https://www.wsj.com/articles/pwc-clients-more-likely-to-revise-financial-statements-115 76578600.Google Scholar
• Eaglesham J, Ziobro P (2019) Mattel, PwC obscured accounting issues, former executive says. Wall Street Journal (November 6), https://www.wsj.com/articles/mattel-pwc-obscured-accounting-issues-former-executive-says-11573036201.Google Scholar
• Economist (2018) What is an audit for? (May 26), https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2018/05/26/what-is-an-audit-for.Google Scholar
• Elfenbein D, Zenger T (2014) What is a relationship worth? Repeated exchange and the development and deployment of relational capital. Organ. Sci. 25(1):222–244.Link, Google Scholar
• Erkens D, Bonner S (2013) The role of firm status in appointments of accounting financial experts to audit committees. Accounting Rev. 88(1):107–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espeland W, Sauder M (2007) Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(1):1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espeland W, Sauder M (2016) Engines of Anxiety: Academic Rankings, Reputation and Accountability (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
• Fung S, Gul F, Krishnan J (2012) City-level auditor industry specialization, economies of scale and audit pricing. Accounting Rev. 87(4):1281–1307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghysels E, Santa-Clara P, Valkanov R (2005) There is a risk-return trade-off after all. J. Financial Econom. 76(3):509–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory (Aldine, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Goode WJ (1978) The Celebration of Heroes: Prestige as a Control System (University of California Press, Berkeley).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graffin SD, Bundy J, Porac J, Wade J, Quinn D (2013) Falls from grace and the hazards of high status: The 2009 British MP expense scandal and its impact on parliamentary elites. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(3):313–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahl O, Zuckerman EW (2014) The denigration of heroes? How the status attainment process shapes attributions of considerateness and authenticity. Amer. J. Sociol. 120(2):504–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hay D, Knechel WR, Willekens M (2014) The function of auditing. Hay D, Knechel WR, Willekens M, eds. The Routledge Companion to Auditing (Routledge, London), 1–9.Google Scholar
• Hay D, Knechel WR, Wong N (2006) Audit fees: A meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Res. 23(1):141–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman A, Ocasio W (2001) Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. Organ. Sci. 12(4):414–434.Link, Google Scholar
• Holmbeck GN (1997) Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. J. Consulting Clinical Psych. 65(4):599–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoyle RH, Kenny DA (1999) Statistical power and tests of mediation. Hoyle RH, ed. Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research (SAGE, Newbury Park, CA), 195–222.Google Scholar
• Hoyle RH, Smith GT (1994) Formulating clinical research hypotheses as structural equation models: A conceptual overview. J. Consulting Clinical Psych. 62(3):429–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu D (2004) What do entrepreneurs pay for venture capital affiliation? J. Finance 59(4):1805–1844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang HW, Liu S, Raghunandan K, Rama DV (2007) Auditor industry specialization, client bargaining power, and audit fees: Further evidence. Auditing 26(1):147–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hudson B, Okhuysen G (2009) Not with a ten-foot pole: Core stigma, stigma transfer, and improbable persistence of men’s bathhouses. Organ. Sci. 20(1):134–153.Link, Google Scholar
• Iacobucci D, Saldanha N, Deng X (2007) A meditation on mediation: Evidence that structural equations models perform better than regressions. J. Consumer Psych. 17(2):139–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus S, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M (2006) Should we stay or should we go? Accountability, status anxiety and client defections. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51:97–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Roy A (2008) Staging exchange partner choices: When do status and reputation matter? Acad. Management J. 51(3):495–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Kim BK, Kim H (2011) The importance of status in markets: A market identity perspective. Pearce JL, ed. Status in Management and Organizations (Cambridge University Pres, Cambridge, UK), 87–117.Google Scholar
• Jha A, Chen Y (2015) Audit fees and social capital. Accounting Rev. 90(2):611–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jonsson S, Greve H, Fujiwara-Greve T (2009) Undeserved loss: The spread of legitimacy loss to innocent organizations in response to reported corporate deviance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(2):195–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judd CM, Kenny DA (1981) Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Rev. 5(5):602–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Bolger N (1998) Data analysis in social psychology. Gilbert D, Fiske S, Lindzey G, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., vol. 1 (McGraw-Hill, Boston), 233–265.Google Scholar
• King B, McDonnell MH (2014) Good firms, good targets: The relationship between corporate social responsibility, reputation, and activist targeting. Tsutsui K, Lim A, eds. Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World: Toward Effective Global CSR Frameworks (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 430–454.Google Scholar
• Krishnan J, Krishnan J (1997) Litigation risk and auditor resignations. Accounting Rev. 72(4):539–560.Google Scholar
• LaCapra LT (2012) In Facebook IPO, bankers seek prestige over fees. Reuters (January 30), https://www.reuters.com/article/us-facebook-ipoview/in-facebook-ipo-bankers-seek-prestige-over-fees-idUSTRE80Q21920120131.Google Scholar
• Leventis S, Hasan I, Dedoulis E (2013) The cost of sin: The effect of social norms on audit pricing. Internat. Rev. Financial Anal. 29:152–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin Z, Yang H, Arya B (2009) Alliance partners and firm performance: Resource complementarity and status association. Strategic. Management J. 30(9):921–940.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynn F, Podolny J, Tao L (2009) A sociological (de)construction of the relationship between status and quality. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3):755–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Makadok R, Burton R, Barney J (2018) A practical guide for making a theoretical contribution. Strategic Management J. 39(6):1530–1545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonnell MH, King B (2018) Order in the court: How firm status and reputation shape the outcomes of employment discrimination suits. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 83(1):61–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKenna F, Riquier A (2017) Where was KPMG, Wells Fargo’s auditor, while the funny business was going on? Marketwatch (August 21), https://www.marketwatch.com/story/where-was-wells-fargos-auditor-kpmg-while-the-funny-business-was-going-on-2017-08-17.Google Scholar
• Merton RC (1973) An intertemporal capital asset pricing model. Econometrica 41(5):867–887.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science 159(3810):56–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mize T (2019) Best practices for estimating, interpreting and presenting nonlinear interaction effects. Sociol. Sci. 6:81–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moeen M (2017) Entry into nascent Industries: Disentangling a firm’s capability portfolio at the time of investment versus market entry. Strategic Management J. 38(10):1986–2004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore C, Payne T, Filatochev I, Zajac E (2019) The cost of status: When social and economic interests collide. Organ. Sci. 30(5):869–884.Link, Google Scholar
• Naumovska I, Lavie D (2021) When an industry peer is accused of financial misconduct: Stigma versus competition effects on non-accused firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(4):1130–1172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Negro G, Williams M, Pontikes E, Lopiano G (2021) Destigmatization and its imbalanced effects in labor markets. Management Sci. 67(12):7669–7686.Link, Google Scholar
• Ody-Brasier A, Fernandez-Mateo I (2017) When being in the minority pays off: Relationships among sellers and price setting in the champagne industry. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(1):147–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ody-Brasier A, Vermeulen F (2014) The price you pay: Price-setting as a response to norm violations in the market for champagne grapes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(1):109–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palmrose ZV, Richardson V, Scholz S (2004) Determinants of the market reactions to restatement announcements. J. Accounting Econom. 37(1):59–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pardo A, Román M (2013) Reflections on the Baron and Kenny model of statistical mediation. Anales de Psicología 29(2):614–623.Google Scholar
• Paruchuri S, Misangyi V (2014) Investor perceptions of financial misconduct: The heterogeneous contamination of bystander firms. Acad. Management J. 58(1):169–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfarrer M, Pollock T, Rindova V (2010) A tale of two assets: The effects of firm reputation and celebrity on earnings surprises and investors’ reactions. Acad. Management J. 53(5):1131–1152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ, Turco CJ, Zuckerman EW (2013) Betrayal as market barrier: Identity-based limits to diversification among high-status corporate law firms. Amer. J. Sociol. 118(4):1023–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piazza A, Castellucci F (2014) Status in organization and management theory. J. Management 40(1):287–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piyasinchai N, Grimes M, Loch C (2021) How the pursuit of sustainability poses tradeoffs between legitimacy and reputational spillovers. Acad. Management Proc. 2021(1):13158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny J (1993) A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(4):829–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny J (2001) Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1):33–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny J (2005) Status Signals: A Sociological Study of Market Competition (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Podolny J, Phillips D (1996) The dynamics of organizational status. Indust. Corporate Change 5(2):453–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollock T, Chen G, Jackson E, Hambrick D (2010) How much prestige is enough? Assessing the value of multiple types of high-status affiliates for young firms. J. Bus. Venturing 25(1):6–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes E, Negro G, Rao H (2010) Stained red: A study of stigma by association to blacklisted artists during the “red scare” in Hollywood, 1945 to 1960. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(3):456–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M (1980) Competitive Strategy (The Free Press/Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Pryor J, Reeder G, Monroe A (2012) The infection of bad company: Stigma by association. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 102(2):224–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ratcliff N, Hugenberg K, Shriver ER, Bernstein M (2011) The allure of status: High-status targets are privileged in face processing and memory. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 37(8):1003–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reilly P (2018) No laughter among thieves: Authenticity and the enforcement of community norms in stand-up comedy. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 83(5):933–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova V, Martins L, Srinivas S, Chandler D (2018) The good, the bad and the ugly of organizational rankings: A multidisciplinary review of the literature and directions for future research. J. Management 44(6):2175–2208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauder M, Lynn F, Podolny J (2012) Status: Insights from organizational sociology. Annual Rev. Sociol. 38:267–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scholz S (2008) The changing nature and consequences of public company financial restatements, 1997–2006. Report, Department of the Treasury, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Sharkey A (2014) Categories and organizational status: The role of industry status in the response to organizational deviance. Amer. J. Sociol. 119(5):1380–1433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simcoe T, Waguespack D (2011) Status, quality, and attention: What’s in a (missing) name? Management Sci. 57(2):274–290.Link, Google Scholar
• Simunic D (2014) The market for auditing services. Hay D, Knechel WR, Willekens M, eds. The Routledge Companion to Auditing (Routledge, London), 33–49.Google Scholar
• Sobel ME (1982) Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Leinhardt S, ed. Sociological Methodology (American Sociological Association, Washington, DC), 290–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O (2014) Status and reputation: Synonyms or separate concepts? Strategic Organ. 12(1):62–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stern I, Dukerich J, Zajac E (2014) Unmixed signals: How reputation and status affect alliance formation. Strategic Management J. 35(4):512–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T, Hoang H, Hybels R (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):315–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swanquist QT, Whited RL (2015) Do clients avoid “contaminated” offices? The economic consequences of low-quality audits. Accounting Rev. 90(6):2537–2570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B, Lancaster R (2004) Embeddedness and price formation in the corporate law market. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69(3):319–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Washington M, Zajac EJ (2005) Status evolution and competition: Theory and evidence. Acad. Management J. 48(2):282–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter B (2020) Why managing reputational risk is a procurement challenge. Accessed September 25, 2023, https://www.fairmarkit.com/blog/why-managing-reputational-risk-is-a-procurement-challenge.Google Scholar
• Ziobro P (2019) Mattel resolves accounting probe, easing debt squeeze. Wall Street Journal (October 29), https://www.wsj.com/articles/mattel-resolves-accounting-probe-easing-debt-squeeze-11572387644.Google Scholar