Unsettling Settled Knowing: Reconciling Differences in Expert Practice

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.15859

References

  • Abbott A (1988) The System of the Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anteby M, Holm A (2021) Translating expertise across work contexts: U.S. puppeteers move from stage to screen. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 86(2):310–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anteby M, Chan CK, DiBenigno J (2016) Three lenses on occupations and professions in organizations: Becoming, doing, and relating. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):183–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anthony C (2021) When knowledge work and analytical technologies collide: The practices and consequences of black boxing algorithmic technologies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(4):1173–1212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barends E, Rousseau DM (2018) Evidence-Based Management: How To Use Evidence To Make Better Organizational Decisions (Kogan Page, New York).Google Scholar
  • Barley SR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1):78–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley SR, Kunda G (2001) Bringing work back in. Organ. Sci. 12(1):76–95.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Battilana J (2011) The enabling role of social position in diverging from the institutional status quo: Evidence from the UK National Health Service. Organ. Sci. 22(4):817–834.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Beane M, Anthony C (2023) Inverted apprenticeship: How senior occupational members develop practical expertise and preserve their position when new technologies arrive. Organ. Sci. 35(2):405–431.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky B (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky B (2019) Evaluative spillovers from technological change: The effects of “DNA envy” on occupational practices in forensic science. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(3):606–643.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky B, Chung D (2018) Latitude or latent control? How occupational embeddedness and control shape emergent coordination. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(3):607–636.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berends H, Deken F (2019) Composing qualitative process research. Strategic Organ. 19(1):134–146.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowker G, Star SL (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences (MIT Press, Boston).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Broom A, Adams J, Tovey P (2009) Evidence-based healthcare in practice: A study of clinician resistance, professional de-skilling, and inter-specialty differentiation in oncology. Soc. Sci. Medicine 68(1):192–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown JS, Duguid P (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. 2(1):40–57.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown JS, Duguid P (2001) Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organ. Sci. 12(2):198–213.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brunsson N, Jacobsson B (2000) A World of Standards (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Bucher S, Langley A (2016) The interplay of reflective and experimental spaces in interrupting and reorienting routine dynamics. Organ. Sci. 27(3):594–613.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Canales R, Bradbury M, Sheldon T (2024) Evidence in practice: How structural and programmatic scaffolds enable knowledge transfer in international development. Admin. Sci. Quart. 69(3):655–710.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carr E (2010) Enactments of expertise. Annual Rev. Anthropology 39:17–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carr E, Obertino H (2022) Legitimizing evidence: The trans-institutional life of evidence-based practice. Soc. Sci. Medicine 310:115130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chown J (2021) The unfolding of control mechanisms inside organizations: Pathways of customization and transmutation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(3):711–752.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collins H, Evans R (2007) Rethinking Expertise (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Compagni A, Cappellaro G, Nigam A (2023) Responding to professional knowledge disruptions of unmitigable uncertainty: The role of emotions, practices, and moral duty among COVID-19 physicians. Acad. Management J. 67(3):829–861.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiBenigno J (2020) Rapid relationality: How peripheral experts build a foundation for influence with line managers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(1):20–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE (2005) Peripheral vision: Expertise in real world contexts. Organ. Stud. 26(5):779–792.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL (1995) Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evans J (2021) How professionals construct moral authority: Expanding boundaries of expert authority in stem cell science. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(4):989–1036.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evans J, Silbey SS (2022) Co-opting regulation: Professional control through discretionary mobilization of legal prescriptions and expert knowledge. Organ. Sci. 33(5):2041–2064.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eyal G (2013) For a sociology of expertise: The social origins of the autism epidemic. Amer. J. Sociol. 118(4):863–907.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freidson E (1970) Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory (Aldine De Gruyter, Berlin).Google Scholar
  • Goode WJ (1960) The profession: Reports and opinion. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 25(6):902–965.Google Scholar
  • Goodrick E, Reay T (2011) Constellations of institutional logics: Changes in the professional work of pharmacists. Work Occupation 38(3):372–416.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gorman EH, Sandefur EH (2011) “Golden age,” quiescence, and revival: How the sociology of professions became the study of knowledge-based work. Work Occupation 38(3):275–302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graebner M, Heimeriks K, Huy Q, Vaara E (2017) The process of post-merger integration: A review and agenda for future research. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):1–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Howard-Grenville J, Nelson A, Earle AG, Haack JA, Young DM (2017) “If chemists don’t do it, who is going to?” Peer-driven occupational change and the emergence of green chemistry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(3):524–560.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huising R (2014) The erosion of expert control through censure episodes. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1633–1661.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huising R (2015) To hive or to hold? Producing professional authority through scut work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(2):263–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the Wild (MIT Press, Boston).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson SR, Kellogg KC (2023) Triadic advocacy work. Organ. Sci. 34(1):456–483.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S, Milde J, Cowan RS (2017) Symbiont practices in boundary spanning: Bridging the cognitive and political divides in interdisciplinary research. Acad. Management J. 60(4):1387–1414.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kellogg KC (2009) Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3):657–711.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kellogg KC (2019) Subordinate activation tactics: Semi-professionals and micro-level institutional change in professional organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(4):928–975.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kellogg KC, Valentine MA, Christin A (2020) Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):366–410.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langley A, Golden-Biddle K, Reay T, Denis J-L, Hébert Y, Lamothe L, Gervais J (2012) Identity struggles in merging organizations: Renegotiating the sameness–Difference dialectic. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 48(2):135–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lebovitz S, Levina N, Lifshitz-Assaf H (2021) Is AI ground truth really true? The dangers of training and evaluating AI tools based on experts’ know-what. MIS Quart. 45(3):1501–1525.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lofland J, Lofland LH (1971) Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA).Google Scholar
  • Majchrzak A, Jarvenpaa SL, Hollingshead AB (2007) Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters. Organ. Sci. 18(1):147–161.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Monin P, Noorderhaven N, Vaara E, Kroon D (2013) Giving sense to and making sense of justice in postmerger integration. Acad. Management J. 56(1):256–284.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson A, Irwin J (2014) “Defining what we do—All over again”: Occupational identity, technological change, and the librarian internet-search relationship. Acad. Management J. 57(3):892–928.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nigam A, Huising R, Golden B (2016) Explaining the selection of routines for change during organizational search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(4):551–583.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ (2002) Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. 13(3):249–273.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orr JE (1996) Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job (ILR Press, Cornell, NY).Google Scholar
  • Pachidi S, Berends H, Faraj S, Huysman M (2020) Make way for the algorithms: Symbolic actions and change in a Regime of Knowing. Organ. Sci. 32(1):18–41.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pakarinen P, Huising R (2023) Relational expertise: What machines can’t know. J. Management Stud. 62(5):2053–2082.Google Scholar
  • Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Raman R, Bharadwaj A (2012) Power differentials and performative deviation paths in practice transfer: The case of evidence-based medicine. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1593–1621.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sandefur RL (2015) Elements of professional expertise: Understanding relational and substantive expertise through lawyers’ impact. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(5):909–933.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sergeeva A, Faraj S, Huysman M (2020) Losing touch: An embodiment perspective on coordination in robotic surgery. Organ. Sci. 31(5):1248–1271.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smets M, Morris T, Greenwood R (2012) From practice to field: A multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change. Acad. Management J. 55(4):877–904.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spradley JP (1979) The Ethnographic Interview (Wadsworth Group, Belmont, CA).Google Scholar
  • Subbiah V (2023) The next generation of evidence-based medicine. Nature Medicine 29(1):49–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas AO, Bakas T, Miller E, Johnson K, Tubbs-Cooley HL (2022) Burnout and turnover among NICU nurses. MCN Amer. J. Maternal Child Nursing 47(1):33–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Timmermans S, Angell A (2001) Evidence-based medicine, clinical uncertainty, and learning to doctor. J. Health Soc. Behav. 42(4):342–359.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Timmermans S, Berg M (1997) Standardization in action: Achieving local universality through medical protocols. Soc. Stud. Sci. 27(2):273–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Timmermans S, Berg M (2003) The Gold Standard: The Challenge of Evidence-Based Medicine and Standardization in Health Care (Temple University Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
  • Timmermans S, Epstein S (2010) A world of standards but not a standard world: Toward a sociology of standards and standardization. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 36:69–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Timmermans S, Kolker E (2004) Evidence-based medicine and the reconfiguration of medical knowledge. J. Health Soc. Behav. 45:177–193.Google Scholar
  • Van Maanen J, Barley SR (1984) Occupational communities: Culture and control in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 6:287–365.Google Scholar
  • Waisberg I, Nelson A (2018) When the general meets the particular: The practices and challenges of interorganizational knowledge reuse. Organ. Sci. 29(3):432–448.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wright AL, Zammuto RF, Liesch PW (2017) Maintaining the values of a profession: Institutional work and moral emotions in the emergency department. Acad. Management J. 60(1):200–237.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.