Attention Focus and New Opportunities: The Moderating Role of Managerial Attention to Alternative Issues

References

• Agarwal R, Tripsas M (2008) Technology and industry evolution. Shane S, ed. The Handbook of Technology and Innovation Management (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, New York), 3–55.Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Novelli E (2016) Incumbent responses to an entrant with a new business model: Resource co-deployment and resource re-deployment strategies. Folta TB, Helfat CE, Karim S, eds. Resource Redeployment and Corporate Strategy (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 125–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres N, Bigelow L, Nickerson JA (2015) Dominant designs, innovation shocks, and the follower’s dilemma. Strategic Management J. 36(2):216–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres N, Mahoney JT, Nickerson J (2019) Strategic responses to shocks: Comparative adjustment costs, transaction costs, and opportunity costs. Strategic Management J. 40(3):357–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker B, Derfler-Rozin R, Pitesa M, Johnson M (2019) Stock market responses to unethical behavior in organizations: An organizational context model. Organ. Sci. 30(2):319–336.Link, Google Scholar
• Barr PS (1998) Adapting to unfamiliar environmental events: A look at the evolution of interpretation and its role in strategic change. Organ. Sci. 9(6):644–669.Link, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tushman M (2002) Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(4):676–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brielmaier C, Friesl M (2023) The attention-based view: Review and conceptual extension toward situated attention. Internat. J. Management Rev. 25(1):99–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bun MJG, Harrison TD (2019) OLS and IV estimation of regression models including endogenous interaction terms. Econometric Rev. 38(7):814–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caldecott B, McDaniels J (2014) Financial dynamics of the environment: Risks, impacts, and barriers to resilience. Working paper, Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
• Castellaneta F, Zollo M (2015) The dimensions of experiential learning in the management of activity load. Organ. Sci. 26(1):140–157.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen G, Meyer-Doyle P, Shi W (2021) Hedge fund investor activism and human capital loss. Strategic Management J. 42(12):2328–2354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cho TS, Hambrick DC (2006) Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organ. Sci. 17(4):453–469.Link, Google Scholar
• Christensen CM (2006) The ongoing process of building a theory of disruption. J. Product Innovation Management 23(1):39–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, Bower JL (1996) Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management J. 17(3):197–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cretys J, Guccione L (2015) The economics of grid defection. Rocky Mountain Institute. Accessed August 19, 2021, https://rmi.org/insight/economics-grid-defection/.Google Scholar
• Cusumano MA, Kahl SJ, Suarez FF (2015) Services, industry evolution, and the competitive strategies of product firms. Strategic Management J. 36(4):559–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Defeuilley C (2009) Retail competition in electricity markets. Energy Policy 37(2):377–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delmas M, Tokat Y (2005) Deregulation, governance structures, and efficiency: The U.S. electric utility sector. Strategic Management J. 26(5):441–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res. Policy 11(3):147–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutt N, Joseph J (2019) Regulatory uncertainty, corporate structure, and strategic agendas: Evidence from the U.S. renewable electricity industry. Acad. Management J. 62(3):800–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Fahey L, Narayanan VK (1983) Toward understanding strategic issue diagnosis. Strategic Management J. 4(4):307–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Kaplan S (2009) Cognition and renewal: Comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organ. Sci. 20(2):461–477.Link, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Park KF (2018) Incumbent adaptation to technological change: The past, present, and future of research on heterogeneous incumbent response. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):357–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisner AB, Shapira Z (1997) Attention Allocation and Managerial Decision Making (Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY).Google Scholar
• Eklund JC (2022) The knowledge-incentive tradeoff: Understanding the relationship between research and development decentralization and innovation. Strategic Management J. 43(12):2478–2509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eklund J, Kapoor R (2019) Pursuing the new while sustaining the current: Incumbent strategies and firm value during the nascent period of industry change. Organ. Sci. 30(2):383–404.Link, Google Scholar
• Eklund JC, Mannor MJ (2021) Keep your eye on the ball or on the field? Exploring the performance implications of executive strategic attention. Acad. Management J. 64(6):1685–1713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Energy Information Administration (2016) Medium-Term Renewable Energy Market Report (Energy Information Administration, Paris).Google Scholar
• Fabrizio KR (2012) Institutions, capabilities, and contracts: Make or buy in the electric utility industry. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1264–1281.Link, Google Scholar
• Ginsberg A, Venkatraman N (1992) Investing in new information technology: The role of competitive posture and issue diagnosis. Strategic Management J. 13(S1):37–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC (1982) Environmental scanning and organizational strategy. Strategic Management J. 3(2):159–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Kim BK (2014) Great, Madama Butterfly again! How robust market identity shapes opera repertoires. Organ. Sci. 25(1):109–126.Link, Google Scholar
• Joseph J, Wilson AJ (2018) The growth of the firm: An attention-based view. Strategic Management J. 39(6):1779–1800.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joskow P (2006) Introduction to electricity sector liberalization: Lessons learned from cross-country studies. Sioshansi FP, Pfaffenberger W, eds. Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective (Elsevier, Oxford, UK), 1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2008) Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 19(5):729–752.Link, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Murray F, Henderson R (2003) Discontinuities and senior management: Assessing the role of recognition in pharmaceutical firm response to biotechnology. Indust. Corporate Change 12(2):203–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Adner R (2012) What firms make vs. what they know: How firms’ production and knowledge boundaries affect competitive advantage in the face of technological change. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1227–1248.Link, Google Scholar
• Kiss AN, Barr PS (2015) New venture strategic adaptation: The interplay of belief structures and industry context. Strategic Management J. 36(8):1245–1263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• König A, Mammen J, Luger J, Fehn A, Enders A (2018) Silver bullet or ricochet? CEOs’ use of metaphorical communication and infomediaries’ evaluations. Acad. Management J. 61(4):1196–1230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee J (2016) Can investors detect managers’ lack of spontaneity? Adherence to predetermined scripts during earnings conference calls. Accounting Rev. 91(1):229–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee JM, Hwang BH, Chen H (2017) Are founder CEOs more overconfident than professional CEOs? Evidence from S&P 1500 companies. Strategic Management J. 38(3):751–769.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D, Rerup C (2006) Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 17(4):502–513.Link, Google Scholar
• Li Q, Maggitti PG, Smith KG, Tesluk PE, Katila R (2013) Top management attention to innovation: The role of search selection and intensity in new product introductions. Acad. Management J. 56(3):893–916.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mannor MJ, Wowak AJ, Bartkus VO, Gomez-Mejia LR (2016) Heavy lies the crown? How job anxiety affects top executive decision making in gain and loss contexts. Strategic Management J. 37(9):1968–1989.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Massa L, Tucci CL, Afuah A (2017) A critical assessment of business model research. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):73–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKenny AF, Short JC, Payne GT (2013) Using computer-aided text analysis to elevate constructs: An illustration using psychological capital. Organ. Res. Methods 16(1):152–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadkarni S, Barr PS (2008) Environmental context, managerial cognition, and strategic action: An integrated view. Strategic Management J. 29(13):1395–1427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nizalova O, Murtazashvili I (2016) Exogenous treatment and endogenous factors: Vanishing of omitted variable bias on the interaction term. J. Econom. Methods 5(1):71–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Toward an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18:187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (2011) Attention to attention. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1286–1296.Link, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W, Joseph J (2005) An attention-based theory of strategy formulation: Linking micro- and macroperspectives in strategy processes. Szulanski G, Porac J, Doz Y, eds. Strategy Process, vol. 22 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 39–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W, Joseph J (2018) The attention-based view of great strategies. Strategy Sci. 3(1):289–294.Link, Google Scholar
• Palepu K (1985) Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure. Strategic Management J. 6(3):239–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pan L, McNamara G, Lee JJ, Haleblian J, Devers CE (2018) Give it to us straight (most of the time): Top managers’ use of concrete language and its effect on investor reactions. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2204–2225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennebaker JW, Francis ME, Booth RJ (2001) Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC 2001 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Penrose E (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, 4th ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Petersen MA (2009) Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(1):435–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfarrer MD, Pollock TG, Rindova VP (2010) A tale of two assets: The effects of firm reputation and celebrity on earnings surprises and investors’ reactions. Acad. Management J. 53(5):1131–1152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhee L (2024) CEO attentional vigilance: Behavioral implications for the pursuit of exploration. Acad. Management J., ePub ahead of print January 11, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2022.0950.Google Scholar
• Rhee L, Ocasio W, Kim TH (2019) Performance feedback in hierarchical business groups: The cross-level effects of cognitive accessibility on R&D search behavior. Organ. Sci. 30(1):51–69.Link, Google Scholar
• Shepherd DA, McMullen JS, Ocasio W (2017) Is that an opportunity? An attention model of top managers’ opportunity beliefs for strategic action. Strategic Management J. 38(3):626–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi W, Connelly BL, Cirik K (2018) Short seller influence on firm growth: A threat rigidity perspective. Acad. Management J. 61(5):1892–1919.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi W, Connelly BL, Mackey JD, Gupta A (2019) Placing their bets: The influence of strategic investment on CEO pay-for-performance. Strategic Management J. 40(12):2047–2077.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Short JC, Broberg JC, Cogliser CC, Brigham KH (2010) Construct validation using computer-aided text analysis (CATA): An illustration using entrepreneurial orientation. Organ. Res. Methods 13(2):320–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Souder D, Zaheer A, Sapienza H, Ranucci R (2017) How family influence, socioemotional wealth, and competitive conditions shape new technology adoption. Strategic Management J. 38(9):1774–1790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suarez FF, Utterback J, von Gruben P, Kang HY (2018) The hybrid trap: Why most efforts to bridge old and new technology miss the mark. Sloan Management Rev. 59(3):52–57.Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• The Economist (2013) How to lose half a trillion euros. The Economist Online (October 15), https://www.economist.com/briefing/2013/10/15/how-to-lose-half-a-trillion-euros.Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (1997) Surviving radical technological change through dynamic capability: Evidence from the typesetter industry. Indust. Corporate Change 6(2):341–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (2009) Technology, identity, and inertia through the lens of “the digital photography company.” Organ. Sci. 20(2):441–460.Link, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10/11):1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner N, Swart J, Maylor H (2013) Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: A review and research agenda. Internat. J. Management Rev. 15(3):317–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM (2006) Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organ. Sci. 17(4):514–524.Link, Google Scholar
• Wu B, Wan Z, Levinthal DA (2014) Complementary assets as pipes and prisms: Innovation incentives and trajectory choices. Strategic Management J. 35(9):1257–1278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zott C, Amit R, Massa L (2011) The business model: Recent developments and future research. J. Management 37(4):1019–1042.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuzul T, Tripsas M (2020) Start-up inertia vs. flexibility: The role of founder identity in a nascent industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):395–433.Crossref, Google Scholar