Measure Twice, Cut Once: Unit Profitability, Scalability, and the Exceptional Growth of New Firms

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.15970

References

  • Adams GS, Converse BA, Hales AH, Klotz LE (2021) People systematically overlook subtractive changes. Nature 592(7853):258–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R, Bacco F, Camuffo A, Coali A, Gambardella A, Msangi H, Sonka ST, Temu A, Waized B, Wormald A (2024) Does a theory-of-value add value? Evidence from a randomized control trial with Tanzanian entrepreneurs. Working paper, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
  • Andreessen M (2007) Pmarchive: The only thing that matters. The Pmarca guide to startups. Accessed August 1, 2023, https://pmarchive.com/guide_to_startups_part4.html.Google Scholar
  • Andries P, Debackere K, Van Looy B (2013) Simultaneous experimentation as a learning strategy: Business model development under uncertainty. Accessed August 1, 2023, Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 7(4):288–310.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Applegate LM (2002) Amazon.com: 1994–2000. Harvard Business School Case 801-194, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman CM (2006) The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behaviour. Acad. Management J. 49(4):741–758.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benner MJ, Tripsas M (2012) The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management J. 33(3):277–302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bingham CB, Davis JP (2012) Learning sequences: Their existence, effect, and evolution. Acad. Management J. 55(3):611–641.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bingham CB, Eisenhardt KM (2011) Rational heuristics: The ‘simple rules’ that strategists learn from process experience. Strategic Management J. 32(13):1437–1464.Google Scholar
  • Bingham CB, Eisenhardt KM, Furr NR (2007) What makes a process a capability? Heuristics, strategy, and effective capture of opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 1(1–2):27–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Birch DL (1981) Who creates jobs. Public Interest 65:3–14.Google Scholar
  • Blank S (2013) Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Bus. Rev. 91(5):63–72.Google Scholar
  • Bohan S, Tippmann E, Levie J, Igoe J, Bowers B (2024) What is scaling? J. Bus. Venturing 39(1):1–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bremner RP, Eisenhardt KM (2022) Organizing form, experimentation, and performance: Innovation in the nascent civilian drone industry. Organ. Sci. 33(4):1645–1674.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Camuffo A, Cordova A, Gambardella A, Spina C (2020) A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Management Sci. 66(2):564–586.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Camuffo A, Gambardella A, Messinese D, Novelli E, Paolucci E, Spina C (2024) A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision‐making: Large‐scale replication and extension. Strategic Management J. 45(6):1209–1237.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cardinal LB, Sitkin SB, Long CP (2004) Balancing and rebalancing in the creation and evolution of organizational control. Organ. Sci. 15(4):411–431.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chandler AD (1962) Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Empire (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Chatterji AK (2009) Spawned with a silver spoon? Entrepreneurial performance and innovation in the medical device industry. Strategic Management J. 30(2):185–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen J (2020) Series A funding, Investopedia. Accessed August 1, 2023, https://www.investopediacom/terms/seriesa.asp.Google Scholar
  • Chi MT, Feltovich PJ, Glaser R (1981) Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Sci. 5(2):121–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clough DR, Wu A (2022) Artificial intelligence, data-driven learning, and the decentralized structure of platform ecosystems. Acad. Management Rev. 47(1):184–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen S, Bingham CB, Hallen BL (2019) The role of accelerator designs in mitigating bounded rationality in new ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(4):810–854.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davidsson P, Steffens P, Fitzsimmons J (2009) Growing profitable or growing from profits: Putting the horse in front of the cart? J. Bus. Venturing 24(4):388–406.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Desai V, Madsen P (2022) Take your time? How activity timing affects organizational learning and performance outcomes. Organ. Sci. 33(5):1707–1723.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DeSantola A, Gulati R (2017) Scaling: Organizing and growth in entrepreneurial ventures. Acad. Management Ann. 11(2):640–668.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dosi G (2023) The Foundations of Complex Evolving Economies: Part One: Innovation, Organization, and Industrial Dynamics (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dosi G, Nelson RR, Winter SG (2001) Introduction. Dosi G, Nelson RR, Winter SG, eds. The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities (Oxford University Press, New York), 1–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eggers JP, Kaplan S (2013) Cognition and capabilities: A multi-level perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):295–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM (2021) What is the Eisenhardt method, really? Strategic Organ. 19(1):147–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2017) Superior strategy in entrepreneurial settings: Thinking, doing, and the logic of opportunity. Strategy Sci. 2(4):246–257.Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM, Schoonhoven CB (1990) Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(3):504–529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenmann TR (2006) Internet companies’ growth strategies: Determinants of investment intensity and long‐term performance. Strategic Management J. 27(12):1183–1204.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felin T, Zenger TR (2017) The theory-based view: Economic actors as theorists. Strategy Sci. 2(4):258–271.Google Scholar
  • Fisher G, Kotha S, Lahiri A (2016) Changing with the times: An integrated view of identity, legitimacy, and new venture life cycles. Acad. Management Rev. 41(3):383–409.Google Scholar
  • Furr N, Ahlstrom P (2011) Nail It Then Scale It: The Entrepreneur’s Guide to Creating and Managing Breakthrough Innovation (Nisi Institute, Lexington, KY).Google Scholar
  • Furr N, Eisenhardt KM (2021) Strategy and uncertainty: Resource-based view, strategy-creation view, and the hybrid between them. J. Management 47(7):1915–1935.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Furr N, Ozcan P, Eisenhardt KM (2022) What is digital transformation? Core tensions facing established companies on the global stage. Global Strategy J. 12(4):595–618.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galunic DC, Eisenhardt KM (1996) The evolution of intracorporate domains: Divisional charter losses in high-technology, multidivisional corporations. Organ. Sci. 7(3):255–282.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Galunic DC, Eisenhardt KM (2001) Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1229–1249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gans JS, Stern S, Wu J (2019) Foundations of entrepreneurial strategy. Strategic Management J. 40(5):736–756.Google Scholar
  • Gary MS, Wood RE (2011) Mental models, decision rules, and performance heterogeneity. Strategic Management J. 32(6):569–594.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gersick CJ (1989) Marking time: Predictable transitions in work groups. Acad. Management J. 32(2):274–309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibson CB, Birkinshaw J (2004) The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. 47(2):209–226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilbert CG (2005) Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource vs. routine rigidity. Acad. Management J. 48(5):741–763.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giustiziero G, Kretschmer T, Somaya D, Wu B (2023) Hyperspecialization and hyperscaling: A resource‐based theory of the digital firm. Strategic Management J. 44(6):1391–1424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Wiedenfeld and Nicholson, London).Google Scholar
  • Gonzalez-Uribe J, Leatherbee M (2018) The effects of business accelerators on venture performance: Evidence from Start-Up Chile. Rev. Financial Stud. 31(4):1566–1603.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graebner ME, Eisenhardt KM (2004) The seller's side of the story: Acquisition as courtship and governance as syndicate in entrepreneurial firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(3):366–403.Google Scholar
  • Grimes MG (2018) The pivot: How founders respond to feedback through idea and identity work. Acad. Management J. 61(5):1692–1717.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grimes M, Busch C, Von Krogh G, Eisenhardt KM (2024) Eureka!! Overcoming the cross cutting effects of artificial intelligence on serendipitous innovation. Working paper, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  • Hallen BL, Hallen EW (2024) Why we need more research on the “Mighty Middle” of entrepreneurship. Working paper, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
  • Hallen BL, Cohen SL, Bingham CB (2020) Do accelerators work? If so, how? Organ. Sci. 31(2):378–414.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hannah DP, Eisenhardt KM (2018) How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 39(12):3163–3192.Google Scholar
  • Helfat CE, Winter SG (2011) Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: Strategy for the (n)ever‐changing world. Strategic Management J. 32(11):1243–1250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hellmann T, Puri M (2002) Venture capital and the professionalization of start‐up firms: Empirical evidence. J. Finance 57(1):169–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heshmati M, Csaszar FA (2024) Learning strategic representations: Exploring the effects of taking a strategy course. Organ. Sci. 35(2):453–473.Google Scholar
  • Hoffman R, Yeh C (2018) Blitzscaling: The Lightning-Fast Path to Building Massively Valuable Companies (Currency, New York).Google Scholar
  • Huckman RS, Pisano GP, Kind L (2012) Amazon web services. Harvard Business School Case 9-609-048, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Jansen JJ, Heavey C, Mom TJ, Simsek Z, Zahra SA (2023) Scaling‐up: Building, leading and sustaining rapid growth over time. J. Management Stud. 60(3):581–604.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joseph J, Ocasio W (2012) Architecture, attention, and adaptation in the multibusiness firm: General Electric from 1951 to 2001. Strategic Management J. 33(6):633–660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joseph J, Wilson AJ (2018) The growth of the firm: An attention‐based view. Strategic Management J. 39(6):1779–1800.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karim S (2009) Business unit reorganization and innovation in new product markets. Management Sci. 55(7):1237–1254.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kirtley J, O’Mahony S (2023) What is a pivot? Explaining when and how entrepreneurial firms decide to make strategic change and pivot. Strategic Management J. 44(1):197–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiss AN, Barr PS (2015) New venture strategic adaptation: The interplay of belief structures and industry context. Strategic Management J. 36(8):1245–1263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper S, Simons KL (2000) Dominance by birthright: Entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the U.S. television receiver industry. Strategic Management J. 21(10/11):997–1016.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koutstaal W (2012) The Agile Mind (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langley A, Meziani N (2020) Making interviews meaningful. J. Appl. Behavioral Sci. 56(3):370–391.Google Scholar
  • Lee S, Kim JD (2024) When do startups scale? Large‐scale evidence from job postings. Strategic Management J. 45(9):1633–1669.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leiponen A, Helfat CE (2010) Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth. Strategic Management J. 31(2):224–236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • MacCormack A, Rusnak J, Baldwin CY (2006) Exploring the structure of complex software designs: An empirical study of open source and proprietary code. Management Sci. 52(7):1015–1030.Google Scholar
  • Mack DZ, Cho TS, Yi AC (2024) Attentional engagement and strategic responses to discontinuous environmental change: Evidence from the US banking industry. Strategic Organ. 22(1):49–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mansikkamäki S (2023) Firm growth and profitability: The role of age and size in shifts between growth–profitability configurations. J. Bus. Venturing Insights 19:e00372.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marx M, Hsu DH (2015) Strategic switchbacks: Dynamic commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Res. Policy 44(10):1815–1826.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McDonald R, Eisenhardt KM (2020) Parallel play: Startups, nascent markets, and effective business-model design. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):483–523.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McDonald R, Gao C (2019) Pivoting isn’t enough? Managing strategic reorientation in new ventures. Organ. Sci. 30(6):1289–1318.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miller KD, Martignoni D (2016) Organizational learning with forgetting: Reconsidering the exploration–exploitation tradeoff. Strategic Organ. 14(1):53–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller A, O’Mahony S, Cohen SL (2024) Opening the aperture: Explaining the complementary roles of advice and testing when forming entrepreneurial strategy. Organ. Sci. 35(1):1–26.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Monsell S (2003) Task switching. Trends Cognitive Sci. 7(3):134–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Motley DC, Eesley CE, Koo W (2023) Born into chaos: How founding conditions shape whether ventures survive or thrive when experiencing environmental change. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 17(2):408–444.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moulton C, Regehr G, Lingard L, Merritt C, Macrae H (2010) Slowing down to stay out of trouble in the operating room: Remaining attentive in automaticity. Acad. Medicine 85(10):1571–1577.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murray A, Rhymer J, Sirmon DG (2021) Humans and technology: Forms of conjoined agency in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 46(3):552–571.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neisser U (1976) Cognition and Reality: Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology (WH Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co, New York).Google Scholar
  • Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Novelli E, Spina C (2024) Making business model decisions like scientists: Strategic commitment, uncertainty, and economic performance. Strategic Management J., ePub ahead of print July 9, https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3636.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W (1997) Toward an attention‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W (2011) Attention to attention. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1286–1296.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ott TE, Eisenhardt KM (2020) Decision weaving: Forming novel, complex strategy in entrepreneurial settings. Strategic Management J. 41(12):2275–2314.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ott TE, Hannah DP (2025) The origins of entrepreneurial theories: How entrepreneurs craft complex causal models with theorizing and data. Strategy Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Ott TE, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2017) Strategy formation in entrepreneurial settings: Past insights and future directions. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 11(3):306–325.Google Scholar
  • Ozcan CP, Eisenhardt KM (2009) Origin of alliance portfolios: Entrepreneurs, network strategies and firm performance. Acad. Management J. 52(2):246–279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Patel N (2015) How to avoid the premature scaling death trap. Entrepreneur Magazine Online (April 30), https://www.entrepreneur.com/growing-a-business/how-to-avoid-the-premature-scaling-death-trap/245603.Google Scholar
  • Penrose E (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Perlow LA, Okhuysen GA, Repenning N (2002) The speed trap: Exploring the relationship between decision making and temporal context. Acad. Management J. 45(5):931–955.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peterson A, Wu A (2021) Entrepreneurial learning and strategic foresight. Strategic Management J. 42(13):2357–2388.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pisano GP (2024) How fast should your company really grow? Harvard Bus. Rev. 102(2):38–45.Google Scholar
  • Rachleff A (2013) Why you should find product-market fit before sniffing around for venture money. Fast Company (July 25), https://www.fastcompany.com/3014841/why-you-should-find-product-market-fit-before-sniffing-around-for-venture-money.Google Scholar
  • Raffaelli R (2019) Technology reemergence: Creating new value for old technologies in Swiss mechanical watchmaking, 1970–2008. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(3):576–618.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raisch S, Fomina K (2024) Combining human and artificial intelligence: Hybrid problem-solving in organizations. Acad. Management Rev., ePub ahead of print January 5, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2021.0421.Google Scholar
  • Rhee L (2024) CEO attentional vigilance: Behavioral implications for the pursuit of exploration. Acad. Management J., ePub ahead of print January 11, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2022.0950.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ries E (2011) The Lean Startup (Crown Business, New York).Google Scholar
  • Rindova VP, Kotha S (2001) Continuous “morphing”: Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1263–1280.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rubinstein JS, Meyer DE, Evans JE (2001) Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. J. Experiment. Psych. Human Perception Performance 27(4):763–797.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S, Stuart T (2002) Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Sci. 48(1):154–170.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shepherd DA, Patzelt H (2022) A call for research on the scaling of organizations and the scaling of social impact. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 46(2):255–268.Google Scholar
  • Shepherd DA, McMullen JS, Ocasio W (2017) Is that an opportunity? An attention model of top managers' opportunity beliefs for strategic action. Strategic Management J. 38(3):626–644.Google Scholar
  • Smith WK, Lewis MW (2011) Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):381–403.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snihur Y, Eisenhardt KM (2022) Looking forward, looking back: Strategic organization and the business model concept. Strategic Organ. 20(4):757–770.Google Scholar
  • Snihur Y, Zott C (2020) The genesis and metamorphosis of novelty imprints: How business model innovation emerges in young ventures. Acad. Management J. 63(2):554–583.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Startup Genome (2011) Why startups fail—Premature scaling. Accessed August 1, 2023, https://startupgenome.com/reports/startup-genome-why-startups-fail-premature-scaling.Google Scholar
  • Sull D, Eisenhardt KM (2015) Simple Rules: How to Succeed in a Complex World (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York).Google Scholar
  • Varga S, Cholakova M, Jansen JJ, Mom TJ, Kok GJ (2023) From platform growth to platform scaling: The role of decision rules and network effects over time. J. Bus. Venturing 38(6):106346.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Volmar E, Eisenhardt K (2025) Mavericks and diplomats: Bridging commercial and institutional entrepreneurship for society’s grand challenges. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print September 9, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.13810.Google Scholar
  • Vella M, Bradley R (2012) Airbnb CEO—Grow fast but not too fast. Fortune (July 18), https://fortune.com/2012/07/18/airbnb-ceo-grow-fast-but-not-too-fast%E2%80%A8/amp/.Google Scholar
  • Wells JR, Weinstock B, Danskin G, Ellsworth G (2019) Amazon.com, 2019. Harvard Business School Case 9-716-402, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 5(2):171–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yin RK (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Zellweger T, Zenger T (2023) Entrepreneurs as scientists: A pragmatist approach to producing value out of uncertainty. Acad. Management Rev. 48(3):379–408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. 13(3):339–351.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zott C, Amit R (2007) Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organ. Sci. 18(2):181–199.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zuzul T, Tripsas M (2020) Founder identity and firm flexibility in nascent industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):395–433.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.