Centralization and Organization Reproduction: Ethnic Innovation in R&D Centers and Satellite Locations

References

• Agrawal A, Kapur D, McHale J (2008) How do spatial and social proximity influence knowledge flows? Evidence from patent data. J. Urban Econom. 64(2):258–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akcigit U, Caicedo S, Miguelez E, Stantcheva S, Sterzi V (2018) Dancing with the stars: Innovation through interactions. NBER Working Paper No. 24466, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Alcacer J, Delgado M (2016) Spatial organization of firms and location choices through the value chain. Management Sci. 62(11):3213–3234.Link, Google Scholar
• Alcacer J, Zhao M (2012) Local R&D strategies and multilocation firms: The role of internal linkages. Management Sci. 58(4):734–753.Link, Google Scholar
• Allen T (1977) Managing the Flow of Technology (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Almeida P, Kogut B (1999) Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. 45(7):905–917.Link, Google Scholar
• Almeida P, Phene A, Li S (2014) The influence of ethnic community knowledge on Indian inventor innovativeness. Organ. Sci. 26(1):198–217.Link, Google Scholar
• Amis JM, Mair J, Munir KA (2020) The organizational reproduction of inequality. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):195–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Silverman BS (2004) R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):929–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Lia S (2021a) Knowledge spillovers and corporate investment in scientific research. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(3):871–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Lia S (2021b) Matching patents to Compustat firms, 1980–2015: Dynamic reassignment, name changes, and ownership structures. Res. Policy 50(5):104217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Rios LA (2014) Make, buy, organize: The interplay between research, external knowledge, and firm structure. Strategic Management J. 35(3):317–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audretsch D, Feldman M (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):630–640.Google Scholar
• Bahar D, Rapoport H (2018) Migration, knowledge diffusion and the comparative advantage of nations. Econom. J. (London) 128(612):F273–F305.Google Scholar
• Bahar D, Choudhury P, Glennon B (2020) An executive order worth $100 billion: The impact of an immigration ban’s announcement on Fortune 500 firms’ valuation. NBER Working Paper No. 27997, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Balachandran S, Hernandez E (2021) Mi casa es tu casa: Immigrant entrepreneurs as pathways to foreign venture capital investments. Strategic Management J. 42(11):2047–2083.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C, Clark K (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bamford CE, Dean TJ, McDougall PP (2000) An examination of the impact of initial founding conditions and decisions upon the performance of new bank start-ups. J. Bus. Venturing 15(3):253–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron JN, Hannan MT, Burton MD (2001) Labor pains: Change in organizational models and employee turnover in young, high-tech firms. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(4):960–1012.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein S, Giroud X, Townsend R (2016) The impact of venture capital monitoring. J. Finance 71(4):1591–1622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein S, Diamond R, McQuade T, Pousada B (2022) The contribution of high-skilled immigrants to innovation in the United States. NBER Working Paper No. 30797, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Boeker W (1989) Strategic change: The effects of founding and history. Acad. Management J. 32(3):489–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Branstetter L, Glennon B, Jensen JB (2018) The IT revolution and the globalization of R&D. Lerner J, Stern S, eds. NBER Innovation Policy and the Economy, vol. 18 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL), 1–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breschi S, Lissoni F, Miguelez E (2017) Foreign inventors in the US: Testing for diaspora and brain gain effects. J. Human Resources 17(5):1009–1038.Google Scholar
• Burton MD, Beckman CM (2007) Leaving a legacy: Position imprints and successor turnover in young firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 72(2):239–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byrne D (1971) The Attraction Paradigm (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Carlino G, Kerr WR (2015) Agglomeration and innovation. Duranton G, Henderson JV, Strange, WC, eds. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. 5 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), 349–404.Google Scholar
• Castellani D, Perri A, Scalera VG (2022) Knowledge integration in multinational enterprises: The role of inventors crossing national and organizational boundaries. J. World Bus. 57(3):101290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choudhury P (2016) Return migration and geography of innovation in MNEs: A natural experiment of knowledge production by local workers reporting to return migrants. J. Econom. Geography 16(3):585–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choudhury P (2017) Innovation outcomes in a distributed organization: Intrafirm mobility and access to resources. Organ. Sci. 28(2):339–354.Link, Google Scholar
• Choudhury P (2022) Geographic mobility, immobility, and geographic flexibility—A review and agenda for research on the changing geography of work. Acad. Management Ann. 16(1):258–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choudhury P, Kim DY (2019) The ethnic migrant inventor effect: Codification and recombination of knowledge across borders. Strategic Management J. 40(2):203–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choudhury P, Khanna T, Sevcenko V (2022) Firm-induced migration paths and strategic human-capital outcomes. Management Sci. 69(1):419–445.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delgado M (2020) The co-location of innovation and production in clusters. Indust. Innovation 27(8):842–870.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimmock SG, Huang J, Weisbenner S (2021) Give me your tired, your poor, your high-skilled labor: H-1B lottery outcomes and entrepreneurial success. Management Sci. 68(9):6950–6970.Link, Google Scholar
• Docquier F, Rapoport H (2012) Globalization, brain drain, and development. J. Econom. Literature 50(3):681–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doran K, Gelber A, Isen A (2022) The effects of high-skill immigration on firms: Evidence from H-1B visa lotteries. J. Political Econom. 130(10):2501–2533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duranton G, Combes PP (2006) Labour pooling, labour poaching and spatial clustering. Regional Sci. Urban Econom. 36(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eklund J (2022) The knowledge-incentive tradeoff: Understanding the relationship between research and development decentralization and innovation. Strategic Management J. 43(12):2478–2509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eklund J, Kapoor R (2021) Mind the gaps: How organization design shapes the sourcing of inventions. Organ. Sci. 33(4):1319–1339.Link, Google Scholar
• Ertug G, Brennecke J, Kovács B, Zou T (2022) What does homophily do? A review of the consequences of homophily. Acad. Management Ann. 16(1):38–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferrucci E, Lissoni F (2019) Foreign inventors in Europe and the United States: Diversity and patent quality. Res. Policy 48(9):103774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, King C, Juda A (2007) Small worlds and regional innovation. Organ. Sci. 18(2):938–954.Link, Google Scholar
• Foley CF, Kerr WR (2013) Ethnic innovation and U.S. multinational firm activity. Management Sci. 59(7):1529–1544.Link, Google Scholar
• Glennon B (2023) How do restrictions on high-skilled immigration affect offshoring? Evidence from the H-1B program. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Hall B, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper No. 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman J (1977) The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. 82(5):929–964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman J (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 49(2):149–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hegde D, Tumlinson J (2014) Does social proximity enhance business partnerships? Theory and evidence from ethnicity’s role in U.S. venture capital. Management Sci. 60(9):2355–2380.Link, Google Scholar
• Hernandez E (2014) Finding a home away from home: Effects of immigrants on firms’ foreign location choice and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(1):73–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hernandez E, Kulchina E (2020) Immigrants and foreign firm performance. Organ. Sci. 31(4):797–820.Link, Google Scholar
• Kanter RM (1977) Men and Women of the Corporation (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Karim S, Williams C (2012) Structural knowledge: How executive experience with structural composition affects intra-firm mobility and unit reconfiguration. Strategic Management J. 33(6):681–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr SP, Kerr WR (2018) Global collaborative patents. Econom. J. (London) 128(612):F235–F272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr SP, Kerr WR, Lincoln WF (2015) Skilled immigration and the employment structures of U.S. firms. J. Labor Econom. 33(S1):S147–S186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr WR (2007) The ethnic composition of U.S. inventors. Harvard Business School Working Paper 08-006, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Kerr WR (2019) The Gift of Global Talent: How Migration Shapes Business, Economy & Society (Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA).Google Scholar
• Kerr WR, Lincoln W (2010) The supply side of innovation: H-1B visa reforms and U.S. ethnic invention. J. Labor Econom. 28(3):473–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr WR, Robert-Nicoud F (2020) Tech clusters. J. Econom. Perspect. 34(3):50–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kimberly JR (1979) Issues in the creation of organizations: Initiation, innovation, and institutionalization. Acad. Management J. 22(3):437–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM, Stuart TE, Tushman ML (2013) Discretion within constraint: Homophily and structure in a formal organization. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1316–1336.Link, Google Scholar
• Kriauciunas A, Kale P (2006) The impact of socialist imprinting and search on resource change: A study of firms in Lithuania. Strategic Management J. 27(7):659–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lahiri N (2010) Geographic distribution of R&D activity: How does it affect innovation quality? Acad. Management J. 53(5):1194–1209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence BS, Shah NP (2020) Homophily: Measures and meaning. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):513–597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12(1):1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiponen A, Helfat CE (2011) Location, decentralization, and knowledge sources for innovation. Organ. Sci. 22(3):641–658.Link, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Wulf J (2007) Innovation and incentives: Evidence from corporate R&D. Rev. Econom. Statist. 89(4):634–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li G, Lai R, Doolin D, D’Amour A, Yu A, Sun Y, Torvik V, Fleming L (2014) Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the U.S. patent inventor database, 1975–2010. Res. Policy 43(6):941–955.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madsen TL, Mosakowski E, Zaheer S (2003) Knowledge retention and personnel mobility: The nondisruptive effects of inflows of experience. Organ. Sci. 14(2):173–191.Link, Google Scholar
• Marino A, Mudambi R, Perri A, Scalera VG (2020) Ties that bind: Ethnic inventors in multinational enterprises’ knowledge integration and exploitation. Res. Policy 49(9):103956.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Tilcsik A (2013) Imprinting: Toward a multilevel theory. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):195–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayda AM, Ortega F, Peri G, Shih K, Sparber C (2018) The effect of the H-1B quota on the employment and selection of foreign-born labor. Eur. Econom. Rev. 108:105–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson JM, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27(1):415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miguelez E (2019) Collaborative patents and the mobility of knowledge workers. Technovation 86–87:62–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miguelez E, Fink C (2017) Measuring the international mobility of inventors: A new database. The International Mobility of Talent and Innovation—New Evidence and Policy Implications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moretti E (2021) The effect of high-tech clusters on the productivity of top inventors. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(10):3328–3375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nerkar A, Paruchuri S (2005) Evolution of R&D capabilities: The role of knowledge networks within a firm. Management Sci. 15(5):771–785.Link, Google Scholar
• Nguyen KT (2020) Trust and innovation within the firm: Evidence from matched CEO-firm data. Working paper, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
• Peri G, Shih K, Sparber C (2015) STEM workers, H-1B visas, and productivity in US cities. J. Labor Econom. 33(S1):S225–S255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Png IPL (2019) U.S. R&D, 1975–1998: A new dataset. Strategic Management J. 40(5):715–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rauch J (2001) Business and social networks in international trade. J. Econom. Literature 39(4):1177–1203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivera LA (2015) Go with your gut: Emotion and evaluation in job interviews. Amer. J. Sociol. 120(5):1339–1389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruiz Castro M, Holvino E (2016) Applying intersectionality in organizations: Inequality markers, cultural scripts and advancement practices in a professional service firm. Gender Work Organ. 23(3):328–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saxenian AL (2006) The New Argonauts (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Saxenian AL, Motoyama Y, Quan X (2002) Local and global networks of immigrant professionals in Silicon Valley (Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Schein EH (1983) The role of the founder in creating organizational culture. Organ. Dynamics 12(1):13–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver JM, Flyer F (2000) Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States. Strategic Management Rev. 21(12):1175–1193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh J (2005) Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Sci. 51(5):756–770.Link, Google Scholar
• Singh J (2008) Distributed R&D, cross-regional knowledge integration and quality of innovative output. Res. Policy 37(1):77–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe AL (1965) Social structure and organizations. March JP, ed. Handbook of Organizations (Rand McNally, Chicago), 142–193.Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe AL (2000) Social structure and organizations. Economics Meets Sociology in Strategic Management (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tecu I (2013) The location of industrial innovation: Does manufacturing matter? US Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies Paper No. CES-WP-13-09, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Tzabbar D, Cirillo B, Breschi S (2021) The differential impact of intrafirm collaboration and technological network centrality on employees’ likelihood of leaving the firm. Organ. Sci. 33(6):2250–2273.Link, Google Scholar
• Waeger D, Weber K (2019) Institutional complexity and organizational change: An open polity perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 44(2):336–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang D (2015) Activating cross-border brokerage: Interorganizational knowledge transfer through skilled return migration. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(1):133–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams CL, Muller C, Kilanski K (2012) Gendered organizations in the new economy. Gender Soc. 26(4):549–573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316(5827):1036–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar