Fast Friends: The Impact of Short-Term Visits on Firms’ Invention Outcomes

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.16081

References

  • Agrawal A, Cockburn I, McHale J (2006) Gone but not forgotten: Knowledge flows, labor mobility, and enduring social relationships. J. Econom. Geography 6(5):571–591.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres NS, Silverman BS (2004) R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management J. 25(89):929–958.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres N, Rios LA, Silverman BS (2020) Organizational change and the dynamics of innovation: Formal R&D structure and intrafirm inventor networks. Strategic Management J. 41(11):2015–2049.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bahar D, Choudhury P, Kim DY, Koo WW (2023) Innovation on wings: Nonstop flights and firm innovation in the global context. Management Sci. 69(10):6202–6223.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baker AC, Larcker DF, Wang CC (2022) How much should we trust staggered difference-in-differences estimates? J. Financial Econom. 144(2):370–395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baruffaldi SH, Landoni P (2012) Return mobility and scientific productivity of researchers working abroad: The role of home country linkages. Res. Policy 41(9):1655–1665.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Birkinshaw J (2001) Strategies for managing internal competition. Calif. Management Rev. 44(1):21–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Birkinshaw J, Lingblad M (2005) Intrafirm competition and charter evolution in the multibusiness firm. Organ. Sci. 16(6):674–686.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau KJ, Brady T, Ganguli I, Gaule P, Guinan E, Hollenberg A, Lakhani KR (2017) A field experiment on search costs and the formation of scientific collaborations. Rev. Econom. Statist. 99(4):565–576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Callaway B, Sant’Anna PH (2021) Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. J. Econometrics 225(2):200–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carpenter MA, Sanders WG, Gregersen HB (2001) Bundling human capital with organizational context: The impact of international assignment experience on multinational firm performance and CEO pay. Acad. Management J. 44(3):493–511.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Catalini C (2018) Microgeography and the direction of inventive activity. Management Sci. 64(9):4348–4364.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Catalini C, Fons-Rosen C, Gaulé P (2020) How do travel costs shape collaboration? Management Sci. 66(8):3340–3360.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chai S, Freeman RB (2019) Temporary colocation and collaborative discovery: Who confers at conferences. Strategic Management J. 40(13):2138–2164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang Y-Y, Gong Y, Peng MW (2012) Expatriate knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and subsidiary performance. Acad. Management J. 55(4):927–948.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cheng JL, Bolon DS (1993) The management of multinational R&D: A neglected topic in international business research. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 24(1):1–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choudhury P (2016) Return migration and geography of innovation in MNEs: A natural experiment of knowledge production by local workers reporting to return migrants. J. Econom. Geography 16(3):585–610.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choudhury P (2017) Innovation outcomes in a distributed organization: Intrafirm mobility and access to resources. Organ. Sci. 28(2):339–354.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Choudhury P (2022) Geographic mobility, immobility, and geographic flexibility–A review and agenda for research on the changing geography of work. Acad. Management Ann. 16(1):258–296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choudhury P, Kim DY (2019) The ethnic migrant inventor effect: Codification and recombination of knowledge across borders. Strategic Management J. 40(2):203–229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and capacity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Criscuolo P (2005) On the road again: Researcher mobility inside the R&D network. Res. Policy 34(9):1350–1365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crown D, Faggian A, Corcoran J (2020) Foreign-born graduates and innovation: Evidence from an Australian skilled visa program. Res. Policy 49(9):103945.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Czaika M, Neumayer E (2017) Visa restrictions and economic globalisation. Appl. Geography 84(July):75–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Chaisemartin C, D’Haultfœuille X (2020) Two-way fixed effects estimators with heterogeneous treatment effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(9):2964–2996.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Chaisemartin C, D’Haultfœuille X (2023) Two-way fixed effects and differences-in-differences estimators with several treatments. J. Econometrics 236(2):105480.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Chaisemartin C, D’Haultfœuille X (2024) Difference-in-differences estimators of intertemporal treatment effects. Rev. Econom. Statist. 1–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeSanctis G, Glass JT, Ensing IM (2002) Organizational designs for R&D. Acad. Management Exec. 16(3):55–66.Google Scholar
  • Dushnitsky G, Shaver JM (2009) Limitations to inter-organizational knowledge acquisition: The paradox of corporate venture capital. Strategic Management J. 30(10):1045–1064.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edström A, Galbraith J (1977) Alternative policies for international transfers of managers. Management Internat. Rev. 17(2):11–22.Google Scholar
  • Ferrucci E, Lissoni F (2019) Foreign inventors in Europe and the United States: Diversity and patent quality. Res. Policy 48(9):103774.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L, Schachter S, Back K (1950) Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing (Harper, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Froese FJ, Stoermer S, Reiche BS, Klar S (2021) Best of both worlds: How embeddedness fit in the host unit and the headquarters improve repatriate knowledge transfer. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 52(7):1331–1349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garud R, Tuertscher P, Van de Ven AH (2013) Perspectives on innovation processes. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):775–819.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gassmann O, Von Zedtwitz M (2003) Trends and determinants of managing virtual R&D teams. R&D Management 33(3):243–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodman-Bacon A (2021) Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. J. Econometrics 225(2):254–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):109–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gunther McGrath R, Nerkar A (2004) Real options reasoning and a new look at the R&D investment strategies of pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Management J. 25(1):1–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haas MR (2006) Acquiring and applying knowledge in transnational teams: The roles of cosmopolitans and locals. Organ. Sci. 17(3):367–384.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper No. 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Hernandez E, Kulchina E (2020) Immigrants and foreign firm performance. Organ. Sci. 31(4):797–820.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hinds PJ, Bailey DE (2003) Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ. Sci. 14(6):615–632.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hoegl M, Weinkauf K, Gemuenden HG (2004) Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study. Organ. Sci. 15(1):38–55.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hofstede G, Neuijen B, Ohayv DD, Sanders G (1990) Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(2):286–316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hovhannisyan N, Keller W (2015) International business travel: An engine of innovation? J. Econom. Growth 20(1):75–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hunt J, Gauthier-Loiselle M (2010) How much does immigration boost innovation? Amer. Econom. J. Macroeconom. 2(2):31–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Inkpen AC (2008) Knowledge transfer and international joint ventures: The case of NUMMI and General Motors. Strategic Management J. 29(4):447–453.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Inkpen AC, Dinur A (1998) Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures. Organ. Sci. 9(4):454–468.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa SL, Leidner DE (1999) Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ. Sci. 10(6):791–815.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen R, Szulanski G (2004) Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross-border knowledge transfers. J. Internat. Bus. 35(6):508–523.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz R, Allen TJ (1982) Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups. R&D Management 12(1):7–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keller J, Loewenstein J (2011) The cultural category of cooperation: A cultural consensus model analysis for China and the United States. Organ. Sci. 22(2):299–319.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kerr SP, Kerr WR (2018) Global collaborative patents. Econom. J. (Lond.) 128(612):F235–F272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kolker A, Platzer MD (2021) Adding Countries to the Visa Waiver Program: Effects on National Security and Tourism, vol. #R46300 (Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Kramsch C (1998) Language and Culture (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Krol R (2021) Effects of immigration on entrepreneurship and innovation. Cato J. 41(3):551–569.Google Scholar
  • Lahiri N (2010) Geographic distribution of R&D activity: How does it affect innovation quality? Acad. Management J. 53(5):1194–1209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lane JN, Ganguli I, Gaule P, Guinan E, Lakhani KR (2021) Engineering serendipity: When does knowledge sharing lead to knowledge production? Strategic Management J. 42(6):1215–1244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levin RC, Klevorick AK, Nelson RR, Winter SG, Gilbert R, Griliches Z (1987) Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity 18(3):783–831.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madsen TL, Mosakowski E, Zaheer S (2003) Knowledge retention and personnel mobility: The nondisruptive effects of inflows of experience. Organ. Sci. 14(2):173–191.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marino A, Mudambi R, Perri A, Scalera VG (2020) Ties that bind: Ethnic inventors in multinational enterprises’ knowledge integration and exploitation. Res. Policy 49(9):103956.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27:415–444.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Monteiro F, Birkinshaw J (2017) The external knowledge sourcing process in multinational corporations. Strategic Management J. 38(2):342–362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Monteiro LF, Arvidsson N, Birkinshaw J (2008) Knowledge flows within multinational corporations: Explaining subsidiary isolation and its performance implications. Organ. Sci. 19(1):90–107.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nobel R, Birkinshaw J (1998) Innovation in multinational corporations: Control and communication patterns in international R&D operations. Strategic Management J. 19(5):479–496.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oldroyd JB, Morris SS, Dotson JP (2019) Principles or templates? The antecedents and performance effects of cross‐border knowledge transfer. Strategic Management J. 40(13):2191–2213.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ (2002) Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. 13(3):249–273.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pearce R (1994) The internationalisation of research and development by multinational enterprises and the transfer sciences. Empirica 21(3):297–311.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petrova E (2014) Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: The process of drug discovery and development. Ding M, Eliashberg J, Stremersch S, eds. Innovation and Marketing in the Pharmaceutical Industry. International Series in Quantitative Marketing, vol. 20 (Springer, New York), 19–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pisano GP (2006) Science Business: The Promise, the Reality, and the Future of Biotech (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Puranam P, Alexy O, Reitzig M (2014) What’s “new” about new forms of organizing? Acad. Management Rev. 39(2):162–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Puranam P, Raveendran M, Knudsen T (2012) Organization design: The epistemic interdependence perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):419–440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seo E, Kang H, Song J (2020) Blending talents for innovation: Team composition for cross-border R&D collaboration within multinational corporations. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 51(5):851–885.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaver JM (2019) Interpreting interactions in linear fixed-effect regression models: When fixed-effect estimates are no longer within-effects. Strategy Sci. 4(1):25–40.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Singh J (2008) Distributed R&D, cross-regional knowledge integration and quality of innovative output. Res. Policy 37(1):77–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spender JC, Grant RM (1996) Knowledge and the firm: Overview. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):5–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Squicciarini M, Dernis H, Criscuolo C (2013) Measuring patent quality: Indicators of technological and economic value. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2013/03, OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
  • Stadler C, Helfat CE, Verona G (2021) Transferring knowledge by transferring individuals: Innovative technology usage and organizational performance in multiunit firms. Organ. Sci. 33(1):253–274.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sun L, Abraham S (2021) Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects. J. Econometrics 225(2):175–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):27–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szulanski G, Jensen RJ (2006) Presumptive adaptation and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer. Strategic Management J. 27(10):937–957.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor A, Helfat CE (2009) Organizational linkages for surviving technological change: Complementary assets, middle management, and ambidexterity. Organ. Sci. 20(4):718–739.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Torpey JC (2018) The Invention of the Passport: Surveillance, Citizenship and the State (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsai W (2001) Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad. Management J. 44(5):996–1004.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsai W, Ghosal S (1998) Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Acad. Management J. 41(4):464–476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Verhoeven D, Bakker J, Veugelers R (2016) Measuring technological novelty with patent-based indicators. Res. Policy 45(3):707–723.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Von Zedtwitz M, Gassmann O (2002) Market vs. technology drive in R&D internationalization: Four different patterns of managing research and development. Res. Policy 31(4):569–588.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yan A, Zhu G, Hall DT (2002) International assignments for career building: A model of agency relationships and psychological contracts. Acad. Management Rev. 27(3):373–391.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.