When Funders Aren’t Customers: Reputation Management and Capability Underinvestment in Multiaudience Organizations

References

• Aaker J, Vohs K, Mogilner C (2010) Non-profits are seen as warm and for-profits as competent: Firm stereotypes matter. J. Consumer Res. 37(2):224–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexander J (2000) Adaptive strategies of nonprofit human service organizations in an era of devolution and new public management. Nonprofit Management Leadership 10(3):287–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Artinger F, Petersen M, Gigerenzer G, Weibler J (2015) Heuristics as adaptive decision strategies in management. J. Organ. Behav. 36(S1):S33–S52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowman W (2006) Should donors care about overhead costs? Do they care? Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Quart. 35(2):288–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coupet J, Berrett JL (2019) Toward a valid approach to nonprofit efficiency measurement. Nonprofit Management Leadership 29(3):299–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dierickx I, Cool K, De Constance B (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. 35(12):1504–1511.Link, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P, Powell W (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebrahim A (2010) The limits of nonprofit impact: A contingency framework for measuring social performance. HBS Working Knowledge No. 10-099.Google Scholar
• Eisinger P (2002) Organizational capacity and organizational effectiveness among street-level food assistance programs. Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Quart. 31(1):115–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epstein MJ, Buhovac AR (2009) Performance measurement of not-for-profit organizations. The Society of Management Accountants of Canada (CMA Canada).Google Scholar
• Fischer GW, Damodaran N, Laskey KB, Lincoln D (1987) Preferences for proxy attributes. Management Sci. 33(2):198–214.Link, Google Scholar
• Froelich KA (1999) Diversification of revenue strategies: Evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Quart. 28(3):246–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frumkin P, Kim MT (2001) Strategic positioning and the financing of nonprofit organizations: Is efficiency rewarded in the contributions marketplace? Public Admin. Rev. 61(3):266–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbons R, Henderson R (2011) Relational contracts and organizational capabilities. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1350–1364.Link, Google Scholar
• Glasrud B (2001) The muddle of outcome measurement. Nonprofit World 19(6):35–37.Google Scholar
• Glickman NJ, Servon LJ (1998) More than bricks and sticks: Five components of community development corporation capacity. Housing Policy Debate 9(3):497–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goggins Gregory A (2013) Pay What It Takes: Focusing on Outcomes, Not Overhead (The Bridgespan Group). Retrieved on February 1, 2019, https://www.bridgespan.org/insights/blog/give-smart/focusing-on-outcomes-not-overhead.Google Scholar
• Goggins Gregory A, Howard D (2009) The nonprofit starvation cycle. Stanford Social Innovation Review. 7(4):49–53.Google Scholar
• Grandori A (1997) An organizational assessment of interfirm coordination modes. Organ. Stud. 18(6):897–925.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenlee JS, Brown K (1999) The impact of accounting information on contributions to charitable organizations. Res. Accounting Regulation 13:111–125.Google Scholar
• Gugerty MK, Karlan D (2018) Ten reasons not to measure impact—And what to do instead. Stanford Soc. Innovation Rev. 16(3):41–47.Google Scholar
• Hansmann HB (2006) The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law J. 89(5):835–901.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herman RD, Renz DO (1999) Theses on nonprofit organizational effectiveness. Nonprofit Volunt. Sector Q. 28(2):107–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobs FA, Marudas NP (2009) The combined effect of donation price and administrative inefficiency on donations to US nonprofit organizations. Financial Accountability Management 25(1):33–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jared B, Nov R, Group STCC (2014) The return of capacity building. Stanford Soc. Innovation Rev.Google Scholar
• Krause R, Wu Z, Bruton GD, Carter SM (2019) The coercive isomorphism ripple effect: An investigation of nonprofit interlocks on corporate boards. Acad. Management J. 62(1):283–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Le V (2014) Capacity Building for Communities of Color: The Paradigm Must Shift (and Why I’m Leaving My Job (Nonprofit AF).Google Scholar
• Le V (2019) Funders, You Want to Help Build Organizational Capacity?Then Stop Trying to Build Organizational Capacity and Just Give Multi-Year General Operating Dollars (MYGOD!) (Nonprofit AF).Google Scholar
• Lecy JD, Searing EAM (2015) Anatomy of the nonprofit starvation cycle: An analysis of falling overhead ratios in the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Quart. 44(3):539–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewin AY, Minton JW (1986) Determining organizational effectiveness: Another look, and an agenda for research. Management Sci. 32(5):514–538.Link, Google Scholar
• Liebschutz SF (1992) Coping by nonprofit organizations during the Reagan years. Nonprofit Management Leadership 2(4):363–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Light PC (2004) Sustaining Nonprofit Performance: The Case for Capacity Building and the Evidence to Support It, 1st ed. (Brookings Institution Press).Google Scholar
• Malatesta D, Smith CR (2014) Lessons from resource dependence theory for contemporary public and nonprofit management. Public Admin. Rev. 74(1):14–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer MW, Zucker LG (1989) Permanently Failing Organizations (Sage Publications).Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM (1984) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods (Sage Publications).Google Scholar
• Mitchell GE (2013) The construct of organizational effectiveness. Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Quart. 42(2):324–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore MH (2000) Managing for Value: Organizational Strategy in for-Profit, Nonprofit, and Governmental Organizations. Nonprofit Volunt. Sector Q. 29(1, suppl)183–204. 10.1177/0899764000291S009.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris G, Roberts D (2018) A national imperative: Joining forces to strengthen human services in America–2018. Oliver Wyman. Retrieved on October 26, 2018, https://www.oliverwyman.com/content/dam/oliver-wyman/v2/campaign-assets/January2018/A National Imperative_Finalscreen.pdf.Google Scholar
• Morris G, Roberts D, MacIntosh J, Bordone A (2018) The financial health of the United States nonprofit sector facts and observations. Retrieved on October 26, 2018, https://www.oliverwyman.com/content/dam/oliver-wyman/v2/publications/2018/January/FinancialHealthofUS Nonprofit Sector.pdf.Google Scholar
• National Council of Nonprofits (2019a) Economic impact. Retrieved on February 1, 2019, https://www.councilofnonprofits.org/economic-impact.Google Scholar
• National Council of Nonprofits (2019b) What is capacity building? Retrieved on February 1, 2019, https://www.councilofnonprofits.org/tools-resources/what-capacity-building.Google Scholar
• Park SH, Ungson GR (2001) Interfirm rivalry and managerial complexity: A conceptual framework of alliance failure. Organ. Sci. 12(1):37–53.Link, Google Scholar
• Rahmandad H, Henderson R, Repenning NP (2018) Making the numbers? “Short termism” and the puzzle of only occasional disaster. Management Sci. 64(3):1328–1347.Link, Google Scholar
• Raynor J, Knowlton T, Mittenthal R, Simpson J (2018) Capacity building 3.0: How to strengthen the social ecosystem. TCC Group. Retrieved on February 1, 2019, https://www.tccgrp.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Capacity-Building-3.0-How-to-Strengthen-the-Social-Ecosystem.pdf.Google Scholar
• Repenning NP, Sterman J (2002a) Capability traps and self-confirming attribution errors in the dynamics of process improvement. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(2):265–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Repenning NP, Sterman JD (2002b) Nobody ever gets credit for fixing problems that never happened: Creating and sustaining process improvement. IEEE Engrg. Management Rev. 30(4):64–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saber B (2015) Debunking the 15% overhead for good. GuideStar. Retrieved on October 26, 2018, https://trust.guidestar.org/blog/2015/11/25/debunking-the-15-overhead-for-good/.Google Scholar
• Saul J (2004) Benchmarking for Nonprofits: How to Measure, Manage, and Improve Performance (Fieldstone Alliance).Google Scholar
• Silverman BL, Taliento L (2006) What business execs don’t know—but should—about nonprofits. Stanford Soc. Innovation Rev. Retrieved on October 26, 2018, https://ssir.org/articles/entry/what_business_execs_dont_know_but_should_about_nonprofits.Google Scholar
• Sterman JD (2000) Business Dynamics—Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World (McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Boston).Google Scholar
• Taylor A, Harold J, Berger K (2013) The Overhead Myth. A joint publication of BBB Wise Giving Alliance, GuideStar, and Charity Navigator. Retrieved on February 1, 2019, http://overheadmyth.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/GS_OverheadMyth_Ltr_ONLINE.pdf.Google Scholar
• The Urban Institute, Wing K, Hagar M (2004) Getting What We Pay For: Low Overhead Limits Nonprofit Effectiveness. Retrieved on February 1, 2019, http://webarchive.urban.org/publications/311044.html.Google Scholar
• Torjman S (1999) Are Outcomes the Best Outcome? (Caledon Institute of Social Policy).Google Scholar