Specialists, Generalists, or Both? Founders’ Multidimensional Breadth of Experience and Entrepreneurial Ventures’ Fundraising at IPO

References

• Adler PS (2001) Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organ. Sci. 12(2):215–234.Link, Google Scholar
• Aldrich HE, Ruef M (2006) Organizations Evolving (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexy O, George G (2013) Category divergence, straddling, and currency: Open innovation and the legitimation of illegitimate categories. J. Management Stud. 50(2):173–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almandoz J, Tilcsik A (2016) When experts become liabilities: Domain experts on boards and organizational failure. Acad. Management J. 59(4):1124–1149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Astebro T, Thompson P (2011) Entrepreneurs, Jacks of all trades or Hobos? Res. Policy 40(5):637–649.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bammens Y, Collewaert V (2014) Trust between entrepreneurs and angel investors: Exploring positive and negative implications for venture performance assessments. J. Management 40(7):1980–2008.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barringer BR, Jones FF, Neubaum DO (2005) A quantitative content analysis of the characteristics of rapid-growth firms and their founders. J. Bus. Venturing 20(5):663–687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barry CB, Muscarella CJ, Peavy JW III, Vetsuypens MR (1990) The role of venture capital in the creation of public companies: Evidence from the going-public process. J. Financial Econom. 27(2):447–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckman CM, Burton MD (2008) Founding the future: Path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organ. Sci. 19(1):3–24.Link, Google Scholar
• Beckman CM, Burton MD, O’Reilly C (2007) Early teams: The impact of team demography on VC financing and going public. J. Bus. Venturing 22(2):147–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benson DF, Brau JC, Cicon J, Ferris SP (2015) Strategically camouflaged corporate governance in IPOs: Entrepreneurial masking and impression management. J. Bus. Venturing 30(6):839–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bigelow L, Lundmark L, McLean Parks J, Wuebker R (2014) Skirting the issues: Experimental evidence of gender bias in IPO prospectus evaluations. J. Management 40(6):1732–1759.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boeker W, Karichalil R (2002) Entrepreneurial transitions: Factors influencing founder departure. Acad. Management J. 45(4):818–826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bottazzi L, Da Rin M, Hellmann T (2016) The importance of trust for investment: Evidence from venture capital. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(9):2283–2318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boulton AJ, Williford A (2018) Analyzing skewed continuous outcomes with many zeros: A tutorial for social work and youth prevention science researchers. J. Soc. Social Work Res. 9(4):721–740.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brau JC, Fawcett SE (2006) Initial public offerings: An analysis of theory and practice. J. Finance 61(1):399–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brav A, Gompers P (2003) The role of lockups in initial public offerings. Rev. Financial Stud. 16(1):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S, Goetzmann W, Liang B, Schwarz C (2012) Trust and delegation. J. Financial Econom. 103(2):221–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bruton GD, Chahine S, Filatotchev I (2009) Founders, private equity investors, and underpricing in entrepreneurial IPOs. Entrep. Theory Pract. 33(4):909–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bruton GD, Filatotchev I, Chanine S, Wright M (2010) Governance, ownership structure, and performance of IPO firms: The impact of different types of private equity investors and institutional environments. Strategic Management J. 31(5):491–509.Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butler JK Jr, Cantrell RS (1984) A behavioral decision theory approach to modeling dyadic trust in superiors and subordinates. Psychol. Rep. 55(1):19–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell K, Tabner IT (2014) Bonding and the agency risk premium: An analysis of migrations between the AIM and the Official List of the London Stock Exchange. J. Internat. Financ. Mark. Inst. Money 30:1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter MA, Pollock TG, Leary MM (2003) Testing a model of reasoned risk‐taking: Governance, the experience of principals and agents, and global strategy in high‐technology IPO firms. Strategic Management J. 24(9):803–820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Swaminathan A (2000) Why the microbrewery movement? Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the U.S. brewing industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3):715–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter R, Manaster S (1990) Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation. J. Finance 45(4):1045–1067.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castellucci F, Ertug G (2010) What’s in it for them? Advantages of higher-status partners in exchange relationships. Acad. Management J. 53(1):149–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Certo ST (2003) Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures. Acad. Management Rev. 28(3):432–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Certo ST, Daily CM, Dalton DR (2001b) Signaling firm value through board structure: An investigation of initial public offerings. Entrep. Theory Pract. 26(2):33–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Certo ST, Holcomb TR, Holmes RM (2009) IPO research in management and entrepreneurship: Moving the agenda forward. J. Management 35(6):1340–1378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Certo ST, Covin JG, Daily CM, Dalton DR (2001a) Wealth and the effects of founder management among IPO‐stage new ventures. Strategic Management J. 22(6‐7):641–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chahine S, Goergen M (2011) VC board representation and performance of US IPOs. J. Bus. Finance Account. 38(3–4):413–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chahine S, Filatotchev I, Wright M (2007) Venture capitalists, business angels, and performance of entrepreneurial IPOs in the UK and France. J. Bus. Finance Account. 34(3-4):505–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang S (2004) Venture capital financing, strategic alliances, and the initial public offerings of Internet startups. J. Bus. Venturing 19(5):721–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee A, Hambrick DC (2011) Executive personality, capability cues, and risk taking: How narcissistic CEOs react to their successes and stumbles. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(2):202–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen XP, Yao X, Kotha S (2009) Entrepreneur passion and preparedness in business plan presentations: A persuasion analysis of venture capitalists’ funding decisions. Acad. Management J. 52(1):199–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark BH, Montgomery DB (1998) Deterrence, reputations, and competitive cognition. Management Sci. 44(1):62–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Clarke JS, Cornelissen JP, Healey MP (2019) Actions speak louder than words: How figurative language and gesturing in entrepreneurial pitches influences investment judgments. Acad. Management J. 62(2):335–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colombo MG, Meoli M, Vismara S (2019) Signaling in science-based IPOs: The combined effect of affiliation with prestigious universities, underwriters, and venture capitalists. J. Bus. Venturing 34(1):141–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connelly BL, Crook TR, Combs JG, Ketchen DJ Jr, Aguinis H (2018) Competence- and integrity-based trust in interorganizational relationships: Which matters more? J. Management 44(3):919–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Courtney C, Dutta S, Li Y (2017) Resolving information asymmetry: Signaling, endorsement, and crowdfunding success. Entrep. Theory Pract. 41(2):265–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Custódio C, Ferreira MA, Matos P (2013) Generalists vs. specialists: Lifetime work experience and chief executive officer pay. J. Financial Econom. 108(2):471–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyr LA, Johnson DE, Welbourne TM (2000) Human resources in initial public offering firms: Do venture capitalists make a difference? Entrep. Theory Pract. 25(1):77–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daily CM, Certo ST, Dalton DR, Roengpitya R (2003) IPO underpricing: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Entrep. Theory Pract. 27(3):271–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davidsson P, Honig B (2003) The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. J. Bus. Venturing 18(3):301–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis JH, Schoorman FD, Mayer RC, Tan HH (2000) The trusted general manager and business unit performance: Empirical evidence of a competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. 21(5):563–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deeds DL, Decarolis D, Coombs JE (1997) The impact of firm specific capabilities on the amount of capital raised in an initial public offering: Evidence from the biotechnology industry. J. Bus. Venturing 12(1):31–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimov DP, Shepherd DA (2005) Human capital theory and venture capital firms: Exploring ‘home runs’ and ‘strike outs’. J. Bus. Venturing 20(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dirks KT (2000) Trust in leadership and team performance: Evidence from NCAA basketball. J. Appl. Psychol. 85(6):1004–1012.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dirks K, Ferrin D (2001) The role of trust in organizational settings. Organ. Sci. 12(4):450–467.Link, Google Scholar
• Duarte J, Siegel S, Young L (2012) Trust and credit: The role of appearance in peer-to-peer lending. Rev. Financial Stud. 25(8):2455–2483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Paolella L (2013) Category stretching: Reorienting research on categories in strategy, entrepreneurship, and organization theory. J. Management Stud. 50(6):1100–1123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, McManus SE (2007) Methodological fit in management field research. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1246–1264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K, Schoonhoven C (1990) Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(3):504–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ensley MD, Carland JW, Carland JC (2000) Investigating the existence of the lead entrepreneur. J. Small Bus. Management 38(4):59–77.Google Scholar
• Fairchild R (2011) An entrepreneur’s choice of venture capitalist or angel-financing: A behavioral game-theoretic approach. J. Bus. Venturing 26(3):359–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferris SP, Hao Q, Liao MY (2012) The effect of issuer conservatism on IPO pricing and performance. Rev. Finance 17(3):993–1027.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fesser HR, Willard GE (1990) Founding strategy and performance: A comparison of high and low growth high tech forms. Strategic Management J. 11(2):87–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filatotchev I (2006) Effects of executive characteristics and venture capital involvement on board composition and share ownership in IPO firms. Br. J. Management 17(1):75–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filatotchev I, Bishop K (2002) Board composition, share ownership, and ‘underpricing’ of UK IPO firms. Strategic Management J. 23(10):941–955.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkle T (1998) The relationship between boards of directors and initial public offerings in the biotechnology industry. Entrep. Theory Pract. 22(3):5–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Taylor SE (1984) Social Cognition (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Florin J (2005) Is venture capital worth it? Effects on firm performance and founder returns. J. Bus. Venturing 20(1):113–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frisch D, Baron J (1988) Ambiguity and rationality. J. Behav. Decis. Making 1(3):149–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fukuyama F (1995) Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, vol. 99. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Fulmer C, Gelfand M (2012) At what level (and in whom) we trust: Trust across multiple organizational levels. J. Management 38(4):1167–1230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galperin RV, Hahl O, Sterling AD, Guo J (2020) Too good to hire? Capability and inferences about commitment in labor markets. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):275–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gehman J, Grimes M (2017) Hidden budge of honor: How contextual distinctiveness affects category promotion among certified B Corporations. Acad. Management J. 60(6):2294–2320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gentry RJ, Harrison JS, Quigley TJ, Boivie S (2021) A database of CEO turnover and dismissal in S&P 1500 firms, 2000–2018. Strategic Management J. 42(5):968–991.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glynn MA, Navis C (2013) Categories, identities, and cultural classification: Moving beyond a model of categorical constraint. J. Management Stud. 50(6):1124–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gounopoulos D, Pham H (2018) Specialist CEOs and IPO survival. J. Corp. Finance 48:217–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graebner M (2009) Caveat venditor: Trust asymmetries in acquisitions of entrepreneurial firms. Acad. Management J. 52(3):435–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruber M, MacMillan IC, Thompson JD (2013) Escaping the prior knowledge corridor: What shapes the number and variety of market opportunities identified before market entry of technology start-ups? Organ. Sci. 24(1):280–300.Link, Google Scholar
• Habib MA, Ljungqvist AP (1998) Underpricing and IPO proceeds: A note. Econom. Lett. 61(3):381–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahl O, Ha J (2020) Committed diversification: Why authenticity insulates against penalties for diversification. Organ. Sci. 31(1):1–22.Link, Google Scholar
• Hahl O, Zuckerman EW (2014) The denigration of heroes? How the status attainment process shapes attributions of considerateness and authenticity. Amer. J. Sociol. 120(2):504–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahl O, Zuckerman EW, Kim M (2017) Why elites love authentic lowbrow culture: Overcoming high-status denigration with outsider art. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(4):828–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Douglas Y (2001) When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46:476–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins MJ, Stephan PE, Thursby JG (2011) Conveying quality and value in emerging industries: Star scientists and the role of signals in biotechnology. Res. Policy 40(4):605–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G (2006) Jacks of all trades and masters of none: Audiences’ reactions to spanning genres in feature film production. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3):420–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Koçak O, Hannan MT (2009) Multiple category memberships in markets: An integrative theory and two empirical tests. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):150–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang L, Pearce JL (2015) Managing the unknowable: The effectiveness of early-stage investor gut feel in entrepreneurial investment decisions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(4):634–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain BA, Kini O (1999) The life cycle of initial public offering firms. J. Bus. Finance Account. 26(9-10):1281–1307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jose ML, Nichols LM, Stevens JL (1986) Contributions of diversification, promotion, and R&D to the value of multiproduct firms: A Tobin’s q approach. Financial Management 15(4):33–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk A, Younkin P (2017) The paradox of breadth: The tension between experience and legitimacy in the transition to entrepreneurship. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(4):731–764.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanagaretnam K, Mestelman S, Khalid Nainar SM, Shehata M (2012) The impact of empowering investors on trust and trustworthiness. J. Econom. Psychol. 33(3):566–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan SN, Strömberg PE (2004) Characteristics, contracts, and actions: Evidence from venture capitalist analyses. J. Finance 59(5):2177–2210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy P (2003) A Guide to Econometrics (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Keren G, Gerritsen LE (1999) On the robustness and possible accounts of ambiguity aversion. Acta Psychol. (Amst.). 103(1–2):149–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khessina OM, Carroll GR (2008) Product demography of de novo and de alio firms in the optical disk drive industry, 1983–1999. Organ. Sci. 19(1):25–38.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim S (2019) The process model of corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication: CSR communication and its relationship with consumers’ CSR knowledge, trust, and corporate reputation perception. J. Bus. Ethics 154(4):1143–1159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kotha S, Rajgogal S, Rindova V (2001) Reputation building and performance: An empirical analysis of the top-50 pure Internet firms. Eur. Management J. 19(6):571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Hannan M (2010) The consequences of category spanning depend on contrast. Negro G, Koçak Ö, Hsu G, eds. Categories in Markets: Origins and Evolution (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 31) (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 175–201.Google Scholar
• Krishnan CVN, Masulis R (2011) Venture capital reputation: A survey. Cummings D, eds. Handbook of Entrepreneurial Finance, Venture Capital and Private Equity (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kroll M, Walters BA, Le SA (2007) The impact of board composition and top management team ownership structure on post-IPO performance in young entrepreneurial firms. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1198–1216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kühberger A, Perner J (2003) The role of competition and knowledge in the Ellsberg task. J. Behav. Decis. Making 16(3):181–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latham S, Braun MR (2010) To IPO or not to IPO: Risks, uncertainty and the decision to go public. Br. J. Management 21(3):666–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear E (2004) Balanced skills and entrepreneurship. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(2):208–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear E (2005) Entrepreneurship. J. Labor Econom. 23:649–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leahey E, Beckman CM, Stanko TL (2017) Prominent but less productive: The impact of interdisciplinarity on scientists’ research. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(1):105–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lechmann DS, Schnabel C (2014) Are the self-employed really jacks-of-all-trades? Testing the assumptions and implications of Lazear’s theory of entrepreneurship with German data. Small Bus. Econom. 42(1):59–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee JM, Hwang BH, Chen H (2017) Are founder CEOs more overconfident than professional CEOs? Evidence from S&P 1500 companies. Strategic Management J. 38(3):751–769.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J (1995) Venture capitalists and the oversight of private firms. J. Finance 50(1):301–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner DA (2016) Behavioral disinhibition and nascent venturing: Relevance and initial effects on potential resource providers. J. Bus. Venturing 31(2):234–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leung MD (2014) Dilettante or renaissance person? How the order of job experiences affects hiring in an external labor market. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(1):136–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leung MD, Sharkey AJ (2014) Out of sight, out of mind? Evidence of perceptual factors in the multiple-category discount. Organ. Sci. 25(1):171–184.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewicki RJ, McAllister DJ, Bies RJ (1998) Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):438–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewicki RJ, Tomlinson EC, Gillespie N (2006) Models of interpersonal trust development: Theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions. J. Management 32(6):991–1022.Google Scholar
• Loughran T, Ritter JR (2002) Why don’t issuers get upset about leaving money on the table in IPOs? Rev. Financial Stud. 15(2):413–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Rao H (2004) Sources of durability and change in market classifications: A study of the reconstitution of product categories in the American mutual fund industry, 1944–1985. Soc. Forces 82(3):969–999.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lowry M, Officer MS, Schwert GW (2010) The variability of IPO initial returns. J. Finance 65(2):425–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lungeanu R, Zajac EJ (2016) Venture capital ownership as a contingent resource: How owner–firm fit influences IPO outcomes. Acad. Management J. 59(3):930–955.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM (1996) Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol. Methods 1(2):130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martens M, Jennings J, Jennings P (2007) Do the stories they tell get them the money they need? The role of entrepreneurial narratives in resource acquisition. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1107–1132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maxwell AL, Lévesque M (2014) Trustworthiness: A critical ingredient for entrepreneurs seeking investors. Entrep. Theory Pract. 38(5):1057–1080.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):709–734.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merluzzi J, Phillips DJ (2016) The specialist discount: Negative returns for MBAs with focused profiles in investment banking. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(1):87–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milanov H, Shepherd DA (2013) The importance of the first relationship: The ongoing influence of initial network on future status. Strategic Management J. 34(6):727–750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milbourn TT (2003) CEO reputation and stock-based compensation. J. Financial Econom. 68(2):233–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I, Lester RH (2011) Family and lone founder ownership and strategic behaviour: Social context, identity, and institutional logics. J. Management Stud. 48(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molina-Azorin JF (2012) Mixed methods research in strategic management: Impact and applications. Organ. Res. Methods 15(1):33–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagle F, Teodoridis F (2020) Jack of all trades and master of knowledge: The role of diversification in new distant knowledge integration. Strategic Management J. 41(1):55–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nahata R (2008) Venture capital reputation and investment performance. J. Financial Econom. 90(2):127–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Natividad G, Rawley E (2016) Interdependence and performance: A natural experiment in firm scope. Strategy Sci. 1(1):12–31.Link, Google Scholar
• Navis C, Glynn MA (2010) How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990-2005. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(3):439–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Navis C, Glynn MA (2011) The entrepreneurial identity: How legitimate distinctiveness affects investors’ judgments of new venture plausibility. Acad. Management Rev. 36(3):479–499.Google Scholar
• Negro G, Leung MD (2013) “Actual” and perceptual effects of category spanning. Organ. Sci. 24(3):684–696.Link, Google Scholar
• Negro G, Hannan MT, Fassiotto M (2015) Category signaling and reputation. Organ. Sci. 26(2):584–600.Link, Google Scholar
• Negro G, Hannan MT, Rao H (2010) Categorical contrast and audience appeal: Niche width and critical success in winemaking. Indust. Corp. Change 19(5):1397–1425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson T (2003) The persistence of founder influence: Management, ownership, and performance effects at initial public offering. Strategic Management J. 24(8):707–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nguyen BD (2015) Is more news good news? Media coverage of CEOs, firm value, and rent extraction. Quart. J. Finance 5(4):1–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paik Y, Woo H (2017) The effects of corporate venture capital, founder incumbency, and their interaction on entrepreneurial firms’ R&D investment strategies. Organ. Sci. 28(4):670–689.Link, Google Scholar
• Paolella L, Durand R (2016) Category spanning, evaluation, and performance: Revised theory and test on the corporate law market. Acad. Management J. 59(1):330–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips N, Tracey P, Karra N (2013a) Building entrepreneurial tie portfolios through strategic homophily: The role of narrative identity work in venture creation and early growth. J. Bus. Venturing 28(1):134–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ, Turco CJ, Zuckerman EW (2013b) Betrayal as market barrier: Identity-based limits to diversification among high status corporate law firms. Amer. J. Sociol. 118(4):1023–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plummer LA, Allison TH, Connelly BL (2016) Better together? Signaling interactions in new venture pursuit of initial external capital. Acad. Management J. 59(5):1585–1604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollock TG, Gulati R (2007) Standing out from the crowd: The visibility-enhancing effects of IPO-related signals on alliance formation by entrepreneurial firms. Strategic Organ. 5(4):339–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG (2012) Two sides of the same coin: How ambiguous classification affects multiple audience evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):81–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porac JF, Thomas H, Wilson F, Paton D, Kanfer A (1995) Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40:203–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40(3):879–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prentice DA, Miller DT (1992) When small effects are impressive. Psych. Bull. 112(1):160–164.Google Scholar
• Pulford BD (2009) Short article: Is luck on my side? Optimism, pessimism, and ambiguity aversion. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol. 62(6):1079–1087.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao HP, Monin P, Durand R (2005) Border crossing: Bricolage and erosion of categorical boundaries in French gastronomy. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(6):968–991.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi PH, Anderson AB (1982) The factorial survey approach: An introduction. Rossi P, Nock S, eds. Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Survey Approach (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA), 15–67.Google Scholar
• Rousseau DM, Sitkin SB, Burt RS, Camerer C (1998) Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):393–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruef M, Patterson K (2009) Credit and Classification: The Impact of Industry Boundaries in Nineteenth-Century America. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(3):486–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sakhartov AV (2018) Stock market undervaluation of resource redeployability. Strategic Management J. 39(4):1059–1082.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sako M (1992) Price, quality and trust: Inter-firm relations in Britain and Japan (No. 18) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanders W, Boivie S (2004) Sorting things out: Valuation of new firms in uncertain markets. Strategic Management J. 25(2):167–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sapienza HJ, Korsgaard MA (1996) Procedural justice in entrepreneur-investor relations. Acad. Management J. 39(3):544–574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sapienza HJ, Manigart S, Vermeir W (1996) Venture capitalist governance and value added in four countries. J. Bus. Venturing 11(6):439–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schulze WS, Zellweger TM (2021) Property rights, owner-management, and value creation. Acad. Management Rev.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sgourev SV, Althuizen N (2014) “Notable” or “not able”: When are acts of inconsistency rewarded? Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(2):282–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shepherd DA, Zacharakis A (2001) The venture capitalist-entrepreneur relationship: Control, trust and confidence in co-operative behavior. Ventur. Cap. 3(2):129–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shepherd DA, Ettenson R, Crouch A (2000) New venture strategy and profitability: A venture capitalist’s assessment. J. Bus. Venturing 15(5–6):449–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simons TL, Peterson RS (2000) Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. J. Appl. Psychol. 85(1):102–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Souder D, Simsek Z, Johnson SG (2012) The differing effects of agent and founder CEOs on the firm’s market expansion. Strategic Management J. 33(1):23–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Souitaris V, Zerbinati S, Peng B, Shepherd D (2020) Should I stay or should I go? Founder power and exit via Initial Public Offering. Acad. Management J. 63(1):64–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Hoang H, Hybels RC (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):315–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Switzer LN, Bourdon JF (2011) Management quality and operating performance: Evidence for Canadian IPOs. Internat. J. Bus. 16(2):133–149.Google Scholar
• Talaulicar T, Grundei J, Werder AV (2005) Strategic decision making in start-ups: the effect of top management team organization and processes on speed and comprehensiveness. J. Bus. Venturing 20(4):519–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teodoridis F (2018) Understanding team knowledge production: The interrelated roles of technology and expertise. Management Sci. 64(8):3625–3648.Link, Google Scholar
• Teodoridis F, Bikard M, Vakili K (2019) Creativity at the knowledge frontier: The impact of specialization in fast and slow-paced domains. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(4):894–927.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Useche D (2014) Are patents signals for the IPO market? An EU–US comparison for the software industry. Res. Policy 43(8):1299–1311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vergne JP (2012) Stigmatized categories and public disapproval of organizations: A mixed methods study of the global arms industry 1996–2007. Acad. Management J. 55(5):1027–1052.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vergne JP, Wry T (2014) Categorizing categorization research: Review, integration, and future directions. J. Management Stud. 51(1):56–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vescio TK, Judd CM, Kwan VS (2004) The crossed-categorization hypothesis: Evidence of reductions in the strength of categorization, but not intergroup bias. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 40(4):478–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villalonga B (2004) Diversification discount or premium? New evidence from the business information tracking series. J. Finance 59(2):479–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vissa B (2012) Agency in action: Entrepreneurs’ networking style and initiation of economic exchange. Organ. Sci. 23(2):492–510.Link, Google Scholar
• Walters BA, Kroll M, Wright P (2010) The impact of TMT board member control and environment on post-IPO performance. Acad. Management J. 53(3):572–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman N (2003) Founder-CEO succession and the paradox of entrepreneurial success. Organ. Sci. 14(2):149–172.Link, Google Scholar
• Wasserman N (2008) The founder’s dilemma. Harvard Bus. Rev. 86(2):102–109.Google Scholar
• Wasserman N (2017) The throne vs. the kingdom: Founder control and value creation in startups. Strategic Management J. 38(2):255–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Welbourne TM, Andrews A (1996) Predicting the performance of initial public offerings: should human resource management be in the equation? Acad. Management J. 39(4):891–919.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Welbourne TM, Cyr LA (1999) The human resource executive effect in initial public offering firms. Acad. Management J. 42(6):616–629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wry T, Lounsbury M (2013) Contextualizing the categorical imperative: Category linkages, technology focus, and resource acquisition in nanotechnology entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Venturing 28(1):117–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu G, Dokko G (2007) Typecasting entrepreneurs: Boundary-crossing experience, funding and the performance of ventures. Presentation, Acad. Management Meetings, August. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
• Wuorinen S, McNamara GM, Pan L (2020) Imprinting effects of IPO underpricing on the future strategic actions of high-tech firms. Acad. Management Proc. 2020(1):21388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Younkin P, Kashkooli K (2020) Stay true to your roots? Category distance, hierarchy, and the performance of new entrants in the music industry. Organ. Sci. 31(3):604–627.Link, Google Scholar
• Younkin P, Kuppuswamy V (2018) The colorblind crowd? Founder race and performance in crowdfunding. Management Sci. 64(7):3269–3287.Link, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW, Kim TY, Ukanwa K, Rittmann JV (2003) Robust identities or nonentities? Typecasting in the feature-film labor market. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(5):1018–1107.Crossref, Google Scholar