In Institutions We Trust? Trust in Government and the Allocation of Entrepreneurial Intentions

References

• Abrams LC, Cross R, Lesser E, Levin DZ (2003) Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Acad. Management Perspect. 17(4):64–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson JA (2002) Reversal of fortune: Geography and institutions in the making of the modern world income distribution. Quart. J. Econom. 117(4):1231–1294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson JA (2005) Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 385–472.Google Scholar
• Acs Z, Åstebro T, Audretsch D, Robinson DT (2016) Public policy to promote entrepreneurship: A call to arms. Small Bus. Econom. 47(1):35–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acs ZJ, Stam E, Audretsch DB, O’Connor A (2017) The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Bus. Econom. 49(1):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahl H (2006) Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrep. Theory Pract. 30(5):595–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldrich HE, Fiol CM (1994) Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Acad. Management Rev. 19(4):645–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arcidiacono P (2004) Ability sorting and the returns to college major. J. Econometrics 121(1–2):343–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armanios D, Eesley C (2021) Lowering entry barriers (but also providing resources): How governments spur founding. Organ. Sci. 10.1287/orsc.2021.1434.Google Scholar
• Armanios DE, Eesley CE, Li J, Eisenhardt KM (2017) How entrepreneurs leverage institutional intermediaries in emerging economies to acquire public resources. Strategic Management J. 38(7):1373–1390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bachmann R, Inkpen AC (2011) Understanding institutional-based trust building processes in inter-organizational relationships. Organ. Stud. 32(2):281–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bachmann R, Zaheer A, eds. (2013) Handbook of Advances in Trust Research (Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bachmann R, Gillespie N, Priem R (2015) Repairing trust in organizations and institutions: Toward a conceptual framework. Organ. Stud. 36(9):1123–1142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bairner A (2001) Sport, Nationalism, and Globalization: European and North American Perspectives (State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
• Barber B (1983) The Logic and Limits of Trust, vol. 96 (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ).Google Scholar
• Bartels BL, Mutz DC (2009) Explaining processes of institutional opinion leadership. J. Political Econom. 71(1):249–261.Google Scholar
• Baumol WJ (1990) Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. J. Political Econom. 98(5):893–921.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumol WJ (1993) Entrepreneurship, Management and the Structure of Payoffs (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bercovitz J, Feldman M (2008) Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organ. Sci. 19(1):69–89.Link, Google Scholar
• Black DA, Smith JA (2006) Estimating the returns to college quality with multiple proxies for quality. J. Labor Econom. 24(3):701–728.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bosma N, Content J, Sanders M, Stam E (2018) Institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth in Europe. Small Bus. Econom. 51(2):483–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breznitz SM, Zhang Q (2020) Determinants of graduates’ entrepreneurial activity. Small Bus. Econom. 55(4):1039–1056.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busenitz LW, Gomez C, Spencer JW (2000) Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Acad. Management J. 43(5):994–1003.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell C (2018) Huge numbers demand the ouster of South Korea’s president in a fifth week of protests. Time. Retrieved from http://time.com/4583033/south-korea-protest-demonstration-seoul-park-geun-hye-choi- soon-sil/.Google Scholar
• Chanley VA, Rudolph TJ, Rahn WM (2000) The origins and consequences of public trust in government: A time series analysis. Public Opin. Quart. 64(3):239–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen A, Patton D, Kenney M (2016) University technology transfer in China: A literature review and taxonomy. J. Tech. Transfer. 41(5):891–929.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi S (2016) Park Geun-hye, embattled South Korean President, says she’s willing to resign. Retreived from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/29/world/asia/park-geun-hye-south-korea-resign.html.Google Scholar
• Chua BH, Iwabuchi K, eds. (2008) East Asian Pop Culture: Analysing the Korean Wave, vol. 1 (Hong Kong University Press).Google Scholar
• Citrin J, Green DP (1986) Presidential leadership and the resurgence of trust in government. British J. Political Sci. 16(4):431–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Citrin J, Luks S (2001) Political trust revisited: Déjà′vu all over again? Hibbing JR, Theiss-Morse E, eds. What Is It about Government that Americans Dislike? (Cambridge University Press, New York), 9–27.Google Scholar
• Colombo MG, Piva E (2020) Start-ups launched by recent STEM university graduates: The impact of university education on entrepreneurial entry. Res. Policy 49(6):103993.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colombo MG, Meoli M, Vismara S (2019) Signaling in science-based IPOs: The combined effect of affiliation with prestigious universities, underwriters, and venture capitalists. J. Bus. Venturing 34(1):141–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colyvas JA (2007) From divergent meanings to common practices: The early institutionalization of technology transfer in the life sciences at Stanford University. Res. Policy 36(4):456–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colyvas JA, Maroulis S (2015) Moving from an exception to a rule: Analyzing mechanisms in emergence–based institutionalization. Organ. Sci. 26(2):601–621.Link, Google Scholar
• Colyvas JA, Powell WW (2006) Roads to institutionalization: The remaking of boundaries between public and private science. Res. Organ. Behav. 27(27):305–353.Google Scholar
• Colyvas J, Crow M, Gelijns A, Mazzoleni R, Nelson RR, Rosenberg N, Sampat BN (2002) How do university inventions get into practice? Management Sci. 48(1):61–72.Link, Google Scholar
• Cook KS (2001) Trust in Society (Russell Sage, New York).Google Scholar
• Cook TE, Gronke P (2005) The skeptical American: Revisiting the meanings of trust in government and confidence in institutions. J. Polit. 67(3):784–803.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Craig SC (2019) The Malevolent Leaders: Popular Discontent in America (Routledge).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danis WM, De Clercq D, Petricevic O (2011) Are social networks more important for new business activity in emerging than developed economies? An empirical extension. Internat. Bus. Rev. 20(4):394–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Darnihamedani P, Block JH, Hessels J, Simonyan A (2018) Taxes, start-up costs, and innovative entrepreneurship. Small Bus. Econom. 51(2):355–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Das TK, Teng B-S (1998) Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):491–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Clercq D, Danis WM, Dakhli M (2010) The moderating effect of institutional context on the relationship between associational activity and new business activity in emerging economies. Internat. Bus. Rev. 19(1):85–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Di Gregorio D, Shane S (2003) Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Res. Policy 32(2):209–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dirks K, Ferrin D (2001) The role of trust in organizational settings. Organ. Sci. 12:450–467 (Database).Link, Google Scholar
• Dobbin F, Dowd TJ (1997) How policy shapes competition: Early railroad foundings in Massachusetts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3):501–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doucette J (2017) The occult of personality: Korea’s candlelight protests and the impeachment of Park Geun-hye. J. Asian Stud. 76(4):851–860.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G (2010) Entrepreneurial optimism in the market for technological inventions. Organ. Sci. 21(1):150–167.Link, Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G, Shaver JM (2009) Limitations to interorganizational knowledge acquisition: The paradox of corporate venture capital. Strategic Management J. 30(10):1045–1064.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutt N, Hawn O, Vidal E, Chatterji A, McGahan A, Mitchell W (2016) How open system intermediaries fill voids in market-based institutions: The case of business incubators in emerging markets. Acad. Management J. 59(3):818–840.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH, Chu W (2003) The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: Empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organ. Sci. 14(1):57–68.Link, Google Scholar
• Eberhart RN, Eesley CE (2018) Too much of a good thing: Institutional change and new firm performance in Japan. Strategic Management J. 39(10):2643–2665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eberhart RN, Eesley CE, Eisenhardt KM (2017) Failure is an option: Institutional change, entrepreneurial risk, and new firm growth. Organ. Sci. 28(1):93–112.Link, Google Scholar
• Edelman (2014) Edelman Trust Barometer (Edelman Associates, New York).Google Scholar
• Eesley C (2016) Institutional barriers to growth: Entrepreneurship, human capital and institutional change. Organ. Sci. 27:1290–1306.Link, Google Scholar
• Eesley CE, Lee YS (2021) Do university entrepreneurship programs promote entrepreneurship? Strategic Management J. 42(4):833–861.Google Scholar
• Eesley CE, Miller WF (2018) Impact: Stanford University’s economic impact via innovation and entrepreneurship. Foundations Trends (R) in Entrepreneurship 14(2):130–278.Google Scholar
• Eesley C, Wu L (2020) For startups, adaptability and mentor network diversity can be pivotal: Evidence from a randomized experiment on a MOOC platform. Management Inf. Syst. Quart. 44(2):661–697.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eesley C, Li JB, Yang D (2016) Does institutional change in universities influence high-tech entrepreneurship? Evidence from China’s Project 985. Organ. Sci. 27(2):446–461.Link, Google Scholar
• Eesley CE, Wu Y, Yang D (2021) Entrepreneurial strategies during institutional changes: Evidence from China’s economic transition. Strategic Entrep. J. Early View 10.1002/sej.1399.Google Scholar
• Eesley CE, Eberhart RN, Skousen BR, Cheng JL (2018) Institutions and entrepreneurial activity: The interactive influence of misaligned formal and informal institutions. Strategy Sci. 3(2):393–407.Link, Google Scholar
• Elam A, Terjesen S (2010) Gendered institutions and cross-national patterns of business creation for men and women. Eur. J. Dev. Res. 22(3):331–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erber R, Lau RR (1990) Political cynicism revisited: An information-processing reconciliation of policy-based and incumbency-based interpretations of changes in trust in government. Amer. J. Political Sci. 34(1):236–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman S (1983) The measurement and meaning of trust in government. Political Methodol. 9(3):341–354.Google Scholar
• Fermin-Robbins J (2018) The Impeachment of South Korean President Park Geun-hye (Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs).Google Scholar
• Fendos J (2017) The history of a scandal: How South Korea’s president was impeached. The Diplomat, thediplomat.com/2017/01/the-history-of-a-scandal-how-south-koreas-president-was- impeached/.Google Scholar
• Fukuyama F (1995) Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity (Hamish Hamilton, London).Google Scholar
• Fulmer CA, Gelfand MJ (2012) At what level (and in whom) we trust: Trust across multiple organizational levels. J. Management 38(4):1167–1230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gemici A, Wiswall M (2014) Evolution of gender differences in post-secondary human capital investments: College majors. Internat. Econom. Rev. 55(1):23–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson JL, Caldeira GA, Spense LK (2005) Why do people accept public policies they oppose? Testing legitimacy theory with a survey-based experiment. Political Res. Quart. 58(2):187–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greif A (1994) Cultural beliefs and the organization of society: A historical and theoretical reflection on collectivist and individualist societies. J. Political Econom. 102(5):912–950.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grimaldi R, Kenney M, Siegel DS, Wright M (2011) 30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 40(8):1045–1057.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guzman J, Stern S (2020) The state of American entrepreneurship: New estimates of the quantity and quality of entrepreneurship for 32 US States, 1988–2014. Amer. Econom. J.: Econom. Policy 12(4):212–43.Google Scholar
• Hafer RW, Jones G (2015) Are entrepreneurship and cognitive skills related? Some international evidence. Small Bus. Econom. 44(2):283–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahm SD, Heo U (2018) The first female president in South Korea: Park Geun-hye’s leadership and South Korean democracy. J. Asian Afr. Stud. 53(5):649–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall RE, Jones CI (1999) Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Quart. J. Econom. 114(1):83–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall RE, Woodward SE (2010) The burden of the nondiversifiable risk of entrepreneurship. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(3):1163–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton BH (2000) Does entrepreneurship pay? An empirical analysis of the returns to self-employment. J. Political Econom. 108(3):604–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris B (2017) Timeline: Downfall of Park Geun-hye. Financial Times (March 9).Google Scholar
• Hayton JC, George G, Zahra SA (2002) National culture and entrepreneurship: A review of behavioral research. Entrep. Theory Pract. 26(4):33–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hetherington MJ (1998) The political relevance of political trust. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 92(4):791–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Carlos WC (2019) From farms to fuel tanks: Stakeholder framing contests and entrepreneurship in the emergent US biodiesel market. Strategic Management J. 40(6):865–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiatt S, Park S (2013) Lords of the harvest: Third-party influence and regulatory approval of genetically modified organisms. Acad. Management J. 56(4):923–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiatt S, Grandy J, Lee B (2015) Organizational responses to public and private politics: An analysis of climate change activists and U.S. oil and gas firms. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1769–1786.Link, Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Sine WD, Tolbert PS (2009) From Pabst to Pepsi: The deinstitutionalization of social practices and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(4):635–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoekstra VJ (2003) Public Reaction to Supreme Court Decisions (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu DH, Roberts EB, Eesley CE (2007) Entrepreneurs from technology-based universities: Evidence from MIT. Res. Policy 36(5):768–788.Google Scholar
• Huang KGL, Geng X, Wang H (2017) Institutional regime shift in intellectual property rights and innovation strategies of firms in China. Organ. Sci. 28(2):355–377.Link, Google Scholar
• Hughes KD, Jennings JE, Brush C, Carter S, Welter F (2012) Extending women’s entrepreneurship research in new directions. Entrep. Theory Pract. 36(3):429–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hwang H, Powell WW (2005) Institutions and entrepreneurship. Alvarez SA, Agarwal R, Sorenson O, eds. Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: Disciplinary Perspectives (Springer, New York), 201–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeong Y, Siegel JI (2018) Threat of falling high status and corporate bribery: Evidence from the revealed accounting records of two South Korean presidents. Strategic Management J. 39(4):1083–1111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk AJ (2013) Social influence and entrepreneurship: The effect of university peers on entrepreneurial entry. Organ. Sci. 24(3):664–683.Link, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Rosenberger JD, Eisenhardt KM (2008) Swimming with sharks: Technology ventures, defense mechanisms and corporate relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(2):295–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keele L (2005) The authorities really do matter: Party control and trust in government. J. Polit. 67(August):445–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keele L (2007) Social capital and the dynamics of trust in government. Amer. J. Political Sci. 51(2):241–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kenney M, Patton D (2009) Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the current university invention ownership model. Res. Policy 38(9):1407–1422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr WR, Nanda R (2009) Democratizing entry: Banking deregulations, financing constraints, and entrepreneurship. J. Financial Econom. 94(1):124–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim A (2017a) South Korea: Sewol ferry tragedy and Park Geun-Hye’s impeachment. Harvard Int. Rev. 38(3):13.Google Scholar
• Kim H (2017b) “Spoon Theory” and the fall of a populist princess in Seoul. J. Asian Stud. 76(4):839–849.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim PH, Dirks KT, Cooper CD (2009) The repair of trust: A dynamic bilateral perspective and multilevel conceptualization. Acad. Management Rev. 34(3):401–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King RG, Levine R (1993) Finance and growth: Schumpeter might be right. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):717–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kinsler J, Pavan R (2015) The specificity of general human capital: Evidence from college major choice. J. Labor Econom. 33(4):933–972.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klapper L, Amit R, Guillén MF (2010) Entrepreneurship and firm formation across countries. Lerner H, Schoar A, eds. International Differences in Entrepreneurship (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 129–158.Google Scholar
• Klapper L, Laeven L, Rajan R (2006) Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship. J. Financial Econom. 82(3):591–629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koo W, Eesley C (2021) Platform governance and the rural–urban divide: Sellers’ responses to design change. Strategic Management J. 42(5):941–967.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwon SH, Kim J (2014) The cultural industry policies of the Korean government and the Korean Wave. Internat. J. Cultural Policy 20(4):422–439.Google Scholar
• Lanahan L, Armanios D (2018) Does more certification always benefit a venture? Organ. Sci. 29(5):931–947.Link, Google Scholar
• Lane C, Bachmann R (1998) Trust within and between Organizations: Conceptual Issues and Empirical Explanations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Lazear EP (2004) Balanced skills and entrepreneurship. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(2):208–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee YS (2017) Entrepreneurship, small businesses and economic growth in cities. J. Econom. Geogr. 17(2):311–343.Google Scholar
• Lee YS (2018) Government guaranteed small business loans and regional growth. J. Bus. Venturing 33(1):70–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee YS, Eesley CE (2018) The persistence of entrepreneurship and innovative immigrants. Res. Policy 47(6):1032–1044.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee B, Hiatt S, Lounsbury M (2017) Market mediators and the tradeoffs of legitimacy-seeking behaviors in a nascent category. Organ. Sci. 28(3):447–470.Link, Google Scholar
• Levie J, Autio E (2008) A theoretical grounding and test of the GEM model. Small Bus. Econom. 31(3):235–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levie J, Autio E (2011) Regulatory burden, rule of law, and entry of strategic entrepreneurs: An international panel study. J. Management Stud. 48(6):1392–1419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin DZ, Cross R (2004) The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. 50(11):1477–1490.Link, Google Scholar
• Lerner J (2009) Boulevard of Broken Dreams: Why Public Efforts to Boost Entrepreneurship and Venture Capital Have Failed—and What to Do about It (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Malmendier U (2013) With a little help from my random friends: Success and failure in post-business school entrepreneurship. Rev. Financial Stud. 26(10):2411–2452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Schoar A (2005) Does legal enforcement affect financial transactions? The contractual channel in private equity. Quart. J. Econom. 120(1):223–246.Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Schoar A, eds. (2010) International Differences in Entrepreneurship (University of Chicago Press, Chicago; London), 129–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewicki RJ, McAllister DJ, Bies RJ (1998) Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):438–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim H (2017) A closer look at the Korean constitutional court’s ruling on Park Geun-hye’s impeachment. Yale J. Internat. Law. Accessed November 27, 2018, http://www.yjil.yale.edu/a-closer-look-at-the-korean-constitutional-courts-ruling-on-park-geun-hyes-impeachment/.Google Scholar
• Long MC (2010) Changes in the returns to education and college quality. Econom. Educ. Rev. 29(3):338–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luhmann N. Davis H, Raffan J, Rooney K, trans. Trust and Power (Wiley, Chichester, UK), 1979:208.Google Scholar
• Mair J, Marti I, Ventresca M (2012) Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Acad. Management J. 55(4):819–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Raynard M (2015) Institutional strategies in emerging markets. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):291–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marx M, Strumsky D, Fleming L (2009) Mobility, skills, and the Michigan non-compete experiment. Management Sci. 55(6):875–889.Link, Google Scholar
• McDermott GA, Corredoira RA, Kruse G (2009) Public-private institutions as catalysts of upgrading in emerging market societies. Acad. Management J. 52(6):1270–1296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKnight DH, Cummings LL, Chervany NL (1998) Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):473–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melguizo T, Wolniak GC (2012) The earnings benefits of majoring in STEM fields among high achieving minority students. Res. High. Educ. 53(4):383–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller AH, Borrelli SA (1991) Confidence in government during the 1980s. Amer. Political Quart. 19(2):147–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Möllering G (2013) Process views of trusting and crises. Handbook of Advances in Trust Research (Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy KM, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1991) The allocation of talent: Implications for growth. Quart. J. Econom. 106(2):503–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nee V, Swedberg R (2005) Economic sociology and new institutional economics. Handbook of New Institutional Economics (Springer, Boston, MA), 789–818.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nooteboom B (1996) Trust, opportunism and governance: A process and control model. Organ. Stud. 17(6):985–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• North DC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park J (2017) Timeline: South Korea’s impeached President Park Geun-hye. Birsel R, Perry M, eds. Reuters, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-southkorea-politics-timeline/timeline-south-koreas-impeached-president-park-geun-hye-idUSKBN16H09W.Google Scholar
• Pirson M, Malhotra D (2011) Foundations of organizational trust: What matters to different stakeholders? Organ. Sci. 22(4):1087–1104.Link, Google Scholar
• Powers JB, McDougall PP (2005) University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: a resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Venturing 20(3):291–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roach M, Sauermann H (2015) Founder or joiner? The role of preferences and context in shaping different entrepreneurial interests. Management Sci. 61(9):2160–2184.Link, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Agung SD, Jiang L (2007) University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature. Indust. Corp. Change 16(4):691–791.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rousseau DM, Sitkin SB, Burt RS, Camerer C (1998) Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Management Rev. 12(3):393–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russo MV (2001) Institutions, exchange relations, and the emergence of new fields: Regulatory policies and independent power production in America, 1978–1992. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(1):57–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salamone MF (2014) Judicial consensus and public opinion: Conditional response to Supreme Court majority size. Political Res. Quart. 67(2):320–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauermann H (2018) Fire in the belly? Employee motives and innovative performance in start‐ups vs. established firms. Strategic Entrep. J. 12(4):423–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauermann H, Roach M (2012) Science PhD career preferences: Levels, changes, and advisor encouragement. PLoS One. 7(5):e36307 (PMC) (10.1371/journal.pone.0036307) (22567149).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saunders MN, Skinner D, Dietz G, Gillespie N, Lewicki RJ, eds. (2010) Organizational Trust: A Cultural Perspective (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Schoar A (2010) The divide between subsistence and transformational entrepreneurship. Lerner J, Stern S, eds. Innovation Policy and the Economy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 57–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoorman FD, Mayer RC, Davis JH (2007) An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):344–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J (1942) Creative destruction. Capitalism, Socialism Democracy (Routledge, London), 825:82–85.Google Scholar
• Scott SM (1995) Institutions and Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Shane S, Kolvereid L, Westhead P (1991) An exploratory examination of the reasons leading to new firm formation across country and gender. J. Bus. Venturing 6(6):431–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro SP (1987) The social control of impersonal trust. Amer. J. Sociol. 93(3):623–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shin S (2020) The rise and fall of Park Geun-hye: The perils of South Korea’s weak party system. Pac. Rev. 33(1):153–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shin GW, Moon R (2017) South Korea after impeachment. J. Democracy 28(4):117–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shleifer A, Vishny RW (2002) The Grabbing Hand: Government Pathologies and Their Cures (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Siegel J (2007) Contingent political capital and international alliances: Evidence from South Korea. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(4):621–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sine WD, David RJ (2003) Environmental jolts, institutional change, and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunity in the US electric power industry. Res. Policy 32(2):185–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sine WD, Lee BH (2009) Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the U.S. wind energy sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1):123–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sine WD, Haveman HA, Tolbert PS (2005) Risky business? Entrepreneurship in the new independent-power sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50:200–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sine WD, Shane S, Di Gregorio D (2003) The halo effect and technology licensing: The influence of institutional prestige on the licensing of university inventions. Management Sci. 49(4):478–496.Link, Google Scholar
• Sørensen JB (2007) Bureaucracy and entrepreneurship: Workplace effects on entrepreneurial entry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):387–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Audia PG (2000) The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(2):424–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spencer JW (2001) How relevant is university-based scientific research to private high-technology firms? A United States-Japan comparison. Acad. Management J. 44(2):432–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spicer A, McDermott GA, Kogut B (2000) Entrepreneurship and privatization in central Europe: The tenuous balance between destruction and creation. Acad. Management Rev. 25(3):630–649.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stam E (2015) Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. Eur. Plann. Stud. 23(9):1759–1769.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stenholm P, Acs ZJ, Wuebker R (2013) Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. J. Bus. Venturing 28(1):176–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephan U, Uhlaner LM (2010) Performance-based vs socially supportive culture: A cross-national study of descriptive norms and entrepreneurship. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 41(8):1347–1364.Google Scholar
• Stevenson B, Wolfers J (2011) Trust in public institutions over the business cycle. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(3):281–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart KJ (2004) Trust transfer on the World Wide Web. Organ. Sci. 14(1):5–17.Link, Google Scholar
• Stoutenborough JW, Haider-Markel DP, Allen MD (2006) Reassessing the impact of Supreme Court decisions on public opinion: Gay civil rights cases. Political Res. Quart. 59(3):419–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Ding WW (2006) When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. 112(1):97–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T, Wang Y (2016) Who cooks the books in China, and does it pay? Evidence from private, high‐technology firms. Strategic Management J. 37(13):2658–2676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. The Transfer and Licensing of Know-How and Intellectual Property: Understanding the Multinational Enterprise in the Modern World (World Scientific Publishing Co, London), 15:67–88.Google Scholar
• Thébaud S (2015) Business as Plan B: Institutional foundations of gender inequality in entrepreneurship across 24 industrialized countries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(4):671–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tolbert PS, David RJ, Sine WD (2011) Studying choice and change: the intersection of institutional theory and entrepreneurship research. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1332–1344.Link, Google Scholar
• Tosa M (2015) Sport nationalism in South Korea: An ethnographic study. SAGE Open. (October–December):1–13.Google Scholar
• Turner M, Kwon SH, O’Donnel, M (2018) Making integrity institutions work in South Korea: The role of people power in the impeachment of President Park in 2016. Asian Survey 58(5):898–919.Google Scholar
• Wadhwa V, Freeman, RB, Rissing BA (2008) Education and Tech Entrepreneurship. Kauffman Foundation Report.Google Scholar
• Washington M, Ventresca MJ (2004) How organizations change: the role of institutional support mechanisms in the incorporation of higher education visibility strategies, 1874–1995. Organ. Sci. 15(1):82–97.Link, Google Scholar
• Welter F (2012) All you need is trust? A critical review of the trust and entrepreneurship literature. Internat. Small Bus. J. 30(3):193–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams JT (1985) Systemic influences on political trust: The importance of perceived institutional performance. Political Methodol. 11(1/2):125–142.Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (2000) The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. J. Econom. Lit. 38:595–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright M, Birley S, Mosey S (2004) Entrepreneurship and university technology transfer. J. Tech. Transfer. 29(3-4):235–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Eesley CE (2021) Regional migration, entrepreneurship and university alumni. Reg. Stud. 1–18. 10.1080/00343404.2021.1934432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaheer S, Zaheer A (2006) Trust across borders. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 37(1):21–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG (1986) Production of trust: institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 8. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 53–111.Google Scholar
• Zucker LG (1987) Institutional theories of organization. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 13:443–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker L (1998) Intellectual human capital and birth of US biotechnology enterprises. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(1):290–306.Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR (2014) Movement of star scientists and engineers and high-tech firm entry. Ann. Econom. Stat. (115/116):125–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR, Armstrong JS (2002) Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Sci. 48(1):138–153.Link, Google Scholar