For Better and Worse: How Proactive Personality Alters the Strain Responses to Challenge and Hindrance Stressors

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1587

References

  • Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Alarcon G (2011) A meta-analysis of burnout with job demands, resources, and attitudes. J. Vocational Behav. 79(2):549–562.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alarcon G, Eschleman KJ, Bowling NA (2009) Relationships between personality variables and burnout: A meta-analysis. Work Stress 23(3):244–263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashforth B, Sluss DM, Saks AM (2007) Socialization tactics, proactive behavior, and newcomer learning: Integrating socialization models. J. Vocational Behav. 70(3):447–462.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bakker AB, Demerouti E (2007) The job demands‐resources model: State of the art. J. Management Psych. 22(3):309–328.Google Scholar
  • Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Euwema MC (2005) Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. J. Occupational Health Psych. 10(2):170–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bateman TS, Crant JM (1993) The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. J. Organ. Behav. 14(2):103–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bauer TN, Green SG (1998) Testing the combined effects of newcomer information seeking and manager behavior on socialization. J. Appl. Psych. 83(1):72–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bauer TN, Bodner T, Erdogan B, Truxillo DM, Tucker JS (2007) Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: A meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. J. Appl. Psych. 92(3):707–721.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boswell WR, Olson-Buchanan JB, LePine MA (2004) Relations between stress and work outcomes: The role of felt challenge, job control, and psychological strain. J. Vocational Behav. 64(1):165–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brienza V (2011) The 10 most stressful jobs of 2011. CareerCast. Accessed March 10, 2022, https://www.careercast.com/jobs-rated/10-most-stressful-jobs-2011.Google Scholar
  • Buch R, Dysvik A, Kuvaas B, Nerstad CG (2015) It takes three to tango: Exploring the interplay among training intensity, job autonomy, and supervisor support in predicting knowledge sharing. Human Resources Management 54(4):623–635.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cavanaugh MA, Boswell WR, Roehling MV, Boudreau JW (2000) An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among US managers. J. Appl. Psych. 85(1):65–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan D (2006) Interactive effects of situational judgment effectiveness and proactive personality on work perceptions and work outcomes. J. Appl. Psych. 91(2):475–481.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan D (2009) So why ask me? Are self-report data really that bad? In Lance CE, Vandenberg RJ, eds. Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the Organizational and Social Sciences (Routledge, New York), 309–336.Google Scholar
  • Chan D, Schmitt N (2000) Interindividual differences in intraindividual changes in proactivity during organizational entry: A latent growth modeling approach to understanding newcomer adaptation. J. Appl. Psych. 85(2):190–210.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen ZX, Aryee S, Lee C (2005) Test of a mediation model of perceived organizational support. J. Vocational Behav. 66(3):457–470.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clarkson JJ, Hirt ER, Jia L, Alexander MB (2010) When perception is more than reality: The effects of perceived vs. actual resource depletion on self-regulatory behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 98(1):29–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooke FL, Wang J, Bartram T (2019) Can a supportive workplace impact employee resilience in a high pressure performance environment? An investigation of the Chinese banking industry. Appl. Psych. 68(4):695–718.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crant JM (1995) The proactive personality scale and objective job performance among real estate agents. J. Appl. Psych. 80(4):532–537.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crant JM (1996) The proactive personality scale as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions. J. Small Bus. Management 34(3):42–49.Google Scholar
  • Crant JM (2000) Proactive behavior in organizations. J. Management 26(3):435–462.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crant JM, Bateman TS (2000) Charismatic leadership viewed from above: The impact of proactive personality. J. Organ. Behav. 21(1):63–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crant JM, Hu J, Jiang K (2017) Proactive personality: A twenty-year review. Parker SK, Bindl UK, eds. Proactivity at Work: Making Things Happen in Organizations (Routledge, New York), 193–225.Google Scholar
  • Crawford ER, LePine JA, Rich BL (2010) Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. J. Appl. Psych. 95(5):834–848.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cropanzano R, Anthony EL, Daniels SR, Hall AV (2017) Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):479–516.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cunningham CJ, De La Rosa GM (2008) The interactive effects of proactive personality and work-family interference on well-being. J. Occupational Health Psych. 13(3):271–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davenport TH (2005) Thinking for a Living: How to Get Better Performances and Results from Knowledge Workers (Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA).Google Scholar
  • Dawson KM, O’Brien KE, Beehr TA (2016) The role of hindrance stressors in the job demand–control–support model of occupational stress: A proposed theory revision. J. Organ. Behav. 37(3):397–415.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deci EL, Ryan RM (2000) The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psych. Inquiry 11(4):227–268.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeShon RP, Gillespie JZ (2005) A motivated action theory account of goal orientation. J. Appl. Psych. 90(6):1096–1127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dikkers JS, Jansen PG, de Lange AH, Vinkenburg CJ, Kooij D (2010) Proactivity, job characteristics, and engagement: A longitudinal study. Career Development Internat. 15(1):59–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edwards JR, Lambert LS (2007) Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psych. Methods 12(1):1–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenberger R, Cummings J, Armeli S, Lynch P (1997) Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. J. Appl. Psych. 82(5):812–820.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Hutchison S, Sowa D (1986) Perceived organizational support. J. Appl. Psych. 71(3):500–507.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erdogan B, Bauer TN (2005) Enhancing career benefits of employee proactive personality: The role of fit with jobs and organizations. Personnel Psych. 58(4):859–891.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fay D, Sonnentag S (2002) Rethinking the effects of stressors: A longitudinal study on personal initiative. J. Occupational Health Psych. 7(3):221–234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fritz C, Sonnentag S (2009) Antecedents of day-level proactive behavior: A look at job stressors and positive affect during the workday. J. Management 35(1):94–111.Google Scholar
  • Gillet N, Fouquereau E, Forest J, Brunault P, Colombat P (2012) The impact of organizational factors on psychological needs and their relations with well-being. J. Bus. Psych. 27(4):437–450.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Godin S (2007) The Dip: A Little Book That Teaches You When to Quit (and When to Stick) (Penguin Group, New York).Google Scholar
  • Grant AM, Ashford SJ (2008) The dynamics of proactivity at work. Res. Organ. Behav. 28:3–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant AM, Christianson MK, Price RH (2007) Happiness, health, or relationships? Managerial practices and employee well-being tradeoffs. Acad. Management Perspect. 21(3):51–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greguras GJ, Diefendorff JM (2010) Why does proactive personality predict employee life satisfaction and work behaviors? A field investigation of the mediating role of the self‐concordance model. Personnel Psych. 63(3):539–560.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffin RW, Bateman TS, Wayne SJ, Head TC (1987) Objective and social factors as determinants of task perceptions and responses: An integrated perspective and empirical investigation. Acad. Management J. 30(3):501–523.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grosemans I, De Cuyper N (2021) Career competencies in the transition from higher education to the labor market: Examining developmental trajectories. J. Vocational Behav. 128:103602.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halbesleben JR (2006) Sources of social support and burnout: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model. J. Appl. Psych. 91(5):1134–1145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halbesleben JR (2010) The role of exhaustion and workarounds in predicting occupational injuries: A cross-lagged panel study of healthcare professionals. J. Occupational Health Psych. 15(1):1–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halbesleben JR, Harvey J, Bolino MC (2009) Too engaged? A conservation of resources view of the relationship between work engagement and work interference with family. J. Appl. Psych. 94(6):1452–1465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halbesleben JR, Neveu JP, Paustian-Underdahl SC, Westman M(2014) Getting to the “COR” understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. J. Management 40(5):1334–1364.Google Scholar
  • Harvey S, Blouin C, Stout D (2006) Proactive personality as a moderator of outcomes for young workers experiencing conflict at work. Personality Individual Differences 40(5):1063–1074.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hayes AF (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Publications, New York).Google Scholar
  • Hobfoll SE (1989) Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Amer. Psych. 44(3):513–524.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hobfoll SE (2001) The influence of culture, community, and the nested‐self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Appl. Psych. 50(3):337–421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hobfoll SE (2002) Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Rev. General Psych. 6(4):307–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hobfoll SE (2011) Conservation of resource caravans and engaged settings. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 84(1):116–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hobfoll SE, Halbesleben J, Neveu JP, Westman M (2018) Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 5:103–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hobfoll SE, Johnson RJ, Ennis N, Jackson AP (2003) Resource loss, resource gain, and emotional outcomes among inner city women. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 84(3):632–643.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmes DS (1978) Projection as a defense mechanism. Psych. Bull. 85(4):677–688.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hom PW, Griffeth RW (1991) Structural equations modeling test of a turnover theory: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. J. Appl. Psych. 76(3):350–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • House RJ (1971) A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 16(3):321–339.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hülsheger UR, Alberts HJ, Feinholdt A, Lang JW (2013) Benefits of mindfulness at work: The role of mindfulness in emotion regulation, emotional exhaustion, and job satisfaction. J. Appl. Psych. 98(2):310–325.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Janssen A (2016) Characterizing employee proactivity: Antecedents of other-centered and self-centered proactive behaviors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Jacobs University, Bremen.Google Scholar
  • Kammeyer-Mueller JD, Wanberg CR (2003) Unwrapping the organizational entry process: Disentangling multiple antecedents and their pathways to adjustment. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):779–794.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kammeyer-Mueller JD, Judge TA, Scott BA (2009) The role of core self-evaluations in the coping process. J. Appl. Psych. 94(1):177–195.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kammeyer-Mueller JD, Simon LS, Judge TA (2016) A head start or a step behind? Understanding how dispositional and motivational resources influence emotional exhaustion. J. Management 42(3):561–581.Google Scholar
  • Karasek RA Jr (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(2):285–308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelly D, Amburgey TL (1991) Organizational inertia and momentum: A dynamic model of strategic change. Acad. Management J. 34(3):591–612.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krueger J, Clement RW (1994) The truly false consensus effect: An ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 67(4):596–610.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kurtessis JN, Eisenberger R, Ford MT, Buffardi LC, Stewart KA, Adis CS (2017) Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. J. Management 43(6):1854–1884.Google Scholar
  • Lawler EJ (2001) An affect theory of social exchange. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(2):321–352.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazarus RS, Folkman S (1984) Stress, Appraisal, and Coping (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
  • Lee RT, Ashforth BE (1996) A meta-analytic examination of the correlates of the three dimensions of job burnout. J. Appl. Psych. 81(2):123–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee MY, Edmondson AC (2017) Self-managing organizations: Exploring the limits of less-hierarchical organizing. Res. Organ. Behav. 37:35–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • LePine JA, Podsakoff NP, LePine MA (2005) A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor–hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Acad. Management J. 48(5):764–775.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • LePine MA, Zhang Y, Crawford ER, Rich BL (2016) Turning their pain to gain: Charismatic leader influence on follower stress appraisal and job performance. Acad. Management J. 59(3):1036–1059.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinson H (1965) Reciprocation: The relationship between man and organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. 9(4):370–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li N, Liang J, Crant JM (2010) The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: A relational perspective. J. Appl. Psych. 95(2):395–404.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li WD, Fay D, Frese M, Harms PD, Gao XY (2014) Reciprocal relationship between proactive personality and work characteristics: A latent change score approach. J. Appl. Psych. 99(5):948–965.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin W, Ma J, Wang L, Wang M (2015) A double-edged sword: The moderating role of conscientiousness in the relationships between work stressors, psychological strain, and job performance. J. Organ. Behav. 36(1):94–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marks G, Miller N (1987) Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psych. Bull. 102(1):72–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maslach C, Jackson SE (1981) The measurement of experienced burnout. J. Organ. Behav. 2(2):99–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mathieu JE, DeShon RP, Bergh DD (2008) Mediational inferences in organizational research: Then, now, and beyond. Organ. Res. Methods 11(2):203–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer JP, Stanley DJ, Herscovitch L, Topolnytsky L (2002) Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. J. Vocational Behav. 61(1):20–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitchell TR, Holtom BC, Lee TW, Sablynski CJ, Erez M (2001) Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1102–1121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morrison EW (1993) Longitudinal study of the effects of information seeking on newcomer socialization. J. Appl. Psych. 78(2):173–183.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muraven M, Baumeister RF (2000) Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psych. Bull. 126(2):247–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson DL, Sutton C (1990) Chronic work stress and coping: A longitudinal-study and suggested new directions. Acad. Management J. 33(4):859–869.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ong WJ, Johnson MD (2022) Toward a configural theory of job demands and resources. Acad. Management J. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Onyemah V (2008) Role ambiguity, role conflict, and performance: Empirical evidence of an inverted-U relationship. J. Personal Selling Sales Management 28(3):299–313.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park JH, DeFrank RS (2018) The role of proactive personality in the stressor–strain model. Internat. J. Stress Management 25(1):44–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parker SK, Sprigg CA (1999) Minimizing strain and maximizing learning: The role of job demands, job control, and proactive personality. J. Appl. Psych. 84(6):925–939.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parker SK, Bindl UK, Strauss K (2010) Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. J. Management 36(4):827–856.Google Scholar
  • Piccolo RF, Colquitt JA (2006) Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Acad. Management J. 49(2):327–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podsakoff NP, LePine JA, LePine MA (2007) Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 92(2):438–453.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rhoades L, Eisenberger R (2002) Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. J. Appl. Psych. 87(4):698–714.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rhoades L, Eisenberger R, Armeli S (2001) Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. J. Appl. Psych. 86(5):825–836.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richardson HA, Yang J, Vandenberg RJ, DeJoy DM, Wilson MG(2008) Perceived organizational support’s role in stressor-strain relationships. J. Managerial Psych. 23(7):789–810.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers T, Moore DA, Norton MI (2017) The belief in a favorable future. Psych. Sci. 28(9):1290–1301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosen CC, Dimotakis N, Cole MS, Taylor SG, Simon LS, Smith TA, Reina CS (2020) When challenges hinder: An investigation of when and how challenge stressors impact employee outcomes. J. Appl. Psych. 105(10):1181–1206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ross L, Greene D, House P (1977) The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 13(3):279–301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rubino C, Perry SJ, Milam AC, Spitzmueller C, Zapf D (2012) Demand–control–person: Integrating the demand–control and conservation of resources models to test an expanded stressor–strain model. J. Occupational Health Psych. 17(4):456–472.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Russell E, Woods SA, Banks AP (2017) Examining conscientiousness as a key resource in resisting email interruptions: Implications for volatile resources and goal achievement. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 90(3):407–435.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salancik GR, Pfeffer J (1978) A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Admin. Sci. Quart. 23(2):224–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwab DP (2005) Research Methods for Organizational Studies (Psychology Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Seibert SE, Kraimer ML, Crant JM (2001) What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success. Personnel Psych. 54(4):845–874.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siemsen E, Roth A, Oliveira P (2010) Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organ. Res. Methods 13(3):456–476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simmering MJ, Fuller CM, Richardson HA, Ocal Y, Atinc GM (2015) Marker variable choice, reporting, and interpretation in the detection of common method variance: A review and demonstration. Organ. Res. Methods 18(3):473–511.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Society for Human Resource Management (2016) 2016 human capital benchmarking report. Accessed March 10, 2022, https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/trends-and-forecasting/research-and-surveys/Documents/2016-Human-Capital-Report.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Spector PE (2006) Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organ. Res. Methods 9(2):221–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spector PE, Allen TD, Poelmans SA, Lapierre LM, Cooper CL, Michael OD, Sanchez JI, et al. (2007) Cross‐national differences in relationships of work demands, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions with work–family conflict. Personnel Psych. 60(4):805–835.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spitzmuller M, Van Dyne L (2013) Proactive and reactive helping: Contrasting the positive consequences of different forms of helping. J. Organ. Behav. 34(4):560–580.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spreitzer GM (1995) Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. 38(5):1442–1465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun S, van Emmerik HI (2015) Are proactive personalities always beneficial? Political skill as a moderator. J. Appl. Psych. 100(3):966–975.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tai WT, Liu SC (2007) An investigation of the influences of job autonomy and neuroticism on job stressor-strain relations. Soc. Behav. Personality 35(8):1007–1020.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • ten Brummelhuis LL, Bakker AB (2012) A resource perspective on the work–home interface: The work–home resources model. Amer. Psych. 67(7):545–556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thoits PA (1994) Stressors and problem-solving: The individual as psychological activist. J. Health Soc. Behav. 35(2):143–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson JA (2005) Proactive personality and job performance: A social capital perspective. J. Appl. Psych. 90(5):1011–1017.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tolli AP, Schmidt AM (2008) The role of feedback, causal attributions, and self-efficacy in goal revision. J. Appl. Psych. 93(3):692–701.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Lange PAM (1999) The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 77(2):337–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Nordenflycht A (2010) What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge intensive firms. Acad. Management Rev. 35(1):155–174.Google Scholar
  • Whetten DA (1989) What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):490–495.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams LJ, O’Boyle EH (2015) Ideal, nonideal, and no-marker variables: The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) marker technique works when it matters. J. Appl. Psych. 100(5):1579–1602.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams LJ, Hartman N, Cavazotte F (2010) Method variance and marker variables: A review and comprehensive CFA marker technique. Organ. Res. Methods 13(3):477–514.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winkel DE, Wyland RL, Shaffer MA, Clason P (2011) A new perspective on psychological resources: Unanticipated consequences of impulsivity and emotional intelligence. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 84(1):78–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Witt LA, Andrews MC, Carlson DS (2004) When conscientiousness isn’t enough: Emotional exhaustion and performance among call center customer service representatives. J. Management 30(1):149–160.Google Scholar
  • Wright TA, Cropanzano R (1998) Emotional exhaustion as a predictor of job performance and voluntary turnover. J. Appl. Psych. 83(3):486–493.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xanthopoulou D, Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Schaufeli WB (2007) The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. Internat. J. Stress Management 14(2):121–141.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xanthopoulou D, Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Schaufeli WB (2009) Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. J. Vocational Behav. 74(3):235–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang C, Mayer DM, Hwang E (2018) More is less: Learning but not relaxing buffers deviance under job stressors. J. Appl. Psych. 103(2):123–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang Z, Wang MO, Shi J (2012) Leader-follower congruence in proactive personality and work outcomes: The mediating role of leader-member exchange. Acad. Management J. 55(1):111–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.