When Does the Pre-entry Experience of New Entrants Improve Their Performance? A Meta-Analytical Investigation of Critical Moderators

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1589

References

  • Adams P, Fontana R, Malerba F (2016) User-industry spinouts: Downstream industry knowledge as a source of new firm entry and survival. Organ. Sci. 27(1):18–35.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R, Braguinsky S (2015) Industry evolution and entrepreneurship: Steven Klepper’s contributions to industrial organization, strategy, technological change, and entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 9(4):380–397.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R, Shah SK (2014) Knowledge sources of entrepreneurship: Firm formation by academic, user, and employee innovators. Res. Policy 43(7):1109–1133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R, Buenstorf G, Cohen WM, Malerba F (2015) The legacy of Steven Klepper: Industry evolution, entrepreneurship, and geography. Indust. Corporate Change 24(4):739–753.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R, Echambadi R, Franco AM, Sarkar M (2004) Knowledge transfer through inheritance: Spin-out generation, development, and survival. Acad. Management J. 47(4):501–522.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Almandoz J, Tilcsik A (2016) When experts become liabilities: Domain experts on boards and organizational failure. Acad. Management J. 59(4):1124–1149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alvarez SA, Busenitz LW (2001) The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. J. Management 27(6):755–775.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andersson M, Klepper S (2013) Characteristics and performance of new firms and spinoffs in Sweden. Indust. Corporate Change 22(1):245–280.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L (1999) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge (Kluwer Academic, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Argote L, Miron-Spektor E (2011) Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1123–1137.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Arora A, Nandkumar A (2011) Cash-out or flameout! Opportunity cost and entrepreneurial strategy: Theory and evidence from the information security industry. Management Sci. 57(10):1844–1860.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Balasubramanian N (2011) New plant venture performance differences among incumbent, diversifying, and entrepreneurial firms: The impact of industry learning intensity. Management Sci. 57(3):549–565.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baptista R, Karaöz M, Mendonça J (2014) The impact of human capital on the early success of necessity vs. opportunity-based entrepreneurs. Small Bus. Econom. 42(4):831–847.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bates T (1990) Entrepreneur human capital inputs and small business longevity. Rev. Econom. Statist. 72(4):551–559.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bayus BL, Agarwal R (2007) The role of pre-entry experience, entry timing, and product technology strategies in explaining firm survival. Management Sci. 53(12):1887–1902.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bijmolt TH, Pieters RG (2001) Meta-analysis in marketing when studies contain multiple measurements. Marketing Lett. 12(2):157–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boone C, Lokshin B, Guenter H, Belderbos R (2019) Top management team nationality diversity, corporate entrepreneurship, and innovation in multinational firms. Strategic Management J. 40(2):277–302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boschma RA, Wenting R (2007) The spatial evolution of the British automobile industry: Does location matter? Indust. Corporate Change 16(2):213–238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Braguinsky S, Klepper S, Ohyama A (2012) High-tech entrepreneurship. J. Law Econom. 55(4):869–900.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buenstorf G, Klepper S (2009) Heritage and agglomeration: The Akron tyre cluster revisited. Econom. J. (London) 119(537):705–733.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carter NM, Williams M, Reynolds PD (1997) Discontinuance among new firms in retail: The influence of initial resources, strategy, and gender. J. Bus. Venturing 12(2):125–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cauchie G, Vaillant NG (2016) New firm survival: Isolating the role of founders’ human capital in accounting for firm longevity. J. Human Capital 10(2):186–211.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatterji AK (2009) Spawned with a silver spoon? Entrepreneurial performance and innovation in the medical device industry. Strategic Management J. 30(2):185–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen PL, Williams C, Agarwal R (2012) Growing pains: Pre-entry experience and the challenge of transition to incumbency. Strategic Management J. 33(3):252–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen JS, Croson DC, Elfenbein DW, Posen HE (2018) The impact of learning and overconfidence on entrepreneurial entry and exit. Organ. Sci. 29(6):989–1009.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clarysse B, Wright M, Van de Velde E (2011) Entrepreneurial origin, technological knowledge, and the growth of spin‐off companies. J. Management Stud. 48(6):1420–1442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Combs JG, Crook TR, Rauch A (2019) Meta‐analytic research in management: Contemporary approaches, unresolved controversies, and rising standards. J. Management Stud. 56(1):1–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coriat B, Dosi G (1998) The institutional embeddedness of economic change: An appraisal of the “evolutionary” and “regulationist” research programmes. Nielson K, Johnson B, eds. Institutions and Economic Change: New Perspectives on Markets, Firms, and Technology (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 3–32.Google Scholar
  • Crossland C, Hambrick DC (2011) Differences in managerial discretion across countries: How nation-level institutions affect the degree to which CEOs matter. Strategic Management J. 32(8):797–819.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dahl MS, Sorenson O (2012) Home sweet home: Entrepreneurs’ location choices and the performance of their ventures. Management Sci. 58(6):1059–1071.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • de Jong JPJ, Freel M (2010) Absorptive capacity and the reach of collaboration in high technology small firms. Res. Policy 39(1):47–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Delmar F, Shane S (2006) Does experience matter? The effect of founding team experience on the survival and sales of newly founded ventures. Strategic Organ. 4(3):215–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dencker JC, Gruber M (2015) The effects of opportunities and founder experience on new firm performance. Strategic Management J. 36(7):1035–1052.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dencker JC, Gruber M, Shah SK (2009) Pre-entry knowledge, learning, and the survival of new firms. Organ. Sci. 20(3):516–537.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eesley CE, Roberts EB (2012) Are you experienced or are you talented? When does innate talent vs. experience explain entrepreneurial performance? Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 6(3):207–219.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eesley CE, Hsu DH, Roberts EB (2014) The contingent effects of top management teams on venture performance: Aligning founding team composition with innovation strategy and commercialization environment. Strategic Management J. 35(12):1798–1817.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315(7109):629–634.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ertug G, Kotha R, Hedstrom P (2020) Kin ties and the performance of new firms: A structural approach. Acad. Management J. 63(6):1893–1922.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fackler D, Schnabel C, Schmucker A (2016) Spinoffs in Germany: Characteristics, survival, and the role of their parents. Small Bus. Econom. 46(1):93–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Florin J, Lubatkin M, Schulze W (2003) A social capital model of high-growth ventures. Acad. Management J. 46(3):374–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Furr NR (2019) Product adaptation during new industry emergence: The role of start-up team pre-entry experience. Organ. Sci. 30(5):1076–1096.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ganco M, Agarwal R (2009) Performance differentials between diversifying entrants and entrepreneurial start-ups: A complexity approach. Acad. Management Rev. 34(2):228–252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geyskens I, Krishnan R, Steenkamp J-BE, Cunha PV (2009) A review and evaluation of meta-analysis practices in management research. J. Management 35(2):393–419.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gimmon E, Levie J (2021) Early indicators of very long-term venture performance: A 20-year panel study. Acad. Management Discoveries 7(2):203–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gompers PA, Gornall W, Kaplan SN, Strebulaev IA (2020) How do venture capitalists make decisions? J. Financial Econom. 135(1):169–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grilli L, Jensen PH, Murtinu S, Park HD (2020) A close look at the contingencies of founders’ effect on venture performance. Indust. Corporate Change 29(4):997–1020.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gruber M, MacMillan IC, Thompson JD (2012) From minds to markets: How human capital endowments shape market opportunity identification of technology start-ups. J. Management 38(5):1421–1449.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haber S, Reichel A (2007) The cumulative nature of the entrepreneurial process: The contribution of human capital, planning, and environment resources to small venture performance. J. Bus. Venturing 22(1):119–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Habersetzer A (2016) Spinoff dynamics beyond clusters: Pre-entry experience and firm survival in peripheral regions. Entrepreneurship Regional Development 28(9–10):791–812.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hayton JC, George G, Zahra SA (2002) National culture and entrepreneurship: A review of behavioral research. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 26(4):33–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hedges LV, Olkin I (1985) Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (Academic Press, Orlando, FL).Google Scholar
  • Helfat CE, Lieberman MB (2002) The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre-history. Indust. Corporate Change 11(4):725–760.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hofstede G (1980) Culture and organizations. Internat. Stud. Management Organ. 10(4):15–41.Google Scholar
  • Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Holbrook D, Cohen WM, Hounshell DA, Klepper S (2000) The nature, sources, and consequences of firm differences in the early history of the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1017–1041.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsu DH (2007) Experienced entrepreneurial founders, organizational capital, and venture capital funding. Res. Policy 36(5):722–741.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hunt RA, Lerner DA, Townsend DM (2019) Parental endowments vs. business acumen: Assessing the fate of low-tech, service-sector spinouts. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 13(4):478–506.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hunter JE, Schmidt FL (2004) Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jahanbakht M, Mostafa R, Veloso F (2022) Pre-entry experience, post-entry adaptations, and internationalization in the African mobile telecommunications industry. Organ. Sci. Forthcoming.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper S (2004) Pre-entry experience and firm performance in the evolution of the U.S. automobile industry. Adv. Strategic Management 21:289–316.Google Scholar
  • Klepper S (2007) Disagreements, spinoffs, and the evolution of Detroit as the capital of the U.S. automobile industry. Management Sci. 53(4):616–631.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper S, Simons KL (2000) Dominance by birthright: Entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the U.S. television receiver industry. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):997–1016.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lafontaine F, Shaw K (2016) Serial entrepreneurship: Learning by doing? J. Labor Econom. 34(S2):S217–S254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear EP (2004) Balanced skills and entrepreneurship. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(2):208–211.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear EP (2005) Entrepreneurship. J. Labor Econom. 23(4):649–680.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee DY, Tsang EW (2001) The effects of entrepreneurial personality, background, and network activities on venture growth. J. Management Stud. 38(4):583–602.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee C, Lee K, Pennings JM (2001) Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management J., 22(6–7):615–640.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li H, Zhang Y (2007) The role of managers’ political networking and functional experience in new venture performance: Evidence from China’s transition economy. Strategic Management J. 28(8):791–804.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lipsey MW, Wilson DB (2001) Practical Meta-Analysis (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Marcus J, Le H (2013) Interactive effects of levels of individualism– collectivism on cooperation: A meta‐analysis. J. Organ. Behav. 34(6):813–834.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer-Haug K, Read S, Brinckmann J, Dew N, Grichnik D (2013) Entrepreneurial talent and venture performance: A meta-analytic investigation of SMEs. Res. Policy 42(6–7):1251–1273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Menzel M-P, Kammer J (2019) Industry evolution in varieties of capitalism: A comparison of the Danish and U.S. wind turbine industries. Indust. Corporate Change 28(6):1381–1403.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mueller SL, Thomas AS (2001) Culture and entrepreneurial potential: A nine-country study of locus of control and innovativeness. J. Bus. Venturing 16(1):51–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson RR (1993) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Okhmatovskiy I, Suhomlinova O, Tihanyi L (2020) Legacy of the state: Prior shared experience and survival of spin-offs from restructured state enterprises. J. Management 46(4):503–529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pinillos M-J, Reyes L (2011) Relationship between individualist– collectivist culture and entrepreneurial activity: Evidence from Global Entrepreneurship Monitor data. Small Bus. Econom. 37(1):23–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Posen HE, Levinthal DA (2012) Chasing a moving target: Exploitation and exploration in dynamic environments. Management Sci. 58(3):587–601.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Qian L, Agarwal R, Hoetker G (2012) Configuration of value chain activities: The effect of pre-entry capabilities, transaction hazards, and industry evolution on decisions to internalize. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1330–1349.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Romme AGL, Zollo M, Berends P (2010) Dynamic capabilities, deliberate learning, and environmental dynamism: A simulation model. Indust. Corporate Change 19(4):1271–1299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sambharya R, Musteen M (2014) Institutional environment and entrepreneurship: An empirical study across countries. J. Internat. Entrepreneurship 12(4):314–330.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Santarelli E, Tran HT (2013) The interplay of human and social capital in shaping entrepreneurial performance: The case of Vietnam. Small Bus. Econom. 40(2):435–458.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sapienza HJ, Autio E, George G, Zahra SA (2006) A capabilities perspective on the effects of early internationalization on firm survival and growth. Acad. Management Rev. 31(4):914–933.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S (1995) Uncertainty avoidance and the preference for innovation championing roles. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 26(1):47–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S (2000) Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organ. Sci. 11(4):448–469.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shrader R, Siegel DS (2007) Assessing the relationship between human capital and firm performance: Evidence from technology‐based new ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 31(6):893–908.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shu C, Simmons SA (2018) Firm survival in traded industries: Does localization moderate the effects of founding team experience? Small Bus. Econom. 50(3):643–655.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stanley T, Jarrell SB (2005) Meta‐regression analysis: A quantitative method of literature surveys. J. Econom. Surveys 19(3):299–308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart RW, Abetti PA (1990) Impact of entrepreneurial and management experience on early performance. J. Bus. Venturing 5(3):151–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Symeonidou N, Nicolaou N (2018) Resource orchestration in start‐ups: Synchronizing human capital investment, leveraging strategy, and founder start‐up experience. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 12(2):194–218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thornhill S (2006) Knowledge, innovation, and firm performance in high- and low-technology regimes. J. Bus. Venturing 21(5):687–703.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tiessen JH (1997) Individualism, collectivism, and entrepreneurship: A framework for international comparative research. J. Bus. Venturing 12(5):367–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Toft-Kehler R, Wennberg K, Kim PH (2014) Practice makes perfect: Entrepreneurial-experience curves and venture performance. J. Bus. Venturing 29(4):453–470.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tosi HL, Greckhamer T (2004) Culture and CEO compensation. Organ. Sci. 15(6):657–670.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Unger JM, Rauch A, Frese M, Rosenbusch N (2011) Human capital and entrepreneurial success: A meta-analytical review. J. Bus. Venturing 26(3):341–358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Urbano D, Aparicio S, Querol V (2016) Social progress orientation and innovative entrepreneurship: An international analysis. J. Evolutionary Econom. 26(5):1033–1066.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vedula S, Kim PH (2019) Gimme shelter or fade away: The impact of regional entrepreneurial ecosystem quality on venture survival. Indust. Corporate Change 28(4):827–854.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wagner JA (1995) Studies of individualism-collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups. Acad. Management J. 38(1):152–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wennberg K, Wiklund J, Wright M (2011) The effectiveness of university knowledge spillovers: Performance differences between university spin-offs and corporate spin-offs. Res. Policy 40(8):1128–1143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weterings A, Koster S (2007) Inheriting knowledge and sustaining relationships: What stimulates the innovative performance of small software firms in the Netherlands? Res. Policy 36(3):320–335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wolfe MT, Patel PC (2021) Same difference? The impact of low-, medium-, and high-tech industries on venture performance and survival. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 68(6):1907–1918.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yeganegi S, Laplume AO, Dass P, Huynh C-L (2016) Where do spinouts come from? The role of technology relatedness and institutional context. Res. Policy 45(5):1103–1112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yu S (2020) How do accelerators impact the performance of high-technology ventures? Management Sci. 66(2):530–552.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zheng Y, Devaughn ML, Zellmer-Bruhn M (2016) Shared and shared alike? Founders’ prior shared experience and performance of newly founded banks. Strategic Management J. 37(12):2503–2520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.