Settlement Constellations and the Dynamics of Fields Formed Around Social and Environmental Issues

References

• Abbott KW, Snidal D (2010) International regulation without international government: Improving IO performance through orchestration. Rev. Internat. Organ. 5(3):315–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguilera RV, Jackson G (2003) The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Acad. Management Rev. 28(3):447–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguilera RV, Rupp DE, Williams CA, Ganapathi J (2007) Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):836–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahmadjian CL (2016) Comparative institutional analysis and institutional complexity. J. Management Stud. 53(1):12–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alamgir F, Banerjee SB (2019) Contested compliance regimes in global production networks: Insights from the Bangladesh garment industry. Human Relations 72(2):272–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansari S, Wijen F, Gray B (2013) Constructing a climate change logic: An institutional perspective on the “tragedy of the commons.” Organ. Sci. 24(4):1014–1040.Link, Google Scholar
• Aragòn-Correa JA, Marcus AA, Vogel D (2020) The effects of mandatory and voluntary regulatory pressures on firms’ environmental strategies: A review and recommendations for future research. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):339–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Auld G, Gulbrandsen L, McDermott C (2008) Certification schemes and the impacts on forests and forestry. Annual Rev. Environ. Resources 33:187–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baba S, Sasaki I, Vaara E (2021) Increasing dispositional legitimacy: Progressive legitimation dynamics in a trajectory of settlements. Acad. Management J. 24(6):1927–1968.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansal P, Kim A, Wood MO (2018) Hidden in plain sight: The importance of scale in organizations’ attention to issues. Acad. Management Rev. 43(2):217–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett ML, Hoffman AJ (2008) Beyond corporate reputation: Managing reputational interdependence. Corporate Reputation Rev. 11(1):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett M, King A (2008) Good fences make good neighbors: A longitudinal analysis of an industry self-regulatory institution. Acad. Management J. 51(6):1150–1170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartley T (2007) Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: The rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(2):297–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartley T (2018a) Transnational corporations and global governance. Annual Rev. Soc. 44:145–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartley T (2018b) Rules Without Rights: Land, Labor, and Private Authority in the Global Economy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barua U, Ansary MA (2017) Workplace safety in Bangladesh ready-made garment sector: 3 years after the Rana Plaza collapse. Internat. J. Occupational Safety Ergonomics 23(4):578–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumann-Pauly D, Nolan J, Van Heerden A, Samway M (2017) Industry-specific multi-stakeholder initiatives that govern corporate human rights standards: Legitimacy assessments of the Fair Labor Association and the Global Network Initiative. J. Bus. Ethics 143(4):771–787.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein S, Cashore B (2007) Can non‐state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework. Regulation Governance 1(4):347–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bondy K, Matten D, Moon J (2008) Multinational corporation codes of conduct: Governance tools for corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance Internat. Rev. 16(4):294–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowen FE, Bansal P, Slawinski N (2018) Scale matters: The scale of environmental issues in corporate collective actions. Strategic Management J. 39(5):1411–1436.Google Scholar
• Buchanan S, Barnett ML (2021) Inside the velvet glove: Sustaining private regulatory institutions through hollowing and fortifying. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print December 13, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1537.Link, Google Scholar
• Buchanan S, Marques JC (2018) How home country industry associations influence MNE international CSR practices: Evidence from the Canadian mining industry. J. World Bus. 53(1):63–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell JL (2007) Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):946–967.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell JT, Eden L, Miller SR (2012) Multinationals and corporate social responsibility in host countries: Does distance matter? J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 43(1):84–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cashore B (2002) Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: How non–state market–driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule–making authority. Governance 15(4):503–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cashore B, Auld G, Newsom D (2003) The United States’ race to certify sustainable forestry: Non-state environmental governance and the competition for policy-making authority. Bus. Politics 5(3):219–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cashore BW, Auld G, Newsom D (2004) Governing Through Markets: Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-State Authority (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Child J, Lu Y, Tsai T (2007) Institutional entrepreneurship in building an environmental protection system for the People’s Republic of China. Organ. Stud. 28(7):1013–1034.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christiansen LH (2018) The use of visuals in issue framing: Signifying responsible drinking. Organ. Stud. 39(5-6):665–689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christmann P, Taylor G (2006) Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: Determinants of symbolic vs. substantive implementation. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 37(6):863–878.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Comyns B, Franklin-Johnson E (2018) Corporate reputation and collective crises: A theoretical development using the case of Rana Plaza. J. Bus. Ethics 150(1):159–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conzelmann T (2012) A procedural approach to the design of voluntary clubs: Negotiating the responsible care global charter. Socio-Econom. Rev. 10(1):193–214.Google Scholar
• Cusumano MA, Mylonadis Y, Rosenbloom RS (1992) Strategic maneuvering and mass-market dynamics: The triumph of VHS over Beta. Bus. Hist. Rev. 66(1):51–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deegan C, Blomquist C (2006) Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: An exploration of the interaction between WWF-Australia and the Australian minerals industry. Accounting Organ. Soc. 31(4–5):343–372.Google Scholar
• Delmas MA (2002) The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and in the United States: An institutional perspective. Policy Sci. 35(1):91–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delmas MA, Burbano VC (2011) The drivers of greenwashing. Calif. Management Rev. 54(1):64–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• den Uijl S, de Vries HJ (2013) Pushing technological progress by strategic manoeuvring: The triumph of Blu-ray over HD-DVD. Bus. Hist. 55(8):1361–1384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Djelic ML, Quack S (2018) Globalization and business regulation. Annual Rev. Soc. 44:123–143Crossref, Google Scholar
• Djelic ML, Sahlin-Andersson K (2006) Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doh JP, Guay TR (2006) Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional-stakeholder perspective. J. Management Stud. 43(1):47–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donaghey J, Reinecke J (2018) When industrial democracy meets corporate social responsibility—A comparison of the Bangladesh Accord and Alliance as responses to the Rana Plaza Disaster. British J. Indust. Relations 56(1):14–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Hawn O, Ioannou I (2019) Willing and able: A general model of organizational responses to normative pressures. Acad. Management Rev. 44(2):299–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton JE (1988) Patterns of interest around issues: The role of uncertainty and feasibility. Acad. Management J. 31(3):663–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elliott KA, Freeman RB (2003) Can Labor Standards Improve Under Globalization? (Peterson Institute Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Faulconbridge J, Muzio D (2021) Field partitioning: The emergence, development and consolidation of sub-fields. Organ. Stud. 42(7):1053–1083.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferns G, Amaeshi K (2019) Struggles at the summits: Discourse coalitions, field boundaries, and the shifting role of business in sustainable development. Bus. Soc. 58(8):1533–1571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feront C, Bertels S (2021) The impact of frame ambiguity on field-level change. Organ. Stud. 42(7):1135–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiegenbaum A, Thomas H (1995) Strategic groups as reference groups: Theory, modeling and empirical examination of industry and competitive strategy. Strategic Management J. 16(6):461–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fligstein N, McAdam D (2011) Toward a general theory of strategic action fields. Sociol. Theory 29(1):1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fligstein N, McAdam D (2012) A Theory of Fields (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flohr A, Rieth L, Schwindenhammer S, Wolf KD (2010) The Role of Business in Global Governance. Corporations as Norm Entrepreneurs (Palgrave, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fransen L (2011) Multi-stakeholder governance and voluntary programme interactions: legitimation politics in the institutional design of corporate social responsibility. Socio-Econom. Rev. 10(1):163–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fransen L (2015) The politics of meta-governance in transnational private sustainability governance. Policy Sci. 48(3):293–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fransen L, Burgoon B (2012) A market for worker rights: Explaining business support for international private labour regulation. Rev. Internat. Political Econom. 19(2):236–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fransen L, Burgoon B (2014) Privatizing or socializing corporate responsibility: Business participation in voluntary programs. Bus. Soc. 53(4):583–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fransen L, Conzelmann T (2015) Fragmented or cohesive transnational private regulation of sustainability standards? A comparative study. Regulation Governance 9(3):259–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furnari S (2018) When does an issue trigger change in a field? A comparative approach to issue frames, field structures and types of field change. Human Relations 71(3):321–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallagher SR (2012) The battle of the blue laser DVDs: The significance of corporate strategy in standards battles. Technovation 32(2):90–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Jain S, Kumaraswamy A (2002) Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Acad. Management J. 45(1):196–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Georgallis P, Dowell G, Durand R (2019) Shine on me: Industry coherence and policy support for emerging industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(3):503–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George G, Howard-Grenville J, Joshi A, Tihanyi L (2016) Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Acad. Management J. 59(6):1880–1895.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Raynard M, Kodeih F, Micelotta E, Lounsbury M (2011) Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):317–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulbrandsen LH (2004) Overlapping public and private governance: Can forest certification fill the gaps in the global forest regime? Global Environ. Politics 4(2):75–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gunningham N (1995) Environment, self‐regulation, and the chemical industry: Assessing responsible care. Law Policy 17(1):57–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gunningham N, Rees J (1997) Industry self‐regulation: An institutional perspective. Law Policy 19(4):363–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haack P, Rasche A (2021) The legitimacy of sustainability standards: A paradox perspective. Organ. Theory, ePub ahead of print October 11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haight C (2011) The problem with fair trade coffee. Stanford Soc. Innovation Rev. Summer. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_problem_with_fair_trade_coffee.Google Scholar
• Hall PA, Soskice D (2001) An introduction to varieties of capitalism. Hall PA, Soskice D, eds. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 1–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helms WS, Oliver C (2015) Radical settlements to conflict: Conflict management and its implications for institutional change. J. Management Organ. 21(4):471–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helms WS, Oliver C, Webb K (2012) Antecedents of settlement on a new institutional practice: Negotiation of the ISO 26000 standard on social responsibility. Acad. Management J. 55(5):1120–1145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hemphill TA, White GO III (2018) Multinational enterprises, employee safety and the socially responsible supply chain: The case of Bangladesh and the apparel industry. Bus. Soc. Rev. 123(3):489–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinings CR, Logue DM, Zietsma C (2017) Fields, institutional infrastructure and governance. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Lawrence TB, Meyer RE, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman AJ (1999) Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Acad. Management J. 42(4):351–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman AJ, Ocasio W (2001) Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. Organ. Sci. 12(4):414–434.Google Scholar
• Judge-Lord D, McDermott CL, Cashore B (2020) Do private regulations ratchet up? How to distinguish types of regulatory stringency and patterns of change. Organ. Environ. 33(1):96–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King AA, Lenox MJ (2000) Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s responsible care program. Acad. Management J. 43(4):698–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King AA, Lenox MJ, Terlaak A (2005) The strategic use of decentralized institutions: Exploring certification with the ISO 14001 management standard. Acad. Management J. 48(6):1091–1106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knudsen JS (2013) The growth of private regulation of labor standards in global supply chains: Mission impossible for western small- and medium-sized firms? J. Business Ethics 117(2):387–98.Google Scholar
• Kolk A, Van Tulder R (2002) The effectiveness of self-regulation: Corporate codes of conduct and child labour. Eur. Management J. 20(3):260–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laverty KJ (1996) Economic “short-termism”: The debate, the unresolved issues, and the implications for management practice and research. Acad. Management Rev. 21(3):825–860.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence TB, Hardy C, Phillips N (2002) Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: The emergence of proto-institutions. Acad. Management J. 45(1):281–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee BH, Hiatt SR, Lounsbury M (2017) Market mediators and the trade-offs of legitimacy-seeking behaviors in a nascent category. Organ. Sci. 28(3):447–470.Link, Google Scholar
• Lepoutre JM, Valente M (2012) Fools breaking out: The role of symbolic and material immunity in explaining institutional nonconformity. Acad. Management J. 55(2):285–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy D, Reinecke J, Manning S (2016) The political dynamics of sustainable coffee: Contested value regimes and the transformation of sustainability. J. Management Stud. 53(3):364–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Litrico JB, David RJ (2017) The evolution of issue interpretation within organizational fields: Actor positions, framing trajectories, and field settlement. Acad. Management J. 60(3):986–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M (2001) Institutional sources of practice variation: Staffing college and university recycling programs. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(1):29–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maguire S, Hardy C (2009) Discourse and deinstitutionalization: The decline of DDT. Acad. Management J. 52(1):148–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marano V, Kostova T (2016) Unpacking the institutional complexity in adoption of CSR practices in multinational enterprises. J. Management Stud. 53(1):28–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matten D, Moon J (2008) “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Rev. 33(2):404–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAdam D, Scott WR (2005) Organizations and movements. Davis GF, McAdam D, Scott WR, Zald MN, eds. Social Movements and Organization Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 4–40.Google Scholar
• Mena S, Waeger D (2014) Activism for corporate responsibility: Conceptualizing private regulation opportunity structures. J. Management Stud. 51(7):1091–1117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer RE, Höllerer MA (2010) Meaning structures in a contested issue field: A topographic map of shareholder value in Austria. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1241–1262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milne MJ, Gray R (2013) W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. J. Bus. Ethics. 118(1):13–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan N, O’Dwyer B (2015) The structuration of issue-based fields: Social accountability, social movements and the Equator Principles issue-based field. Account. Organ. Soc. 43:33–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Overdevest C (2010) Comparing forest certification schemes: the case of ratcheting standards in the forest sector. Socio-Econom. Rev. 8(1):47–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pacheco DF, York JG, Hargrave TJ (2014) The coevolution of industries, social movements, and institutions: Wind power in the United States. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1609–1632.Link, Google Scholar
• Pope S, Lim A (2020) The governance divide in global corporate responsibility: The global structuration of reporting and certification frameworks, 1998–2017. Organ. Stud. 41(6):821–854.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (2008) Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Potoski M, Prakash A (2005) Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities’ environmental performance. J. Policy Anal. Management 24(4):745–769.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prado AM (2013) Competition among self-regulatory institutions: Sustainability certifications in the cut-flower industry. Bus. Soc. 52(4):686–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prakash A, Potoski M (2006) Racing to the bottom? Trade, environmental governance, and ISO 14001. Amer. J. Political Sci. 50(2):350–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Kenney M (2008) New forms as settlements. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Suddaby R, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA), 352–370.Google Scholar
• Rathert N (2016) Strategies of legitimation: MNEs and the adoption of CSR in response to host-country institutions. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 47(7):858–879.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rees JV (1997) Development of communitarian regulation in the chemical industry. Law Policy 19:477–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinecke J, Donaghey J (2015) After Rana Plaza: Building coalitional power for labour rights between unions and (consumption-based) social movement organisations. Organization 22(5):720–740.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinecke J, Manning S, Von Hagen O (2012) The emergence of a standards market: Multiplicity of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry. Organ. Stud. 33(5–6):791–814.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saka‐Helmhout A, Deeg R, Greenwood R (2016) The MNE as a challenge to institutional theory: Key concepts, recent developments and empirical evidence. J. Management Stud. 53(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schüssler E, Rüling C, Wittneben B (2014) On melting summits: The limitations of field-configuring events as catalysts of change in transnational climate policy. Acad. Management J. 57(1):140–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott WR (1995) Institutions and Organizations. Foundations for Organizational Science (SAGE, London).Google Scholar
• Scott WR (2013) Institutions and organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities (SAGE, London).Google Scholar
• Seremani T, Farias C, Clegg S (2021) New order and old institutions: South Africa and the institutional work of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Organ. Stud., ePub ahead of print, April 16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Short JL, Toffel MW (2010) Making self-regulation more than merely symbolic: The critical role of the legal environment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(3):361–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slawinski N, Pinkse J, Busch T, Banerjee SB (2017) The role of short-termism and uncertainty avoidance in organizational inaction on climate change: A multi-level framework. Bus. Soc. 56(2):253–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith TM, Fischlein M (2010) Rival private governance networks: Competing to define the rules of sustainability performance. Glob. Environ. Change 20(3):511–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss AL (1978) Negotiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes, and Social Order (Jossey-Bass Inc, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Strike VM, Gao J, Bansal P (2006) Being good while being bad: Social responsibility and the international diversification of US firms. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 37(6):850–862.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):571–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Wijk J, Stam W, Elfring T, Zietsma C, Den Hond F (2013) Activists and incumbents structuring change: The interplay of agency, culture, and networks in field evolution. Acad. Management J. 56(2):358–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villena VH, Gioia DA (2018) On the riskiness of lower-tier suppliers: Managing sustainability in supply networks. J. Oper. Management 64:65–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vitols S (2001) The origins of bank-based and market-based financial systems: Germany, Japan, and the United States. Streeck W, Yamamura K, eds. The Origins of Nonliberal Capitalism: Germany and Japan in Comparison (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY), 171–199.Google Scholar
• Wang H, Gibson C, Zander U (2020) Editors’ comments: Is research on corporate social responsibility undertheorized? Acad. Management Rev. 45(1):1–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber K, Heinze KL, DeSoucey M (2008) Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):529–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whitley R (1999) Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Wooten M, Hoffman AJ (2017) Organizational fields: Past, present and future. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Lawrence TB, Meyer RE, eds.The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA), 130–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yue LQ, Ingram P (2012) Industry self-regulation as a solution to the reputation commons problem: The case of the New York Clearing House Association. Pollock TG, Barnett ML, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Reputation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 278–296.Google Scholar
• Yue LQ, Luo J, Ingram P (2013) The failure of private regulation: Elite control and market crises in the Manhattan banking industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(1):37–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zietsma C, Lawrence TB (2010) Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(2):189–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zietsma C, McKnight B (2009) Building the iron cage: institutional creation work in the context of competing proto-institutions. Lawrence TB, Suddaby R, Leca B, eds. Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zietsma C, Groenewegen P, Logue DM, Hinings CR (2017) Field or fields? Building the scaffolding for cumulation of research on institutional fields. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):391–450.Crossref, Google Scholar